Skip to main content

01.12.2018 | Lungenkarzinome | Case report | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

BMC Cancer 1/2018

Efficacy and safety of everolimus treatment in a hemodialysis patient with metastatic atypical bronchial carcinoid: case report and literature review

BMC Cancer > Ausgabe 1/2018
M. P. Brizzi, A. La Salvia, M. Tampellini, C. Sonetto, M. Volante, G. V. Scagliotti
Computed tomography
End-stage renal disease
Grade 1
Neuroendocrine tumor
Neuroendocrine tumors
UICC pathological TNM staging system


In two phase III trials everolimus has been shown to be active against neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arising from the lung [ 1, 2]. Its tolerability in lung NET patients with concomitant severe renal insufficiency has never been reported. Here we describe the case of a hemodialysis patient with metastatic atypical bronchial carcinoid treated with everolimus.

Case presentation

In February 2011, a 47-year-old white male patient underwent right lung lobectomy for resection of an atypical bronchial carcinoid (pT1pN2). His medical history was significant for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) secondary to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis requiring iterative hemodialysis. In September 2011 a right hepatectomy was performed due to liver metastases; metastatic disease progressed to liver and bone over the next 17 months. Monthly administration of intramuscular Lanreotide 120 mg was initiated and continued for 1 year. In March 2014 further disease progression was noted and oral everolimus was initiated at a dose of 10 mg/day, then reduced to 5 mg/day 1 month later due to persistent grade II mucositis. No grade III-IV toxicities occurred. A computed tomography (CT) scan taken 3 months later showed stabilization of disease. Everolimus therapy was discontinued in November 2014, after a 9-month course of treatment, because of hepatic and bone disease progression. Somatostatin analogue therapy was continued throughout. A CT scan taken 6 months later revealed progression of liver disease and development of peritoneal metastases, for which 5 cycles of chemotherapy with temozolomide were administered from April to August 2015. Liver metastases and peritoneal metastases progressed, and oral metronomic chemotherapy with capecitabine was initiated in November 2015. The patient died in January 2016 due to disease progression.

Discussion and conclusions

Several therapeutic options are available for front-line treatment of metastatic bronchial carcinoids, including somatostatin analogues, chemotherapy, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy [ 3].
However, comorbidities such as renal failure can limit or even preclude such treatments [ 4].
Unfortunately, there are no established guidelines for the administration of chemotherapeutic or target agents in hemodialysis patients [ 5]. The prevalence of renal insufficiency in cancer patients is growing [ 6], making observations in any tumor setting important.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a hemodialysis patient with metastatic atypical bronchial carcinoid treated with everolimus. In the one case of a hemodialysis patient with metastatic ileal well differentiated NET (G1) described so far, disease stabilization was achieved without any adverse effects [ 7].
Clinical trials investigating everolimus activity have excluded ESRD patients because the condition is thought to alter drug pharmacokinetics. Indeed, drug clearance may be different in hemodialysis patients, increasing the risk of overdosage and higher toxicities [ 8], or it may be more rapid and thus reduce drug efficacy. Recent reports have documented that everolimus pharmacokinetics is not altered by hemodialysis in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer [ 913], probably owing to the absence of diffusion of everolimus through commonly used dialysis membranes and in the dialysate fluid (Table  1). Another explanation for the unchanged tolerability profile of everolimus in patients with renal insufficiency is that the drug is predominantly metabolized by the liver and eliminated in the bile [ 14].
Table 1
Everolimus in the treatment of hemodialysis patients with metastatic renal cell carcinomas
Study description
No. of patients included
No. of prior regimen
Everolimus dosage
Best responses
Duration of response
Thiery-Vuillemin A et al. [ 9]
Case reports
1; 1
5 mg
Grade II asthenia, diarrhea and mucositis; grade III hyperglycemia
Syrios J et al. [ 10]
Case reports
1; 1
10 mg
4 mo; 40 mo
Well tolerated
Adytia V et al. [ 11]
Single institution experience
10 mg; 1 dosage reduction to 5 mg
Median duration of therapy 1.9 mo (0.4–17)
5 patients: well tolerated, 1 patient: pneumonitis
Czarnecka AM et al. [ 12]
Single institution experience
10 mg
4 mo
Well tolerated
Omae K et al. [ 13]
Single institution experience
Median duration of therapy 6.7 mo
Grade II rash, diarrhea, pneumonitis, and mucositis
Abbreviations: NA Not available, SD Stable disease, PD Progression of disease, mo Months
Moreover, repeated surgery for multiple renal cell carcinoma in patients with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome may lead to ESRD in up to 25% of cases [ 15]. In these young patients, pancreatic NETs occurrence is frequent. Treatment with everolimus may be considered safe in this patient setting. Everolimus therapy is feasible in hemodialysis patients with metastatic bronchial carcinoid. Its observed efficacy and tolerability profile are similar to those reported in patients with normal renal function. To confirm the clinical features of everolimus in NET patients undergoing hemodialysis, data collection from single case or case series is highly envisioned. This will remove any concern about treating this rare patient subgroup with an active treatment allowing their inclusion in prospective trials.




