Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2015

Open Access 01.12.2015 | Review

FRMD3 gene: its role in diabetic kidney disease. A narrative review

verfasst von: Marjoriê Piuco Buffon, Denise Alves Sortica, Fernando Gerchman, Daisy Crispim, Luís Henrique Canani

Erschienen in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome | Ausgabe 1/2015

Abstract

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is a chronic complication of diabetes mellitus, which is considered a worldwide epidemic. Several studies have been developed in order to elucidate possible genetic factors involved in this disease. The FRMD3 gene, a strong candidate selected from genome wide association studies (GWAS), encodes the structural protein 4.1O involved in maintaining cell shape and integrity. Some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in FRMD3 have been associated with DKD in different ethnicities. However, despite these findings, the matter is still controversial. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize the evidence regarding the role of FRMD3 in DKD.
Abkürzungen
DKD
diabetic kidney disease
GWAS
genome wide association studies
SNPs
single nucleotide polymorphisms
DM
diabetes mellitus
CKD
chronic kidney disease
ESRD
end-stage renal disease
UAE
urinary albumin excretion
ADA
American diabetes association
eGFR
estimated GFR
T1DM
type 1 diabetes
EURODIAB
the European diabetes prospective complications study
FRMD3
4.1 protein ezrin, radixin, moesin [FERM] domain containing 3
T2DM
type 2 diabetes mellitus
TFBS
transcription factor binding site
BMP
bone morphogenetic protein
GoKinD
genetics of kidneys in diabetes
JDC
joslin diabetes center
GWU
George Washington university
DCCT/EDIC
diabetes control and complications trial/epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications
APOL1
apolipoprotein L1
MYH9
non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9
GENIE
Genetics of nephropathy—an international effort
UK–ROI
Republic of Ireland
FinnDiane
finnish DKD study
HOMF
homeodomain factor

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a complex and chronic illness involving a state of hyperglycemia [1]. Depending on the intensity and duration of exposure to hyperglycemia, structural lesions may occur in the vascular endothelium and nervous tissue, causing damage and dysfunction in multiple organs and tissues, leading to chronic complications [2]. One such complication is diabetic kidney disease (DKD), in which there is increased urine excretion of proteins, predominantly albumin [3]. The precise mechanism that determines which patients with DM would or would not progress to renal failure and dialysis has yet to be elucidated. A great effort has been devoted to the study of candidate genes related to DKD development and progression.

Diabetic kidney disease

DKD, which was initially described as a glomerular disease characterized by proteinuria, seems to be much more than that. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as renal damage resulting from structural or functional abnormalities of the kidneys, or glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 with or without kidney damage over a period of time equal to or greater than 3 months [4]. DKD affects around 25–30 % of individuals with DM and is responsible for over a quarter of new cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [5, 6]. In 25 % of patients with DM, increased urinary albumin excretion (UAE) is observed [7]. Furthermore, low GFR has also been reported in a substantial proportion of normoalbuminuric subjects [710]. As a result, since 2006 the American Diabetes Association (ADA) has recommended DKD assessment based on UAE and estimated GFR (eGFR) [11, 12]. More recently, ADA has suggested that albuminuria must be classified as normal UAE or increased UAE [12], instead using the term microalbuminuria [13, 14].
Despite the high prevalence and severity of DKD, not all individuals with DM will develop this disease. The cumulative incidence of persistent albuminuria (microalbuminuria) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) has been reported from 12.6 % over 7.3 years according to The European Diabetes Prospective Complications Study Group (EURODIAB) [15] to 33 % in an 18-year study carried out in Denmark [16]. It seems that T1DM patients who do not develop DKD 10–15 years after diagnosis are protected from this complication [17]. Furthermore, some subjects with elevated albuminuria will progress to a more severe albumin profile and GFR loss, while others will remain stable or even return to normoalbuminuria [18, 19]. Thus, it is believed that the presence of risk factors such as hyperglycemia and hypertension will lead to DKD in genetically predisposed individuals.

