Background
Methods
Searches
" (“End-of-life” OR palliative OR hospice OR dying OR death OR "Advance Care Planning"[Mesh] OR "Hospice Care"[Mesh] OR "Palliative Care"[Mesh] OR "Withholding Treatment"[Mesh] OR "Terminal Care"[Mesh] OR "Euthanasia"[Mesh] OR “palliative sedation” OR “truth telling“ OR “truth disclosure” OR “advance directives”) AND (culture specific* OR culturally specific* OR diversity specific* OR culture sensitive* OR culturally sensitive* OR diversity sensitive* OR culturally divers* OR cultural aspect* OR cultural competen* OR “cultural context” OR racial OR etnic minorit* OR etnic specific* OR ethnic minorit* OR ethnic specific* OR “ethnic background” OR “etnic background” OR cross?cultural OR crosscultural OR trans?cultural OR transcultural OR intercultural OR inter?cultural OR multicultural OR multi?cultural OR indigeneous OR indiginous OR immigrant* OR migrant* OR ethnicity OR acculturation OR islam* OR Muslim* OR Hindu* OR Winti OR (Moroc* [tiab] OR Maroc* [tiab] OR Turk* [tiab] OR Surinam* [tiab] OR Antill* [tiab] OR aruba* [tiab] OR caribb* [tiab])) AND ("2000"[PDAT] : "2010"[PDAT]) "
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Appraisal of the methodological quality
Data extraction, analysis and synthesis
Study | Family care as a duty | Family care as an economic necessity | Family care as a burden |
---|---|---|---|
Findings concerning Turkish patients
| |||
(Aksoy, 2005) [28] | It was important for a traditional Turkish family to look after ill and old parents. Family care was a duty. |
-
|
-
|
(De Meyere, 2004) [47] | - | Some women had financial problems, e.g. they could not pay for a breast prosthesis. | Women became depressed if they had no family, feared losing their husband, or inducing gossiping in community. |
(Groen-van de Ven and Smits, 2009) 2009 [55] | Ideally elderly live with their eldest son, cared for by their daughter-in-law, but often other relatives (daughters) cared for parents. Professional care was valued as not good enough. |
-
| Family care involved a lot of tasks (preparing food, housekeeping, accompanying patients to doctors, and personal care). Relatives became overloaded when practices did not correspond with their norms. |
(Oksuzoglu et al., 2006) [68] | The role of family and social factors was very great in Turkey. |
-
|
-
|
(Van den Bosch, 2010) [77] | - | Financial situation limited self efficacy in Turkish elderly. |
-
|
(Yerden, 2000) [80] | Turkish active elderly expected their children (eldest son and wife) to take care for them. Their sons felt obliged to do so, but hoped to share this task with all the family. |
-
| Turkish elderly were often cared for by their children, but some children moved to other towns to flee from the heavy duty. |
(Yerden, 2004) [81] | Ideally elderly live with their son’s family, many don’t. Daughters (in law) mainly do caring. When elderly are active they suppose family will care, when they become bedridden family care turns out to be insufficient. |
-
| Children support elderly by shopping, cleaning, administration, cooking and personal care. |
Findings concerning Moroccan patients
| |||
(Errihani et al., 2005) [52] | 92% of patients were supported by family members. | For many families monthly revenues were not enough to pay for treatments, only 15% were insured. |
-
|
(Errihani et al., 2006) [50] | 92% of patients were helped by their family. | Poverty and lack of medical insurance limit professional treatments. |
-
|
Findings regarding Turkish and Moroccan patients ( sometimes other immigrant patients as well)
| |||
(De Graaff and Francke, 2003a) [17] | ‘You should care for sick’ was an ideal, but also a must, enforced by fear of gossip in the community. Male relatives often rejected help from outside family. Professional help was more accepted when women were active in decision-making process. |
-
| Even in large extended families daily physical care was often carried out by one female family member. |
(De Graaff and Francke, 2009) [45] | - |
-
| Limited use of home care often led to high care burden for relatives and improper care. |
(Meulenkamp et al., 2010) [65] | Many elderly expected their children to care for them and to prepare and offer food as soon as visitors arrive. | The financial situation of immigrant elderly was often bad. Many elderly depended on their children for administration and financial management. |
-
|
(Koppenol et al., 2006) [59] | Patients preferred to be cared for by their kin. Talking about illness and the sorrow it brings was often not done in Turkish and Moroccan families. |
