Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Insights into Imaging 3/2018

Open Access 06.04.2018 | Pictorial Review

Multidetector CT of expected findings and complications after hysterectomy

verfasst von: Massimo Tonolini

Erschienen in: Insights into Imaging | Ausgabe 3/2018

Abstract

Indicated to manage a variety of disorders affecting the female genital tract, hysterectomy represents the second most common gynaecological operation after caesarean section. Performed via an open, laparoscopic or vaginal approach, hysterectomy is associated with non-negligible morbidity and occasional mortality. Iatrogenic complications represent a growing concern for gynaecologists and may result in prolonged hospitalisation, need for interventional procedures or repeated surgery, renal impairment and malpractice claims. As a result, radiologists are increasingly requested to investigate patients with suspected complications after hysterectomy. In the vast majority of early postoperative situations, multidetector CT represents the ideal modality to comprehensively visualise the surgically altered pelvic anatomy and to consistently triage the varied spectrum of possible injuries. This pictorial review provides an overview of current indications and surgical techniques, illustrates the expected CT appearances after recent hysterectomy, the clinical and imaging features of specific complications such as lymphoceles, surgical site infections, haemorrhages, urinary tract lesions and fistulas, bowel injury and obstruction. Our aim is to increase radiologists’ familiarity with normal post-hysterectomy findings and with post-surgical complications, which is crucial for an appropriate choice between conservative, interventional and surgical management.

Teaching points

Hysterectomy via open, laparoscopic or vaginal route is associated with non-negligible morbidity.
• Multiplanar CT imaging optimally visualises the surgically altered pelvic anatomy.
• Familiarity with early post-hysterectomy CT and expected findings is warranted.
• Complications encompass surgical site infections, haemorrhages, bowel injury and obstruction.
• Urological complications include ureteral leakage, bladder injury, urinomas and urinary fistulas.

Introduction

Background

Performed to manage several different disorders of the female reproductive system, hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) represents one of the most prevalent surgeries worldwide and the second most common gynaecological operation after caesarean section. The annual hysterectomy rates vary among different countries in the range 1.2 to 4.8/1000 women. In the USA, approximately 600,000 such operations are performed each year [1].
Although the majority of women experience an uneventful postoperative course, hysterectomy is associated with non-negligible risks. Potentially serious postoperative complications such as infections, haemorrhage, urinary and bowel injuries may be either recognised intraoperatively, manifest during postoperative hospitalisation, or sometimes become apparent weeks or months later [25].

Aim

Transvaginal ultrasound represents the first-line modality to investigate the female genital organs. However, in recently operated patients this modality is cumbersome and poorly tolerated, and provides a limited field of view. In our experience, partly due to fear of litigation, radiologists are increasingly requested to investigate suspected iatrogenic complications after hysterectomy. During the last decade, multidetector CT has become the mainstay technique to assess the vast majority of postoperative abdominal and pelvic conditions, as it rapidly and comprehensively visualises the surgically altered anatomy and can triage the varied spectrum of possible complications [69].
This pictorial essay provides an overview of current indications and surgical techniques, then reviews and illustrates the expected postoperative CT findings, and common and unusual specific complications after hysterectomy. Our aim is to provide radiologists with an increased familiarity in the interpretation of early post-hysterectomy CT studies, thus providing a consistent basis for correct therapeutic choice and ultimately helping to decrease morbidity [7, 9].

