Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Sports Medicine 3/2005

01.03.2005 | Review Article

Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Strengthen the Quadriceps Femoris?

A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials

verfasst von: Leon Bax, Filip Staes, Arianne Verhagen

Erschienen in: Sports Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2005

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Devices for neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) are increasingly used by individuals without specific injuries and are standard equipment in most physical therapy practices. The most often stimulated muscle group is the quadriceps femoris. We designed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials to determine whether NMES is an effective modality for strength augmentation of the quadriceps femoris.

A full content search for randomised controlled trials was performed in Medline, Embase, Cinahl, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the Physical Therapy Evidence Database. Maximum volitional isometric or isokinetic muscle torque in Nm was used as main outcome measure.

Thirty-five trials were included and evaluated. A fundamental distinction was made between the trials using subjects with unimpaired quadriceps femoris muscles and the trials using post-injury or post-operative subjects. In the unimpaired quadriceps subgroup, meta-analyses were performed for the comparisons ‘NMES versus no exercises’ and ‘NMES versus volitional exercises’. All other comparisons were evaluated descriptively. The included trials were generally of poor quality and meta-analytic data indicate that publication bias may be present. The evaluated data suggest that, both for the unimpaired and impaired quadriceps, NMES makes sense compared with doing no exercises but volitional exercises appear to be more effective in most situations.

Based on the available evidence, NMES may only be preferred over volitional training for within-cast muscle training and perhaps in specific situations where volitional training does not receive sufficient patient compliance. Further research should be directed toward identifying the clinical impact at activity and participation levels and the optimal stimulation parameters of this modality.