-
|
-
|
(Korstanje, 2008) [60] | Relatives felt responsible for patients and neglected duties regarding their work or children. |
-
| Family care sometimes led to financial problems. Relatives felt overburdened, but not able to discuss this as family care is obviously expected in their culture. |
(NOOM, 2009) [23] | Parents and children created a dilemma: the ideal of children taking care of parents prevented them from looking for other solutions for meeting care needs. |
-
|
-
|
(VPTZ, 2008b) [26] | Family care was an obvious response to a new situation, since immigrants often had no experience with dying people and did not know the supporting facilities in Netherlands. Turkish elderly often lived with a son or daughter, Moroccan families sometimes brought a helper from Morocco. |
-
|
-
|
(Yerden and Van Koutrike, 2007) [82] | Men felt responsible for organizing care, but physical care and housekeeping was done by women. |
-
|
-
|
Study | Preferences for hospital care | Barriers to use of professional care / Perspectives on quality of professional care |
---|---|---|
Findings concerning Turkish patients
| ||
(Aksoy, 2005) [28] | General public: 47% would not send relatives to hospices, as it did not fit with traditional views on family duties; 54% would prefer to stay at hospital in their terminal phase. |
-
|
Health professionals: 55% would not wish relatives to stay in a hospice; 64% would prefer to stay at home in terminal phase, since not much can be done in hospitals for patients in their terminal phase. | ||
(Beji et al., 2005) [32] | In cases where treatment fails 43% of gynaecological cancer patients would prefer inpatient care, 41% outpatient care, 16,2% wished to go home. Main reason was feelings of security (90%). |
-
|
(Betke, 2005) [33] | - | Turkish elderly had little experience with and knowledge about palliative care. They would like to have Turkish-speaking personnel, flexible \visiting hours, separate wards for male and female patients, no pork meat and accommodation for Muslim burial rituals. |
(Cobanoglu and Algier, 2004) [40] | - | Physicians’ most mentioned problem in category of ‘social problems’ was limited resources of hospitals (49%). |
(De Meyere, 2004) [47] | - | Groups for mutual help among migrant women were not effective as women did not feel socially safe within these groups. |
Talking to doctors was more comfortable as they are medical experts, who vowed secrecy. | ||
(Ersoy and Gundogmus, 2003) [54] | Most GPs preferred to hospitalize patients, even by using force if necessary, in order to keep them from harm. |
-
|
Physicians were more often inclined to fulfil wishes of patients’ family, than to respect patients’ wishes, living will or previous consent of patient. | ||
(Meric and Elcioglu, 2004) [64] | 33% of nurses preferred patients dying at home, 45% preferred patients dying in special facilities in hospitals and 22% preferred wards exclusively for terminally ill people. | Teamwork within hospitals and communication between professionals and patient and relatives should be improved. 64% of nurses thought psychiatrists should be working in palliative care, 18% opted for a palliative team comprising doctors, nurses, psychiatrists and relatives; 18% opted for a team including dieticians and physiotherapists. |
(Oflaz et al., 2010) [67] | - | 27% of nurses experienced difficulties in dealing with problems like unrelieved pain and suffering of patients, and their own sadness and anxiety; 61% felt they experienced inadequacy and helplessness about pain management and treatment; 29% experienced difficulties with emotional distress, e.g. when patients or relatives denied their situation, were dissatisfied or refused treatment. |
(Van den Bosch, 2010) [77] | - | Many Turkish elderly had language problems when visiting GP. All patients having home care, used care from a Turkish home care organization. |
66% had been visiting doctors in Turkey, but these visits were expensive. | ||
Most Turkish elderly preferred using care in Netherlands, for insurance reasons and because care seemed better in Netherlands. | ||
(Yerden, 2000) [80] | - | Elderly were too ashamed to ask for professional care. They accepted use of GP and hospital, but not use of home care and old people’s homes. Children were less negative about care provisions, but realized it would induce gossiping. |
(Yerden, 2004) [81] | - | Home care and old people’s homes were becoming more accepted, daughters (in law) were more willing to use provisions than sons. |
