Skip to main content
Erschienen in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 4/2006

01.07.2006 | Original Research Article

A Comparison of Two Multiple-Characteristic Decision-Making Models for the Comparison of Antihypertensive Drug Classes

Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)

verfasst von: Dr Boris L. G. Van Wijk, Olaf H. Klungel, Eibert R. Heerdink, Anthonius de Boer

Erschienen in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Ausgabe 4/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Multiple-characteristics decision-making (MCDM) models can be used to calculate a score, based on a set of characteristics, for a number of alternative drugs or drug classes to allow comparison between them and thus enhance evidence-based pharmacotherapy.

Objective

To compare two MCDM models, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), in determining first-line antihypertensive drug class.

Methods

Five different classes of antihypertensive drugs were analyzed: diuretics, β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers), dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DHP-CCBs), ACE inhibitors, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]). Four characteristics were deemed relevant for the determination of first-line antihypertensive drug class: effectiveness, persistence with treatment as a measure of tolerability, cost, and clinical experience. Weight factors were determined by sending questionnaires to cardiologists, pharmacists, general practitioners (GPs), and internists in The Netherlands. Absolute scores for the characteristics were determined from literature (effectiveness and persistence) and health insurance data (costs and clinical experience).

Results

Ninety-two cardiologists (33% of those sent the questionnaire), 90 GPs (31%), 87 internists (31%), and 123 pharmacists (43%) completed the questionnaire. Among all professions, according to both SAW and TOPSIS, ACE inhibitors were ranked as the first-line antihypertensive drug class, typically followed by β-blockers.

