Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 2/2018

11.09.2017 | Gastrointestinal

Optimisation of the MR protocol in pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis

verfasst von: Ilah Shin, Yong Eun Chung, Chansik An, Hye Sun Lee, Honsoul Kim, Joon Seok Lim, Myeong-Jin Kim

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the optimal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol in pregnant women suspected of having acute appendicitis.

Materials and methods

One hundred and forty-six pregnant women with suspected appendicitis were included. MR images were reviewed by two radiologists in three separate sessions. In session 1, only axial single-shot turbo spin echo (SSH-TSE) T2-weighted images (WI) were included with other routine sequences. In sessions 2 and 3, coronal and sagittal T2WI were sequentially added. The visibility of the appendix and diagnostic confidence of appendicitis were evaluated in each session using a 5-point grading scale. If diseases other than appendicitis were suspected, specific diagnosis with a 5-point confidence scale was recorded. Diagnostic performance for appendicitis and other diseases were evaluated.

Results

Twenty-five patients (17.1%) were diagnosed with appendicitis. Among the patients with normal appendix, 28 were diagnosed with other disease. Diagnostic performance including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve values for diagnosing appendicitis and other diseases showed no significant difference among sets for both reviewers (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Diagnostic performance of MR in pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis can be preserved with omission of sagittal or both coronal and sagittal SSH-T2WI.

Key points

Diagnostic performance of appendicitis is preserved with omission of sagittal/coronal T2WIs.
Diagnosis of other disease may be sufficient with axial T2WIs only.
Careful serial omission of sagittal and coronal T2WIs can be considered.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E (2012) MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics 32:317–334CrossRefPubMed Spalluto LB, Woodfield CA, DeBenedectis CM, Lazarus E (2012) MR imaging evaluation of abdominal pain during pregnancy: appendicitis and other nonobstetric causes. Radiographics 32:317–334CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T et al (2015) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q 31:85–91CrossRefPubMed Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T et al (2015) ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Right Lower Quadrant Pain--Suspected Appendicitis. Ultrasound Q 31:85–91CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Konrad J, Grand D, Lourenco A (2015) MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 40:3359–3364CrossRefPubMed Konrad J, Grand D, Lourenco A (2015) MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis. Abdom Imaging 40:3359–3364CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ditkofsky NG, Singh A (2015) Challenges in magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. Current problems in diagnostic radiology 44:297–302CrossRefPubMed Ditkofsky NG, Singh A (2015) Challenges in magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. Current problems in diagnostic radiology 44:297–302CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340CrossRefPubMed Chen MM, Coakley FV, Kaimal A, Laros RK Jr (2008) Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol 112:333–340CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Baheti AD, Nicola R, Bennett GL et al (2016) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Abdominal and Pelvic Pain in the Pregnant Patient. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 24:403–417CrossRefPubMed Baheti AD, Nicola R, Bennett GL et al (2016) Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Abdominal and Pelvic Pain in the Pregnant Patient. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 24:403–417CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramalingam V, LeBedis C, Kelly JR, Uyeda J, Soto JA, Anderson SW (2015) Evaluation of a sequential multi-modality imaging algorithm for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pregnant female. Emerg Radiol 22:125–132CrossRefPubMed Ramalingam V, LeBedis C, Kelly JR, Uyeda J, Soto JA, Anderson SW (2015) Evaluation of a sequential multi-modality imaging algorithm for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pregnant female. Emerg Radiol 22:125–132CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:693.e691–693.e696CrossRef Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:693.e691–693.e696CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501–530CrossRefPubMed Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C et al (2013) ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:501–530CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF et al (2016) Accuracy of Unenhanced MR Imaging in the Detection of Acute Appendicitis: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review. Radiology 279:451–460CrossRefPubMed Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF et al (2016) Accuracy of Unenhanced MR Imaging in the Detection of Acute Appendicitis: Single-Institution Clinical Performance Review. Radiology 279:451–460CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2005) Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg 71:803–808PubMed McGory ML, Zingmond DS, Nanayakkara D, Maggard MA, Ko CY (2005) Negative appendectomy rate: influence of CT scans. Am Surg 71:803–808PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 74:494-522 (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Health Phys 74:494-522
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L (1990) Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 176:593–606CrossRefPubMed Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L (1990) Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 176:593–606CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232:635–652CrossRefPubMed Shellock FG, Crues JV (2004) MR procedures: biologic effects, safety, and patient care. Radiology 232:635–652CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250:749–757CrossRefPubMed Pedrosa I, Lafornara M, Pandharipande PV, Goldsmith JD, Rofsky NM (2009) Pregnant patients suspected of having acute appendicitis: effect of MR imaging on negative laparotomy rate and appendiceal perforation rate. Radiology 250:749–757CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E et al (2014) Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics 133:586–593CrossRefPubMed Aspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E et al (2014) Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics 133:586–593CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DB, Stewart RD, Matulevicius SA et al (2015) The Effects of Maternal Position and Habitus on Maternal Cardiovascular Parameters as Measured by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Am J Perinatol 32:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed Nelson DB, Stewart RD, Matulevicius SA et al (2015) The Effects of Maternal Position and Habitus on Maternal Cardiovascular Parameters as Measured by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Am J Perinatol 32:1318–1323CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D (2013) Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology 267:137–144CrossRefPubMed Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D (2013) Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology 267:137–144CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L, Coerkamp E, Puylaert J, Blickman J (2009) A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 19:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed Cobben L, Groot I, Kingma L, Coerkamp E, Puylaert J, Blickman J (2009) A simple MRI protocol in patients with clinically suspected appendicitis: results in 138 patients and effect on outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 19:1175–1183CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H et al (2016) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:508–517CrossRefPubMed Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H et al (2016) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of MRI for Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206:508–517CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Optimisation of the MR protocol in pregnant women with suspected acute appendicitis
verfasst von
Ilah Shin
Yong Eun Chung
Chansik An
Hye Sun Lee
Honsoul Kim
Joon Seok Lim
Myeong-Jin Kim
Publikationsdatum
11.09.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5038-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

European Radiology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.