Findings concerning Moroccan patients
| ||
(McCarthy et al., 2004) [63] | - | Nurses and physicians working in oncology centres felt embarrassed by shortage of means and training in treatment of cancer-related pain. |
(Errihani et al., 2005) [52] | - | Poverty and illiteracy were major obstacles for patient care. Alternative treatment were visiting marabouts, fqihs, using medical plants. |
(Errihani et al., 2006) [50] | - | Poverty and lack of medical insurance limited effective treatments: 85% of patients had no medical insurance and 52% had an income below 1500 DH per month whereas cost of disease was >35000 DH in 85% of cases. |
Chemotherapy was difficult to accept (90%), radiotherapy (54%) and surgery (40%) were more accepted. | ||
Findings regarding Turkish and Moroccan patients ( sometimes also other immigrant patients)
| ||
(ACTIZ, 2009) [22] | - | Relatives advised Dutch providers of home care and elderly care not to strive for standard culture-related care programs but for an individual approach. They asked for support in dealing with loss of independence of their patient and facilities to organize culture-specific rituals. |
(Buiting et al., 2008) [35] | Immigrant patients’ rates of death in hospitals was high. (59% for immigrants vs 32% for Dutch) |
-
|
(De Graaff and Francke, 2003a) [17] | - | Asking for professional care is restricted by feelings of shame, not only personally (being vulnerable or naked) but also socially (adopting ‘Dutch’ care instead of clinging to own traditions). |
(De Graaff and Francke, 2009) [45] | - | Few Turks and Moroccans were referred to home care, especially those who did not speak Dutch. |
According to GPs and nurses, main barrier to home care was communication problems. | ||
(De Graaff et al., 2010a) [18] | - | The views of Turkish and Moroccan patients and relatives on ‘good care’ and ‘ good communication’ were often different from views of Dutch care providers. |
(Meulenkamp et al., 2010) [65] | - | Elderly migrants were concerned about hygiene and body care; they wished to take a shower daily. Women preferred to be cared for by female care providers. |
Professional care homes should have enough room for visitors and religious duties; professionals who can speak Turkish/Moroccan. | ||
(Koppenol et al., 2006) [59] | - | Many Turkish and Moroccan elderly didn’t understand aetiology of illness, they feared cancer as contagious, and fatal. Patients asked for care in acute situations, but being unaware of diagnosis, they felt cured as soon as they felt a little better. |
(Korstanje, 2008) [60] | - | Even in hospital relatives felt responsible for wellbeing of patient, they were very alert to professionals’ activities. Discharge from hospital was too abrupt, decisions were not sufficiently communicated. |
(NOOM, 2009) [23] | - | Use of professional care was often impeded by the community (insisting on family care) and administrative procedures. |
Turkish and Moroccan men generally would like to have body hair shaven, but they didn’t dare to ask care providers to help them. Bathing should be done with running water. | ||
(VPTZ, 2008b) [26] | Most Turkish and Moroccan patients preferred to die at home, but being in hospital was preferred if one still hoped for cure, or wanted to unburden the family. | Relatives did not ask for professional help, they wanted to stay in charge, and feared financial debts. |
(Yerden and Van Koutrike, 2007) [82] | - | Relatives felt professional care didn’t fit with traditions of hygiene, halal food, and help of people of same sex. |
Study | Hope for cure and faith in Allah | Perspectives regarding end-of-life decisions: euthanasia or hastening death / withdrawing or withholding life-prolonging treatments/continuing to offer food and artificial nutrition | Involvement in end-of-life care or decision making |
---|---|---|---|
Findings concerning Turkish patients
| |||
(Akpinar et al., 2009) [27] | - | 40% of Turkish nurses found withdrawing life-prolonging treatments justified when no medical benefit; 81% preferred continuing treatment for a dying child (50% until brain death), 19% preferred palliative care. In case a baby would survive with physical or mental impairment 41% left decision to family, if progressive irreversible illness 65% found family should decide. |
-
|
68% agreed that artificial nutrition should always be continued. | |||
(Balseven Odabasi and Ornek Buken, 2009) [31] | - | Elderly patients accepted life-prolonging proposals of physicians. Even when patients wanted to die, relatives wanted them to live.