The genetics of diabetic kidney disease

Familial clustering of DKD, a multifactorial disease, has been reported in several studies, supporting the hypothesis that genetic factors are involved in its pathogenesis [20, 21]. However, all the efforts to identify a gene with a major effect have been disappointing, possibly because several genes are involved, acting synergistically or additively [22]. For instance, some genes might be related to increased albuminuria, and others to GFR decline [23, 24].
Pezzolesi et al. [25] conducted a genome wide association study (GWAS) in Caucasians with T1DM and found 13 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) associated with DKD. The most significant associations were identified in variants located near genes from four chromosomal regions: CHN2/CPVL on chromosome 7, FRMD3 on chromosome 9, CARS on chromosome 11, and a locus near the IRS2 on chromosome 13. Among those, the strongest association was near the FRMD3 gene (4.1 protein ezrin, radixin, moesin [FERM] domain containing 3). Nevertheless, Maeda et al. [26] analyzed polymorphic variants of this gene [25] in Japanese with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and did not find any association with DKD.
Regardless of extensive evidence of genetic susceptibility to DKD, the identification of susceptibility genes and their variants has had limited success [27, 28]. Mooyart et al. [29] conducted a meta-analysis of genetic association studies focusing on DKD and found that 21 genetic variants were significantly associated with DKD [29], two of them in the FRMD3 gene. Other variants were in or near the following genes: ACE, AKR1B1, APOC1, APOE, EPO, NOS3, HSPG2, VEGFA, CARS, UNC13B, CPVL, CHN2, GREM1, and others. Additional variants were detected in subgroup analyses: ELMO1 (Asians), CCR5 (Asians), and CNDP1 (T2DM). However, these associations were not confirmed by others [30].
The inconsistencies in the results of genetic association studies in complex diseases could be due to small sample sizes or incorrect associations conducting to false or spurious positive results [3134]. Therefore, independent replication of positive associations remains essential to avoid associations by chance.

FRMD3 gene

The FRMD3 (ID: 257019) is located on chromosome 9, band q21.32. It has 21 exons spanning 2,282 base pairs (http://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​gene/​257019) (Fig. 1). In addition, 7 different mRNA sequence splice variants for the FRMD3 gene are also shown in Fig. 1.
FRMD3 encodes protein 4.1O, a structural protein that is part of the protein 4.1 family [35]. Members of this family act as cytoskeletal proteins, maintaining cell shape and integrity in a variety of cell types including rat nephron cells [36, 37]. However, the role of protein 4.1O has not yet been elucidated [38]. It contains a FERM domain, which contributes to cell integrity by interacting with transmembrane proteins and actin filaments [38, 39]. FRMD3 is detected in different tissues according to the Nephromine database (Fig. 2). Studies also have reported FRMD3 expression in adult ovaries, fetal skeletal muscle, brain, thymus, and human podocytes [35]. In addition, FRMD3 expression seems to be decreased in a DKD mouse model as compared to non-diabetic mouse kidneys (Fig. 3a). FRMD3 is differentially expressed in different regions of murine kidney, showing the highest level in glomeruli (Fig. 3b).
The 4.1 protein family comprises a group of proteins including 4.1R, 4.1G (general type), 4.1B (brain type), and 4.1N (neuron type) [40]. Erythrocyte protein 4.1 (4.1R) is a multifunctional protein essential for maintaining erythrocyte shape, mechanical properties of the membrane, deformability, and stability through interactions with the spectrin and actin skeleton network [40]. Figure 4 represents different domains of the FRMD3 protein. The FERM domain [38] is an N-terminal 30-kDa domain containing binding sites for cytoplasmatic tails of integral membrane proteins such as band 3 (integral membrane protein involved in spectrin-actin interaction) [41, 42], glycophorin C (erythroid membrane proteins) [43], CD44 (transmembrane glycoprotein found in erythroid as well as non-erythroid cells) [44], p55 (abundantly palmitoylated phosphoprotein of the erythroid membrane) [43] and calmodulin (a highly conserved calcium-binding protein, ubiquitously distributed in eukaryotic cells, known to affect a plethora of biological functions) [40]. An internal 8-10 kDa domain contains the spectrin-actin binding activity that is necessary for membrane stability [45], and the 22–24 kDa C-terminal domain has been reported to bind immunophilin FKBP13 (membrane-associated protein thought to function as an endoplasmic reticulum chaperone) [46] and nuclear mitotic apparatus protein (NuMA) [47].
FERM domain proteins have been implicated in nephron function. Some of these proteins were described as important in the composition of specialized cell–cell adhesion complexes. These complexes called slit-diaphragms that form between podocyte foot processes surrounding glomerular blood vessels have an important role in the function of podocytes, establishing the blood filtration barrier in the kidney glomerulus. A reduced expression of some FERM domain proteins in zebrafish, such as nephrin, podocin or band 4.1/FERM domain mosaic eyes resulted in loss of glomerular filtration discrimination and abnormal passage of high molecular weight substances into the glomerular filtrate [48]. Another FERM domain protein that has been recently related to nephron function is kindlin, an adaptor protein that contributes to renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. This protein regulates renal tubular cell plasticity by activation of Ras and its downstream signaling pathway [49]. Therefore, it is possible that FRMD3 might have related functions in kidney.
In the study of Pezzolesi et al. [25], FRMD3 expression was increased in proximal renal tubular human cells. Expression data for FRMD3 and its co-expressed transcripts suggest that these genes are linked to early development of DKD [50]. Moreover, FRMD3 is predicted to interact with other genes, suggesting alternative pathways in which this gene might act (Fig. 5).
It has been hypothesized that the 9q21.32 locus contributes to glomerular injury early in the pathogenesis of DKD [51]. More recently, the rs1888747 risk allele was shown to generate a transcription factor binding site (TFBS) in a module that is shared by multiple members of the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway, which has previously been implicated in the development of DKD [50, 52]. Regarding these findings, new pathways are being proposed to explain the role of FRMD3 in DKD physiopathology.

