Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Häufige urologisch-sexualmedizinische Themen in der Praxis sind das Thema des MMW-Webinars am 5. Juni von 17.30 bis 19 Uhr. Konkret geht es um die Frage, wann bei Harnwegsinfektionen auf Antibiotika verzichtet werden kann, und um ein Update zur Therapie von Libido- und Potenzstörungen des Mannes. Der dritte Vortrag behandelt sexuell übertragbare Krankheiten. Stellen Sie Ihre Fragen an die Experten und sammeln Sie 2 CME-Punkte. Jetzt gleich anmelden!
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Heart Failure Reports
Erschienen in: Current Heart Failure Reports 3/2010

01.09.2010

Minimally Invasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output in the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit

verfasst von: Jamal A. Alhashemi, Maurizio Cecconi, Giorgio della Rocca, Maxime Cannesson, Christoph K. Hofer

Erschienen in: Current Heart Failure Reports | Ausgabe 3/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Cardiac output monitoring in the cardiac surgery patient is standard practice that is traditionally performed using the pulmonary artery catheter. However, over the past 20 years, the value of pulmonary artery catheters has been challenged, with some authors suggesting that its use might be not only unnecessary but also harmful. New minimally invasive devices that measure cardiac output have become available. In this paper, we review their operative principles, limitations, and utility in an integrated approach that could potentially change patients’ outcome. However, it is now clear that it is how the monitor is used (ie, the protocol or therapy associated with its use, or its lack thereof), and not the monitor per se, that should be questioned when a patient’s outcome is being evaluated.
Literatur
1.
Connors AF Jr, Speroff T, Dawson NV, et al.: The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators. JAMA 1996, 276:889–897.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Harvey S, Young D, Brampton W, et al.: Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006, 3:CD003408.PubMed
3.
Shoemaker WC, Appel PL, Kram HB, et al.: Prospective trial of supranormal values of survivors as therapeutic goals in high-risk surgical patients. Chest 1988, 94:1176–1186.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al.: Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001, 345:1368–1377.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Hamzaoui O, Monnet X, Richard C, et al.: Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period. Crit Care Med 2008, 36:434–440.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Hofer CK, Button D, Weibel L, et al.: Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2010, 24:257–264.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Della Rocca G, Costa MG, Coccia C, et al.: Cardiac output monitoring: aortic transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis agree with standard thermodilution methods in patients undergoing lung transplantation. Can J Anaesth 2003, 50:707–711.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Cecconi M, Dawson D, Grounds RM, Rhodes A: Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique. Intensive Care Med 2009, 35:498–504.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Cecconi M, Fawcett J, Grounds RM, Rhodes A: A prospective study to evaluate the accuracy of pulse power analysis to monitor cardiac output in critically ill patients. BMC Anesthesiol 2008, 8:3.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Yamashita K, Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, et al.: Cardiac output by PulseCO is not interchangeable with thermodilution in patients undergoing OPCAB. Can J Anaesth 2005, 52:530–534.CrossRefPubMed
11.
• Mayer J, Boldt J, Poland R, et al.: Continuous arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output using the FloTrac/Vigileo: a review and meta-analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2009, 23:401–406. This article is a systematic review of the utility of FloTrac/Vigileo as a noninvasive cardiac output monitoring device. CrossRefPubMed
12.
Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O, et al.: Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2007, 99:329–336.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, et al.: Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007, 24:832–839.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Senn A, Button D, Zollinger A, Hofer CK: Assessment of cardiac output changes using a modified FloTrac/Vigileo algorithm in cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care 2009, 13:R32.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Moxon D, Pinder M, van Heerden PV, Parsons RW: Clinical evaluation of the HemoSonic monitor in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU. Anaesth Intensive Care 2003, 31:408–411.PubMed
16.
Lefrant JY, Bruelle P, Aya AG, et al.: Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24:347–352.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Valtier B, Cholley BP, Belot JP, et al.: Noninvasive monitoring of cardiac output in critically ill patients using transesophageal Doppler. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998, 158:77–83.PubMed
18.
Dark PM, Singer M: The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:2060–2066.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Collins S, Girard F, Boudreault D, et al.: Esophageal Doppler and thermodilution are not interchangeable for determination of cardiac output. Can J Anaesth 2005, 52:978–985.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Hullett B, Gibbs N, Weightman W, et al.: A comparison of CardioQ and thermodilution cardiac output during off-pump coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2003, 17:728–732.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Arora D, Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N: Cardiac output estimation after off-pump coronary artery bypass: a comparison of two different techniques. Ann Card Anaesth 2007, 10:132–136.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P: Measurement of cardiac output with a non-invasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc 2006, 8:309–314.PubMed
23.
Van den Oever HL, Murphy EJ, Christie-Taylor GA: USCOM (Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitors) lacks agreement with thermodilution cardiac output and transoesophageal echocardiography valve measurements. Anaesth Intensive Care 2007, 35:903–910.PubMed
24.
Cotter G, Moshkovitz Y, Kaluski E, et al.: Accurate, noninvasive continuous monitoring of cardiac output by whole-body electrical bioimpedance. Chest 2004, 125:1431–1440.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Doering L, Lum E, Dracup K, Friedman A: Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. Crit Care Med 1995, 23:1667–1673.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Engoren M, Barbee D: Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance, thermodilution, and the Fick method. Am J Crit Care 2005, 14:40–45.PubMed
27.
Gujjar AR, Muralidhar K, Banakal S, et al.: Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method. J Clin Monit Comput 2008, 22:175–180.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Keren H, Burkhoff D, Squara P: Evaluation of a noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring system based on thoracic bioreactance. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007, 293:H583–H589.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Raval NY, Squara P, Cleman M, et al.: Multicenter evaluation of noninvasive cardiac output measurement by bioreactance technique. J Clin Monit Comput 2008, 22:113–119.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Gueret G, Kiss G, Rossignol B, et al.: Cardiac output measurements in off-pump coronary surgery: comparison between NICO and the Swan-Ganz catheter. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006, 23:848–854.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Rocco M, Spadetta G, Morelli A, et al.: A comparative evaluation of thermodilution and partial CO2 rebreathing techniques for cardiac output assessment in critically ill patients during assisted ventilation. Intensive Care Med 2004, 30:82–87.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Tachibana K, Imanaka H, Takeuchi M, et al.: Noninvasive cardiac output measurement using partial carbon dioxide rebreathing is less accurate at settings of reduced minute ventilation and when spontaneous breathing is present. Anesthesiology 2003, 98:830–837.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Nilsson LB, Eldrup N, Berthelsen PG: Lack of agreement between thermodilution and carbon dioxide-rebreathing cardiac output. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2001, 45:680–685.CrossRefPubMed
34.
van Heerden PV, Baker S, Lim SI, et al.: Clinical evaluation of the non-invasive cardiac output (NICO) monitor in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 2000, 28:427–430.PubMed
35.
Boldt J, Lenz M, Kumle B, Papsdorf M: Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey. Intensive Care Med 1998, 24:147–151.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, et al.: Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 2005, 94:748–755.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al.: Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004, 32:691–699.CrossRefPubMed
38.
•• Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al.: Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007, 35:64–68. This paper shows that cardiac filling pressures are poor predictors of fluid responsiveness in septic patients. CrossRefPubMed
39.
Della Rocca G, Costa GM, Coccia C, et al.: Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation. Anesth Analg 2002, 95:835–843.CrossRefPubMed
40.
• Goepfert MS, Reuter DA, Akyol D, et al.: Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33:96–103. This study showed that algorithm-based therapy that optimizes global end-diastolic volume index reduces requirements for vasoactive therapy and shortens ICU stay. CrossRefPubMed
41.
Sakka SG, Klein M, Reinhart K, Meier-Hellmann A: Prognostic value of extravascular lung water in critically ill patients. Chest 2002, 122:2080–2086.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al.: The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009, 108:513–517.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A: Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008, 12:R82.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al.: Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004, 21:132–138.PubMed
45.
•• Monnet X, Teboul JL: Passive leg raising. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:659–663. This paper showed that passive leg raising reliably predicts fluid responsiveness, even in patients with arrhythmias and in those who are spontaneously breathing. CrossRefPubMed
46.
Marx G, Reinhart K: Venous oximetry. Curr Opin Crit Care 2006, 12:263–268.CrossRef
47.
Pearse R, Dawson D, Fawcett J, et al.: Early goal-directed therapy after major surgery reduces complications and duration of hospital stay. A randomised, controlled trial [ISRCTN38797445]. Crit Care 2005, 9:R687–R693.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Pölönen P, Ruokonen E, Hippeläinen M, et al.: A prospective, randomized study of goal-oriented hemodynamic therapy in cardiac surgical patients. Anesth Analg 2000, 90:1052–1059.CrossRefPubMed
49.
Dueck MH, Klimek M, Appenrodt S, et al.: Trends but not individual values of central venous oxygen saturation agree with mixed venous oxygen saturation during varying hemodynamic conditions. Anesthesiology 2005, 103:249–257.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally Invasive Monitoring of Cardiac Output in the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit
verfasst von
Jamal A. Alhashemi
Maurizio Cecconi
Giorgio della Rocca
Maxime Cannesson
Christoph K. Hofer
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2010
Verlag
Current Science Inc.
Erschienen in
Current Heart Failure Reports / Ausgabe 3/2010
Print ISSN: 1546-9530
Elektronische ISSN: 1546-9549
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-010-0019-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2010