| Clinicians should accord a larger role to patients in end-of-life decisions. Discussing medical ethical issues openly is not easy in Turkey, leaving physicians alone in decision making. |
Physicians need training to handle communication about reanimating or passive euthanasia. | |||
(Beji et al., 2005) [32] | After learning diagnosis 87% of patients with gynaecological cancer wanted survival and 50% recovery. If treatment should fail 75% would struggle, 27% would trust in God. | Abstaining from life-prolonging treatments only in patients suffering from bad family relations, pain or depression (37%), 63% wanted to survive. If treatment was to fail, 63% would ask for life prolongation, 36.8% would refuse that. |
-
|
(Celik et al., 2009) [38] | - |
-
| 82% of nurses provided an environment suitable for family to say goodbye to deceased patient, 5% allowed family to help care for deceased patient. Nurses did not apply special cultural or spiritual activities. |
(Cobanoglu and Algier, 2004) [40] | - | Withdrawing or withholding life-prolonging treatments was problematic for 48% of physicians and 46% of nurses. Physicians found withdrawing more difficult than not initiating treatment. Nurses felt uncertainty in absence of written DNR orders. |
-
|
(Cohen et al., 2006) [41] | - | Acceptance of euthanasia is low in Turkey. Weak religious belief is most closely associated with higher acceptance of euthanasia, as well asyoung age, being from non-manual social class, higher education, belief in national traditions and history. |
-
|
(Erer et al., 2008) [49] | - |
-
| 87% of cancer patients declared that knowing diagnosis is a patients’ right; 92% found physician should inform them about disease and choices of treatment, but 77% regarded it to be an obligation for physician to provide this information. 43% agreed that patients could refuse treatment. 79% wanted to take part in decisions. |
(Ersoy and Gundogmus, 2003) [54] | - | 84% of physicians would prolong life of a patient who had stated he did not want to live with aid of artificial respiration devices, but if his wife wanted him to live, only 13% would respect patient’s wishes. |
-
|
(Ilkilic, 2008) [56] | - | In case of a relative who cannot live without mechanical support, Turkish parents wished to prolong life as long as possible, referring to religious duties. German physicians proposed stopping care when a situation is medically hopeless. |
-
|
(Iyilikci et al., 2004) [57] | - | 58% of anaesthesiologists would continue prolonging treatment when family wanted cessation, 85% would continue life support when family wanted continuation, 68% would continue minimal support in case of no likelihood of recovery. | 66% of Turkish anaesthesiologists had given DNR orders, 14% discussed DNR with family, 1% with patient, 83% with colleagues and 2% with Ethics Committee. 10% preferred doctors to decide, 31% preferred to decide with patient, relatives and responsible physician, 58% preferred consensus between hospital administrators, Ethics Committee, patient, relatives and physician. |
(Karadeniz et al., 2008) [58] | - | 28% of health professionals found life support should be decreased when patient wanted euthanasia, 35% rejected this option. 27% agreed with statement that euthanasia should be legalized in all countries, 24% was undecided and 49% disagreed with this statement. 43% would not perform euthanasia if legalized. 42% agreed with statement that a patient should decide on his right to live. 19% was undecided and 41% disagreed with this statement. 11% agreed with statement that if a patient wanted euthanasia, nutrition should be stopped, 14% was undecided, 75% disagreed with this statement. |
-
|
(Kumas et al., 2007) [61] | - | 51% of ICU nurses stated they did not have enough knowledge about euthanasia. |
-
|
56% stated it was patient’s right, 24% would support patient’s request for active euthanasia, 39% would support passive euthanasia. 75% opposed active euthanasia, 73% opposed passive euthanasia. 81% thought legalization would be exploited, 77% said it would be exploited for inheritance reasons. 40% thought passive euthanasia is practiced in some cases, 20% that it is never practiced in Turkey. | |||
(Mayda et al., 2005) [62] | - | 84% of oncologists agreed euthanasia should be discussed in Turkey. 42% believed euthanasia is performed in Turkey. 38% advised incurable patients not to start therapy. | 54% of oncologists thought patients should decide about euthanasia, 42% said families and doctors, 4% relied on families. |
34% had been asked for euthanasia. 44% did not object to euthanasia, 56% objected to it as unethical. | 64% of those who performed euthanasia (n = 42) thought relatives and doctors should decide on withdrawing treatment in case of euthanasia. | ||
