nach oben

Abdominal Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.06.2006 | UPDATE

MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease

verfasst von: A. G. Schreyer, K. Scheibl, P. Heiss, S. Feuerbach, J. Seitz, H. Herfarth

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2006

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Colonography based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appears to be a promising technique for polyp assessment in the colon. Several studies have evaluated this method for colonic assessment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We briefly review different methodologies such as dark lumen and bright lumen techniques for abdominal MRI. In addition, recently published studies concerning the sensitivity and accuracy in detecting inflammatory bowel changes in inflammatory bowel disease using MRI are discussed.

Schreyer AG, Gölder S, Seitz J, Herfarth H (2003) New diagnostic avenues in inflammatory bowel diseases. Capsule endoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging and virtual enteroscopy. Dig Dis 21:129–137PubMedCrossRef

Schreyer AG, Seitz J, Feuerbach S, et al. (2004) Modern imaging using computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:45–54PubMedCrossRef

Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. (2003) Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 52:1738–1743PubMedCrossRef

Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. (2001) Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:785–789PubMedCrossRef

Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, et al. (1998) Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 207:59–65PubMed

Goehde SC, Hunold P, Vogt FM, et al. (2005) Full-body cardiovascular and tumor MRI for early detection of disease: feasibility and initial experience in 298 subjects. AJR 184:598–611PubMed

Luboldt W, Debatin JF (1998) Virtual endoscopic colonography based on 3D MRI. Abdom Imaging 23:568–572PubMedCrossRef

Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef

Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA, et al. (2003) Computerized tomographic colonography: Performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 125:688–695PubMedCrossRef

10.

Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, Wilson LA, et al. (2003) Prospective blinded evaluation of computed tomographic colonography for screen detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125:311–319PubMedCrossRef

11.

Rieber A, Wruk D, Potthast S, et al. (2000) Diagnostic imaging in Crohn’s disease: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and conventional imaging methods. Int J Colorectal Dis 15:176–181PubMedCrossRef

12.

Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, et al. (2004) Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn’s disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:491–497PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gölder SK, Schreyer AG, Endlicher E, Feuerbach S, Schölmerich J, Kullmann F, Rogler S, Seitz J, Herfarth H (2005) Comparison of capsule endoscopy and magnetic resonance (MR)-enteroclysis in suspected small bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis in press

14.

Voderholzer WA, Beinhoelzl J, Rogalla P, et al. (2005) Small bowel involvement in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and computed tomography enteroclysis. Gut 54:369–373PubMedCrossRef

15.

Schreyer AG, Goelder S, Scheibl K, et al. (2005) Dark lumen magnetic resonance enteroclysis in combination with MRI colonography for whole bowel assessment in patients with Crohn’s disease: first clinical experience. Inflamm Bowel Dis 11:388–394PubMedCrossRef

16.

Jardine VL, Sala E, Lomas DJ (2005) MR colonography: baseline appearance of the unprepared rectosigmoid. Br J Radiol 78:202–206PubMedCrossRef

17.

Goehde SC, Descher E, Boekstegers A, et al. (2005) Dark lumen MR colonography based on fecal tagging for detection of colorectal masses: accuracy and patient acceptance. Abdom Imaging 30:576–583PubMedCrossRef

18.

Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300–1311PubMedCrossRef

19.

Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349:1288–1291PubMedCrossRef

20.

Schreyer AG, Rath HC, Kikinis R, et al. (2005) Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging colonography with conventional colonoscopy for the assessment of intestinal inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a feasibility study. Gut 54:250–256PubMedCrossRef

21.

Scheibl K, Schreyer AG, Kullmann F, et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging gastrography: evaluation of the dark lumen technique compared with conventional gastroscopy in patients with malignant gastric disease. Invest Radiol 40:164–172PubMedCrossRef

22.

Hagspiel KD, Altes TA, Mugler JP III, et al. (2000) MR virtual colonography using hyperpolarized (3)He as an endoluminal contrast agent: demonstration of feasibility. Magn Reson Med 44:813–816PubMedCrossRef

23.

Lam WW, Leung WK, Wu JK, et al. (2004) Screening of colonic tumors by air-inflated magnetic resonance (MR) colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:447–452PubMedCrossRef

24.

Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, et al. (2002) Inflammatory bowel disease evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Comparison with endoscopy, 99mTc-HMPAO leucocyte scintigraphy, conventional radiography and surgery. Scand J Gastroenterol 37:307–316PubMedCrossRef

25.

Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC (2003) Virtual magnetic resonance colonography. Gut 52(suppl 4):iv17–iv22PubMed

26.

Biancone L, Fiori R, Tosti C, et al. (2003) Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy for stricturing postoperative recurrence in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 9:343–350PubMedCrossRef

27.

Schreyer AG, Herfarth H, Kikinis R, et al. (2002) 3D modeling and virtual endoscopy of the small bowel based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Invest Radiol 37:528–533PubMedCrossRef

28.

Schreyer AG, Fielding JR, Warfield SK, et al. (2000) Virtual CT cystoscopy: color mapping of bladder wall thickness. Invest Radiol 35:331–334PubMedCrossRef

29.

Jaume S, Ferrant M, Macq B, et al. (2003) Tumor detection in the bladder wall with a measurement of abnormal thickness in CT scans. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 50:383–390PubMedCrossRef

30.

Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L, et al. (2000) Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228PubMedCrossRef

31.

Schunk K, Reiter S, Kern A, et al. (2001) Hydro-MRI in inflammatory bowel diseases: a comparison with colonoscopy and histology. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 173:731–738PubMedCrossRef

32.

Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. (2001) MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn’s disease. AJR 177:1325–1332PubMed

33.

Neurath MF, Vehling D, Schunk K, et al. (2002) Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease activity: a comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, hydromagnetic resonance imaging, and granulocyte scintigraphy with labeled antibodies. Am J Gastroenterol 97:1978–1985PubMedCrossRef

34.

Gasche C, Turetschek K (2005) Value of MR colonography for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease? Believe what you see—see what you believe. Gut 54:181–182PubMedCrossRef

Titel: MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease
verfasst von: A. G. Schreyer
K. Scheibl
P. Heiss
S. Feuerbach
J. Seitz
H. Herfarth
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2006
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 3/2006
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-005-0377-6

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

MR colonography in inflammatory bowel disease

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2006

MDCT angiography of living laparoscopic renal donors

Importance of accurate preoperative diagnosis in the management of aggressive angiomyxoma: report of three cases and review of the literature

Endovascular graft exclusion for abdominal aortic aneurysms: 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography

CT appearance of incidental pancreatic lipomas: a case series

Virtual CT gastrectomy by three-dimensional imaging using multidetector-row CT for laparoscopic gastrectomy

Multidetector spiral CT renal angiography in the diagnosis of giant renal artery aneurysms

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update Radiologie