nach oben

Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports

Erschienen in:

01.12.2014 | Reconstructed Bladder Function and Dysfunction (G Bales, Section Editor)

Patient Selection, Operative Technique, and Contemporary Outcomes of Continent Catheterizable Diversion: the Indiana Pouch

verfasst von: Shane M. Pearce, Joshua A. Cohn, Zoe Steinberg, Gary D. Steinberg

Erschienen in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports | Ausgabe 4/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Techniques for continent cutaneous urinary diversion (CCD) have evolved considerably over the last 65 years. The Indiana pouch (IP) was initially described in the 1980s and has gained wide acceptance among urologists. For patients who desire continent urinary diversion, many clinical scenarios and individual preferences continue to make the IP an excellent option for appropriately selected patients. Continence rates for the IP are generally satisfactory and compare favorably with orthotopic neobladder. Unfortunately, radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is associated with a high complication rate. We discuss short-term (<90 days) and long-term complications for CCD with attention to specific complications related to the efferent limb and continent pouch. Finally, we discuss health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after IP urinary diversion with comparison to the orthotopic neobladder and conduit diversion.

Cody JD, Nabi G, Dublin N, McClinton S, Neal DE, Pickard R et al. Urinary diversion and bladder reconstruction/replacement using intestinal segments for intractable incontinence or following cystectomy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;2:CD003306. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003306.pub2

2.•

Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):11–23. doi:10.1111/bju.12121. High quality review article which examines the pros and cons of various options for urinary diversion after radical cystectomy. The article reviews criteria for patient selection as well as outcomes for various types of urinary diversion including continent cutaneous diversion. PubMedCrossRef

Rink MK L, Eichelberg E, Fisch M, Dahlem R. Continent catheterizable pouches for urinary diversion. Eur Urol Suppl. 2010;9:754–62.CrossRef

Rowland RG. Present experience with the Indiana pouch. World J Urol. 1996;14(2):92–8.PubMedCrossRef

Verhoogen J. Neostomie uretero-cecale formation d’une poche vesicale et d’un noveau uretre. Assoc Franc d’Urol. 1908;12:352–65.

Gilchrist RK, Merricks JW, Hamlin HH, Rieger IT. Construction of a substitute bladder and urethra. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950;90(6):752–60.PubMed

Kock NG, Nilson AE, Nilsson LO, Norlen LJ, Philipson BM. Urinary diversion via a continent ileal reservoir: clinical results in 12 patients. J Urol. 1982;128(3):469–75.PubMed

Rowland RGM ME, Bihrle R. The ileocecal continent urinary reservoir. World J Urol. 1985;3:185.CrossRef

Mansson W, Davidsson T, Colleen S. The detubularized right colonic segment as urinary reservoir: evolution of technique for continent diversion. J Urol. 1990;144(6):1359–61.PubMed

10.

Bejany DE, Politano VA. Stapled and nonstapled tapered distal ileum for construction of a continent colonic urinary reservoir. J Urol. 1988;140(3):491–4.PubMed

11.

Lockhart JL. Remodeled right colon: an alternative urinary reservoir. J Urol. 1987;138(4):730–4.PubMed

12.

Thuroff JW, Alken P, Engelmann U, Riedmiller H, Jacobi GH, Hohenfellner R. The Mainz pouch (mixed augmentation ileum’n zecum) for bladder augmentation and continent urinary diversion. Eur Urol. 1985;11(3):152–60.PubMed

13.

Riedmiller H, Burger R, Muller S, Thuroff J, Hohenfellner R. Continent appendix stoma: a modification of the Mainz pouch technique. J Urol. 1990;143(6):1115–7.PubMed

14.

Hautmann RE, Abol-Enein H, Hafez K, Haro I, Mansson W, Mills RD, et al. Urinary diversion. Urology. 2007;69(1 Suppl):17–49. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.058.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Ashley MS, Daneshmand S. Factors influencing the choice of urinary diversion in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2010;106(5):654–7. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410×.2009.09183.x.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Hautmann RE. Which patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder or prostatic urethra are candidates for an orthotopic neobladder? Curr Uro Rep. 2000;1(3):173–9.CrossRef

17.