51% of oncologists had sometimes withdrawn treatment. | 36% thought patients and doctors and patients should decide, 2% thought that only patient could decide stopping treatment. | ||
(Oz, 2001) [69] | - | 58% of nurses and physicians defined euthanasia as ‘allowing death, leaving patients to die’, 17% as ‘passive euthanasia, not active death determined by others’, 13% as ‘painless peaceful death’. |
-
|
21% of nurses and 18% of physicians had requests ‘to make death easy’. For 63% of nurses and 43% of physicians pain was major reason, but pain should be controlled. | |||
For 14% of nurses and 30% of physicians loss of hope was major reason. Euthanasia seemed appropriate for 81% of nurses and 66% of physicians ‘if there was no possible treatment or other alternative’. 13% answered ‘if patient is conscious and he and his family wanted it’. | |||
41% of nurses wanted an active role in euthanasia, 54% was undecided. | |||
66% of nurses and 61% of physicians would not do it after legalization. | |||
(Ozdogan et al., 2004) [71] | - |
-
| Many physicians favoured a paternalistic approach and felt that patients are not able to cope emotionally with bad news. |
(Ozkara et al., 2004) [73] | - | 92% of physicians defined euthanasia as ‘the performance of death upon request of a patient, who has a progressive, unbearable and fatal disease after a long and painful period with no hope of recovery in today’s medicine, with assistance of a physician, in better conditions and without pain’. |
-
|
85% wished for a public debate. 61% did not approve of euthanasia. Arguments against euthanasia were: probable abuse (42%), ethically incorrect (25%), religious (19%) en illegal (11%). | |||
30% of physicians felt practicing euthanasia should be punished; 56% thought that euthanasia is practiced, | |||
19% had encountered a euthanasia request. | |||
(Pelin and Arda, 2000) [74] | - | 62% of physicians supported euthanasia, 60% only on conscious and persistent demands, 33% under strict regulations, 32% only passive form. 39% did not support euthanasia, because doctors should save life (58%) and science might solve problems (54%). | Keeping information away from patients in disease process especially in poor prognosis was almost a common practice in Turkey. |
(Tepehan et al., 2009) [75] | - | Nurses and doctors did not have same knowledge about different forms of euthanasia (active, passive, physician-assisted suicide and involuntary euthanasia); most well known was passive euthanasia (73% of doctors and 63% of nurses). |
-
|
56% of doctors and 53% of nurses wanted euthanasia to be legalized. | |||
57% of nurses and 59% of doctors thought it is performed secretly. | |||
40% of ICU doctors discontinued treatment in patients with an incurable disease on more than one occasion. | |||
In ICU higher scores. If legalized 28% of ICU doctors would apply it versus 15% of paediatrics. 24% of ICU nurses would participate. Justifications for objecting to legalization were: not ethical, can be abused, religious beliefs and personal values. 65% of nurses and 73% of physicians agreed that individuals should have right to decide about own death. | |||
(Turla et al., 2006) [76] | - | Euthanasia is defined as the killing, through either an active or passive way, of someone who suffers from an illness which arouses pity and who will never get better when asked by either the person himself/herself or his/her relatives. 66% of health professionals thought euthanasia as such should not be performed. They were all worried about abuse of euthanasia, 30% noted religious reasons, 30% found it unethical and 15% illegal. | 57% found it useful to have discussions about euthanasia. |
63% thought decision should be made by both physician and family. | |||
8% had been asked to perform euthanasia. | |||
If it were legal in Turkey 74% would not perform it. | |||
81% found euthanasia can be misused if it is legal. | |||
(Yaguchi et al., 2005) [79] | ICU physicians in Turkey preferred oral DNRe orders, while 80% of Western physicians would apply written DNR orders. | Withdrawing or withholding life-prolonging treatments: In case of patient in vegetative state, IC physicians in Turkey chose life prolonging more often than physicians in other countries. |
-
|
They would, like their colleagues of southern Europe, treat complications with antibiotics, colleagues in northern and central Europe would actively withdraw therapy. | |||
Findings regarding Moroccan patients
| |||
(McCarthy et al., 2004) [63] | - | Use of oxygen + sedation stopped after complications. Morphine was used only for terminally ill patients. |
-
|
(Errihani et al., 2005) [52] | 48% of cancer patients were active believers. Faith helps control fear and incertitude. |
-
|
-
|
