Erschienen in:
01.06.2003 | Clinical Investigations
Patency of Wallstents Placed at the Venous Anastomosis of
Dialysis Grafts for Salvage of Angioplasty-Induced Rupture
verfasst von:
Dheeraj K. Rajan, Timothy W.I. Clark
Erschienen in:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
|
Ausgabe 3/2003
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the
patency of Wallstents placed at the venous anastomosis of
polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE) hemodialysis grafts to preserve function
following angioplasty-induced rupture.
Methods: The
charts of all patients who underwent percutaneous angioplasty of
functioning hemodialysis PTFE grafts between September 1997 and
September 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 414
angioplasties were performed. Nine cases of rupture at the venous
anastomosis managed with stent placement were identified (7 women, 2
men). Two grafts were loop grafts, seven grafts were straight grafts.
All stents placed were Wallstents; six stents were 8 × 40 mm, the
remaining three were 8 × 20 mm, 8 × 60 mm and 10 × 42
mm. Average follow-up was 13 months.
Results: Technical
and clinical success of stent placement was 100%. The primary patency
rates (±SE) of stents placed at the venous anastomosis were 88%
(12%) at 30 days, 63% (17%) at 90 days, 33% (18%) at 180 days and
17% (15%) at 360 days. The secondary patency rates (±SE) were 89%
(11%) at 90 days, 76% (15%) at 180 days and 69% (23%) (6 stents
patent) at 360 days. During follow-up, one graft was removed because of
infection, one patient died and another was lost to follow-up. A single
minor complication of a puncture site hematoma occurred (11%) with no
major complications.
Conclusions: This small
retrospective series suggests that Wallstent placement following
angioplasty-induced venous anastomotic rupture is effective for
preserving dialyzable flow in hemodialysis grafts. Patency is
comparable to that of stents placed for reasons other than rupture.