Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008

Open Access 01.01.2008

Minimally invasive pediatric surgery: Increasing implementation in daily practice and resident’s training

verfasst von: E. A. te Velde, N. M. A. Bax, S. H. A. J. Tytgat, J. R. de Jong, D. Vieira Travassos, W. L. M. Kramer, D. C. van der Zee

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 1/2008

download
DOWNLOAD
print
DRUCKEN
insite
SUCHEN

Abstract

Background

In 1998, the one-year experience in minimally invasive abdominal surgery in children at a pediatric training center was assessed. Seven years later, we determined the current status of pediatric minimally invasive surgery in daily practice and surgical training.

Methods

A retrospective review was undertaken of all children with intra-abdominal operations performed between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2005.

Results

The type of operations performed ranged from common interventions to demanding laparoscopic procedures. 81% of all abdominal procedures were performed laparoscopically, with a complication rate stable at 6.9%, and conversion rate decreasing from 10% to 7.4%, compared to 1998. There were six new advanced laparoscopic procedures performed in 2005 as compared to 1998. The children in the open operated group were significantly smaller and younger than in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The majority (64.2%) of the laparoscopic procedures were performed by a trainee. There was no difference in the operating times of open versus laparoscopic surgery, or of procedures performed by trainees versus staff surgeons. Laparoscopy by trainees did not have a negative impact on complication or conversion rates.

Conclusions

Laparoscopy is an established approach in abdominal procedures in children, and does not hamper surgical training.

Background

In adults, the known advantages of minimally invasive surgery are improved cosmesis due to smaller incisions, and fewer postoperative ileus and pain, which results in less analgesic use, less respiratory morbidity, shorter hospital stays, and a swift return to preoperative activities [1]. In pediatric surgery, minimally invasive surgery has been introduced at a slower pace, in part because the patients are smaller, the operations are often already performed through small incisions, and many of the conditions that require surgery are rare, and therefore require a longer training period [2]. Davenport stated in 2003 that the majority of procedures in children were still conventional rather than laparoscopic [3]. In addition, in the early 1990s, prudence was widely advocated [4, 5] and it is well known that a surgeon’s experience and learning curve are very important predictors of outcome.
On the other hand, in 1998 we found that of all abdominal surgery performed in our hospital, already as much as 60% had been performed by minimally invasive techniques as opposed to laparotomy, with a conversion rate of 10.1% (mainly appendicitis) and a complication rate of 6.8% [6]. Moreover, as we described earlier, trainees easily learned the laparoscopic pyloromyotomy procedure without any increase in the complication rate [7]. However, it could be speculated that with an increase in laparoscopic procedures, the surgical training of a trainee might be compromised since the procedures are more strenuous than in open surgery and therefore require intensive training.
In this study we retrospectively assessed all consecutive abdominal surgical procedures in 2005. We evaluated the current use of minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in pediatric patients, in order to determine its role in the training of surgical trainees.

Patients and methods

All consecutive children undergoing an abdominal surgical procedure in the Department of Pediatric Surgery of the University Medical Center Utrecht during a period of one year (1 January 2005 to 31 December 2005) were included. All medical data was retrieved from the patients’ files, including gender, age, weight, procedure, emergency or planned, operating surgeon (one surgical resident, two fellows and four staff surgeons), duration of operation, intraoperative surgical and technical problems, conversions, and complications. Well-supervised surgical residents and fellows in pediatric surgery — henceforth referred to as trainees, unless stated otherwise — were distinguished from staff surgeons, and it was noted by whom a procedure was performed. A procedure was defined as an emergency procedure when it was performed within 12 hours after diagnosis. The pyloromyotomies were considered a planned procedure. The postoperative course was reviewed, and complications, reinterventions and time to follow-up were assessed. The type of operation was graded according to its complexity as easy, difficult, or demanding using the grading of Costi et al. for laparoscopic procedures in adults [8], modified for pediatric laparoscopies by Metzelder et al. [9].
For the record, it should be noted that in our department no resections of solid tumors or urologic procedures are performed.
For laparoscopic procedures, a standard open introduction technique of the first port through the inferior umbilical fold was used. Laparoscopy was performed routinely with reusable instruments and devices, mostly 3–5 mm ports (Storz® Tutlingen, Germany). The maximum intra-abdominal pressure was kept at 8 mmHg and the maximum flow at 5 L/min in older children, and at 5 mmHg and 2 L/min in infants. Monopolar electrocautery devices were used. At the end of the operation all port sites were closed by use of a resorbable suture. In laparoscopic-assisted surgery, dissection was performed laparoscopically followed by a small local incision to perform an anastomosis outside of the abdominal cavity.
Statistical analysis was performed using independent sample Mann-Whitney t-test.
Significance was determined by a p value less than 0.05. SPSS (Inc Chicago, Illinois) software package for Windows was used. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation, or median (range).