(Errihani et al., 2006) [50] | After diagnosis of cancer 50% of practicing Muslim patients felt culpable and 93% started practicing. In both groups new behaviours: wearing of “hijab”, eating plants recommended in de Koran. |
-
|
-
|
(Errihani et al., 2008) [51] | Those who don’t actively practice their belief (49%) felt guilty, while those who were practicing believed Allah was testing them, so they accepted disease. |
-
|
-
|
Findings regarding Turkish and Moroccan patients ( sometimes other immigrant patients as well)
| |||
(ACTIZ, 2009) [22] | Relatives thought Allah would decide on end of life. |
-
| Relatives noted that decision making within families was often difficult as it was not clear who had to decide on what topics. |
(Buiting et al., 2008) [35] | Physicians’ data on treatment of immigrant and Dutch patients: | Immigrants had fewer euthanasia requests (3% of immigrants vs 25% of Dutch), were more often seen as incompetent (60% of immigrants vs 45% of Dutch), more often physicians’ decisions (39% of immigrants vs 25% of Dutch). |
-
|
less wish to hasten end (5% of immigrants vs 17% of Dutch). | Also less withholding of life-prolonging treatments for immigrants than for native Dutch (12% vs. 15%); more withdrawing (20% of immigrants vs 12% of Dutch), more respiration (38% of immigrants vs 16% of Dutch), more cardiovascular medicines. (30% of immigrants vs 11% of Dutch), but less artificial nutrition and hydration (12% of immigrants vs 28% of Dutch). | ||
(De Graaff and Francke, 2003a) [17] | - |
-
| Many Turkish and Moroccan patients wished to die in home country, but return is hampered when they have few relatives there and more relatives in Netherlands. |
(De Graaff and Francke, 2009) [45] | - |
-
| According to GPs and nurses, patients do not understand them. Non-satisfaction is often rooted in communication problems, Turkish and Moroccan patients need coaching by GP and nurses. |
(De Graaff et al., 2010a) [18] | Some relatives saw wanting best possible treatment, keeping hope alive and not stopping feeding and giving curative treatment as a religious commandment. | Main concerns about ‘good care’ at end of life expressed by Turkish and Moroccan families were: maximum treatment and curative care till end of lives, never having hope taken away, devoted care by families, avoiding shameful situations, dying with a clear mind and being buried in own country. These wishes often conflicted with values of Dutch professionals, like improving quality of life, giving sufficient pain and symptom relief. | Relatives wished to decide as a family what information is given to patient. This wish sometimes conflicted with views of Dutch physicians. |
‘Good’ care implied not stopping feeding. | |||
(Koppenol et al., 2006) [59] | The immigrants’ way to deal with cancer is influenced by belief in supernatural forces. Cancer can be seen as a test or trial by Allah. |
-
|
-
|
(Korstanje, 2008) [60] | Relatives felt morally supported by religion. |
-
|
-
|
(Mostafa, 2009) [66] | Cancer was like Allah is testing you. |
-
| Talking about cancer was not done in Turkish or Moroccan community. |
(NOOM, 2009) [23] | - |
-
| Elderly and children believed that aged people deserved rest, children had to look after them, and decision making should be left to children. |
(Van Wijmen et al., 2010) [78] | - |
-
| Significantly less use of ADs among people who had: |
- children and a good relation with them, (15% versus 8%), | |||
- only elementary or basic vocational training (24% versus 12% and 8% for those with secondary school and higher), | |||
- a religious belief (16% versus 10%). | |||
(VPTZ, 2008b) [26] | Reciting Koran verses gave peace to many Muslims. Dutch care professionals were not involved in rituals. |
-
| In last days many people were assisting in practical matters, but personal care was often done by one or two women only. |
Islamic women were often not involved in funeral. |
Study | Communication about diagnosis | Communication about pain, sorrow and mental problems | Language barriers | Communication within family and within community |
---|---|---|---|---|
Findings concerning Turkish patients
| ||||
(Aksoy, 2005) [28] | 61% of general public and 89% of professionals wanted to know diagnosis, but 58% of general public and 71% of professionals preferred to hide it from relatives. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Atesci et al., 2004) [29] | 55% of cancer patients were unaware of diagnosis, 45% were aware; 68% guessed it from treatment process; 15% had been fully informed. | More psychiatric disorder in patients aware of diagnosis. Physicians may be reluctant to reveal diagnosis and prognosis, as cancer is regarded as a death sentence. |
-
|
-
|
(Bagcivan et al., 2009) [30] | - | Many patients did not want to talk about pain as they feared dependency on analgesics and did not want to upset relatives. |