Variants in the FRMD3 gene and diabetic kidney disease

Research has been developed to investigate the association of variants in the FRMD3 gene and risk of DKD. The main variants studied so far are briefly described in Table 1. The polymorphisms rs942278, rs942280, rs942283, rs1535752, rs1535753, rs2378658, rs10867977 and rs10867977 are in strong linkage disequilibrium (LD) with each other. The Hapmap project does not show LD information for the rs1888746, rs1888747, rs10868025 and rs13289150 SNPs (http://​hapmap.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov).
Table 1
FRMD3 variants studied in the context of diabetic kidney disease
Variant
Reference
Ethnicity
Sample description
Chromossome 9a position
Risk allele
P value
Odds ratio (95 % CI)
rs942278
Freedman et al. [55]
African–American
966 cases (T2DM-DKD)
1032 controls (Non-DM, non DKD)
85906066
T
0.0023
1.30 (1.11–1.53)
rs942280
   
85905861
G
0.00070
1.28 (1.09–1.51)
rs942283
   
85905666
C
0.0014
1.25 (1.07–1.47)
rs1535752
   
85905253
T
0.013
1.27 (1.03–1.57)
rs1535753
   
85905060
T
0.0024
1.24 (1.06–1.46)
rs2378658
   
85904778
C
0.0040
1.25 (1.06–1.46)
rs10867977
   
85907516
G
0.022
1.31 (1.06–1.62)
rs1888746
Hu et al. [53]
Chinese
622 cases (378 T2DM-DKD and 244 DKD and retinopathy)
280 controls (>10 years T2DM)
86155392
C
0.66
0.93 (0.60–1.38)
 
Pezzolesi et al. [25]
Caucasian
820 cases (284—proteinuria and 536—ESRD)
885 controls (T1DM)
86155392
C
0.02
NAb
rs1888747
Maeda et al. [26]
Japanese
754 cases (T2DM- DKD and retinopathy) and 558 controls (T2DM—only retinopathy)
86155551
G
0.10
1.24 (0.96–1.61)
   
449 cases (T2DM—DKD and retinopathy) and 965 controls (T2DM- only retinopathy)
  
0.84
1.02 (0.83–1.26)
   
32 cases (T2DM-microalbuminuria progressed to overt proteinuria) and 168 controls (T2DM-microalbuminuria)
  
0.004
0.28 (0.12–0.67)
   
300 cases (T2DM-DKD) and 224 controls (normoalbuminuria and >10 years T2DM)
  
0.43
0.87 (0.61–1.23)
 
Pezzolesi et al. [25]
Caucasian
   
0.00000067
1.45 (1.25–1.67)
 
Williams et al. [30]
Caucasian
UK—ROI: 903 cases (DKD, retinopathy and ESRD) and 1001 controls (T1DM)
FinnDiane: 1289 cases (ESRD and macroalbuminuria) and 1577 controls (normoalbuminuria)
Reanalysis of US GoKind data: 905 cases (DKD) and 898 controls (T1DM)
  
0.24
1.06 (0.96–1.17)
 
Pezzolesi et al. [58]
Caucasian
743 cases (T2DM- 427 microalbuminuria and 316 proteinuria/ESRD) and 646 controls (T2DM-normoalbuminuria)
  
0.92
1.01 (0.86–1.19)
 
Pezzolesi et al. [51]
Caucasian
382 controls (non T2DM) and 416 cases (T2DM- DKD)
  
0.0014
NAd
 
Moyaart et al. [29]
Caucasian
Meta-analysis
1052 cases (DKD)
2057 controls (T1DM)
  
0.60
0.74 (0.65–0.83)
rs10868025
Pezzolesi et al. [25]
Caucasian
 
86164176
A
0.00005
1.45 (1.25–1.67)
 
Williams et al. [30]
Caucasian
   
0.19
1.06 (0.97–1.17)
 
Pezzolesi et al. [51]
Caucasian
   
0.0039
NAe
 
Pezzolesi et al. [58]
Caucasian
   
0.90
0.99 (0.84–1.16)
 
Maeda et al. [26]
Japanese
754 cases (T2DM-DKD and retinopathy) and 558 controls (T2DM- only retinopathy)
  
0.31
1.12 (0.89–1.42)
   
449 cases (T2DM-DKD and retinopathy) and 965 controls (T2DM- only retinopathy)
  
0.54
0.94 (0.78–1.14)
   
32 cases (T2DM-microalbuminuria progressed to overt proteinuria) and 168 controls (T2DM-microalbuminuria)
  
0.07
0.49 (0.22–1.06)
   
300 cases (T2DM-DKD) and 224 controls (normoalbuminuria and >10 years T2DM)
  
0.33
0.85 (0.62–1.18)
 
