Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2020

23.12.2019 | Original Article

Long-term oncologic outcome and risk factors after conversion in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

verfasst von: Sung Chul Lee, Jung Wook Huh, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes after laparoscopic converted surgery for patients with colon cancer.

Methods

Retrospective database of consecutive curative-intent laparoscopic-assisted surgery for primary stage I–III colon cancer was reviewed from 2000 to 2013. The patients were divided into non-conversion and conversion groups. The patient characters, operative features, perioperative parameters, pathologic features, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

Results

A total of 4010 patients were included in the study: 3929 in the non-conversion group and 81 (2%) in the conversion group. The median follow-up period was 63.9 months. There were significant differences in age, preoperative clinical T-stage, and tumor size between the groups. In operative details between the two groups, there were also significant differences in access to surgery, tumor location, cancer obstruction, cancer perforation, and estimated blood loss (P < 0.001). The two most common reasons for conversion were adhesion (n = 37, 46%) and bleeding (n = 21, 26%). Multivariate analysis showed that conversion was an independent predictor of both overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P = 0.003). The 5-year OS rate of the conversion group was 79.6%, and that of the non-conversion group was 96.2% (P < 0.001). The multivariate predictors of conversion were age, type of surgery, cancer obstruction, cancer perforation, and clinical T-stage.

