Osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease after treatment with anti-PD1 antibody

A 38-year-old woman with no smoking history noticed right shoulder pain and dyspnea on exertion in December 2014, and presented at hospital in January 2015. She was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma, harboring an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R mutation on exon 21. She was treated with bevacizumab plus erlotinib as first-line chemotherapy, and subsequently received carboplatin plus pemetrexed. In February 2016, nivolumab at a dose of 3 mg/kg was administered every 2 weeks up to four cycles. However, no significant response was observed, and a CT-guided needle biopsy of the pleural lesion was performed to evaluate EGFR mutation status. The biopsy specimens revealed adenocarcinoma harboring an EGFR L858R mutation on exon 21 and a T790 M mutation on exon 20. The patient was referred to our institution in April 2016 to be treated with osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). As the tumor had shown dramatic and aggressive growth since diagnosis, osimertinib treatment (80 mg, once daily) was initiated 8 days after the last administration of nivolumab.

Thirty-one days after initiating osimertinib treatment, the patient began to complain of low-grade fever and shortness of breath without hypoxemia. Her chest radiograph revealed a remarkable antitumor response with an improvement in right pleural thickening and pleural effusion, although faint infiltrations were observed in the bilateral lung field. Because the possibility of osimertinib-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD) was considered, treatment with osimertinib was discontinued. After osimertinib treatment interruption, the patient’s symptoms were gradually relieved and osimertinib was re-administered following consideration of the clinical benefit of its antitumor efficacy. A week after resumption of osimertinib treatment, however, her symptoms worsened and bilateral faint shadows were observed by chest radiograph. Furthermore, the chest CT scan revealed further tumor shrinkage and bilateral diffuse, faint, ground-glass opacities lacking consolidation and traction bronchiectasis, a pattern compatible with hypersensitivity pneumonitis (Fig. 1). Thus, osimertinib-induced ILD was strongly suspected and we performed various appropriate examinations.

Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), obtained from the left bronchus (90 mL/150 mL), contained a white blood count of 1660 cells/μL (83 % lymphocytes, 14.5 % macrophages, 1 % neutrophils, and 1 % eosinophils) and showed a CD4+/CD8+ ratio of 0.3. BALF culture was negative for pathogens including bacteria, fungi, acid-fast bacilli, and pneumocystis jirovecii by polymerase chain reaction. A transbronchial lung biopsy specimen showed mainly lymphocytic alveolitis with partial organization in several alveolar spaces, without severe fibrosis. There was no evidence of infection, cardiogenic pulmonary edema, carcinomatous lymphangitis, pulmonary hemorrhage, or hyaline membranes (Fig. 2). This pathological pattern was compatible with previous reports of drug-induced ILD, although there are few reports on the specific pathological features of EGFR-TKI-induced ILD [1]. Although general blood tests including serum inflammatory markers, white blood cell count, and CRP level were within the normal range, serum KL-6 was elevated from 547 U/mL (May 2016) to 2310 U/mL (June 2016). Based on these clinical findings, we diagnosed the patient with osimertinib-induced ILD. Following withdrawal of osimertinib, her symptoms and the faint shadows on the bilateral lung field gradually diminished without administration of steroids, further supporting the diagnosis of osimertinib-induced ILD. Two months after discontinuation of osimertinib treatment, a chest CT scan showed that the bilateral diffuse, faint, ground-glass opacities had disappeared completely, but right pleural thickening had worsened. Therefore, she has been treated with ramucirumab plus docetaxel as subsequent chemotherapy from August 2016.