Hautmann RE. Urinary diversion: ileal conduit to neobladder. J Urol. 2003;169(3):834–42. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000029010.97686.eb.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Granberg CF, Boorjian SA, Crispen PL, Tollefson MK, Farmer SA, Frank I, et al. Functional and oncological outcomes after orthotopic neobladder reconstruction in women. BJU Int. 2008;102(11):1551–5. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410×.2008.07909.x.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Jentzmik F, Schrader AJ, de Petriconi R, Hefty R, Mueller J, Doetterl J, et al. The ileal neobladder in female patients with bladder cancer: long-term clinical, functional, and oncological outcome. World J Urol. 2012;30(6):733–9. doi:10.1007/s00345-012-0837-x.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Lee CT, Hafez KS, Sheffield JH, Joshi DP, Montie JE. Orthotopic bladder substitution in women: nontraditional applications. J Urol. 2004;171(4):1585–8. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000116547.75199.44.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Stein JP, Penson DF, Lee C, Cai J, Miranda G, Skinner DG. Long-term oncological outcomes in women undergoing radical cystectomy and orthotopic diversion for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2052–8. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.020. discussion 8–9.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Maffezzini M, Campodonico F, Canepa G, Gerbi G, Parodi D. Current perioperative management of radical cystectomy with intestinal urinary reconstruction for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and reduction of the incidence of postoperative ileus. Surg Oncol. 2008;17(1):41–8. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2007.09.003.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Guenaga KF, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;9, CD001544. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4.PubMed

24.•

Large MC, Kiriluk KJ, DeCastro GJ, Patel AR, Prasad S, Jayram G, et al. The impact of mechanical bowel preparation on postoperative complications for patients undergoing cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol. 2012;188(5):1801–5. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.039. This study describes a single surgeon experience before and after a change of practice by eliminating mechanical bowel preparation before radical cystectomy and ileal conduit or orthotopic neobladder reconstruction. 105 patients underwent bowel preparation and 75 did not, with no significant difference in perioperative infectious, wound, and bowel complications.PubMedCrossRef

25.•

Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Schuckman AK, Mitra AP, Cai J, Miranda G, et al. Enhanced recovery protocol after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J Urol. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.097. This is a single center experience of 126 consecutive patients undergoing open radical cystectomy and urinary diversion. Utilization of an enhanced recovery protocol after surgery resulted in expedited bowel function recovery and shorter length of stay, without increase in readmission. PubMedCentral

26.

Maffezzini M, Campodonico F, Capponi G, Manuputty E, Gerbi G. Fast-track surgery and technical nuances to reduce complications after radical cystectomy and intestinal urinary diversion with the modified Indiana pouch. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(3):191–5. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2012.02.001.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Elkassabany N, Ahmed M, Malkowicz SB, Heitjan DF, Isserman JA, Ochroch EA. Comparison between the analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block and placebo in open retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. J Clin Anesth. 2013;25(6):459–65. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.04.009.PubMedCrossRef

28.•

Lee CT, Chang SS, Kamat AM, Amiel G, Beard TL, Fergany A, et al. Alvimopan accelerates gastrointestinal recovery after radical cystectomy: a multicenter randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.036. Multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled trial which demonstrated alvimopam use leads to quicker recovery of bowel function and shorter hospital stay compared to placebo, with no increase in complications. PubMedCentral

29.

Rasmussen MS, Jorgensen LN, Wille-Jorgensen P. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;1, CD004318. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004318.pub2.PubMed

30.

Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Volkmer BG. Lessons learned from 1,000 neobladders: the 90-day complication rate. J Urol. 2010;184(3):990–4. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.037. quiz 1235.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Madersbacher S, Schmidt J, Eberle JM, Thoeny HC, Burkhard F, Hochreiter W, et al. Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion. J Urol. 2003;169(3):985–90. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000051462.45388.14.PubMedCrossRef

32.•

Shimko MS, Tollefson MK, Umbreit EC, Farmer SA, Blute ML, Frank I. Long-term complications of conduit urinary diversion. J Urol. 2011;185(2):562–7. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.096. Retrospective study examining long term complications in patients (n = 1,057) who underwent radical cystectomy and conduit urinary diversion. The complication rate was high at 60.8 % but reoperation rate was low. Additionally this study highlights the need for long-term follow-up because complications can occur decades after surgery. PubMedCrossRef

33.

