Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2021

29.06.2020 | Hepatobiliary Tumors

Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons’ Learning Curve

verfasst von: Jonathan Geograpo Navarro, MD, Incheon Kang, MD, Seoung Yoon Rho, MD, Gi Hong Choi, MD, PhD, Dai Hoon Han, MD, PhD, Kyung Sik Kim, MD, PhD, Jin Sub Choi, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Surgical complications for surgeons still in the learning phase of major laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have been frequently observed. We aimed to compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery based on the surgeons’ learning curve for LLR after propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of all patients with a histologic diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent major hepatectomy between January 2013 and December 2018. A PSM analysis was used to compare the groups of patients who underwent LLR and open major liver resection (OLR) before and after the learning curve was maximized.

Results

Among 405 patients, 106 underwent LLR and 299 underwent OLR. The learning curve was maximized after 42 cases. Compared with OLR, LLR had more liver-related injury and grade III or higher complications during the learning phase. The LLR group had less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements, and fewer liver-related complications during the ‘experienced’ phase. Hospital stay was significantly shorter during and after maximization of the learning curve in LLR compared with OLR. Operative time was comparable in the two phases. Overall, LLR was associated with less blood loss, fewer complications, and shorter hospital stay compared with open surgery. There was no significant difference in long-term survival outcomes between the two groups.