Literatur
  1. Stillings D. Electrical stimulation for foot drop, 1772. Med Instrum 1975 Nov-Dec; 9 (6): 276–7PubMed
  2. Pichon F, Chatard JC, Martin A, et al. Electrical stimulation and swimming performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27 (12): 1671–6PubMed
  3. Maffiuletti NA, Cometti G, Amiridis IG, et al. The effects of electromyostimulation training and basketball practice on muscle strength and jumping ability. Int J Sports Med 2000; 21: 437–43PubMedView Article
  4. Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ 2001; 323: 334–6PubMedView Article
  5. Lloyd T, De Domenico G, Strauss GR, et al. A review of the use of electro-motor stimulation in human muscles. Aust J Physiother 1988; 32 (1): 18–30
  6. Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA. A critical review of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscles. Crit Rev Phys Rehab Med 1997; 9 (384): 301–14
  7. Hainaut K, Duchateau J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise. Sports Med 1992; 14 (2): 100–13PubMedView Article
  8. Kramer JF, Mendryk SW. Electrical stimulation as a strength improvement technique: a review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1982; 4 (2): 91–8PubMed
  9. Selkowitz DM. High frequency electrical stimulation in muscle strengthening. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17 (1): 103–11PubMedView Article
  10. Marks R, Ungar M, Ghasemmi M. Electrical stimulation for osteoarthritis of the knee: biological basis and systematic review. N Z J Physiother 2000; 28 (3): 6–21
  11. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ 1994; 309: 1286–91PubMedView Article
  12. Verhagen AP, de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, et al. The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51 (12): 1235–41PubMedView Article
  13. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001
  14. Baujat B, Mahé C, Pignon JP, et al. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Stat Med 2002; 21: 2641–52PubMedView Article
  15. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56 (2): 455–63PubMedView Article
  16. Balogun JA, Onilari AO, Akeju OA, et al. High voltage electrical stimulation in the augmentation of muscle strength. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 910–6PubMed
  17. Caggiano E, Emrey T, Shirley S, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation or voluntary contraction for strengthening the quadriceps femoris muscles in an aged male population. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994; 20 (1): 22–8PubMed
  18. Singer KP, Gow PJ, Otway WF, et al. A comparison of electrical muscle stimulation, isometric, isotonic and isokinetic strength training programs. N Z J Sports Med 1983; 11 (3): 61–3
  19. Wolf SL, Ariel GB, Saar D, et al. The effect of muscle stimulation during resistive training on performance parameters. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (1): 18–23PubMedView Article
  20. Hortobagyi T, Lambert J, Scot K. Incomplete muscle activation after training with electromyostimulation. Can J Appl Physiol 1998; 23 (3): 261–70PubMedView Article
  21. Hortobagyi T, Scot K, Lambert J, et al. Cross-education of muscle strength is greater with stimulated than voluntary contractions. Motor Control 1999; 3: 205–19PubMed
  22. Kramer JF, Semple JE. Comparison of selected strengthening techniques for normal quadriceps. Physiother Can 1983; 35 (6): 300–4
  23. Mohr T, Carlson B, Sulentic C, et al. Comparison of isometric exercise and high volt galvanic stimulation on quadriceps femoris muscle strength. Phys Ther 1985; 65 (5): 606–9PubMed
  24. Romero JA, Sanford TL, Schroeder RV, et al. The effects of electrical stimulation of normal quadriceps on strength and girth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14 (3): 194–7PubMed
  25. Currier DP, Mann R. Muscular strength development by electrical stimulation in healthy individuals. Phys Ther 1983; 63 (6): 915–21PubMed
  26. Fahey TD, Harvey M, Schroeder RV, et al. Influence of sex differences and knee joint position on electrical stimulation modulated strength increases. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985; 17 (1): 144–7PubMed
  27. Kubiak RJ, Whitman KM, Johnston RM. Changes in quadriceps femoris muscle strength using isometric exercise versus electrical stimulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1987; 8 (11): 537–41PubMed
  28. Lai HS, De Domenico G, Strauss GR. The effect of different electro-motor stimulation training intensities on strength improvement. Aust J Physiother 1988; 34 (3): 151–64
  29. Laughman RK, Youdas JW, Garret TR, et al. Strength changes in the normal quadriceps femoris muscle as a result of electrical muscle stimulation. Phys Ther 1983; 63 (4): 494–9PubMed
  30. McMiken DF, Todd-Smith M, Thompson C. Strengthening of human quadriceps muscles by cutaneous electrical stimulation. Scand J Rehabil Med 1983; 15: 25–8PubMed
  31. Selkowitz DM. Improvement in isometric strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle after training with electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 1985; 65 (2): 186–96PubMed
  32. Halkjaer-Kristensen J, Ingemann-Hansen T. Wasting of the human quadriceps muscle after knee ligament injuries. Scand J Rehab Med 1985; Suppl. 13: 29–37
  33. Riel KA, Bernet P. Transcutaneous electrical muscle stimulation during post-operative knee immobilization [in German]. Sportmedizin 1990; 41: 425–8
  34. Anderson AF, Lipscomb AB. Analysis of rehabilitation techniques after anterior cruciate reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17 (2): 154–60PubMedView Article
  35. Buhmann HW, Schleicher W, Urbach D, et al. Electromyostimulation and isokinetic training in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate surgery [in German]. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1998; 8 (1): 13–6View Article
  36. Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA, Winstanley J. A comparison of two types of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Clin Rehab 2001; 15: 637–46View Article
  37. Delitto A, Rose SJ, KcKowen JM, et al. Electrical stimulation versus voluntary exercise in strengthening thigh musculature after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Phys Ther 1988; 68 (5): 660–3PubMed
  38. Draper V, Ballard L. Electrical stimulation versus electromyographic biofeedback in the recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle function following anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Phy Ther 1991; 71 (6): 455–64
  39. Gobelet C, Frey M, Bonard A. Muscle development techniques and retropatellar chondropathy [in French]. Rev Rhum 1992; 59 (1): 23–7PubMed
  40. Gould N, Donnermeyer D, Pope M, et al. Transcutaneous muscle stimulation as a method to retard disuse atrophy. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1982; 164: 215–20
  41. Lieber RL, Silva PD, Daniel DM. Equal effectiveness of electrical and volitional strength training for quadriceps femoris muscles after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Orthop Res 1996; 14 (1): 131–8PubMedView Article
  42. Oldham JA, Howe TE, Petterson T, et al. Electrotherapeutic rehabilitation of the quadriceps in elderly osteoarthritic patients: a double blind assessment of patterned neuromuscular stimulation. Clin Rehab 1995; 9 (1): 10–20View Article
  43. Paternostro-Sluga T, Fialka C, Alacamliogliu Y, et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1999; 368: 166–75
  44. Quittan M, Wiesinger GF, Sturm B, et al. Improvement of thigh muscles by neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with refractory heart failure. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2001; 80 (3): 206–14View Article
  45. Sisk TD, Stralka SW, Deering MB, et al. Effect of electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength after reconstructive surgery of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 1987; 15 (3): 215–20PubMedView Article
  46. Snyder-Mackler L, Ladin Z, Schepsis AA, et al. Electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73-A (7): 1025–36PubMed
  47. Snyder-Mackler L, Delitto A, Bailey SL, et al. Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77-A (8): 1166–73PubMed
  48. Wigerstad-Lossing I, Grimby G, Jonsson T, et al. Effects of electrical muscle stimulation combined with voluntary contractions after knee ligament surgery. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1988; 20 (1): 93–8PubMedView Article
  49. Williams RA, Morrissey MC, Brewster CE. The effect of electrical stimulation on quadriceps strength and thigh circumference in menisectomy patients. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1986; 8 (3): 143–6PubMed
  50. Follmann D, Elliot P, Suh I, et al. Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45 (7): 769–73PubMedView Article
  51. Huwiler-Muntener K, Jüni P, Junker C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodological quality. JAMA 2002 Jun 5; 287 (21): 2801–4PubMedView Article
  52. Juni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, et al. The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA. 1999 Sep 15; 282 (11): 1054–60PubMedView Article
  53. Greenland S. Can meta-analysis be salvaged? Am J Epidemiol 1994 Nov 1; 140 (9): 783–7PubMed
  54. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1–12PubMedView Article
  55. Berlin JA. Does blinding of readers affect the results of meta-analyses? Lancet 1997; 350: 185–6PubMedView Article
  56. Verhagen AP, de Vet HCW, de Bie RA, et al. Balneotherapy and quality assessment; inter-observer reliability of the Maastricht criteria list and the need for blinded quality assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51: 335–41PubMedView Article
Metadaten
Titel
Does Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Strengthen the Quadriceps Femoris?
A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
verfasst von
Leon Bax
Filip Staes
Arianne Verhagen
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2005
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Sports Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0112-1642
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-2035
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2005

Sports Medicine 3/2005 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Knie-TEP: Kein Vorteil durch antibiotikahaltigen Knochenzement

29.05.2024 Periprothetische Infektionen Nachrichten

Zur Zementierung einer Knie-TEP wird in Deutschland zu über 98% Knochenzement verwendet, der mit einem Antibiotikum beladen ist. Ob er wirklich besser ist als Zement ohne Antibiotikum, kann laut Registerdaten bezweifelt werden.

Häusliche Gewalt in der orthopädischen Notaufnahme oft nicht erkannt

28.05.2024 Häusliche Gewalt Nachrichten

In der Notaufnahme wird die Chance, Opfer von häuslicher Gewalt zu identifizieren, von Orthopäden und Orthopädinnen offenbar zu wenig genutzt. Darauf deuten die Ergebnisse einer Fragebogenstudie an der Sahlgrenska-Universität in Schweden hin.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.