Overview of hysterectomy

Techniques and indications

The uterus may be removed using three different routes, namely vaginal, abdominal and laparoscopic. The indications of different surgical techniques are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1
Surgical techniques for hysterectomy with relative indications and contraindications
Route
Indications
Contraindications
Vaginal hysterectomy (VH)
Genital prolapse (50–65% of cases)
Hypermenorrhoea/dysfunctional uterine bleeding
Symptomatic (bleeding) uterine leiomyomas
Microinvasive cervical carcinoma
History of caesarean section (CS) or other pelvic surgery
No previous vaginal delivery
Large uterus (≥12–14-week gestation size)
Coexistent extrauterine pelvic pathology (e.g. adhesions, endometriosis)
Need for oophorectomy
Invasive tumours
Laparoscopically assisted VH (LAVH)
Dysfunctional uterine bleeding or symptomatic uterine leiomyomas in patients with contraindicated or difficult VH (e.g. due to previous CS or adhesions)
Patients with chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) requiring hysterectomy
Patients with endometriosis requiring hysterectomy
Obesity
Very large uterus
Potentially malignant adnexal mass
Risk of laparotomic conversion (e.g. severe post-surgical adhesions, endometriosis requiring bowel resection and/or involving rectovaginal septum)
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
Same as LAVH + endometrial and cervical tumours
Abdominal hysterectomy (AH)
Malignant genital tumours
Potentially malignant adnexal mass
Uterine leiomyomas not amenable to VH and laparoscopy (e.g. very large uterus, severe adhesions)
Endometriosis and PID not amenable to laparoscopy (e.g. due to rectovaginal septum involvement, need for bowel resection)
Secondary post-partum haemorrhage (exceptional)
Benign uterine disease (e.g. dysfunctional uterine bleeding or symptomatic uterine leiomyomas) amenable to VH or laparoscopy
Although declining, abdominal hysterectomy (AH) continues to be the most widely used approach (60–64% of all operations) worldwide. AH begins with a transverse suprapubic laparotomic incision of the anterior abdominal wall, involves dissection and removal of the uterus, and ends with suture of the vaginal cuff (VC). Radical AH for tumours is completed with removal of the adnexa (salpingo-oophorectomy), lymphadenectomy, peritoneal exploration and lavage [10, 11].
Worldwide, the majority (90%) of hysterectomies are performed to treat non-neoplastic conditions which negatively impact women’s quality of life, such as bleeding leiomyomas and hypermenorrhoea. In recent years, hysterectomy rates are declining in Western countries after introduction of several alternative therapeutic options for benign diseases, such as hormonal medications, intrauterine levonorgestrel-releasing devices, endometrial ablation techniques, hysteroscopic and surgical myomectomy, ultrasound focused energy and transcatheter uterine artery embolisation. However, leiomyomas still account for approximately 40–62% of all hysterectomies [1, 1215].
For benign disorders requiring hysterectomy, according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines, criteria for choosing the surgical route include surgeon’s skill and training, parity, size and shape of the vagina and uterus, accessibility to the uterus (e.g. prolapse, pelvic adhesions), underlying pathological condition and presence of extrauterine disease [14].
In vaginal hysterectomy (VH) the uterus is approached, excised, anteverted and extracted via the vagina. Being the safest technique, unless contraindicated, VH should be the preferred approach in the majority of patients with non-malignant disorders, particularly genital prolapse [1214, 16].
Laparoscopy is increasingly used as a minimally invasive alternative to AH for those patients in whom VH is contraindicated or technically challenging, and currently accounts for 14% of all hysterectomies in the USA. The technically challenging total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) is differentiated from laparoscopically-assisted VH (LAVH), which is completed with removal of the uterus via the vagina. Compared to AH, both VH and laparoscopy result in shorter hospitalisation, less postoperative pain and fever, and faster return to normal activities. On the other hand, laparoscopy requires specific surgeons’ training and the longest operating time of all techniques [1, 2, 12, 15].

Complications

The overall morbidity and mortality rates associated with different hysterectomy techniques are summarised in Table 2. Both prevalence of major complications at 30 postoperative days and mortality are highest after radical hysterectomy for cancer. Conversely, the composite morbidity is much lower in VH compared to AH, and in patients operated with every technique for benign disease, the 40-day mortality is approximately 1/1000. General risk factors for post-hysterectomy morbidity included advanced age, medical comorbidities and malignancy [3].
Table 2
Overall morbidity, reoperation and mortality rates associated with different hysterectomy techniques
Route
30-day major complications (%)
Need for repeated surgery (%)
Mortality (%)
Radical abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for cancer
9.8
3.0
1.1
AH for benign conditions
4.8
1.9
0.2
Vaginal hysterectomy (VH)
2.4
1.0
0.03
Laparoscopically-assisted VH (LAVH)
3.4
1.5
0.1
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
2.6
2.0
Regarding the type of complications, systemic and cardiorespiratory events such as venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, sepsis and fluid/metabolic imbalance may develop after hysterectomy similarly to other surgeries. Clinically manifest thromboembolic disease and pneumonia are reported in 1–4% and 2% of patients, respectively [25, 12].
Patterns and incidence of specific complications partly differ between the three surgical approaches (Table 3). The commonest category is postoperative infections, which affect 9–13% of patients after hysterectomy with every technique and encompass surgical site, urinary tract, systemic and wound infections. The latter occur in 1–6% of patients, particularly after AH. Vaginal vault haematoma and lymphocele are typically associated with VH and radical AH, respectively. The incidence of significant bleeding requiring transfusions is in the range 2–5% with every technique. The next most frequent category is urologic injuries, which occur most usually after TLH (3–6.2%), LAVH (3.06%) and radical AH (2.78%). The uncommon VC dehiscence mostly develops after TLH (1.35%) rather than LAVH, AH and VH in descending order of frequency. With every technique, potentially severe injuries to the gastrointestinal tract occur in less than 1% (roughly 0.2–0.3%) of patients [25, 12].
Table 3
Relative frequency of specific post-hysterectomy complications with different surgical techniques
Route
All infections
Wound infections
Lymphocele
Vaginal vault haematoma
Bleeding requiring transfusion
Urologic complications (bladder, ureter, fistulas)
Vaginal cuff dehiscence
Gastrointestinal complications
Abdominal hysterectomy (AH)
(* radical AH
for malignancy)
+++
++
(* +++)
++
(* +++)
+
++
+/++
(* +++)
+
+
Vaginal hysterectomy (VH)
+++
+
+/−
+++
+
+
+/−
+
Laparoscopically assisted VH (LAVH)
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH)
++
+
+
+
++
+++
++/+++
+