Bachir BG, Kassouf W. Urinary diversions: advantages and disadvantages of the major types of diversions. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013;7(3):249–53. doi:10.1097/SPC.0b013e3283627903.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Lowrance WT, Rumohr JA, Clark PE, Chang SS, Smith Jr JA, Cookson MS. Urinary diversion trends at a high volume, single American tertiary care center. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2369–74. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.026.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Cookson MS, Chang SS, Wells N, Parekh DJ, Smith Jr JA. Complications of radical cystectomy for nonmuscle invasive disease: comparison with muscle invasive disease. J Urol. 2003;169(1):101–4. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000039521.77948.f9.PubMedCrossRef

36.••

Nazmy M, Yuh B, Kawachi M, Lau CS, Linehan J, Ruel NH, et al. Early and late complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a standardized analysis by urinary diversion type. J Urol. 2014;191(3):681–7. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.022. Retrospective study which examined early (<90 days) and late complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy with extra-corporeal urinary diverion in 209 consecutive patients, including 48 patients who underwent Indiana pouch construction. PubMedCrossRef

37.••

Nieuwenhuijzen JA, de Vries RR, Bex A, van der Poel HG, Meinhardt W, Antonini N, et al. Urinary diversions after cystectomy: the association of clinical factors, complications and functional results of four different diversions. Eur Urol. 2008;53(4):42–4. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.008. Retrospective study of 281 consecutive cystectomies which examines clinical factors, complication rates, functional results, and metabolic complications after cystectomy with analysis based on the type of urinary diversion. 51 patients underwent Indiana pouch urinary diversion. The Indiana pouch was associated with comparable complication rates to orthotopic neobladder and significantly better continence outcomes. CrossRef

38.

Richards KA, Steinberg GD. Perioperative outcomes in radical cystectomy: how to reduce morbidity? Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23(5):456–65. doi:10.1097/MOU.0b013e32836392bb.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

40.

Hautmann RE, Hautmann SH, Hautmann O. Complications associated with urinary diversion. Nat Rev Urol. 2011;8(12):667–77. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2011.147.PubMed

41.

Morgan M, Smith N, Thomas K, Murphy DG. Is Clavien the new standard for reporting urological complications? BJU Int. 2009;104(4):434–6. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410×.2009.08516.x.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Hollenbeck BK, Miller DC, Taub D, Dunn RL, Khuri SF, Henderson WG, et al. Identifying risk factors for potentially avoidable complications following radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2005;174(4 Pt 1):1231–7. discussion 7.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, Brooks CM, Cronin AM, Savage C, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–74. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Bochner BH, Karanikolas N, Barakat RR, Wong D, Chi DS. Ureteroileocecal appendicostomy based urinary reservoir in irradiated and nonirradiated patients. J Urol. 2009;182(5):2376–80. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.038.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Ahlering TE, Weinberg AC, Razor B. A comparative study of the ileal conduit, Kock pouch and modified Indiana pouch. J Urol. 1989;142(5):1193–6.PubMed

46.

Arai Y, Kawakita M, Terachi T, Oishi K, Okada Y, Takeuchi H, et al. Long-term followup of the Kock and Indiana pouch procedures. J Urol. 1993;150(1):51–5.PubMed

47.

Bihrle R. The Indiana pouch continent urinary reservoir. Urol clin N Am. 1997;24(4):773–9.CrossRef

48.

Carr LK, Webster GD. Kock versus right colon continent urinary diversion: comparison of outcome and reoperation rate. Urology. 1996;48(5):711–4. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00424-4.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Fisch M, Thuroff JW. Continent cutaneous diversion. BJU international. 2008;102(9 Pt B):1314–9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410×.2008.07976.×

50.•

Holmes DG, Thrasher JB, Park GY, Kueker DC, Weigel JW. Long-term complications related to the modified Indiana pouch. Urology. 2002;60(4):603–6. This is a single-institution, single-surgeon experience of 125 patients who underwent Indiana pouch during a 14-year periord with mean follow-up of 41.1 months. This study provides a very detailed description of the high rates of long-term complications that can occur after Indiana pouch urinary diversion. PubMedCrossRef

51.

