Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2013

01.05.2013 | Breast Oncology

Effect of MRI on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast

verfasst von: Melissa Pilewskie, MD, Carlie Kennedy, MD, Claire Shappell, PhD, Irene Helenowski, PhD, Denise Scholtens, PhD, Nora Hansen, MD, Kevin Bethke, MD, Jacqueline Jeruss, MD, Patricia Karstaedt, MD, Seema A. Khan, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

The accuracy of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detection of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has prompted recommendations for its routine preoperative use, but its clinical benefit is debated. We reviewed our experience with MRI in DCIS patients to assess the utility of MRI for surgical planning.

Methods

DCIS patients (2008–2010) were identified through a prospectively maintained database and grouped into MRI and no-MRI groups. The rates of additional biopsies, altered surgical management, and reoperation were compared. Additionally, DCIS size ascertained by mammography, MRI, and final pathology was compared.

Results:

Of 352 DCIS patients, 217 received MRI and 135 did not. The type of initial operation and number of reoperations were similar between the two groups, but successful breast conservation was more frequent in the no-MRI group (p = 0.06). The additional biopsy rate was 38 % in the MRI group versus 7 % in the no-MRI group; ≥2 additional biopsies were performed in 18 % of the MRI group and 2 % of the no-MRI group (p < 0.0001). These yielded a cancer diagnosis in 26 % of MRI and 33 % of no-MRI patients (p = 0.73). MRI was not superior to mammogram in detecting size of DCIS lesions preoperatively; 52 % of mammograms were accurate (within 1 cm) compared with 41 % of MRIs.