Current Heart Failure Reports 3/2010 Zur Ausgabe

ReviewPaper

Managing Beta-blockers in Acute Heart Failure: When to Start and When to Stop?

Invited Commentary

Heart Failure is Preventable

ReviewPaper

Rubbing Salt into Wounds: Hypertonic Saline to Assist with Volume Removal in Heart Failure

ReviewPaper

CD-NP: An Innovative Designer Natriuretic Peptide Activator of Particulate Guanylyl Cyclase Receptors for Cardiorenal Disease

ReviewPaper

Acute Heart Failure With Low Cardiac Output: Can We Develop a Short-term Inotropic Agent That Does Not Increase Adverse Events?

ReviewPaper

Observation Units in the Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes

Neu im Fachgebiet Kardiologie

GLP-1-Agonisten können Fortschreiten diabetischer Retinopathie begünstigen

24.05.2024 Diabetische Retinopathie Nachrichten

Möglicherweise hängt es von der Art der Diabetesmedikamente ab, wie hoch das Risiko der Betroffenen ist, dass sich sehkraftgefährdende Komplikationen verschlimmern.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

„Jeder Fall von plötzlichem Tod muss obduziert werden!“

17.05.2024 Plötzlicher Herztod Nachrichten

Ein signifikanter Anteil der Fälle von plötzlichem Herztod ist genetisch bedingt. Um ihre Verwandten vor diesem Schicksal zu bewahren, sollten jüngere Personen, die plötzlich unerwartet versterben, ausnahmslos einer Autopsie unterzogen werden.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise