Skip to main content
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2017

14.10.2016 | Clinical Investigation

Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Dialysis Access. Results from a Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis

verfasst von: Panagiotis M. Kitrou, Stavros Spiliopoulos, Panagiotis Papadimatos, Nicolaos Christeas, Theodoros Petsas, Konstantinos Katsanos, Dimitris Karnabatidis

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the safety and effectiveness of lutonix paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) for the treatment of dysfunctional dialysis access.

Materials and Methods

This was a single-center, single-arm, retrospective analysis of 39 patients (23 male, 59 %) undergoing 61 interventions using 69 PCBs in a 20-month period. There was a balance between arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and grafts (AVG) (20 AVFs, 19AVGs), and the majority of lesions were restenotic (25/39, 64.1 %). Mean balloon diameter used was 6.6 mm and length 73.4 mm. Primary outcome measure was target lesion primary patency (TLPP) at 6 months, while secondary outcome measures included factors affecting TLPP and major complications. As there were lesions treated more than once with PCB, authors also compared patency results after first and second PCB angioplasty.

Results

TLPP was 72.2 % at 6 months with a median patency of 260 days according to the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. No major complications occurred. TLPP between AVFs and AVGs (311 vs. 237 days, respectively; p = 0.29) and de novo and restenotic lesions was similar (270.5 vs. 267.5 days, respectively; p = 0.50). In 14 cases, in which lesions were treated with two PCB angioplasties, a statistically significant difference in TLPP after the second treatment was noted (first intervention 179.5 days vs. second intervention 273.5 days; p = 0.032).

Conclusion

In this retrospective analysis, Lutonix PCB proved to be safe and effective in treating restenosis in dysfunctional dialysis access with results comparable to the literature available. Larger studies are needed to prove abovementioned results.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gilmore J. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations—2006 updates. Nephrol Nurs J. 2006;33(5):487–8.PubMed Gilmore J. KDOQI clinical practice guidelines and clinical practice recommendations—2006 updates. Nephrol Nurs J. 2006;33(5):487–8.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Haskal ZJ, et al. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):494–503.CrossRefPubMed Haskal ZJ, et al. Stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for failing dialysis-access grafts. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(6):494–503.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Diskin CJ. Novel insights into the pathobiology of the vascular access—do they translate into improved care? Blood Purif. 2010;29(2):216–29.CrossRefPubMed Diskin CJ. Novel insights into the pathobiology of the vascular access—do they translate into improved care? Blood Purif. 2010;29(2):216–29.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Karnabatidis D, et al. Stent-grafts versus angioplasty and/or bare metal stents for failing arteriovenous grafts: a cross-over longitudinal study. J Nephrol. 2013;26(2):389–95.CrossRefPubMed Karnabatidis D, et al. Stent-grafts versus angioplasty and/or bare metal stents for failing arteriovenous grafts: a cross-over longitudinal study. J Nephrol. 2013;26(2):389–95.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Haskal ZJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, concurrently-controlled study of a stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of arteriovenous access graft stenosis: 2-year results of the RENOVA study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1105–14.CrossRefPubMed Haskal ZJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, concurrently-controlled study of a stent graft versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of arteriovenous access graft stenosis: 2-year results of the RENOVA study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27(8):1105–14.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Shemesh D, et al. Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(6):1524–31.CrossRefPubMed Shemesh D, et al. Angioplasty with stent graft versus bare stent for recurrent cephalic arch stenosis in autogenous arteriovenous access for hemodialysis: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48(6):1524–31.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitrou PM, et al. Paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae: 1-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(3):348–54.CrossRefPubMed Kitrou PM, et al. Paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty for dysfunctional arteriovenous fistulae: 1-year results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26(3):348–54.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitrou PM, et al. Drug-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access: final results and cost-effectiveness analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01174472). Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(3):418–23.CrossRefPubMed Kitrou PM, et al. Drug-eluting versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access: final results and cost-effectiveness analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01174472). Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(3):418–23.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsanos K, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. plain balloon dilation for the treatment of failing dialysis access: 6-month interim results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(2):263–72.CrossRefPubMed Katsanos K, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty vs. plain balloon dilation for the treatment of failing dialysis access: 6-month interim results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(2):263–72.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai CC, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon improves target lesion restenosis on inflow lesions of autogenous radiocephalic fistulas: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(4):535–41.CrossRefPubMed Lai CC, et al. Percutaneous angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon improves target lesion restenosis on inflow lesions of autogenous radiocephalic fistulas: a pilot study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(4):535–41.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray RJ, et al. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. Technology Assessment Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1405–15.CrossRefPubMed Gray RJ, et al. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. Technology Assessment Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10(10):1405–15.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitrou PM, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K. Drug-coated balloons are replacing the need for nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016. Kitrou PM, Karnabatidis D, Katsanos K. Drug-coated balloons are replacing the need for nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016.
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray RJ, et al. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S433–42.CrossRefPubMed Gray RJ, et al. Reporting standards for percutaneous interventions in dialysis access. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14(9 Pt 2):S433–42.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Karunanithy N, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon fistuloplasty versus plain balloon fistuloplasty only to preserve the patency of arteriovenous fistulae used for haemodialysis (PAVE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karunanithy N, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon fistuloplasty versus plain balloon fistuloplasty only to preserve the patency of arteriovenous fistulae used for haemodialysis (PAVE): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17(1):241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Patane D, et al. Drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of failing hemodialytic radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: our experience in the treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses. J Vasc Access. 2014;15(5):338–43.CrossRefPubMed Patane D, et al. Drug-eluting balloon for the treatment of failing hemodialytic radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas: our experience in the treatment of juxta-anastomotic stenoses. J Vasc Access. 2014;15(5):338–43.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Massmann A, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic central vein restenosis in patients with hemodialysis fistulas. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(1):74–9.CrossRefPubMed Massmann A, et al. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for symptomatic central vein restenosis in patients with hemodialysis fistulas. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(1):74–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Dysfunctional Dialysis Access. Results from a Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis
verfasst von
Panagiotis M. Kitrou
Stavros Spiliopoulos
Panagiotis Papadimatos
Nicolaos Christeas
Theodoros Petsas
Konstantinos Katsanos
Dimitris Karnabatidis
Publikationsdatum
14.10.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-016-1479-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.