-
|
-
|
(Balseven Odabasi and Ornek Buken, 2009) [31] | 85% of patients found that if a patient is diagnosed with cancer he should be informed about diagnosis. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
68% of physicians argued they had to tell diagnosis first to patients before informing relatives. | ||||
(Betke, 2005) [33] | Turkish elderly preferred not to talk about cancer or any other negative diagnosis to very ill patient. They didn’t want to reveal diagnosis to an incurable patient and preferred doctors to tell truth only to relatives. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Bozcuk et al., 2002) [34] | 44% of cancer patients not aware of diagnosis. | Predictors of good emotional functioning: gender (males were more often accompanied) and social functioning. | ||
44% of cancer patients informed about diagnosis. | ||||
There was no significant difference between scores on quality of life (QLQ-C30) between patients who knew and patients who did not know diagnosis. | ||||
(Buken, 2003) [37] | 63% of patients diagnosed with cancer not aware of diagnosis. Level of informing increased with chance of recovery and patients’ socio-economic and educational level. 52% of physicians were ‘protective’, preferred not to tell truth. Reasons for not informing: lack of legal foundation and control and difficulty of changing protective physicians’ attitude. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Cetingoz et al., 2002) [39] | 75% of the general Turkish population had satisfactory knowledge of cancer, 13% thought cancer is contagious, 87% thought cancer is fatal, but 40% also believed that half of all cancers can be cured. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
84% wanted to be informed of cancer diagnosis, but only 63% wanted relatives to be informed. | ||||
Presence of cancer in a relative did not influence results. | ||||
(De Meyere, 2004) [47] | - |
-
| Less educated patients sometimes got to false information and believed that cancer is contagious. |
-
|
(Demirsoy et al., 2008) [48] | 16% of patients (mixed cancer and non-cancer patients) were not aware of diagnosis; 84% knew diagnosis, but 19% of these reported a different diagnosis than on chart. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
66% of patients wanted to be informed about diagnosis, 33% did not want this, 95% wanted to know effects of available treatments. | ||||
90% of nurses wanted to inform patients about diagnosis and prognosis, 75% reported that patients should be informed. | ||||
(Erer et al., 2008) [49] | 87% of patients (more types of cancers, 38% breast cancer) agreed that patients had right to be informed about diagnosis. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Ersoy and Goz, 2001) [53] | 76% of nurses would in case a breast cancer patient asked for her diagnosis, tell truth (some after consulting physician); 24% would prefer not to tell it. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Ersoy and Gundogmus, 2003) [54] | 53% of physicians would reveal diagnosis to a HIV patient, 8% would tell family but not patient, 18% would tell it to patient and his family together. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
44% of physicians would tell patient his diagnosis of lung cancer, 19% would first investigate patients’ competence, 12% would ask consent of family, 16% would not tell patient, in order not to harm him. | ||||
(Groen-van de Ven and Smits, 2009) [55] | The Christian Turks in this study obviously cared for parents, encouraged by faith and by community. Professional care could only be accepted when a trustful relation with relatives had been created. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Ilkilic, 2008) [56] | - |
-
| Language barriers impeded physicians in making joint decisions with Turkish patients. They often could not understand discussions of patients and interfering relatives. |
-
|
(Meric and Elcioglu, 2004) [64] | 57% of nurses noted that patients were not informed about diagnosis and prognosis. | 29% of nurses faced problems in communication about care for terminally ill patients, they had feelings of empathy and loss when people die, 7% saw no problems and 63% had problems with some ‘special’ patients. |
-
|
-
|
58% thought patients should not be informed about prognosis. | ||||
All nurses felt relatives should be informed, 66% wanted to inform when diagnosis is clear, 34% wanted to inform when problems arise. | ||||
(Oflaz et al., 2010) [67] | 96% of nurses did not want to inform patient about his terminal status. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
60% did not think a person should be told his illness is incurable or terminal. | ||||