Early post-hysterectomy CT

Indications and techniques

In our experience, the usual indications for obtaining urgent post-hysterectomy CT imaging are listed in Table 4, and are often multiple in each patient.
Table 4
Usual clinical indications for post-hysterectomy CT imaging
Intraoperative injury (suspected, recognised by surgeon or repaired) to blood vessels, bowel or urinary tract
Suspected haemorrhage:
- dropping haemoglobin
- blood from drainage tube
- hypotension/shock
Physical signs of peritonitis
Persistent or worsening abdominal distension, pelvic or perineal pain
Suspected infection/sepsis:
- fever
- increasing leukocyte count and C-reactive protein levels
Abnormal vaginal examination:
- discharge
- suspicious physical finding (e.g. swelling, vaginal cuff discontinuity)
Suspicious, abnormal or extensive transvaginal ultrasound findings (e.g. vaginal vault haematoma or abscess)
Suspected urologic injury:
- hydronephrosis
- worsening renal function tests
- haematuria, abnormal urinalysis
Since pleuropulmonary changes (such as atelectasis, pneumonia and pleural effusions) are commonly encountered, after recent hysterectomy the CT acquisition should encompass the entire abdomen from the lung bases to the inferior contour of the gluteus muscles. A comprehensive CT study including intravenous contrast medium (CM) injection is warranted unless strongly contraindicated. In patients with impaired renal function or allergy, appropriate measures are recommended such as intravenous hydration or pharmacological premedication, following guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology [17].
Following recent hysterectomy, we generally recommend a multiphase protocol, including a preliminary unenhanced acquisition, aiming to identify high attenuation values consistent with recent blood at the vaginal vault, in the pelvis and peritoneal cavity. After automated power injection of 110–130 ml of iodinated CM (dose may be calculated on the basis of lean body weight and CM iodine concentration) such as iopromide (370 mgI/ml), iomeprol (350 mgI/ml) or iodixanol (300 mgI/ml) at a 2.5 to 4-ml/s flow rate, we usually acquire arterial phase scanning using a bolus tracking technique with a region of interest in the infrarenal aorta, a 10-s delay and a 120-Hounsfield units (HU) threshold. Aimed at detecting active haemorrhage, the arterial phase (CT angiography) may be obviated to limit the radiation dose if haemoglobin levels tend to improved during the first postoperative days. The mandatory portal-venous phase acquisition is obtained after 75–80 s after start of CM injection. At the attending radiologist’s discretion, excretory phase may be acquired after injection of 200 ml of saline and 8–10 min of delay, to visualise the opacified urinary cavities. Additional very delayed acquisition (20 min to 1 h) may be warranted if urinary tract injury or urinoma are suspected [7, 9].
Additionally, in patients with clinical suspicion of iatrogenic bladder injury or fistulisation multidetector CT cystography acquired after drop infusion of 1:10 diluted CM through the Foley catheter represents the most accurate technique. The resulting acquisition should be reviewed along multiple planes at CT angiography window settings (width 600–900 HU, level 150–300 HU) [18]. Borrowing from experience with multidetector CT imaging of acute gynaecological diseases, also in the postoperative setting, routine reconstruction of 3–4-mm-thick contiguous images along sagittal and coronal planes is beneficial to elucidate the female pelvic anatomy [1921].

Study interpretation and expected post-surgical appearances

After AH the vagina is best identified on mid-sagittal CT images, with the VC slightly retracted cranially compared to preoperative studies, a band- or H-shaped axial configuration, uniform walls and thin enhancing mucosa (Fig. 1). After recent hysterectomy, minimal pelvic effusion and gas are common postoperative findings. Following AH, air may either distribute freely in the peritoneal cavity or collect in the operated subperitoneal spaces, and typically resolves within a week but decreases on serial imaging. Conversely, air which persists or increases should raise concern for visceral perforation. Following laparoscopic surgery, the amount of expected intraperitoneal free gas is lower compared to AH because insufflated carbon dioxide is rapidly reabsorbed, and subcutaneous emphysema from insufflation in the abdominal wall is sometimes encountered [2224].
After uncomplicated VH, we have consistently observed a characteristic CT appearance which reflects diffuse vaginal oedema, including a roundish configuration in transverse planes, circumferential oedematous mural thickening and marked mucosal enhancement (Fig. 2). When interpreting early post-hysterectomy CT studies, radiologists should thoroughly search for abnormal (bloody, fluid or abscess) collections at the surgical site above the closed VC.

CT imaging of post-hysterectomy complications

Vaginal vault haematoma

A typical sequel of VH, vaginal vault haematoma develops in up to 20–25% of patients, more frequently in premenopausal women with larger, more vascular uteri rather than in elderly woman with atrophic uteri. Diagnosed up to 7–14 days after VH, haematomas often manifest with fever, and are generally self-limiting but may require blood transfusions, prolongation of hospitalisation or readmission after discharge. Conversely, after AH and TLH, vaginal vault haematoma is rare and not associated with febrile morbidity [2527].
At CT, median or paramedian haematomas generally measure 3 to 6 cm in size and are identified by their characteristic hyperattenuation. In CM-enhanced acquisition, the peripheral rim enhancement can be misleading as it may suggest an incorrect diagnosis of abscess (Fig. 3). However, in most cases, the gynaecologist is aware of this complication since it is easily detected clinically and sonographically [2527].

