Introduction
Papillary neoplasms in the WHO classification of breast tumors
Intraductal papilloma
Intraductal papilloma with ADH, DCIS, or lobular neoplasia
Clinical management of intraductal papillomas detected on CNB and VAB
1st author (year of publication) | Number of cases (specific features) | Biopsy device | Upgrade to in situ or invasive (%) | Upgrade to a high-risk lesion (ADH, ALH, FEA, cLCIS) % | Conclusion | Suggestion | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Chang (2011) [14] | 49 | 11 G vacuum or core | 0 | 6.1 | Papillary lesions without atypia can be diagnosed accurately by US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy | Surgical excision may not be required for IDP diagnosed by US-guided 11-gauge vacuum assisted biopsies | |
Pareja (2016) [62] | 166 (lesions without atypia) | core | 2.3 | 0 (papilloma with ADH were exclusion criterium) | Upgrade rate at the excision was low for IDP with radiological-pathological concordance | Conservative approach is appropriate for IDP without atypia on CNB and with concordant pathological-radiological assessment, regardless of size | |
Kuehner (2019) [41] | 327 (mass lesions) | core | 5.8 | 9.5 | Overall outcomes for BPBLs diagnosed on IGCNB are favorable whether immediate surgical excision or imaging surveillance is the final treatment choice | Conservative approach is reasonable in the management of BPBLs diagnosed on IGCNB | |
Moynihan (2019) [57] | 124 (symptomatic) | core | 2.4 | 12.1 | Low risk of upgrade to malignancy for patients with a diagnosis of IDP without atypia on CNB | Observation may be a safe alternative to surgical excision in selected cases | |
MacColl (2019) [49] | 180 (multi-institutional; lesions without atypia) | core | 12 (cLCIS also included) | 0 (cLCIS included into upgrade) | Risk factors associated with invasive carcinoma are advanced patient age, high BI-RADS score. For radiologically identified lesions, higher risk for carcinoma is associated with size > 0.5 cm and calcifications | Younger women with biopsies targeting non-mass abnormalities and low BI-RADS scores may benefit from clinical and imaging follow-up alone | |
Nakhlis (2020) [59] | 85 (multi-institutional; asymptomatic) | core | 1.7 | 13 | Very low upgrade rate to invasive cancer or DCIS on excision if IDP without atypia diagnosed on core biopsy of BI-RADS4 lesions | Routine excision is not indicated for IDP without atypia on CNB and with concordant imaging findings | |
Moseley (2021) [55] | 102 | 9–18 G core ± vacuum | 2.9 | 7.8 | Personal history of breast cancer and lesion size are associated with upgrade to carcinoma | Follow-up by imaging at 6 months interval for 2 years in selected low-risk patients with no history of breast cancer, no clinical symptoms, and size < 1 cm | |
Lin (2021) [47] | 165 | core | 3 | N/A | The surgical upgrade rate for pure IDP on CNB in younger women is only 3% | The low upgrade rate should be part of the management discussion |