Navon JD, Wong AK, Weinberg AC, Ahlering TE. A comparative study of postoperative complications associated with the modified Indiana pouch in elderly versus younger patients. J Urol. 1995;154(4):1325–8.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Rowland RG, Kropp BP. Evolution of the Indiana continent urinary reservoir. J Urol. 1994;152(6 Pt 2):2247–51.PubMed

53.

Weijerman PC, Schurmans JR, Hop WC, Schroder FH, Bosch JL. Morbidity and quality of life in patients with orthotopic and heterotopic continent urinary diversion. Urology. 1998;51(1):51–6.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Wilson TG, Moreno JG, Weinberg A, Ahlering TE. Late complications of the modified Indiana pouch. J Urol. 1994;151(2):331–4.PubMed

55.•

Wiesner C, Bonfig R, Stein R, Gerharz EW, Pahernik S, Riedmiller H, et al. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion: long-term follow-up of more than 800 patients with ileocecal reservoirs. World J Urol. 2006;24(3):315–8. doi:10.1007/s00345-006-0078-y. The authors report their clinical outcomes and long-term complications in over 800 patients who underwent continent cutaneous urinary diversion with an ileocecal reservoir (Mainz pouch 1) with mean follow-up of 7.6 years. PubMedCrossRef

56.

Abol-Enein H, Salem M, Mesbah A, Abdel-Latif M, Kamal M, Shabaan A, et al. Continent cutaneous ileal pouch using the serous lined extramural valves. the Mansoura experience in more than 100 patients. J Urol. 2004;172(2):588–91.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Mansson W, Davidsson T, Konyves J, Liedberg F, Mansson A, Wullt B. Continent urinary tract reconstruction—the Lund experience. BJU Int. 2003;92(3):271–6.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Webster C, Bukkapatnam R, Seigne JD, Pow-Sang J, Hoffman M, Helal M, et al. Continent colonic urinary reservoir (Florida pouch): long-term surgical complications (greater than 11 years). J Urol. 2003;169(1):174–6. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000038954.98838.34.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Wiesner C, Pahernik S, Stein R, Hahn K, Franzaring L, Melchior SW, et al. Long-term follow-up of submucosal tunnel and serosa-lined extramural tunnel ureter implantation in ileocaecal continent cutaneous urinary diversion (Mainz pouch I). BJU Int. 2007;100(3):633–7. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410×.2007.06991.x.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Kristjansson A, Wallin L, Mansson W. Renal function up to 16 years after conduit (refluxing or anti-reflux anastomosis) or continent urinary diversion. 1. Glomerular filtration rate and patency of uretero-intestinal anastomosis. Br J Urol. 1995;76(5):539–45.PubMedCrossRef

61.••

Harraz AM, Mosbah A, Abdel-Latif M, El-Assmy A, Gad H, Shaaban AA. Impact of the type of ureteroileal anastomosis on renal function measured by diuretic scintigraphy: long-term results of a prospective randomized study. BJU international. 2013. doi:10.1111/bju.12511. Long-term results from a prospective randomized study comparing renal function for renal units after refluxing versus anti-refluxing ureteroileal anastomosis. They found no difference in renal function between the two groups at a median follow-up of 6-years.

62.

Studer UE, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Springer JP, Turner WH. Antireflux nipples or afferent tubular segments in 70 patients with ileal low pressure bladder substitutes: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 1996;156(6):1913–7.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Salom EM, Mendez LE, Schey D, Lambrou N, Kassira N, Gomez-Marn O, et al. Continent ileocolonic urinary reservoir (Miami pouch): the University of Miami experience over 15 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(4):994–1003. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.01.023.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Wilkin M, Horwitz G, Seetharam A, Hartenbach E, Schink JC, Bruskewitz R, et al. Long-term complications associated with the Indiana pouch urinary diversion in patients with recurrent gynecologic cancers after high-dose radiation. Urol Oncol. 2005;23(1):12–5. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2004.07.018.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Mills RD, Studer UE. Metabolic consequences of continent urinary diversion. J Urol. 1999;161(4):1057–66.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Koch MO, McDougal WS. Bone demineralization following ureterosigmoid anastomosis: an experimental study in rats. J Urol. 1988;140(4):856–9.PubMed

67.

