Maintenance of certification for radiologists: an overview of European countries

Radiologists have to undergo intensive training and assessment in order to get accredited by pertinent governing bodies [1]. In Europe, radiology training takes on average 5 years (range 2–6 years), whereas subspecialty fellowship training is offered in just over half of European countries [1]. The ESR has defined the training requirements for trainees in radiology [2]. In 2011, the European Society of Radiology (ESR) created the European Diploma in Radiology (EDiR), which serves the standardisation and accreditation of radiologists across European borders [3, 4]. From the times of Hippocrates, medical doctors have taken oaths to keep their knowledge and skills up-to-date [5]. The importance of keeping up with knowledge and new developments is self-evident to maintain an adequate level of patient care. As progress in medicine becomes ever faster, the necessity to update ones knowledge is even greater [5]. This especially holds true for radiology, where new knowledge is being developed at an increasingly rapid rate owing to technological advances [6, 7]. The process of continuing medical education (CME) is a part of every physician’s professional growth, development, and lifelong learning [8, 9]. It aids the radiologist in keeping current with new techniques, procedures, and information [8]. To our knowledge, however, it is not clear yet whether the CME requirements for radiologists to keep up their certification are equal across Europe. Equal CME requirements would be desirable for uniform cross-border quality of radiology and because of the fundamental principle of free movement of workers in the European Union (EU) [10]. Therefore, the purpose of our study was to determine the maintenance of certification requirements for radiologists in different European countries.

Ethics committee approval was not applicable for this study. This study was driven by personal interest and not an ESR initiative. The authors who analysed and interpreted the data (R.M.K. and T.C.K.) had no conflicts of interest with regard to this study.

Forty-six European countries were contacted. Contact email addresses of Kyrgyzstan and Moldova were not available. Responses were received from 37/46 national radiological societies of European countries (80% response rate) (Fig. 1), which were included in the analyses. An overview of the responses is displayed in Table 1. Twenty-two of 37 responding countries (59%) reported mandatory requirements to maintain a radiologist’s license to practise. Accordingly, 15 of 37 responding countries (41%) did not report mandatory requirements. The median license period was 5 years (range 1–7). The median required number of CME points per year was 40 (range 8–57.6, interquartile range 30). Eight countries reported additional requirements, including practising clinical radiology, attending quality meeting/clinical audit, and attending additional courses (such as radiation safety training and advanced medical training course) (Table 1).

Our overview shows that there is a wide variation with respect to requirements to maintain a radiologist’s license to practise: in 22 of 37 responding European countries, radiologists are required to obtain at least 8 up to 50 (median 40) CME credits per year, whereas in other European countries, radiologists currently keep their license for life without any mandatory CME requirements. Remarkably, such a considerable heterogeneity with regard to certification maintenance has also been reported for other medical specialties [13‐16].

In 2006, Bresolin et al. [17] conducted a survey on maintenance of certification in radiology among 34 countries worldwide [17]. At that time, CME was requested for radiologists in 13 of 24 responding countries (54%) and requested under certain circumstances in another four countries (17%) [17]. Interestingly, one third of countries failure to meet the requested CME requirements would not lead to loss of licensure or certification [17]. It should be noted, though, that there is still no evidence of a causative link between improved health care outcomes and either mandatory or voluntary recertification systems [15]. It is difficult to compare the study by Bresolin et al. [17] to our current study, because Bresolin et al. [17] did not report how many CME credits were required per country and because they included responses of only 7 European countries (Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Romania, Spain, and the UK) [17]. Nevertheless, our study shows that Belgium, Germany, Ireland, and the UK currently have mandatory requirements (minimum number CME credits to be obtained and/or participation in quality improvement types of programs). This suggests a trend towards an increased number of European countries with official requirements to maintain a radiologist’s license to practise. Accordingly, some Scandinavian countries also responded that they are planning to formalise CME requirements.

Europe can be compared to the USA in terms of size: both consist of multiple countries (Europe) or states (USA). However, the requirements for maintenance of certification for radiologists in the United States of America (USA) are more uniform than among European countries. Although every state medical board has slightly different CME requirements [18], the umbrella organisation for radiologists in the USA, the American Board of Radiology (ABR), requires radiologists to attain 75 CME credits every 3 years to satisfy maintenance of certification. At least 25 of these 75 CME credits must be from self-assessment CME activities, which are primarily podium presentations with a post-session assessment instrument [19]. In addition, besides having a valid and unrestricted licensure in all states, radiologists should pass the ABR’s online longitudinal assessment and complete at least one practice quality improvement project or participatory quality improvement activity every 3 years [19]. All the provinces in Canada have equal CME requirements for radiologists [20], which is also the case in Oceania [21]. More uniformity in Europe would be desirable for uniform radiology quality and professional mobility of radiologists across European countries. However, the current systems of licensing and registration of medical doctors within the EU, which are controlled by national regulatory bodies, are diverse and complex [13‐16]. The ESR could, similar to the EDiR initiative [3, 4], play a future leading role to achieve uniformity in maintenance of certification for radiologists across Europe.

Our study has some potential limitations. First, we did not receive a response from all countries. However, the response rate of 80% can be considered high [22, 23]. Moreover, even a 100% response rate would not change the main result. Second, our study presents a current overview of national regulations, which may change in the near future. Third, 8 European countries reported additional requirements besides CME, including practicing clinical radiology, attending quality meeting/clinical audit, and attending additional courses (such as radiation safety training and advanced medical training course), as listed in Table 1. However, it was not possible to provide comparable summary measures of these additional non-CME requirements because of their heterogeneous nature. Nevertheless, they should be taken into account when comparing maintenance of certification requirements among different countries.

In conclusion, our overview shows that there is considerable heterogeneity across European countries regarding the maintenance of certification requirements for radiologists. More homogeneity is desired for uniform quality assurance and professional mobility of radiologists across Europe. The data from our overview may be used to establish a benchmark for national societies who issue maintenance of licensure requirements for radiologists.