This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Patient written informed consent has been obtained to partecipate. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Consent for pubblication

Patient written informed consent has been obtained for pubblication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Cancer 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Passend zum Thema


19.04.2021 | Onlineartikel

Thromboseprophylaxe bei GI-Tumoren: Erstmal daran denken

Obere gastrointestinale Tumoren, allen voran das Pankreaskarzinom aber auch Ösophagus- und Magenkarzinome, gehen oft mit Thromboembolien einher. Als internistischer Onkologe erläutert Prof. Dr. Ralf Hofheinz, Mannheim, welche antikoagulatorischen Maßnahmen bei der stationären Behandlung und im ambulanten Setting betroffener Patienten durchzuführen sind. Dabei berücksichtigt er das besondere Blutungsrisiko genauso wie mögliche Arzneimittelinteraktionen. 


Publikation: Individuelles Thrombosemanagement bei „3G“-Tumoren

Bei Patienten mit gastrointestinalen, genito-urologischen und gynäkologischen Tumoren („3G“) besteht unter therapeutischer Antikoagulation ein im Vergleich zu anderen Krebsarten deutlich erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko. Wie diese Risiken einzuordnen sind und wie in der Praxis damit umgegangen wird, diskutierten Onkologen und Gerinnungsexperten bei der 65. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Thrombose- und Hämostaseforschung (GTH).


Management von Thromboembolien bei Krebspatienten

Die Thromboembolie ist neben Infektionen die zweithäufigste Todesursache bei Krebspatienten. Die Behandlung der CAT (cancer associated thrombosis) ist komplex und orientiert sich am individuellen Patienten. Angesichts einer Vielzahl zur Verfügung stehender medikamentöser Behandlungsoptionen finden Sie hier Video-Experteninterviews, Sonderpublikationen und aktuelle Behandlungsalgorithmen zur Therapieentscheidung auf Basis von Expertenempfehlungen.

Passend zum Thema


EGFRm+ NSCLC: Leitliniengerecht behandeln

Sowohl klinische als auch Registerdaten zur Erstlinientherapie des EGFRm+ NSCLC zeigen hohe Patientenverluste von der Erst- zur Zweitlinie. Deshalb sollte die effektivste Therapie initial eingesetzt werden. Als Folgetherapien stehen neue aber auch etablierte Therapiemöglichkeiten zur Verfügung.


„Wir haben einen neuen Standard, der überzeugt“

Dank moderner zielgerichteter Therapieansätze hat sich die Prognose von Patienten mit EGFRm NSCLC in den letzten Jahren deutlich verbessert. Dies zeigen auch aktuelle OS-Daten vom ESMO-Kongress. Über deren Bedeutung für die Behandlung dieser Patienten sprachen wir mit Prof. Wehler, Homburg.


Therapie des EGFRm NSCLC Up2Date

Ein Tyrosinkinaseinhibitor (TKI) kann neue Perspektiven für die Erstlinienbehandlung des fortgeschrittenen oder metastasierten EGFRm NSCLC eröffnen. Mehr zur Wirksamkeit sowie Experten-Meinungen zum Potenzial eines TKI finden Sie hier auf dem Content Hub von AstraZeneca.

Passend zum Thema


RCT und RWE: Datenlage beim HR+/HER2- Brustkrebs

Randomisierte klinische Studien (RCT) sind der Goldstandard zur Beurteilung von Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit eines Wirkstoffs [1]. Zur Klasse der CDK4/6-Inhibitoren existiert bereits eine breite Basis klinischer Studiendaten, aber auch Real World Evidence (RWE) gewinnt immer mehr an Bedeutung [2-9].