Conclusion

Conversion to open surgery may affect patient survival and recurrence after laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colon cancer. Our data suggest that conversion is associated with poor outcomes, but we should not hesitate to convert it to patients who have difficulty in laparoscopic surgery.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Stocchi L, Remzi FH (2016) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery? Tech Coloproctol 20:845–851CrossRef Gorgun E, Benlice C, Abbas MA, Stocchi L, Remzi FH (2016) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: are short-term outcomes worse than with open surgery? Tech Coloproctol 20:845–851CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Perez A, de’Angelis N (2018) Oncologic results of conventional laparoscopic TME: is the intramesorectal plane really acceptable? Tech Coloproctol 22:831–834CrossRef Martinez-Perez A, de’Angelis N (2018) Oncologic results of conventional laparoscopic TME: is the intramesorectal plane really acceptable? Tech Coloproctol 22:831–834CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29:3443–3453CrossRef Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJ (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29:3443–3453CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC, Bonjer HJ (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Negoi I, Hostiuc S, Negoi RI, Beuran M (2017) Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 9:475–491CrossRef Negoi I, Hostiuc S, Negoi RI, Beuran M (2017) Laparoscopic vs open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 9:475–491CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372:1324–1332CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat (2018) The impact of conversion on the risk of major complication following laparoscopic colonic surgery: an international, multicentre prospective audit. Colorectal Dis 20 Suppl 6:69–89 (2018) The impact of conversion on the risk of major complication following laparoscopic colonic surgery: an international, multicentre prospective audit. Colorectal Dis 20 Suppl 6:69–89
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Scheidbach H, Garlipp B, Oberlander H, Adolf D, Kockerling F, Lippert H (2011) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: impact on short- and long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:923–927CrossRef Scheidbach H, Garlipp B, Oberlander H, Adolf D, Kockerling F, Lippert H (2011) Conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: impact on short- and long-term outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 21:923–927CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu B, Wang W, Hao G, Song G (2018) Effect of cancer characteristics and oncological outcomes associated with laparoscopic colorectal resection converted to open surgery: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e13317CrossRef Wu B, Wang W, Hao G, Song G (2018) Effect of cancer characteristics and oncological outcomes associated with laparoscopic colorectal resection converted to open surgery: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e13317CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yerokun BA, Adam MA, Sun Z, Kim J, Sprinkle S, Migaly J, Mantyh CR (2016) Does conversion in laparoscopic colectomy portend an inferior oncologic outcome? Results from 104,400 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1042–1048CrossRef Yerokun BA, Adam MA, Sun Z, Kim J, Sprinkle S, Migaly J, Mantyh CR (2016) Does conversion in laparoscopic colectomy portend an inferior oncologic outcome? Results from 104,400 patients. J Gastrointest Surg 20:1042–1048CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix ME, Furnee EJ, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2016) Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: what is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival? World J Gastroenterol 22:8304–8313CrossRef Allaix ME, Furnee EJ, Mistrangelo M, Arezzo A, Morino M (2016) Conversion of laparoscopic colorectal resection for cancer: what is the impact on short-term outcomes and survival? World J Gastroenterol 22:8304–8313CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yun JA, Yun SH, Park YA, Huh JW, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY (2016) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colon cancer. Ann Surg 263:973–978CrossRef Yun JA, Yun SH, Park YA, Huh JW, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY (2016) Oncologic outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopy for colon cancer. Ann Surg 263:973–978CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pyo DH, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK (2016) A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 30:2449–2456CrossRef Pyo DH, Huh JW, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK (2016) A comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: a propensity score analysis. Surg Endosc 30:2449–2456CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh BY, Park YA, Huh JW, Yun SH, Kim HC, Chun HK, Kim SH, Ha SY, Lee WY, Cho YB (2018) Prognostic impact of tumor-budding grade in stages 1-3 colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:204–211CrossRef Oh BY, Park YA, Huh JW, Yun SH, Kim HC, Chun HK, Kim SH, Ha SY, Lee WY, Cho YB (2018) Prognostic impact of tumor-budding grade in stages 1-3 colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:204–211CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Allaix ME, Furnee E, Esposito L, Mistrangelo M, Rebecchi F, Arezzo A, Morino M (2018) Analysis of early and long-term oncologic outcomes after converted laparoscopic resection compared to primary open surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg 42:3405–3414CrossRef Allaix ME, Furnee E, Esposito L, Mistrangelo M, Rebecchi F, Arezzo A, Morino M (2018) Analysis of early and long-term oncologic outcomes after converted laparoscopic resection compared to primary open surgery for rectal cancer. World J Surg 42:3405–3414CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRef Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, Nam BH, Choi HS, Kim DW, Lim SB, Lee TG, Kim DY, Kim JS, Chang HJ, Lee HS, Kim SY, Jung KH, Hong YS, Kim JH, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Oh JH (2010) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637–645CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat White I, Greenberg R, Itah R, Inbar R, Schneebaum S, Avital S (2011) Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer. JSLS 15:182–187CrossRef White I, Greenberg R, Itah R, Inbar R, Schneebaum S, Avital S (2011) Impact of conversion on short and long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer. JSLS 15:182–187CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrucciani N, Memeo R, Genova P, Le Roy B, Courtot L, Voron T, Aprodu R, Tabchouri N, Saleh NB, Berger A, Ouaissi M, Pezet D, Mutter D, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N (2019) Impact of conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery in patients with right colon cancer. Am Surg 85:177–182PubMed Petrucciani N, Memeo R, Genova P, Le Roy B, Courtot L, Voron T, Aprodu R, Tabchouri N, Saleh NB, Berger A, Ouaissi M, Pezet D, Mutter D, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N (2019) Impact of conversion from laparoscopy to open surgery in patients with right colon cancer. Am Surg 85:177–182PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller DS, Khorgami Z, Swendseid B, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach. Surg Endosc 28:1940–1948CrossRef Keller DS, Khorgami Z, Swendseid B, Champagne BJ, Reynolds HL Jr, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2014) Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach. Surg Endosc 28:1940–1948CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu KC, Cone MM, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Herzig DO (2011) Laparoscopic converted to open colectomy: predictors and outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample. Am J Surg 201:634–639CrossRef Lu KC, Cone MM, Diggs BS, Rea JD, Herzig DO (2011) Laparoscopic converted to open colectomy: predictors and outcomes from the nationwide inpatient sample. Am J Surg 201:634–639CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Long-term oncologic outcome and risk factors after conversion in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer
verfasst von
Sung Chul Lee
Jung Wook Huh
Woo Yong Lee
Seong Hyeon Yun
Hee Cheol Kim
Yong Beom Cho
Yoon Ah Park
Jung Kyong Shin
Publikationsdatum
23.12.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03489-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 3/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.