Lymphoceles

Lymphoceles are collections of lymphatic fluid which result from surgical injury to the lymphatic system. Strongly associated with lymph node dissection, uni- or bilateral lymphoceles are detected in up to 40% of patients after resection of gynaecologic tumours [4, 28] .
At CT, the characteristic appearance of a lymphocele is a laterally positioned pelvic collection with homogeneous fluid attenuation and signal intensity, generally adjacent to surgical clips and iliac blood vessels (Figs. 3 and 4). On early postoperative CT studies, lymphoceles lack a perceptible wall (Fig. 4a). Later on, lymphoceles progressively become round- or ovoid-shaped and better demarcated, and develop a thin regular contour which corresponds to the fibrotic wall without epithelial lining. Variably sized lymphoceles are generally asymptomatic and therefore incidentally found on cross-sectional imaging. The majority of cases tend to resolve spontaneously, may occasionally (20% of cases) persist 1 year after surgery and do not require treatment [28].
Some lymphoceles may cause ipsilateral lower limb oedema and pain, and may be treated by imaging-guided interventions. Percutaneous catheter drainage with and without sclerotherapy achieves technical success in 74.3% and 100% of cases, respectively. Recurrence occurs in up to 13% of patients and may require repeated drainage. Alternatively, open surgical or laparoscopic drainage and internal marsupialisation may be performed [29, 30].
Occasionally, complications such as deep venous thrombosis, bladder compression and superinfection may occur. The latter is heralded by fever, pelvic pain, leukocytosis and elevated acute phase reactants, and is suggested at imaging by enlargement of a known lymphocele, appearance of septations, internal inhomogeneity or by an abscess-like appearance with thickened enhancing walls (Fig. 5) [31].

Surgical site infections

Infections result from ascending polymicrobial contamination of the surgical site from the vagina and endocervix. Specific risk factors include patient features (such as obesity, diabetes, malnutrition, advanced ages, steroid use, history of radiation and bacterial vaginosis) and operation-related factors including prolonged duration, blood loss and staple closure. Among them, VC cellulitis represents superficial infection at the vaginal suture margin, and typically present with 5–10 postoperative days with fever, abdominal pain and palpation without masses. Conversely, deep infections encompass pelvic cellulitis and abscesses, often manifest after discharge from the hospital with pelvic pain, purulent vaginal secretions, marked oedema, tenderness and a mass at physical examination. CT helpfully complements physical examination by demonstrating the extent and topography of pelvic abscesses (Fig. 6), which may sometimes result from superinfection of a conservatively treated haematoma, lymphocele or urinoma. If clinically unresponsive to intensive antibiotics, abscesses require percutaneous or laparoscopic drainage [32].
Alternatively to infection, the presence of a fluid collection abutting the VC may occasionally correspond to VC dehiscence. Particularly in patients suffering from vaginal pain and bleeding, careful scrutiny of the VC for mural discontinuity and fat herniation is warranted to suggest to the gynaecologist the possibility of VC and request a focused physical examination [2, 9, 33].
The key CT differential diagnosis of a postoperative pelvic abscess is presence of oxidised regenerated cellulose (Surgicel®, Ethicon), a gauze-like bioabsorbable haemostatic material which mimics as a mixed gas-fluid collection and requires awareness of surgical details to avoid misinterpretation [34].
Finally, a peculiar condition underlying persistent postoperative fever is septic pelvic thrombophlebitis, which may result in systemic embolisation (to the lungs, brain and musculoskeletal system) if untreated [35, 36]. The CT findings include enlargement of hypogastric, iliac or femoral veins, with partial or complete luminal non-opacification, thickening and hyperenhancement of the vessel wall, and inflammatory stranding of the surrounding fat planes [9, 35, 37].

Haemorrhage

After hysterectomy, bleeding is one of the most feared complications. Haemorrhage from surgical manipulation or inadequate vessel ligation may extend from the surgical site to the pelvis and abdominal cavity. Alternatively, during laparoscopic surgery, the abdominal wall, mesenteric or inferior epigastric vessels may be injured by insertion of Veress needles or trocars [23, 24].
The use of CT is crucial to detect the presence, site, entity, age and features of iatrogenic haemorrhage. Haematomas are recognised by the characteristic 30–45-HU attenuation of fresh blood, which becomes even more hyperdense (HU > 60) after a few hours from clotting, and progressively develops inhomogeneity and fluid-fluid levels from mixing of clotted regions and serum from haemoglobin lysis. CT may reveal CM extravasation corresponding to active bleeding in either arterial or venous phase (Figs. 7 and 8) [7, 9].
If available, transarterial embolisation of the uterine or internal iliac artery is increasingly performed to control iatrogenic pelvic bleeding without repeated surgery [38].

Bowel injury and obstruction

Compared to postoperative ileus, bowel obstruction is relatively rare. Within and immediately after the postoperative hospitalisation, the most frequent cause is represented by incision and port site (Fig. 9) hernias developing respectively after open and laparoscopic surgery. Risk factors include advanced age, obesity, duration of surgery, use of large-bore trocars and ports for specimen removal. Due to the small size of the defect, both sites have a high likelihood of causing obstruction. Borrowing from experience with spontaneous acute abdomens, CT effectively triages presence and degree of obstruction, transition point (Fig. 9) and possible signs of strangulation [2224].
Although very uncommon, iatrogenic intestinal injuries represent potentially serious complications, especially if unrecognised at the time of surgery. Delayed diagnosis corresponds to high risk of perforation, faecal peritonitis, sepsis and death. After both AH and VH, most injuries involve the rectum and sigmoid colon. Conversely, albeit incidence is similar, laparoscopic surgery may damage the small bowel during Veress needle or trocar insertion. Radiologists should suggest possible bowel injury when faced with abundant, persistent or increasing pneumoperitoneum, with peritonitis with effusion and enhancing serosa (Fig. 10), or with unexplained abscess collections. The rare but more specific signs include identification of focal bowel wall thickening, discontinuity (Fig. 11) or non-enhancement. Unfortunately, CT sensitivity is approximately 70%, and negative CT findings despite serious bowel complications have been reported [9, 39].

