Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2010

01.10.2010

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison of automatic bolus tracking and empirical scan delay

verfasst von: Yoshihiko Fukukura, Koji Takumi, Takuro Kamiyama, Toshikazu Shindo, Ryutaro Higashi, Masayuki Nakajo

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 5/2010

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the efficacy of automatic bolus tracking in multidetector row CT (MDCT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma as compared with standard scan delay using the fixed duration contrast injection technique.

Materials and methods

Seventy-nine patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomas underwent three-phase enhanced CT with an individualized scan delay as determined by automatic bolus tracking (protocol 1) or an empiric scan delay (protocol 2). We evaluated enhancement of the aorta, portal vein, hepatic parenchyma, pancreatic parenchyma, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma during each phase. Two radiologists graded the conspicuity of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the pancreatic parenchymal phase. The results for the different groups were statistically compared.

Results

Pancreatic parenchymal enhancement (mean ± standard deviation, 100.2 HU ± 17.6 vs. 88.5 HU ± 22.1; P < 0.05) and tumor-to-pancreas contrast (mean ± standard deviation, 75.3 HU ± 25.0 vs. 63.1HU ± 24.1; P < 0.05) were significantly greater in protocol 1 than in protocol 2 during pancreatic parenchymal phase. Qualitative results correlated well with quantitative results (reviewer 1: R s = 0.78, P < 0.001; reviewer 2: R s = 0.66, P < 0.001)