Conclusions

DCIS patients who undergo preoperative breast MRI are far more likely to undergo additional biopsies. Unless these can be demonstrated to lead to improved long-term outcomes, the utility of routine preoperative MRI in DCIS patients remains questionable.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1430–41.PubMedCrossRef Burstein HJ, Polyak K, Wong JS, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1430–41.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. NIH Consensus and State-of-the-Science Statements Volume 26, Number 2, 2009. NIH State-of-the-Science Conference Statement on: diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ. NIH Consensus and State-of-the-Science Statements Volume 26, Number 2, 2009.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994;11:181–92.PubMed Holland R, Hendriks JH. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994;11:181–92.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radio Graphics. 2010;30:1183–98. Yamada T, Mori N, Watanabe M, et al. Radiologic-pathologic correlation of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radio Graphics. 2010;30:1183–98.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;41:150–51.CrossRef Lehman CD. Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;41:150–51.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1353–60.PubMedCrossRef Oshida K, Nagashima T, Ueda T, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using dynamic MR mammography. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:1353–60.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2007;13:545–50.PubMedCrossRef Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2007;13:545–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, Ali S, Pantelic MV. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radio Graphics. 2010;30:1673–87. Mossa-Basha M, Fundaro GM, Shah BA, Ali S, Pantelic MV. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation. Radio Graphics. 2010;30:1673–87.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Raza S, Vallejo M, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR. 2008;191:689–99.PubMedCrossRef Raza S, Vallejo M, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL. Pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a range of MRI features. AJR. 2008;191:689–99.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging. 2007;31:394–400.PubMedCrossRef Facius M, Renz DM, Neubauer H, et al. Characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ in magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging. 2007;31:394–400.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR, et al. Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2011–19.PubMedCrossRef Rahbar H, Partridge SC, Eby PR, et al. Characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ on diffusion weighted breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2011–19.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–88. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–88.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:110–19.PubMed Esserman L, Hylton N, Yassa L, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: evidence for improved preoperative staging. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:110–19.PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment MRI with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–95.PubMedCrossRef Bleicher RJ, Ciocca RM, Egleston BL, et al. Association of routine pretreatment MRI with time to surgery, mastectomy rate, and margin status. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209:180–95.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–47.PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Cambic A, Hansen NM, Bethke KP. Evaluating the impact of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on the surgical management of newly diagnosed breast cancers. Arch Surg. 2007;142:441–47.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull L, Brown S, Olivier C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef Turnbull L, Brown S, Olivier C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:563–71.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3248–58.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S, et al. Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer. Res Treat. 2008;111:179–87.PubMedCrossRef Braun M, Polcher M, Schrading S, et al. Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer. Res Treat. 2008;111:179–87.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMedCrossRef Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG, et al. Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer. 2003;98:468–73.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;30:3413–23.CrossRef Tillman GF, Orel SG, Schnall MD, et al. Effect of breast magnetic resonance imaging on the clinical management of women with early-stage breast carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2002;30:3413–23.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhl C, Khun W, Braun M, Schild H. Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast. 2007;16:S34–44.PubMedCrossRef Kuhl C, Khun W, Braun M, Schild H. Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast. 2007;16:S34–44.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer one step forward, two steps back? JAMA. 2004;292:2779–80.PubMedCrossRef Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer one step forward, two steps back? JAMA. 2004;292:2779–80.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Hayes D. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef Houssami N, Hayes D. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:290–302.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Adkisson CD, Vallow LV, Kowalchik K., et al. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1678–83.PubMedCrossRef Adkisson CD, Vallow LV, Kowalchik K., et al. Patient age and preoperative breast MRI in women with breast cancer: biopsy and surgical implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1678–83.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Allen LR, Lago-Tora CE, Hughes JH, et al. Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2395–2400.PubMedCrossRef Allen LR, Lago-Tora CE, Hughes JH, et al. Is there a role for MRI in the preoperative assessment of patients with DCIS? Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2395–2400.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Itakura K, Lessing J, Sakata T, et al. The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11:33–8.PubMedCrossRef Itakura K, Lessing J, Sakata T, et al. The impact of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on surgical treatment and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer. 2011;11:33–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kropcho LC, Steen ST, Chung AP, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2012;18:151–6.PubMedCrossRef Kropcho LC, Steen ST, Chung AP, et al. Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J. 2012;18:151–6.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–88.PubMedCrossRef Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082–88.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Schouten van der Velden AP, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T. Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg. 2009;198:262–9.CrossRef Schouten van der Velden AP, Schlooz-Vries MS, Boetes C, Wobbes T. Magnetic resonance imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ: what is its clinical application? A review. Am J Surg. 2009;198:262–9.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chung A, Saouaf R, Scharre K, Phillips E. The Impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS. Am Surg. 2005;71:705–10.PubMed Chung A, Saouaf R, Scharre K, Phillips E. The Impact of MRI on the treatment of DCIS. Am Surg. 2005;71:705–10.PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.PubMedCrossRef Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology. 2004;233:830–49.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan ME, Houssani M, Lord S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5640–49.PubMedCrossRef Brennan ME, Houssani M, Lord S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systemic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5640–49.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Gao X, Fisher S, Emami B. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:1038–45.PubMedCrossRef Gao X, Fisher S, Emami B. Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:1038–45.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 2010;19:475–92.CrossRef Morrow M. Magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, and eligibility for breast-conserving surgery: promises and pitfalls. Surg Oncol Clin North Am. 2010;19:475–92.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang W, Harris EE, Schnall MD. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef Solin LJ, Orel SG, Hwang W, Harris EE, Schnall MD. Relationship of breast magnetic resonance imaging to outcome after breast-conservation treatment with radiation for women with early stage invasive breast carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:386–91.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready DR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3000–09.PubMedCrossRef Hwang N, Schiller DE, Crystal P, Maki E, McCready DR. Magnetic resonance imaging in the planning of initial lumpectomy for invasive breast carcinoma: its effect on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast-conservation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:3000–09.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Effect of MRI on the Management of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast
verfasst von
Melissa Pilewskie, MD
Carlie Kennedy, MD
Claire Shappell, PhD
Irene Helenowski, PhD
Denise Scholtens, PhD
Nora Hansen, MD
Kevin Bethke, MD
Jacqueline Jeruss, MD
Patricia Karstaedt, MD
Seema A. Khan, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2771-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Annals of Surgical Oncology 5/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.