Conclusions

LLR had a higher incidence of liver-related complications during the surgeon’s learning phase compared with OLR. This association was significantly diminished with surgeon experience. Overall perioperative outcomes such as estimated blood loss, surgical complications, and hospital stay remained better for LLR compared with OLR.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–841.CrossRef Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:831–841.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825–830.CrossRef Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250:825–830.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261:619–629.PubMed Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg. 2015;261:619–629.PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg. 2016;263:761–777.CrossRef Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection: 9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg. 2016;263:761–777.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown KM, Geller DA. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1065–1071.CrossRef Brown KM, Geller DA. What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1065–1071.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berardi G, Aghayan D, Fretland AA, et al. Multicentre analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments. Br J Surg. 2019;106(11):1512–1522.CrossRef Berardi G, Aghayan D, Fretland AA, et al. Multicentre analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments. Br J Surg. 2019;106(11):1512–1522.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:923–928.CrossRef van der Poel MJ, Besselink MG, Cipriani F, et al. Outcome and learning curve in 159 consecutive patients undergoing total laparoscopic hemihepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2016;151:923–928.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland AA, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2238 patients from 4 European specialized centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:639–649.CrossRef Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland AA, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2238 patients from 4 European specialized centers. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225:639–649.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Thornblade LW, Shi X, Ruiz A, Flum DR, Park JO. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery and conventional approaches for major or challenging hepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:851–861.CrossRef Thornblade LW, Shi X, Ruiz A, Flum DR, Park JO. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive surgery and conventional approaches for major or challenging hepatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;224:851–861.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Guro H, Cho JY, Han HS, et al. Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:31–35.CrossRef Guro H, Cho JY, Han HS, et al. Outcomes of major laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol. 2018;27:31–35.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267:199–207.CrossRef Fretland AA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjornelv GMW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2018;267:199–207.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–355.CrossRef Strasberg SM. Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12:351–355.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Coles SR, Besselink MG, Serin KR, et al. Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3190–3195.CrossRef Coles SR, Besselink MG, Serin KR, et al. Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc 2015;29:3190–3195.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Martinez-Cecilia D, Fontana M, Siddiqi NN, Halls M, Barbaro S, Abu-Hilal M. Laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resections in segment 8: techniques for a demanding and infrequent procedure. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2012–2019.CrossRef Martinez-Cecilia D, Fontana M, Siddiqi NN, Halls M, Barbaro S, Abu-Hilal M. Laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resections in segment 8: techniques for a demanding and infrequent procedure. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2012–2019.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH, Choi JS. Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2015;29:387–397.CrossRef Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH, Choi JS. Laparoscopic liver resection using a rubber band retraction technique: usefulness and perioperative outcome in 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2015;29:387–397.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gombay E, Hussein AA, Steiner SH. Monitoring binary outcomes using risk-adjusted charts: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2011;30:2815–2826.CrossRef Gombay E, Hussein AA, Steiner SH. Monitoring binary outcomes using risk-adjusted charts: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2011;30:2815–2826.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, et al. Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2821–2831.CrossRef Park EJ, Kim CW, Cho MS, et al. Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison. Surg Endosc 2014;28:2821–2831.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiangfei M, Yinzhe X, Yingwei P, Shichun L, Weidong D. Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2396–2418.CrossRef Xiangfei M, Yinzhe X, Yingwei P, Shichun L, Weidong D. Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2396–2418.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ciria R, Gomez-Luque I, Ocana S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: updated results from the European guidelines meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:252–263.CrossRef Ciria R, Gomez-Luque I, Ocana S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: updated results from the European guidelines meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26:252–263.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shang HT, Bao JH, Zhang XB, Wang HB, Zhang HT, Li ZL. Comparison of clinical efficacy and complications between laparoscopic partial and open partial hepatectomy for liver carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29:225–232.CrossRef Shang HT, Bao JH, Zhang XB, Wang HB, Zhang HT, Li ZL. Comparison of clinical efficacy and complications between laparoscopic partial and open partial hepatectomy for liver carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019;29:225–232.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai W, Liu Z, Xiao Y, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3550–3557.CrossRef Cai W, Liu Z, Xiao Y, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(11):3550–3557.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009;250:772–782.CrossRef Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg. 2009;250:772–782.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH, Kwon SW, Choi JS. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: toward protocolization and simplification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:554–555.CrossRef Choi SH, Choi GH, Han DH, Kwon SW, Choi JS. Laparoscopic right hepatectomy: toward protocolization and simplification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:554–555.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Aldrighetti L, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Ratti F. A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures. Updates Surg. 2019;71:273–283.CrossRef Aldrighetti L, Cipriani F, Fiorentini G, Catena M, Paganelli M, Ratti F. A stepwise learning curve to define the standard for technical improvement in laparoscopic liver resections: complexity-based analysis in 1032 procedures. Updates Surg. 2019;71:273–283.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg. 2014;38:3169–3174.CrossRef Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M. Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg. 2014;38:3169–3174.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Guilbaud T, Birnbaum DJ, Berdah S, Farges O, Beyer Berjot L. Learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection, educational value of simulation and training programmes: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2019;43:2710–2719.CrossRef Guilbaud T, Birnbaum DJ, Berdah S, Farges O, Beyer Berjot L. Learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection, educational value of simulation and training programmes: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2019;43:2710–2719.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, et al. Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases. Ann Surg. 2018;268:1051–1057.CrossRef Halls MC, Cipriani F, Berardi G, et al. Conversion for unfavorable intraoperative events results in significantly worse outcomes during laparoscopic liver resection: lessons learned from a multicenter review of 2861 cases. Ann Surg. 2018;268:1051–1057.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2015;102:796–804.CrossRef Nomi T, Fuks D, Kawaguchi Y, Mal F, Nakajima Y, Gayet B. Learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy. Br J Surg 2015;102:796–804.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:131–136.CrossRef Kluger MD, Vigano L, Barroso R, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:131–136.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Yamada S, Shimada M, Imura S, et al. Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2623–2629.CrossRef Yamada S, Shimada M, Imura S, et al. Effective stepwise training and procedure standardization for young surgeons to perform laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:2623–2629.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Gani F, Ejaz A, Dillhoff M, et al. A national assessment of the utilization, quality and cost of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(10):1327–1335.CrossRef Gani F, Ejaz A, Dillhoff M, et al. A national assessment of the utilization, quality and cost of laparoscopic liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2019;21(10):1327–1335.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Franken C, Lau B, Putchakayala K, DiFronzo LA. Comparison of short-term outcomes in laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:941–946.CrossRef Franken C, Lau B, Putchakayala K, DiFronzo LA. Comparison of short-term outcomes in laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:941–946.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Heinrich S, Tripke V, Huber T, Mittler J, Lang H. A match-pair analysis of open versus laparoscopic liver surgery. JSLS. 2017;21:e2017.00061. Heinrich S, Tripke V, Huber T, Mittler J, Lang H. A match-pair analysis of open versus laparoscopic liver surgery. JSLS. 2017;21:e2017.00061.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery. 2018;163:985–995.CrossRef Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, et al. Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery. 2018;163:985–995.CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg. 2018;268:11–18.CrossRef Abu Hilal M, Aldrighetti L, Dagher I, et al. The southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg. 2018;268:11–18.CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Navarro JG, Kang CM. Pitfalls for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: need for a stepwise approach. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:254–268.CrossRef Navarro JG, Kang CM. Pitfalls for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: need for a stepwise approach. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3:254–268.CrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Yoon YI, Kim KH, Cho HD, et al. Long-term perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):796–805.CrossRef Yoon YI, Kim KH, Cho HD, et al. Long-term perioperative outcomes of pure laparoscopic liver resection versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(2):796–805.CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1203–1215.CrossRef Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:1203–1215.CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H, et al. The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg. 2015;67:123–128.CrossRef Ban D, Kudo A, Ito H, et al. The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection. Updates Surg. 2015;67:123–128.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Major Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Based on Surgeons’ Learning Curve
verfasst von
Jonathan Geograpo Navarro, MD
Incheon Kang, MD
Seoung Yoon Rho, MD
Gi Hong Choi, MD, PhD
Dai Hoon Han, MD, PhD
Kyung Sik Kim, MD, PhD
Jin Sub Choi, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
29.06.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08764-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.