Post-hysterectomy urologic complications

Despite technical advancements and surgeons’ experience, due to the close anatomic relationship between the urinary and female genital tracts, urologic injuries represent typical complications of gynaecologic surgery and a potential cause of litigation. According to the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines, early recognition facilitates immediate repair, improves patients’ outcome and decreases the likelihood of long-term sequelae such as renal function impairment [8, 40].
General risk factors for urologic complications include obesity, diabetes, radical hysterectomy including lymph node dissection for malignancy, adhesions from previous surgeries and history of irradiation. In descending order of frequency, urologic injuries affect the urinary bladder (60–70% of cases), the ureter (24–30%) and the vagina (2.1%). Acute urologic injuries manifest during the first postoperative days with a combination of pelvic or flank pain, abdominal distension, ileus, peritonitis, fever, decreased urinary output, worsening renal function, haematuria and abnormal urinalysis [4148].

Ureteral injuries

Mechanisms of iatrogenic damage to the ureters include direct manipulation, inadvertent ligation or kinking with a suture, thermal injury and ischaemia from devascularisation. In patients with distorted pelvic anatomy, prophylactic stenting is beneficial to decrease risks. Unfortunately, ureteral damage is unrecognised during hysterectomy in almost two thirds of patients and delayed diagnosis (weeks to months after surgery) with hydronephrosis and permanent loss of renal function is not unusual [8, 43, 44, 49, 50].
According to the EAU guidelines, appropriate therapeutic planning requires thorough assessment of the site, features and degree of ureteral injuries using excretory-phase CT [8]. The right and left ureters are injured with similar frequency. The typical (80–90% of cases) site of injury is the lower ureteral third, either at the pelvic brim or along the pelvic sidewall at uterine artery crossing. The main CT pattern of ureteral injury is partial or complete disruption, which is heralded by extravasation of urine (Figs. 12 and 13). Following recent hysterectomy, fluid-attenuation (0–20 HU) collections abutting the ureters should be viewed with suspect. The diagnosis of urinoma is confirmed by enhancement on excretory-phase scanning, with inhomogeneous opacification (denser close to the leaking source) which progresses on repeated delayed scanning. Preserved opacification of the ureteral segment distal to the leaking site allows differentiating partial lacerations from complete disruption [7, 9, 5153].
The second pattern of ureteral injury is ligation without urine extravasation, which often occurs at the site of surgical clips, causes upstream hydronephrosis and may be either acute (Fig. 14) or asymptomatic (Fig. 15). Nowadays, percutaneous nephrostomy, antegrade recanalisation by endourology techniques and long-term stent placement are the preferred management for both ureteral obstruction and laceration. Alternatively, open or laparoscopic surgical repair with suturing, end-to-end uretero-ureterostomies or uretero-neocystostomy may be necessary [49, 50, 54].

Bladder injury and fistulas

The urinary bladder may be damaged during surgical dissection or from laparoscopic trocar insertion. Most bladder injuries are recognised intraoperatively using dyes and cystoscopy, and immediately repaired [44, 55].
After surgery, the CT hallmark of bladder injury is represented by either extraperitoneal or intraperitoneal urine extravasation at excretory-phase CT. Since a Foley catheter is generally in place shortly after hysterectomy, minor bladder injuries and suspected urinomas should be investigated using CT cystography which confirms bladder wall integrity, ruling out possible leakages, when retrograde filling with at least 250 ml of diluted contrast is obtained (Fig. 16) [7, 9, 18]. Whereas extraperitoneal leakage is treated conservatively with bladder drainage, intraperitoneal injuries require surgical exploration and repair [8].
Alternatively, hysterectomy may result in formation of a vesico-vaginal fistula (VVF), which accounts for over two thirds of iatrogenic pelvic fistulas. The risk is highest (0.74%) during radical AH secondary to extensive parametrial and nodal dissection. The typical manifestations include continuous urinary leakage, foul odours or discharge from the vagina. Clinical diagnosis of VVF is often challenging, and requires a combination of vaginal examination, cystoscopy, bladder filling with dye and biochemical assay of discharge fluid for high creatinine levels [42, 44, 47, 56].
At imaging, a VVF is suggested by identification of air and/or fluid in the vaginal lumen. Excretory-phase CT or CT cystography are useful for treatment planning as they can confirm and directly visualise the opacified abnormal track (Fig. 17) [7, 9, 18, 57]. Albeit some VVF seal during with prolonged catheterisation, most cases ultimately require surgical repair [42, 44, 47, 56].

