Anzeige
Erschienen in:
23.11.2016
Optimization of window settings for standard and advanced virtual monoenergetic imaging in abdominal dual-energy CT angiography
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 3/2017
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Objectives
To determine the optimal window setting for displaying virtual monoenergetic reconstructions of third generation dual-source, dual-energy CT (DECT) angiography of the abdomen.
Methods
Forty-five patients were evaluated with DECT angiography (90/150 kV, 180/90 ref. mAs). Three datasets were reconstructed: standard linear blending (M_0.6), 70 keV traditional virtual monoenergetic (M70), and 40 keV advanced noise-optimized virtual monoenergetic (M40+). The best window setting (width and level, W/L) was assessed by two blinded observers and was correlated with aortic attenuation to obtain the Optimized W/L setting (O-W/L). Subjective image quality was assessed, and vessel diameters were measured to determine any possible influences between different W/L settings. Repeated measures of variance were used to evaluate comparison of W/L values, image quality, and vessel sizing between M_0.6, M70, and M40+.
Results
The Best W/L (B-W/L) for M70 and M40+ was 880/280 and 1410/450, respectively. Results from regression analysis inferred an O-W/L of 850/270 for M70 and 1350/430 for M40+. Significant differences for W and L were found between the Best and the Optimized W/L for M40+, and between M70 and M40+ for both the Best and Optimized W/L. No significant differences for vessel measurements were found using the O-W/L for M40+ compared to the standard M_0.6 (p ≥ 0.16), and significant differences were observed when using the B-W/L with M40+ compared to M_0.6 (p ≤ 0.04).
Conclusion
In order to optimize virtual monoenergetic imaging with both traditional M70 and advanced M40+, adjusting the W/L settings is necessary. Our results suggest a W/L setting of 850/270 for M70 and 1350/430 for M40+.