Yakout H, Bissada NK. Intermediate effects of the ileocaecal urinary reservoir (Charleston pouch 1) on serum vitamin B12 concentrations: can vitamin B12 deficiency be prevented? BJU Int. 2003;91(7):653–5. discussion 5–6.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Cella DF, Tulsky DS. Quality of life in cancer: definition, purpose, and method of measurement. Cancer Investig. 1993;11(3):327–36.CrossRef

69.

Bjerre BD, Johansen C, Steven K. Health-related quality of life after cystectomy: bladder substitution compared with ileal conduit diversion. A questionnaire Surv Br J Urol. 1995;75(2):200–5.CrossRef

70.

Hardt J, Filipas D, Hohenfellner R, Egle UT. Quality of life in patients with bladder carcinoma after cystectomy: first results of a prospective study. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehabil. 2000;9(1):1–12.CrossRef

71.

Hobisch A, Tosun K, Kinzl J, Kemmler G, Bartsch G, Holtl L, et al. Life after cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder versus ileal conduit urinary diversion. Semin Urol Oncol. 2001;19(1):18–23.PubMed

72.

Kitamura H, Miyao N, Yanase M, Masumori N, Matsukawa M, Takahashi A, et al. Quality of life in patients having an ileal conduit, continent reservoir or orthotopic neobladder after cystectomy for bladder carcinoma. Int J Urol Off J Japan Urol Assoc. 1999;6(8):393–9.

73.•

Large MC, Katz MH, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, Steinberg GD. Orthotopic neobladder versus Indiana pouch in women: a comparison of health related quality of life outcomes. The Journal of urology. 2010;183(1):201–6. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.148. This is an analysis of health related quality of life of 47 women with an orthotopic neobladder and 45 women with an Indiana pouch. They found no significant difference in health related quality of life between Indiana pouch and orthotopic neobladder in women. PubMedCrossRef

74.

Mansson A, Davidsson T, Hunt S, Mansson W. The quality of life in men after radical cystectomy with a continent cutaneous diversion or orthotopic bladder substitution: is there a difference? BJU Int. 2002;90(4):386–90.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Pazooki D, Edlund C, Dahlstrand C, Lindholm E, Tornqvist H, Jonsson O. Continent cutaneous urinary diversion is still a valid alternative after cystectomy for bladder carcinoma. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2005;39(6):468–73. doi:10.1080/00365590500191001.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Patient Selection, Operative Technique, and Contemporary Outcomes of Continent Catheterizable Diversion: the Indiana Pouch
verfasst von: Shane M. Pearce
Joshua A. Cohn
Zoe Steinberg
Gary D. Steinberg
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2014
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports / Ausgabe 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1931-7212
Elektronische ISSN: 1931-7220
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-014-0265-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

30.05.2024 Operationen am Penis Nachrichten

In Lebensgefahr brachte ein junger Mann nicht nur sich selbst, sondern auch das urologische Team, das ihm zu Hilfe kam: Er hatte sich zur Selbstbefriedigung eine scharfe Patrone in die Harnröhre gesteckt.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Patient Selection, Operative Technique, and Contemporary Outcomes of Continent Catheterizable Diversion: the Indiana Pouch

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Update Urologie

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2014

Robotic Approaches to Augmentation Cystoplasty: Ready for Prime Time?

Is the Diabetic Bladder a Neurogenic Bladder? Evidence from the Literature

Sexual Dysfunction in Male Spinal Cord Injury Patients

Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection for Patients with Neurogenic Bladder

Detrusor Underactivity and Detrusor Hyperactivity with Impaired Contractility

Long-Term Enterocystoplasty Follow-Up: Metabolic and Neoplastic Concerns

Neu im Fachgebiet Urologie

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

Update Urologie