Conclusion

Imaging plays an increasingly pivotal role in the diagnosis of postoperative complications following hysterectomy, such as infections, haemorrhage, bowel perforation or obstruction, urologic injuries and fistulas. In our experience, multidetector CT allows a comprehensive assessment of the operated pelvis, and is therefore recommended to elucidate suspected post-hysterectomy complications and to provide a consistent basis for choosing between conservative, percutaneous or open surgical management.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Domingo S, Pellicer A (2009) Overview of current trends in hysterectomy. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol 4:673–685CrossRef Domingo S, Pellicer A (2009) Overview of current trends in hysterectomy. Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol 4:673–685CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ (2013) Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121:654–673CrossRefPubMed Clarke-Pearson DL, Geller EJ (2013) Complications of hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121:654–673CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Erekson EA, Yip SA, Ciarleglio M et al (2011) Postoperative complications after gynecological surgery. Obstet Gynecol 118:784–793CrossRef Erekson EA, Yip SA, Ciarleglio M et al (2011) Postoperative complications after gynecological surgery. Obstet Gynecol 118:784–793CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Riva C et al (2001) Postoperative complications after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 78:232–237 discussion 237-240CrossRefPubMed Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Riva C et al (2001) Postoperative complications after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. J Surg Oncol 78:232–237 discussion 237-240CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hodges KR, Davis BR, Swaim LS (2014) Prevention and management of hysterectomy complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 57:43–57CrossRefPubMed Hodges KR, Davis BR, Swaim LS (2014) Prevention and management of hysterectomy complications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 57:43–57CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Paspulati RM, Dalal TA (2010) Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery. Radiographics 30:625–642CrossRefPubMed Paspulati RM, Dalal TA (2010) Imaging of complications following gynecologic surgery. Radiographics 30:625–642CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Summerton DJ, Kitrey ND, Lumen N et al (2012) EAU guidelines on iatrogenic trauma. Eur Urol 62:628–639CrossRefPubMed Summerton DJ, Kitrey ND, Lumen N et al (2012) EAU guidelines on iatrogenic trauma. Eur Urol 62:628–639CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan YGS, Ho HK, Chen CYH (1993) Abdominal hysterectomy: indications and complications. Singap Med J 34:337–340 Chan YGS, Ho HK, Chen CYH (1993) Abdominal hysterectomy: indications and complications. Singap Med J 34:337–340
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Moen M (2016) Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: Total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 43:431–440CrossRef Moen M (2016) Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: Total abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 43:431–440CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N et al (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: Cd003677 Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N et al (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: Cd003677
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrnes JN, Occhino JA (2016) Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: Total vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 43:441–462CrossRef Byrnes JN, Occhino JA (2016) Hysterectomy for benign conditions of the uterus: Total vaginal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 43:441–462CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Reich H (2007) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:337–344CrossRefPubMed Reich H (2007) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: indications, techniques and outcomes. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 19:337–344CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeppson PC, Sung VW (2014) Hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: indications and techniques. Clin Obstet Gynecol 57:72–82CrossRefPubMed Jeppson PC, Sung VW (2014) Hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse: indications and techniques. Clin Obstet Gynecol 57:72–82CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini M, Bianco R (2012) Multidetector CT cystography for imaging colovesical fistulas and iatrogenic bladder leaks. Insights Imaging 3:181–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tonolini M, Bianco R (2012) Multidetector CT cystography for imaging colovesical fistulas and iatrogenic bladder leaks. Insights Imaging 3:181–187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G (2002) Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics 22:785–801CrossRefPubMed Bennett GL, Slywotzky CM, Giovanniello G (2002) Gynecologic causes of acute pelvic pain: spectrum of CT findings. Radiographics 22:785–801CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cano Alonso R, Borruel Nacenta S, Diez Martinez P et al (2009) Role of multidetector CT in the management of acute female pelvic disease. Emerg Radiol 16:453–472CrossRefPubMed Cano Alonso R, Borruel Nacenta S, Diez Martinez P et al (2009) Role of multidetector CT in the management of acute female pelvic disease. Emerg Radiol 16:453–472CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Swart JE, Fishman EK (2008) Gynecologic pathology on multidetector CT: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol 15:383–389CrossRefPubMed Swart JE, Fishman EK (2008) Gynecologic pathology on multidetector CT: a pictorial review. Emerg Radiol 15:383–389CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Saddala P, Ramanathan S, Tirumani SH et al (2015) Complications of minimally invasive procedures of the abdomen and pelvis: a comprehensive update on the clinical and imaging features. Emerg Radiol 22:283–294CrossRefPubMed Saddala P, Ramanathan S, Tirumani SH et al (2015) Complications of minimally invasive procedures of the abdomen and pelvis: a comprehensive update on the clinical and imaging features. Emerg Radiol 22:283–294CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hindman NM, Kang S, Parikh MS (2014) Common postoperative findings unique to laparoscopic surgery. Radiographics 34:119–138CrossRefPubMed Hindman NM, Kang S, Parikh MS (2014) Common postoperative findings unique to laparoscopic surgery. Radiographics 34:119–138CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Han NY, Sung DJ, Park JB et al (2014) Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging 39:398–410CrossRefPubMed Han NY, Sung DJ, Park JB et al (2014) Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging 39:398–410CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson AJ, Farquharson RG (2000) Vault haematoma and febrile morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy. Hosp Med 61:535–538CrossRefPubMed Thomson AJ, Farquharson RG (2000) Vault haematoma and febrile morbidity after vaginal hysterectomy. Hosp Med 61:535–538CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Thomson AJ, Sproston AR, Farquharson RG (1998) Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:211–215CrossRefPubMed Thomson AJ, Sproston AR, Farquharson RG (1998) Ultrasound detection of vault haematoma following vaginal hysterectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:211–215CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn RJ, de Crespigny LC (1985) Vault haematoma after vaginal hysterectomy: an invariable sequel? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 25:59–62CrossRefPubMed Kuhn RJ, de Crespigny LC (1985) Vault haematoma after vaginal hysterectomy: an invariable sequel? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 25:59–62CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Tam KF, Lam KW, Chan KK et al (2008) Natural history of pelvic lymphocysts as observed by ultrasonography after bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:87–90CrossRefPubMed Tam KF, Lam KW, Chan KK et al (2008) Natural history of pelvic lymphocysts as observed by ultrasonography after bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32:87–90CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim JK, Jeong YY, Kim YH et al (1999) Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology 212:390–394CrossRefPubMed Kim JK, Jeong YY, Kim YH et al (1999) Postoperative pelvic lymphocele: treatment with simple percutaneous catheter drainage. Radiology 212:390–394CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Alago W Jr, Deodhar A, Michell H et al (2013) Management of postoperative lymphoceles after lymphadenectomy: percutaneous catheter drainage with and without povidone-iodine sclerotherapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:466–471CrossRefPubMed Alago W Jr, Deodhar A, Michell H et al (2013) Management of postoperative lymphoceles after lymphadenectomy: percutaneous catheter drainage with and without povidone-iodine sclerotherapy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36:466–471CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kew F, Noble A, Sandhu M (2012) Infection of a lymphocyst after pelvic lymph node dissection for endocervical adenocarcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:606CrossRefPubMed Kew F, Noble A, Sandhu M (2012) Infection of a lymphocyst after pelvic lymph node dissection for endocervical adenocarcinoma. J Obstet Gynaecol 32:606CrossRefPubMed
32.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA (2012) Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:284–288CrossRefPubMed Cronin B, Sung VW, Matteson KA (2012) Vaginal cuff dehiscence: risk factors and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206:284–288CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Mausner EV, Yitta S, Slywotzky CM et al (2011) Commonly encountered foreign bodies and devices in the female pelvis: MDCT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W461–W470CrossRefPubMed Mausner EV, Yitta S, Slywotzky CM et al (2011) Commonly encountered foreign bodies and devices in the female pelvis: MDCT appearances. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W461–W470CrossRefPubMed
35.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Chirinos JA, Garcia J, Alcaide ML et al (2006) Septic thrombophlebitis: diagnosis and management. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 6:9–14CrossRefPubMed Chirinos JA, Garcia J, Alcaide ML et al (2006) Septic thrombophlebitis: diagnosis and management. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 6:9–14CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang JS, Ho AS, Ahmed A et al (2011) Borne identity: CT imaging of vascular infections. Emerg Radiol 18:335–343CrossRefPubMed Huang JS, Ho AS, Ahmed A et al (2011) Borne identity: CT imaging of vascular infections. Emerg Radiol 18:335–343CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Katz MD, Sugay SB, Walker DK et al (2012) Beyond hemostasis: spectrum of gynecologic and obstetric indications for transcatheter embolisation. Radiographics 32:1713–1731CrossRefPubMed Katz MD, Sugay SB, Walker DK et al (2012) Beyond hemostasis: spectrum of gynecologic and obstetric indications for transcatheter embolisation. Radiographics 32:1713–1731CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat AlHilli MM, El-Nashar SA, Garrett AT et al (2013) Use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of bowel complications after gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 122:1255–1262CrossRefPubMed AlHilli MM, El-Nashar SA, Garrett AT et al (2013) Use of computed tomography in the diagnosis of bowel complications after gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 122:1255–1262CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Hove LD, Bock J, Christoffersen JK et al (2010) Analysis of 136 ureteral injuries in gynecological and obstetrical surgery from completed insurance claims. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:82–86CrossRefPubMed Hove LD, Bock J, Christoffersen JK et al (2010) Analysis of 136 ureteral injuries in gynecological and obstetrical surgery from completed insurance claims. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89:82–86CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Adelman MR, Bardsley TR, Sharp HT (2014) Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:558–566CrossRefPubMed Adelman MR, Bardsley TR, Sharp HT (2014) Urinary tract injuries in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:558–566CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Hwang JH, Lim MC, Joung JY et al (2012) Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Int Urogynecol J 23:1605–1611CrossRefPubMed Hwang JH, Lim MC, Joung JY et al (2012) Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy. Int Urogynecol J 23:1605–1611CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Parpala-Sparman T, Paananen I, Santala M et al (2008) Increasing numbers of ureteric injuries after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42:422–427CrossRefPubMed Parpala-Sparman T, Paananen I, Santala M et al (2008) Increasing numbers of ureteric injuries after the introduction of laparoscopic surgery. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42:422–427CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Siow A, Nikam YA, Ng C et al (2007) Urological complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a four-year review at KK Women's and Children's hospital, Singapore. Singap Med J 48:217–221 Siow A, Nikam YA, Ng C et al (2007) Urological complications of laparoscopic hysterectomy: a four-year review at KK Women's and Children's hospital, Singapore. Singap Med J 48:217–221