Conclusion

The use of automatic bolus tracking with MDCT can significantly improve the degree of contrast enhancement in the pancreatic parenchyma and tumor-to-pancreas conspicuity.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Megibow AJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions. Radiology 1992; 183: 297–303PubMed Megibow AJ. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: designing the examination to evaluate the clinical questions. Radiology 1992; 183: 297–303PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishiharu T, Yamashita Y, Abe Y, et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging-ROC analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 445–452PubMed Nishiharu T, Yamashita Y, Abe Y, et al. Local extension of pancreatic carcinoma: assessment with thin-section helical CT versus with breath-hold fast MR imaging-ROC analysis. Radiology 1999; 212: 445–452PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson PT, Fishman EK. IV contrast selection for MDCT: current thoughts and practice. AJR 2006; 186:406–415CrossRefPubMed Johnson PT, Fishman EK. IV contrast selection for MDCT: current thoughts and practice. AJR 2006; 186:406–415CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697–701PubMed Lu DS, Vedantham S, Krasny RM, Kadell B, Berger WL, Reber HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology 1996; 199:697–701PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McNulty N, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Gebremariam A. Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001; 220:97–102PubMed McNulty N, Francis IR, Platt JF, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Gebremariam A. Multi-detector row helical CT of the pancreas: effect of contrast-enhanced multiphasic imaging on enhancement of the pancreas, peripancreatic vasculature, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Radiology 2001; 220:97–102PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2003; 229:81–90CrossRefPubMed Fletcher JG, Wiersema MJ, Farrell MA, et al. Pancreatic malignancy: value of arterial, pancreatic, and hepatic phase imaging with multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2003; 229:81–90CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Sou H, et al. MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimal imaging phases and multiplannar reformatted imaging. AJR 2006; 187:1513–1520CrossRefPubMed Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Sou H, et al. MDCT of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: optimal imaging phases and multiplannar reformatted imaging. AJR 2006; 187:1513–1520CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 1998; 209:327–329PubMed Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 1998; 209:327–329PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu H, He DH, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000; 215:55–62PubMed Hu H, He DH, Foley WD, Fox SH. Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. Radiology 2000; 215:55–62PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MRI angiography: when dose it occur and why ? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003; 227:809–816CrossRefPubMed Bae KT. Peak contrast enhancement in CT and MRI angiography: when dose it occur and why ? pharmacokinetic study in a porcine model. Radiology 2003; 227:809–816CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Silverman PK, Robers SC, Ducic I, et al. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material. AJR 1996; 167:79–84PubMed Silverman PK, Robers SC, Ducic I, et al. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material. AJR 1996; 167:79–84PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehnert F, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Kopp AF, Claussen CD. Biphasic spiral CT of the liver: automatic bolus tracking or time delay? Eur Radiol 2001; 11:427–431CrossRefPubMed Mehnert F, Pereira PL, Trubenbach J, Kopp AF, Claussen CD. Biphasic spiral CT of the liver: automatic bolus tracking or time delay? Eur Radiol 2001; 11:427–431CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sandstede JJW, Tschammler A, Beer M, Vogelsang C, Wittenberg G, Hahn D. Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1396–1400CrossRefPubMed Sandstede JJW, Tschammler A, Beer M, Vogelsang C, Wittenberg G, Hahn D. Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1396–1400CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim T, Murakami T, Hori M, et al. Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by double arterial phase CT performed with single breath-hold scanning and automatic bolus tracking. AJR 2002; 178:899–904PubMed Kim T, Murakami T, Hori M, et al. Small hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by double arterial phase CT performed with single breath-hold scanning and automatic bolus tracking. AJR 2002; 178:899–904PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Satake H, Iwano S, Ishigaki T. Late-arterial and portal-venous phase imaging of the liver with a multislice CT scanner in patients without circulatory disturbances: automatic bolus tracking or empirical scan delay? Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1665–1673CrossRefPubMed Itoh S, Ikeda M, Achiwa M, Satake H, Iwano S, Ishigaki T. Late-arterial and portal-venous phase imaging of the liver with a multislice CT scanner in patients without circulatory disturbances: automatic bolus tracking or empirical scan delay? Eur Radiol 2004; 14:1665–1673CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 2004; 230:142–150CrossRefPubMed Awai K, Hiraishi K, Hori S. Effect of contrast material injection duration and rate on aortic peak time and peak enhancement at dynamic CT involving injection protocol with dose tailored to patient weight. Radiology 2004; 230:142–150CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MJ, Chung YE, Kim KW, et al. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocol. AJR 2006; 186:185–192CrossRefPubMed Kim MJ, Chung YE, Kim KW, et al. Variation of the time to aortic enhancement of fixed-duration versus fixed-rate injection protocol. AJR 2006; 186:185–192CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006; 241:167–174CrossRefPubMed Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, et al. Pancreas: optimal scan delay for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT. Radiology 2006; 241:167–174CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, et al. Pancreas: patient body weight-tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT. Radiology 2007; 245: 475–482CrossRefPubMed Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, et al. Pancreas: patient body weight-tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT. Radiology 2007; 245: 475–482CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on Pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999; 210:97–101PubMed Tublin ME, Tessler FN, Cheng SL, Peters TL, McGovern PC. Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on Pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. Radiology 1999; 210:97–101PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate-pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 1998; 206:455–464PubMed Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate-pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 1998; 206:455–464PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Irie T, Kajitani M, Yamaguchi M, Itai Y. Contrast-enhanced CT with saline flush technique using two automated injectors: how much contrast medium dose it save? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:287–291CrossRefPubMed Irie T, Kajitani M, Yamaguchi M, Itai Y. Contrast-enhanced CT with saline flush technique using two automated injectors: how much contrast medium dose it save? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:287–291CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR 2007; 188:751–756CrossRefPubMed Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. MDCT of the pancreas: optimizing scanning delay with a bolus-tracking technique for pancreatic, peripancreatic vascular, and hepatic contrast enhancement. AJR 2007; 188:751–756CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. AJR 1994; 163:323–331PubMed Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. AJR 1994; 163:323–331PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shieman RG, Raptopopoulos V, Caruso P, Vrachliotis T, Pearlman J. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen. AJR 1996; 167:725–729 Shieman RG, Raptopopoulos V, Caruso P, Vrachliotis T, Pearlman J. Comparison of tailored and empiric scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen. AJR 1996; 167:725–729
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 1–7CrossRefPubMed Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 1999; 189: 1–7CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a comparison of automatic bolus tracking and empirical scan delay
verfasst von
Yoshihiko Fukukura
Koji Takumi
Takuro Kamiyama
Toshikazu Shindo
Ryutaro Higashi
Masayuki Nakajo
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2010
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 5/2010
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9560-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2010

Abdominal Radiology 5/2010 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.