Hu et al. [53]
Chinese
   
0.25
0.91 (0.76–1.07)
 
Moyaart et al. [29]
Caucasian
   
0.12
0.72 (0.64–0.81)
rs13289150
Pezzolesi et al. [25]
Caucasian
 
83549513
A
0.05
NAc
NA not applicable, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus, DKD diabetes kidney disease, ESRD end-stage renal disease
aAdapted from on the hg19 genome assembly
bHazard ratio 1.33
cHazard ratio 1.23
dZ score 3.19
eZ score 2.88
The first published study regarding variants in FRMD3 was a GWAS with T1DM patients from the GoKinD (Genetics of Kidneys in Diabetes) collection [25]. The SNP rs10868025 had the strongest association with DKD (OR = 1.45, P = 5.0 × 10−7) [25]. This SNP involves a G for A nucleotide substitution and is located in the long arm of chromosome 9 at position 85.4, near the 5′ end of FRMD3 [25]. The frequency of the risk allele was 0.66/0.56 (cases/controls) in the Joslin Diabetes Center study (JDC study) and 0.66/0.59 in the George Washington University study (GWU study) [25]. Two other FRMD3 SNPs associated with DKD in the GoKinD collection (rs1888746 and rs13289150) were also associated with the development of severe nephropathy in the DCCT/EDIC (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications) follow-up study [25].
In a meta-analysis, involving three studies including 1052 cases and 2057 controls, the rs10868025 SNP was associated with a lower risk of DKD in European T1DM subjects (OR 0.72 [95 % CI 0.64–0.81]) [29], whereas in a study with T2DM subjects [26], no significant associations between the rs10868025 SNP and DKD were detected in four independent Japanese populations. The G allele frequency for cases vs. controls in the four populations studied was: 0.74 vs. 0.73, 0.72 vs. 0.73, 0.67 vs. 0.73, and 0.70 vs. 0.73 (P > 0.25 in all cases). The same findings were replicated in the Chinese population [53], for which no association between FRMD3 SNPs and DKD was observed (P = 0.249).
The rs1888747 (C/G) SNP is intergenic, located on the long arm of chromosome 9 at position 85.3, near the promoter region of the gene [54]. In the study developed by Pezzolesi et al. [25], a relevant association of rs1888747 SNP was found with DKD (P = 6.3 × 10−7) in Caucasians with T1DM. The frequency of the risk allele (G) was 0.68/0.73 for controls/cases in the GWU GoKinD and 0.66/0.74 for controls/cases in the JDC GoKinD [25]. These findings were strengthened by a meta-analysis including three studies analyzing the rs1888747 SNP in a total of 1052 cases and 2057 controls [29], which confirmed an association of rs1888747 SNP with DKD (OR 0.74 [95 % CI 0.65–0.83]; P = 0.602) [29], primarily driven by the GoKinD cohort. However, in Japanese individuals with T2DM, no associations between rs1888747 SNP and DKD were demonstrated in four different groups [26]. The frequency of the G allele for cases/controls was 0.81/0.80, 0.80/0.80, 0.70/0.82 and 0.77/0.81 (P > 0.05).
In 2011, Freedman et al. [55] identified that a potential interaction between FRMD3 and the APOL1 (apolipoprotein L1 gene)—MYH9 (non-muscle myosin heavy chain 9 gene) region on chromosome 22 contributes to DKD susceptibility in African Americans. Nevertheless, initially no association was found between FRMD3 SNPs (rs942280 and others, Table 1) and DKD before adjusting for variants on chromosome 20. The results revealed an approximately 25–30 % increase in DKD risk with multiple FRMD3 SNPs in subjects not homozygous for MYH9 risk haplotypes (or APOL1risk variants).
One year later, Williams et al. [30] formed the GEnetics of Nephropathy, an International Effort (GENIE) consortium, to examine reported genetic associations with DKD in T1DM previously observed in the GoKinD collection [25]. The samples were provided by the All Ireland-Warren 3-Genetics of Kidneys in Diabetes UK and Republic of Ireland (UK–ROI) collection and the Finnish DKD Study (FinnDiane). None of the analyzed FRMD3 polymorphisms were associated with DKD (rs1888747 [P = 0.77 and 0.25, UK–ROI and FinnDiane respectively]; rs1086805 [P = 0.52 for UK–ROI and 0.25 for FinnDiane]) [30].
Further evidence of the role of FRMD3 in kidney disease came from the study of Park et al. [56]. In this study, the authors aimed to find candidate genetic determinants of renal function in 1007 individuals from 73 extended families of Mongolian origin [56]. The strongest associations found were with rs17400257 SNP (P = 7.21 × 10−9) and rs6559725 SNP (P = 9.12 × 10−7). The rs17400257 SNP is located 45 kb downstream of FRMD3, and rs6559725 SNP is located in the intronic region of FRMD3 [56].