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Bai SW, Huh EH, Jung Da J et al (2006) Urinary tract injuries during pelvic surgery: incidence rates and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:360–364CrossRef Bai SW, Huh EH, Jung Da J et al (2006) Urinary tract injuries during pelvic surgery: incidence rates and predisposing factors. Int Urogynecol J 17:360–364CrossRef
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorairajan G, Rani PR, Habeebullah S et al (2004) Urological injuries during hysterectomies: a 6-year review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:430–435CrossRefPubMed Dorairajan G, Rani PR, Habeebullah S et al (2004) Urological injuries during hysterectomies: a 6-year review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30:430–435CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozdemir E, Ozturk U, Celen S et al (2011) Urinary complications of gynecologic surgery: iatrogenic urinary tract system injuries in obstetrics and gynecology operations. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 38:217–220PubMed Ozdemir E, Ozturk U, Celen S et al (2011) Urinary complications of gynecologic surgery: iatrogenic urinary tract system injuries in obstetrics and gynecology operations. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 38:217–220PubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Awadi K, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A et al (2005) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 37:235–241CrossRefPubMed Al-Awadi K, Kehinde EO, Al-Hunayan A et al (2005) Iatrogenic ureteric injuries: incidence, aetiological factors and the effect of early management on subsequent outcome. Int Urol Nephrol 37:235–241CrossRefPubMed
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahendran HA, Praveen S, Ho C et al (2012) Iatrogenic ureter injuries: eleven years experience in a tertiary hospital. Med J Malaysia 67:169–172PubMed Mahendran HA, Praveen S, Ho C et al (2012) Iatrogenic ureter injuries: eleven years experience in a tertiary hospital. Med J Malaysia 67:169–172PubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S et al (2002) Urinomas caused by ureteral injuries: CT appearance. Abdom Imaging 27:88–92CrossRefPubMed Gayer G, Zissin R, Apter S et al (2002) Urinomas caused by ureteral injuries: CT appearance. Abdom Imaging 27:88–92CrossRefPubMed
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Titton RL, Gervais DA, Hahn PF et al (2003) Urine leaks and urinomas: diagnosis and imaging-guided intervention. Radiographics 23:1133–1147CrossRefPubMed Titton RL, Gervais DA, Hahn PF et al (2003) Urine leaks and urinomas: diagnosis and imaging-guided intervention. Radiographics 23:1133–1147CrossRefPubMed
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Gayer G, Apter S, Garniek A et al (2000) Complications after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 25:435–439CrossRefPubMed Gayer G, Apter S, Garniek A et al (2000) Complications after laparoscopic gynecologic procedures: CT findings. Abdom Imaging 25:435–439CrossRefPubMed
54.
Zurück zum Zitat Koukouras D, Petsas T, Liatsikos E et al (2010) Percutaneous minimally invasive management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries. J Endourol 24:1921–1927CrossRefPubMed Koukouras D, Petsas T, Liatsikos E et al (2010) Percutaneous minimally invasive management of iatrogenic ureteral injuries. J Endourol 24:1921–1927CrossRefPubMed
55.
Zurück zum Zitat Ibeanu OA, Chesson RR, Echols KT et al (2009) Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy based on universal cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 113:6–10CrossRefPubMed Ibeanu OA, Chesson RR, Echols KT et al (2009) Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy based on universal cystoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 113:6–10CrossRefPubMed
56.
Zurück zum Zitat Romics I, Kelemen Z, Fazakas Z (2002) The diagnosis and management of vesicovaginal fistulae. BJU Int 89:764–766CrossRefPubMed Romics I, Kelemen Z, Fazakas Z (2002) The diagnosis and management of vesicovaginal fistulae. BJU Int 89:764–766CrossRefPubMed
57.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon SG, Kim SH, Lee HJL et al (2001) Pelvic fistulas complicating pelvic surgery or diseases: spectrum of imaging findings. Korean J Radiol 2(2):97–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moon SG, Kim SH, Lee HJL et al (2001) Pelvic fistulas complicating pelvic surgery or diseases: spectrum of imaging findings. Korean J Radiol 2(2):97–104CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
58.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini F (2018) Early CT after vaginal hysterectomy: normal or abnormal? {Online}. EuroRAD Case 15268 Tonolini F (2018) Early CT after vaginal hysterectomy: normal or abnormal? {Online}. EuroRAD Case 15268
59.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini M, Pagani A (2014) Late superinfection of postsurgical lymphocele {Online} EuroRAD Case 11670 Tonolini M, Pagani A (2014) Late superinfection of postsurgical lymphocele {Online} EuroRAD Case 11670
60.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini M (2017) Life-threatening haemorrhage after laparoscopic hysterectomy {Online}. EuroRAD Case 15152 Tonolini M (2017) Life-threatening haemorrhage after laparoscopic hysterectomy {Online}. EuroRAD Case 15152
61.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini M (2015) Iatrogenic ureteral injury with urinoma following laparoscopic hysterectomy: CT diagnosis and follow-up {Online}. EuroRAD Case 12226 Tonolini M (2015) Iatrogenic ureteral injury with urinoma following laparoscopic hysterectomy: CT diagnosis and follow-up {Online}. EuroRAD Case 12226
62.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonolini M, Damiani G (2014) Post-surgical vesico-vaginal fistula: CT diagnosis and follow-up {Online}. EuroRAD Case 12239 Tonolini M, Damiani G (2014) Post-surgical vesico-vaginal fistula: CT diagnosis and follow-up {Online}. EuroRAD Case 12239
Metadaten
Titel
Multidetector CT of expected findings and complications after hysterectomy
verfasst von
Massimo Tonolini
Publikationsdatum
06.04.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Insights into Imaging / Ausgabe 3/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0610-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Insights into Imaging 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.