Results

In total, 231 patients underwent abdominal surgery in 2005, of which 44 (18.9%) were performed via laparotomy and 187 (81%) were performed laparoscopically. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient characteristics
 
Open
Laparosopy
 
Median age (range)
15 (0–25 weeks)
76 weeks (0 days–17 years)
p = 0.001
Under one year of age
30 (68.1%)
89 (48.7%)
 
Under four weeks of age
20 (45.5%)
25 (14.4%)
 
Mean weight, in kg (range)
3.6 (0.76–61)
8.2 (0.76–90)
p < 0.001
As compared to 1998, six new procedures were performed in a minimally invasive fashion in 2005 (n = 14), of which all but one were classified as demanding procedures, and are indicated by an asterisk in Table 3. A trainee was the operating surgeon in 72.7% of the open procedures (Table 2) versus 64.2% in the laparoscopic group (Table 3). The percentage of the laparoscopic procedures classified as difficult and performed by a trainee was 48%.
Table 2.
Indications for laparotomy
Laparotomy
Total number
Number performed by trainees
Number performed by staff surgeons
Easy
  Appendectomy
3
2
1
  CAPD*
3
3
 
Difficult
  Entero-enterostomy/adhesiolysis
10
7
3
  Ventral hernia**
8
5
3
  Resection of the ileum
4
2
2
  Intussusception
3
3
 
  Adhesion
3
3
0
  Gastroschisis closure
3
2
1
  Gastrostomy
1
1
 
  Ileostomy
2
2
 
Demanding
  Subtotal colectomy
1
1
0
  Derotation/adhesiolysis
1
1
 
  Duodenoduodenostomy
1
1
 
  Diaphragm closure
 
1
1
  Total
44
32
12
* CAPD, Continuous ambulant peritoneal dialysis
** Omphalocele
Table 3.
Indications for laparoscopy by performing surgeon
Laparoscopic procedures
Total number
Performed by trainees
Performed by staff surgeons
Easy
  Appendectomy
22
20
2
  Diagnostic
11
5
6
  Hernia, inguinal rec*
1
1
1
  Total
34
25
9
Difficult
  Cholecystectomy
1
0
1
  Cholecystotomy
1
0
1
  Colostomy
1
1
 
  Hernia, incisional
1
0
1
  Colectomy, subtotal
1
0
1
  Gastrostomy
39
36
3
  Intussusception
2
2
 
  Perforation
1
0
1
  Pyloromyotomy
50
36
14
  Splenectomy
7
3
4
  Thal
16
11
5
  Transverso-transversostomy
1
0
1
  Abscess evacuation
1
1
0
  Total
122
90
32
Demanding
  Duodenoduodenostomy
7
0
7
  Gastrocolic fistula
1
0
1
  Hirschsprung, Duhamel
1
0
1
  Ileorectal anastomosis*
1
0
1
  Ileumresection*
1
0
1
  Kasai*
4
0
4
  Laparoscopic-assisted cecumresection
1
0
1
  Obstruction, adhesiolysis
5
2
3
  Pyloromyotomy, redo**
4
2
2
  Rectosigmoidres, transanal*
1
0
1
  Retroperitoneal lymph node biopsy
1
1
 
  Diaphragm closure
1
0
1
  Subtotal colectomy with J-pouch*
1
0
1
  Thal, redo
2
0
2
  Total
31
5
26
* New procedure performed laparoscopically since 1998
** Two were referred from elsewhere
Of the open procedures, 40.9% were planned compared to 74.8% of the laparoscopic procedures. Of the minimally invasive procedures, the trainees performed 35% of the planned procedures and 66.7% of the emergency procedures. A trainee performed 72% of all emergency procedures that were conventionally operated.
Intraoperative and postoperative complications were encountered in 12 patients (6.9%) that underwent laparoscopic operations (see Table 4). Two complications (incomplete myotomy and bleeding) occurred in one patient. In the open group, the complication rate was 4.4%. The conversion rate from laparoscopy to laparotomy was 7.4% (Table 5). The reason for conversion in the majority of patients (n = 4) was distention of the bowel and/or adhesions that prevented good overview. Intraoperative complications (i.e., bleeding) caused conversion in three patients. In four patients, a diagnostic laparoscopy identified generalized peritonitis, and in two patients, intussusception was found; all followed by conversion [10]. The small diameter of the intestine together with multiple atresia did not permit laparoscopic duodenoduodenostomy in one patient.
Table 4.
Intraoperative and postoperative complications in all laparoscopies (n = 187)
 