After the initial findings in T1DM in 2009 [25], Pezzolesi et al. [51] proceeded to examine whether the SNPs at these susceptibility loci were associated with DKD in a T2DM Family Collection. The 9q21.32 locus was significantly associated with high microalbuminuria, proteinuria, and ESRD [51]. Among diabetic family members, rs1888747 SNP on chromosome 9q21.32 was associated with advanced nephropathy (P = 0.029). Furthermore, when the definition of DKD was expanded to include individuals with high microalbuminuria, the strength of the association improved significantly [51].
Martini et al. [50] proposed a transcriptional link that might explain how the rs1888747 SNP in FRMD3 influences transcriptional regulation within the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-signaling pathway. FRMD3 transcript levels decreased significantly with the progression of DKD (P < 0.02). FRMD3 gene expression was studied by comparing renal biopsies in a group of 22 Pima Indians with T2DM and normal GFR and a cohort of seven participants with T2DM and CKD stage 3 [50]. Hierarchical clustering using the FRMD3 coexpressed transcripts detected two distinct clusters. In cluster 1, presenting higher ∆ACR/year (∆ albumin-to-creatinine ratio per year), gene expressions of seven out of the eight BMP pathway genes (BMPR2, CREB1, KRAS, MAP3K7, PRKAR2B, SMAD5, and XIAP) were lower than the expressions of these genes in cluster 2. These findings suggest a common molecular mechanism responsible for the coregulation of FRMD3 and several BMP pathway members [50]. Additionally, in silico comparison of sequence variants of the risk allele identified a potential homeodomain factor (HOMF) transcription factor binding site (TFBS) covering the SNP position [50]. The rs1888747 SNP affects protein binding, suggesting the generation of a TFBS by this particular SNP [50]. However, the mechanism mediating the connection between FRMD3 and BMP pathway members is still unknown, and no data are available at protein, RNA, or microRNA levels to elucidate this association [50]. It should be noted that Palmer and Freedman [54] suggested that the framework proposed by Martini et al. [50] is limited to genes with known or predicted functional roles.
Recently, a GWAS was performed by Palmer et al. [57] with the objective of evaluating candidate DKD susceptibility genes in African Americans. The SNPs selected were the same previously studied in European ancestries by Pezzolesi et al. [25]. The results showed that SNPs in FRMD3 tended toward association with T2DM-ESRD (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Even though not much is known about the FRMD3 gene, some studies provide insights into the relationship between FRMD3 variants and DKD. Major findings in the African American population show an association between DKD and many SNPs, especially rs10867977 (OR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.06–1.62). In the Japanese population, a significant association was found only at rs1888747, whereas in Caucasians three SNPs have been found to be associated with DKD (rs1888746, rs1888747, rs10868025). Nevertheless, considering all SNPs and ethnic groups analyzed, the strongest association was found in Caucasians with polymorphisms rs1888747 and rs10868025. However, the data produced so far is not sufficient to ascertain a role of FRMD3 in DKD pathogenesis. Also, because the relationship between the FRMD3 gene and DKD was recently detected, very few studies focusing on its mRNA and protein expression are available. Some limitations regarding the development of genetic association studies for diabetic complications could explain differences among studies which evaluated the FRMD3 gene. The first limitation involves differences in the definition of DKD among the studies. The recommended prognosis of DKD is determined by two parameters, GFR and albuminuria levels. Nevertheless, the majority of studies frequently use only one of these parameters to classify the disease. Moreover, differences in confounding factors such as DM duration and glycemic control could also influence the results.
The functional context of FRMD3 could be experimentally elucidated by several approaches. One possibility is to perform functional studies in kidney cells to evaluate the consequences of FRMD3 gene silencing/overexpression. Knockout/transgenic mouse models may also contribute to clarify FRMD3 function in the kidney. Fine mapping studies of GWAS data could identify new functional FRMD3 polymorphisms associated with DKD. Moreover, designing studies would be helpful to determine what molecules could be interacting with FRMD3 aiming to further increase knowledge of the mechanisms and pathways in which the gene is involved and its relation to diseases, as suggested by Martini et al. [50].
In summary, FRMD3 is a strong candidate gene for DKD. However, further studies are needed to explain the pathways through which FRMD3 influences the onset of this diabetic complication.