Conclusion

Both SAW and TOPIS analyses, using weight factors assigned by cardiologists, pharmacists, GPs, and internists from The Netherlands, rank ACE inhibitors as the first choice among antihypertensive drug classes for the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension. Both methods are valuable tools in the development of evidence-based pharmacotherapy.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrari MD. Tripstar: a comprehensive patient-based approach to compare triptans. Headache 2002; 42 Suppl. 1: 18–25.PubMedCrossRef Ferrari MD. Tripstar: a comprehensive patient-based approach to compare triptans. Headache 2002; 42 Suppl. 1: 18–25.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ferrari MD, et al. TRIPSTAR: prioritizing oral triptan treatment attributes in migraine management. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110(3): 137–43.PubMedCrossRef Goadsby PJ, Dodick DW, Ferrari MD, et al. TRIPSTAR: prioritizing oral triptan treatment attributes in migraine management. Acta Neurol Scand 2004; 110(3): 137–43.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Janknegt R. Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(1): 15–33.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R. Fluoroquinolones: use of clinical data to aid formulary choice by the system of objective judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1994; 6(1): 15–33.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Janknegt R. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: formulary committee perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 Suppl. 2: 49–52.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R. Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: formulary committee perspective. Pharmacoeconomics 2001; 19 Suppl. 2: 49–52.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Janknegt R, Steenhoek A. The system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA): a tool in rational drug selection for formulary inclusion. Drugs 1997; 53(4): 550–62.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R, Steenhoek A. The system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA): a tool in rational drug selection for formulary inclusion. Drugs 1997; 53(4): 550–62.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Janknegt R, van den Broek PJ, Kullberg BJ, et al. Choice of antibiotics in uncomplicated cystitis; application of ‘system of objectified judgement analysis’ (SOJA) method [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(49): 2466–71.PubMed Janknegt R, van den Broek PJ, Kullberg BJ, et al. Choice of antibiotics in uncomplicated cystitis; application of ‘system of objectified judgement analysis’ (SOJA) method [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1999; 143(49): 2466–71.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Janknegt R, van der Kuy A, Declerck G, et al. Hypnotics: drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(2): 152–63.PubMedCrossRef Janknegt R, van der Kuy A, Declerck G, et al. Hypnotics: drug selection by means of the system of objectified judgement analysis (SOJA) method. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(2): 152–63.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brodie MJ, Kwan P. The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice. CNS Drugs 2001; 15(1): 1–12.PubMedCrossRef Brodie MJ, Kwan P. The star systems: overview and use in determining antiepileptic drug choice. CNS Drugs 2001; 15(1): 1–12.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2534–44.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA 2003; 289(19): 2534–44.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55(7): 728–35.PubMedCrossRef Gregoire JP, Moisan J, Guibert R, et al. Determinants of discontinuation of new courses of antihypertensive medications. J Clin Epidemiol 2002; 55(7): 728–35.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20(4): 671–81.PubMedCrossRef Bloom BS. Continuation of initial antihypertensive medication after 1 year of therapy. Clin Ther 1998; 20(4): 671–81.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.CrossRef Hwang CL, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitworth JA. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92.PubMedCrossRef Whitworth JA. 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens 2003; 21(11): 1983–92.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiersma T, Walma EP, Thomas S, et al. Summary of the practice guideline ‘Hypertension’ (third division) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004 May 8; 148(19): 923–31.PubMed Wiersma T, Walma EP, Thomas S, et al. Summary of the practice guideline ‘Hypertension’ (third division) from the Dutch College of General Practitioners [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004 May 8; 148(19): 923–31.PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. on behalf of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec; 42(6): 1206–52. Epub 2003 Dec 1.PubMedCrossRef Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. on behalf of Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension 2003 Dec; 42(6): 1206–52. Epub 2003 Dec 1.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277(9): 739–45.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 277(9): 739–45.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low-dose diuretic therapies. JAMA 2004; 292(1): 43–4.PubMedCrossRef Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD. Meta-analysis of health outcomes of chlorthalidone-based vs nonchlorthalidone-based low-dose diuretic therapies. JAMA 2004; 292(1): 43–4.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbiano L, Martelli A, Brambilla G. Discrepancies between use of antihypertensive drugs and guidelines indications: pharmacoeconomic implications. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19(10): 819–22.PubMedCrossRef Robbiano L, Martelli A, Brambilla G. Discrepancies between use of antihypertensive drugs and guidelines indications: pharmacoeconomic implications. J Hum Hypertens 2005; 19(10): 819–22.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Steinman MA, Fischer MA, Shlipak MG, et al. Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines. Am J Med 2004; 117(10): 747–54.PubMedCrossRef Steinman MA, Fischer MA, Shlipak MG, et al. Clinician awareness of adherence to hypertension guidelines. Am J Med 2004; 117(10): 747–54.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1995: 28–53. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 1995: 28–53.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16(8): 569–75.PubMedCrossRef Hasford J, Mimran A, Simons WR. A population-based European cohort study of persistence in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16(8): 569–75.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364(9446): 1684–9.PubMedCrossRef Carlberg B, Samuelsson O, Lindholm LH. Atenolol in hypertension: is it a wise choice? Lancet 2004; 364(9446): 1684–9.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 366(9496): 1545–53.PubMedCrossRef Lindholm LH, Carlberg B, Samuelsson O. Should beta blockers remain first choice in the treatment of primary hypertension? A meta-analysis. Lancet 2005; 366(9496): 1545–53.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9426): 2022–31.PubMedCrossRef Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: the VALUE randomised trial. Lancet 2004; 363(9426): 2022–31.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003.PubMedCrossRef Dahlof B, Devereux RB, Kjeldsen SE, et al. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction in hypertension study (LIFE): a randomised trial against atenolol. Lancet 2002; 359(9311): 995–1003.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Metadaten
Titel
A Comparison of Two Multiple-Characteristic Decision-Making Models for the Comparison of Antihypertensive Drug Classes
Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)
verfasst von
Dr Boris L. G. Van Wijk
Olaf H. Klungel
Eibert R. Heerdink
Anthonius de Boer
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2006
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Ausgabe 4/2006
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Elektronische ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/00129784-200606040-00005

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2006

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 4/2006 Zur Ausgabe

Adis Drug Evaluation

Reteplase

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Schlechtere Vorhofflimmern-Prognose bei kleinem linken Ventrikel

17.05.2024 Vorhofflimmern Nachrichten

Nicht nur ein vergrößerter, sondern auch ein kleiner linker Ventrikel ist bei Vorhofflimmern mit einer erhöhten Komplikationsrate assoziiert. Der Zusammenhang besteht nach Daten aus China unabhängig von anderen Risikofaktoren.

Semaglutid bei Herzinsuffizienz: Wie erklärt sich die Wirksamkeit?

17.05.2024 Herzinsuffizienz Nachrichten

Bei adipösen Patienten mit Herzinsuffizienz des HFpEF-Phänotyps ist Semaglutid von symptomatischem Nutzen. Resultiert dieser Benefit allein aus der Gewichtsreduktion oder auch aus spezifischen Effekten auf die Herzinsuffizienz-Pathogenese? Eine neue Analyse gibt Aufschluss.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.