Total number
Number performed by trainees
Number performed by staff surgeons
Complications of laparoscopy
  Incomplete myotomy in pyloromyotomy
2
2
 
  Mucosal injury in pyloromyotomy, laparoscopic repair
1
1
 
  Abcesses postappendectomy, followed by laparotomy
2
1
1
  Bleeding (see conversion)
3
1
2
Anastomotic leakage
  One in duodenuduodenostomy; laparoscopic repair
   
  One in ileoanal pouch, open repair
2
 
2
  Portsite hernia, local repair
1
 
1
  Dysphagia after reflux surgery, laparoscopic repair
1
 
1
  Tear endobag in appendectomy
1
1
 
  Total
13
6
7
Table 5.
Events leading to conversion and laparotomy by performing surgeon
Conversion
Total number
Number performed by trainees
Number performed by staff surgeons
Lack of overview due to peritonitis/adhesions
4
2
2
Lack of overview due to bowel distention
4
2
2
Lesion art epigastrica in appendicitis
1
1
 
Venous bleeding crus in redo-Thal
1
 
1
Bleeding, redo pyloromyotomy
1
 
1
Small diameter of the intestine
1
 
1
Insufficient result scopic reduction intussusception
2
2
 
Total
14
7
7
The mean duration of the laparoscopies did not significantly differ from the duration of the open procedures (p = 0.104). The duration of pyloromyotomies performed by the trainees (n = 36) was 44.6 ± 15.9 minutes versus 37.3 ± 16.7 minutes for staff surgeons (n = 14; p = NS). Follow-up median was six months (1–613 days).