Authors’ contributions

MPB wrote the manuscript; DAS reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the discussion; FG reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the discussion; DC reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the discussion; LHC reviewed the manuscript and contributed to the discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was partially supported by grants from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) and Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa e Eventos (FIFE) at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.
Grant support Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) and Fundo de Incentivo à Pesquisa (FIPE) from Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre.

Competing interests

All the authors declared no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–80.CrossRef Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2014. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(Suppl 1):S14–80.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes: summary of revisions. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl):S4. Association AD. Standards of medical care in diabetes: summary of revisions. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(Suppl):S4.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Sortica DA, et al. The role of ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 in diabetic nephropathy. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2011;55(9):677–85.PubMedCrossRef Sortica DA, et al. The role of ecto-nucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 1 in diabetic nephropathy. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2011;55(9):677–85.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Levey AS, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005;67(6):2089–100.PubMedCrossRef Levey AS, et al. Definition and classification of chronic kidney disease: a position statement from Kidney Disease: improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Kidney Int. 2005;67(6):2089–100.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bruno RM, Gross JL. Prognostic factors in Brazilian diabetic patients starting dialysis: a 3.6-year follow-up study. J Diabetes Compl. 2000;14(5):266–71.CrossRef Bruno RM, Gross JL. Prognostic factors in Brazilian diabetic patients starting dialysis: a 3.6-year follow-up study. J Diabetes Compl. 2000;14(5):266–71.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de Boer IH et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 305(24):2532–9 de Boer IH et al. Temporal trends in the prevalence of diabetic kidney disease in the United States. JAMA. 305(24):2532–9
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dwyer JP et al. Renal dysfunction in the presence of normoalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: results from the DEMAND Study. Cardiorenal Med. 2(1): 1–10. Dwyer JP et al. Renal dysfunction in the presence of normoalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes: results from the DEMAND Study. Cardiorenal Med. 2(1): 1–10.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer H. Screening for kidney disease in adults with diabetes and prediabetes. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14(3):249–52.PubMedCrossRef Kramer H. Screening for kidney disease in adults with diabetes and prediabetes. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14(3):249–52.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer CK, et al. Clinical and laboratory profile of patients with type 2 diabetes with low glomerular filtration rate and normoalbuminuria. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):1998–2000.PubMedCrossRef Kramer CK, et al. Clinical and laboratory profile of patients with type 2 diabetes with low glomerular filtration rate and normoalbuminuria. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(8):1998–2000.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Ada ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4–42. Ada ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(Suppl 1):S4–42.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2013. Diabetes Care. 36(Suppl 1): S11–66. ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2013. Diabetes Care. 36(Suppl 1): S11–66.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stevens PE, Levin A. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11):825–30.PubMedCrossRef Stevens PE, Levin A. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(11):825–30.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat KDIGO. clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012; Suppl: S1–S150. KDIGO. clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012; Suppl: S1–S150.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chaturvedi N, et al. Microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes: rates, risk factors and glycemic threshold. Kidney Int. 2001;60(1):219–27.PubMedCrossRef Chaturvedi N, et al. Microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes: rates, risk factors and glycemic threshold. Kidney Int. 2001;60(1):219–27.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Adler AI, et al. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int. 2003;63(1):225–32.PubMedCrossRef Adler AI, et al. Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64). Kidney Int. 2003;63(1):225–32.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Krolewski AS. Genetics of diabetic nephropathy: evidence for major and minor gene effects. Kidney Int. 1999;55(4):1582–96.PubMedCrossRef Krolewski AS. Genetics of diabetic nephropathy: evidence for major and minor gene effects. Kidney Int. 1999;55(4):1582–96.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Caramori ML, Fioretto P, Mauer M. The need for early predictors of diabetic nephropathy risk: is albumin excretion rate sufficient? Diabetes. 2000;49(9):1399–408.PubMedCrossRef Caramori ML, Fioretto P, Mauer M. The need for early predictors of diabetic nephropathy risk: is albumin excretion rate sufficient? Diabetes. 2000;49(9):1399–408.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Perkins BA, et al. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2285–93.PubMedCrossRef Perkins BA, et al. Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(23):2285–93.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Canani LH, Gerchman F, Gross JL. Familial clustering of diabetic nephropathy in Brazilian type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1999;48(4):909–13.PubMedCrossRef Canani LH, Gerchman F, Gross JL. Familial clustering of diabetic nephropathy in Brazilian type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 1999;48(4):909–13.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yajima Y, Nakajima S. Familial clustering and genetics of diabetic nephropathy. Nihon Rinsho. 1997;55(Suppl):795–801.PubMed Yajima Y, Nakajima S. Familial clustering and genetics of diabetic nephropathy. Nihon Rinsho. 1997;55(Suppl):795–801.PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Martini S, et al. Defining human diabetic nephropathy on the molecular level: integration of transcriptomic profiles with biological knowledge. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008;9(4):267–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martini S, et al. Defining human diabetic nephropathy on the molecular level: integration of transcriptomic profiles with biological knowledge. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2008;9(4):267–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezzolesi MG, et al. Genome-wide association scan for diabetic nephropathy susceptibility genes in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58(6):1403–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pezzolesi MG, et al. Genome-wide association scan for diabetic nephropathy susceptibility genes in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2009;58(6):1403–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Maeda S, et al. Replication study for the association between four Loci identified by a genome-wide association study on European American subjects with type 1 diabetes and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2010;59(8):2075–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Maeda S, et al. Replication study for the association between four Loci identified by a genome-wide association study on European American subjects with type 1 diabetes and susceptibility to diabetic nephropathy in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2010;59(8):2075–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Ng DP, Krolewski AS. Molecular genetic approaches for studying the etiology of diabetic nephropathy. Curr Mol Med. 2005;5(5):509–25.PubMedCrossRef Ng DP, Krolewski AS. Molecular genetic approaches for studying the etiology of diabetic nephropathy. Curr Mol Med. 2005;5(5):509–25.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman BI, et al. Genetic factors in diabetic nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(6):1306–16.PubMedCrossRef Freedman BI, et al. Genetic factors in diabetic nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2(6):1306–16.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams WW, et al. Association testing of previously reported variants in a large case-control meta-analysis of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2012;61(8):2187–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Williams WW, et al. Association testing of previously reported variants in a large case-control meta-analysis of diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2012;61(8):2187–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Lohmueller KE, et al. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet. 2003;33(2):177–82.PubMedCrossRef Lohmueller KE, et al. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies supports a contribution of common variants to susceptibility to common disease. Nat Genet. 2003;33(2):177–82.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Carpena MP, et al. Genetics of diabetic nephropathy. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;54(3):253–61.PubMedCrossRef Carpena MP, et al. Genetics of diabetic nephropathy. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;54(3):253–61.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat McKnight AJ, McKay V, Maxwell AP. Genetic and epigenetic risk factors for diabetic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 21(3): 287–96. McKnight AJ, McKay V, Maxwell AP. Genetic and epigenetic risk factors for diabetic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 21(3): 287–96.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Ni X, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the protein 4.1O gene, a novel member of the protein 4.1 family with focal expression in ovary. J Hum Genet. 2003;48(2):101–6.PubMedCrossRef Ni X, et al. Molecular cloning and characterization of the protein 4.1O gene, a novel member of the protein 4.1 family with focal expression in ovary. J Hum Genet. 2003;48(2):101–6.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoover KB, Bryant PJ. The genetics of the protein 4.1 family: organizers of the membrane and cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12(2):229–34.PubMedCrossRef Hoover KB, Bryant PJ. The genetics of the protein 4.1 family: organizers of the membrane and cytoskeleton. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2000;12(2):229–34.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramez M, et al. Distinct distribution of specific members of protein 4.1 gene family in the mouse nephron. Kidney Int. 2003;63(4):1321–37.PubMedCrossRef Ramez M, et al. Distinct distribution of specific members of protein 4.1 gene family in the mouse nephron. Kidney Int. 2003;63(4):1321–37.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Chishti AH, et al. The FERM domain: a unique module involved in the linkage of cytoplasmic proteins to the membrane. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23(8):281–2.PubMedCrossRef Chishti AH, et al. The FERM domain: a unique module involved in the linkage of cytoplasmic proteins to the membrane. Trends Biochem Sci. 1998;23(8):281–2.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Baines AJ. A FERM-adjacent (FA) region defines a subset of the 4.1 superfamily and is a potential regulator of FERM domain function. BMC Genom. 2006;7:85.CrossRef Baines AJ. A FERM-adjacent (FA) region defines a subset of the 4.1 superfamily and is a potential regulator of FERM domain function. BMC Genom. 2006;7:85.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Takakuwa Y. Protein 4.1, a multifunctional protein of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton: structure and functions in erythrocytes and nonerythroid cells. Int J Hematol. 2000;72(3):298–309.PubMed Takakuwa Y. Protein 4.1, a multifunctional protein of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton: structure and functions in erythrocytes and nonerythroid cells. Int J Hematol. 2000;72(3):298–309.PubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasternack GR, et al. Interactions between protein 4.1 and band 3. An alternative binding site for an element of the membrane skeleton. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(6):3676–83.PubMed Pasternack GR, et al. Interactions between protein 4.1 and band 3. An alternative binding site for an element of the membrane skeleton. J Biol Chem. 1985;260(6):3676–83.PubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lombardo CR, Willardson BM, Low PS. Localization of the protein 4.1-binding site on the cytoplasmic domain of erythrocyte membrane band 3. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(14):9540–6.PubMed Lombardo CR, Willardson BM, Low PS. Localization of the protein 4.1-binding site on the cytoplasmic domain of erythrocyte membrane band 3. J Biol Chem. 1992;267(14):9540–6.PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Marfatia SM, et al. Identification of the protein 4.1 binding interface on glycophorin C and p55, a homologue of the Drosophila discs-large tumor suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(2):715–9.PubMedCrossRef Marfatia SM, et al. Identification of the protein 4.1 binding interface on glycophorin C and p55, a homologue of the Drosophila discs-large tumor suppressor protein. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(2):715–9.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Nunomura W, et al. Regulation of CD44-protein 4.1 interaction by Ca2+ and calmodulin. Implications for modulation of CD44-ankyrin interaction. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(48):30322–8.PubMedCrossRef Nunomura W, et al. Regulation of CD44-protein 4.1 interaction by Ca2+ and calmodulin. Implications for modulation of CD44-ankyrin interaction. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(48):30322–8.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Schischmanoff PO, et al. Defining of the minimal domain of protein 4.1 involved in spectrin-actin binding. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(36):21243–50.PubMedCrossRef Schischmanoff PO, et al. Defining of the minimal domain of protein 4.1 involved in spectrin-actin binding. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(36):21243–50.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Walensky LD, et al. The 13-kD FK506 binding protein, FKBP13, interacts with a novel homologue of the erythrocyte membrane cytoskeletal protein 4.1. J Cell Biol. 1998;141(1):143–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Walensky LD, et al. The 13-kD FK506 binding protein, FKBP13, interacts with a novel homologue of the erythrocyte membrane cytoskeletal protein 4.1. J Cell Biol. 1998;141(1):143–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Mattagajasingh SN, et al. A nonerythroid isoform of protein 4.1R interacts with the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(1):29–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mattagajasingh SN, et al. A nonerythroid isoform of protein 4.1R interacts with the nuclear mitotic apparatus (NuMA) protein. J Cell Biol. 1999;145(1):29–43.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Kramer-Zucker AG, et al. Organization of the pronephric filtration apparatus in zebrafish requires Nephrin, Podocin and the FERM domain protein Mosaic eyes. Dev Biol. 2005;285(2):316–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kramer-Zucker AG, et al. Organization of the pronephric filtration apparatus in zebrafish requires Nephrin, Podocin and the FERM domain protein Mosaic eyes. Dev Biol. 2005;285(2):316–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Wei X, et al. Kindlin-2 regulates renal tubular cell plasticity by activation of Ras and its downstream signaling. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;306(2):F271–8.PubMedCrossRef Wei X, et al. Kindlin-2 regulates renal tubular cell plasticity by activation of Ras and its downstream signaling. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2013;306(2):F271–8.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Martini S, et al. From single nucleotide polymorphism to transcriptional mechanism: a model for FRMD3 in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2013;62(7):2605–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Martini S, et al. From single nucleotide polymorphism to transcriptional mechanism: a model for FRMD3 in diabetic nephropathy. Diabetes. 2013;62(7):2605–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezzolesi MG, et al. Family-based association analysis confirms the role of the chromosome 9q21.32 locus in the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Pezzolesi MG, et al. Family-based association analysis confirms the role of the chromosome 9q21.32 locus in the susceptibility of diabetic nephropathy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e60301.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolan V, Hensey C, Brady HR. Diabetic nephropathy: renal development gone awry? Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(2):75–84.PubMed Dolan V, Hensey C, Brady HR. Diabetic nephropathy: renal development gone awry? Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;18(2):75–84.PubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu C, et al. CPVL/CHN2 genetic variant is associated with diabetic retinopathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):3085–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu C, et al. CPVL/CHN2 genetic variant is associated with diabetic retinopathy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2011;60(11):3085–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer ND, Freedman BI. Diabetic nephropathy: FRMD3 in diabetic nephropathy–guilt by association. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(6):313–4.PubMedCrossRef Palmer ND, Freedman BI. Diabetic nephropathy: FRMD3 in diabetic nephropathy–guilt by association. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(6):313–4.PubMedCrossRef
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman BI, et al. Differential effects of MYH9 and APOL1 risk variants on FRMD3 Association with Diabetic ESRD in African Americans. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Freedman BI, et al. Differential effects of MYH9 and APOL1 risk variants on FRMD3 Association with Diabetic ESRD in African Americans. PLoS Genet. 2011;7(6):e1002150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Park H, et al. A family-based association study after genome-wide linkage analysis identified two genetic loci for renal function in a Mongolian population. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):285–92.PubMedCrossRef Park H, et al. A family-based association study after genome-wide linkage analysis identified two genetic loci for renal function in a Mongolian population. Kidney Int. 2013;83(2):285–92.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Palmer ND, et al. Evaluation of candidate nephropathy susceptibility genes in a genome-wide association study of African American diabetic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88273.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Palmer ND, et al. Evaluation of candidate nephropathy susceptibility genes in a genome-wide association study of African American diabetic kidney disease. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e88273.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezzolesi, M.G., et al., An intergenic region on chromosome 13q33.3 is associated with the susceptibility to kidney disease in type 1 and 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 80(1): 105–11. Pezzolesi, M.G., et al., An intergenic region on chromosome 13q33.3 is associated with the susceptibility to kidney disease in type 1 and 2 diabetes. Kidney Int. 80(1): 105–11.
Metadaten
Titel
FRMD3 gene: its role in diabetic kidney disease. A narrative review
verfasst von
Marjoriê Piuco Buffon
Denise Alves Sortica
Fernando Gerchman
Daisy Crispim
Luís Henrique Canani
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2015
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome / Ausgabe 1/2015
Elektronische ISSN: 1758-5996
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-015-0114-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.