Discussion

In the Wilhelmina University Children’s hospital in 2005, 81% of 231 abdominal procedures were performed by minimally invasive surgery, compared to 60% of 244 procedures in 1998 [6]. Since 1998, the conversion rate has decreased from 10 to 7.4%, whilst the complication rate remained unchanged (6.8% in 1998 vs. 6.9% in 2005; Tables 4 and 5). The indication for laparoscopic surgery has been broadened with the addition of six different procedures, five of which are amongst the most difficult operations. This increase in the use of laparoscopic procedures during the past seven years is partly due to complete establishment of the laparoscopic approach by the surgeons, and probably also due to the acceptance and skills of staff (i.e., anesthetists, nurses).
Meanwhile, children in the open group were significantly smaller and younger than in the laparoscopic group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively), indicating that there is specific a group of patients deemed not suitable for laparoscopic surgery. In addition, more than half of the laparotomies performed would not benefit from an endoscopic approach, given the indications such as gastroschisis and adhesiolysis (Table 2).
The operating time of the laparoscopic group was not significantly longer than that of the open group, reflecting that laparoscopy has become a standard procedure. This adds favor for minimally invasive procedures: Laparoscopy does not take longer, and therefore does not affect operating schedules in a negative manner. Moreover, the duration of surgery performed by trainees is no different than when the same procedures are performed by staff surgeons. This contradicts the concern expressed by some that the trainees might not be able to gain sufficient expertise.
We found that a trainee was the operating surgeon in as many as 64.2% of all laparoscopic procedures, and 48% of all minimally invasive procedures classified as difficult (Table 3). All together, the complication and conversion rates were not increased in the patients on which trainees operated as compared to staff surgeons.
Trainees in a pediatric laparoscopic training center can perform laparoscopic procedures in children with good results, which is in concordance with the findings of others [11]. As we described earlier, trainees learned to perform a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy, which can be classified as an easy procedure, without an increase in the complication rate [7]. In this study, we have shown that the more difficult procedures are equally well performed by trainees. Furthermore, the increase in laparoscopic procedures as opposed to conventional procedures does not imply that trainees perform fewer procedures: they are still able to perform a significant amount of operations, and develop skills in minimal invasive surgery.
In conclusion, in a pediatric laparoscopic training center, up to 81% of all abdominal procedures are currently performed by minimally invasive surgery. Operating time is no different between laparoscopy and conventional surgery. Residents or fellows do not take significantly longer to operate than staff surgeons. In addition, the trainees perform up to 64% of all laparoscopic procedures, which indicates not only that they are able to perform more difficult procedures, but also that minimally invasive surgery does not necessarily hamper surgical training.
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License ( https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0 ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
2.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Duckett JW (1994) Pediatric laparoscopy: prudence, please. J Urol 151:742–743PubMed Duckett JW (1994) Pediatric laparoscopy: prudence, please. J Urol 151:742–743PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Delarue A, Guys JM, Louis-Borrione C, Simeoni J, Esposito C (1994) Pediatric endoscopic surgery: pride and prejudice. Eur J Pediatr Surg 4:323–326PubMedCrossRef Delarue A, Guys JM, Louis-Borrione C, Simeoni J, Esposito C (1994) Pediatric endoscopic surgery: pride and prejudice. Eur J Pediatr Surg 4:323–326PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ure BM, Bax NM, van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35:1170–1173PubMedCrossRef Ure BM, Bax NM, van der Zee DC (2000) Laparoscopy in infants and children: a prospective study on feasibility and the impact on routine surgery. J Pediatr Surg 35:1170–1173PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC, Bax NM (2004) Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: impact of experience on the results in 182 cases. Surg Endosc 18:907–909PubMedCrossRef van der Bilt JD, Kramer WL, van der Zee DC, Bax NM (2004) Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: impact of experience on the results in 182 cases. Surg Endosc 18:907–909PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Costi R, Denet C, Sarli L, Perniceni T, Roncoroni L, Gayet B (2003) Laparoscopy in the last decade of the millennium: have we really improved? Surg Endosc 17:791–797PubMedCrossRef Costi R, Denet C, Sarli L, Perniceni T, Roncoroni L, Gayet B (2003) Laparoscopy in the last decade of the millennium: have we really improved? Surg Endosc 17:791–797PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Metzelder ML, Jesch N, Dick A, Kuebler J, Petersen C, Ure BM (2006) Impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1733–1737PubMedCrossRef Metzelder ML, Jesch N, Dick A, Kuebler J, Petersen C, Ure BM (2006) Impact of prior surgery on the feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for children: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 20:1733–1737PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Laan M, Bax NM, van der Zee DC, Ure BM (2001) The role of laparoscopy in the management of childhood intussusception. Surg Endosc 15:373–376PubMedCrossRef van der Laan M, Bax NM, van der Zee DC, Ure BM (2001) The role of laparoscopy in the management of childhood intussusception. Surg Endosc 15:373–376PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gollin G, Moores D, Baerg JC (2004) Getting residents in the game: an evaluation of general surgery residents’ participation in pediatric laparoscopic surgery. J Pediatr Surg 39:78–80PubMedCrossRef Gollin G, Moores D, Baerg JC (2004) Getting residents in the game: an evaluation of general surgery residents’ participation in pediatric laparoscopic surgery. J Pediatr Surg 39:78–80PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Minimally invasive pediatric surgery: Increasing implementation in daily practice and resident’s training
verfasst von
E. A. te Velde
N. M. A. Bax
S. H. A. J. Tytgat
J. R. de Jong
D. Vieira Travassos
W. L. M. Kramer
D. C. van der Zee
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9395-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Recycling im OP – möglich, aber teuer

05.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Auch wenn sich Krankenhäuser nachhaltig und grün geben – sie tragen aktuell erheblich zu den CO2-Emissionen bei und produzieren jede Menge Müll. Ein Pilotprojekt aus Bonn zeigt, dass viele Op.-Abfälle wiederverwertet werden können.

Im OP der Zukunft läuft nichts mehr ohne Kollege Roboter

04.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Der OP in der Zukunft wird mit weniger Personal auskommen – nicht, weil die Technik das medizinische Fachpersonal verdrängt, sondern weil der Personalmangel es nötig macht.

Nur selten Nachblutungen nach Abszesstonsillektomie

03.05.2024 Tonsillektomie Nachrichten

In einer Metaanalyse von 18 Studien war die Rate von Nachblutungen nach einer Abszesstonsillektomie mit weniger als 7% recht niedrig. Nur rund 2% der Behandelten mussten nachoperiert werden. Die Therapie scheint damit recht sicher zu sein.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.