(Oksuzoglu et al., 2006) [68] | 48% of relatives wanted patient to be informed; 39% thought diagnosis should not be disclosed, 13% was hesitant. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
87% wanted family to be informed, 80% of the 39% that did not want to inform patient, wanted only family to be informed. | ||||
89% thought treating doctor should be messenger. | ||||
(Ozcakir et al., 2008) [70] | Medical students found talking to patients important, patients should get permission to die at home. Students disagreed that incurably ill patients should be told diagnosis. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Ozdogan et al., 2004) [71] | 66% of relatives did not want patient to be informed about diagnosis; 57% because patient would be upset, 29% because patient would not want to know it. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
(Ozdogan et al., 2006) [72] | The percentages that never, rarely, generally, and always told truth about diagnosis were 9%, 39%, 45% and 7%. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
54% of physicians felt influenced by requests from relatives, 46% not. Physicians who felt influenced told truth less often than those who did not. Training in breaking bad news resulted in higher scores of telling truth. | ||||
(Pelin and Arda, 2000) [74] | 93% of physicians thought patients should be informed about diagnosis, but one should avoid talking about life expectancy. 30% said they may choose to inform relatives. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
Older and more experienced physicians gave more information. | ||||
(Van den Bosch, 2010) [77] | Many Turkish patients generally trusted medical competence of GP, but communication was limited as Turkish elderly did not accept idea of incurability and felt discriminated or not being taken seriously. Some thought GP was not informing them fully. | Many Turkish patients did not want to talk about psychological problems. |
-
|
-
|
(Yerden, 2000) [80] | - | - | - | Communication within family about future needs and solutions was limited. |
Findings regarding Moroccan patients
| ||||
(Errihani et al., 2005) [52] | 33% of patients (diagnosed with cancer) were not aware of diagnosis and prognosis. |
-
|
-
|
-
|
In 89% of cases relatives were informed, in 9% only some very close kin, in 2% of cases patients lived with their disease in full discretion. | ||||
1% of patients’ families thought that cancer is contagious. | ||||
(Errihani et al., 2006) [50] | - |
-
| Illiteracy and insufficient knowledge of Arabic caused problems. 37% were illiterate and 25% spoke Berber only. |
-
|
(McCarthy et al., 2004) [63] | - | Physicians and nurses believed that pain in children with cancer is rarely expressed in Morocco, which hampered assessment of pain. For some Moroccans pain was inevitable. Some feared morphine addiction. |
-
|
-
|
Findings regarding Turkish and Moroccan patients ( sometimes other immigrant patients as well)
| ||||
(De Graaff and Francke, 2003a) [17] | Several Turkish and Moroccan relatives said diagnosis and prognosis given by GP was not understood. |
-
| Important information came from relatives or members of community who worked in health sector. | Informing within community is hampered by fear of gossiping. |
(De Graaff and Francke, 2009) [45] | GPs and nurses perceived a taboo on communication about diagnosis of terminal illnesses. |
-
| GPs and nurses found it difficult to distinguish patients’ wishes apart from relatives’ wishes, especially when relatives were translating. | GPs and nurses didn’t recognize influence of local migrant community on decision making in care. |
(De Graaff et al., 2010a) [18] |
Communication about diagnosis
|
-
| In cases with language barriers Dutch professionals struggled with relatives who were acting as interpreter and as person in charge. | Relatives needed information about diseases and choices of treatments, they lacked role models in care for dying patients. |
Dutch professionals wished to inform patient and to realize advanced care planning, while Turkish and Moroccan relatives wished to keep patients’ hope alive. Turkish and Moroccan patients disliked direct way in which Dutch care providers informed patients. | ||||
(Meulenkamp et al., 2010) [65] | - |
-
| Many elderly depended on children for administration and financial management. Some were illiterate; others did not have enough mastery of Dutch language. | Many migrant elderly enjoy participating in activities, but they also fear gossiping of compatriots. |
(Koppenol et al., 2006) [59] | Relatives impeded doctors in informing patient about cancer diagnosis, although breast cancer women were often informed, because of surgery decisions. Many patients were in need of information, they felt bad, wanted to know reasons for complaints. |
-
|
-
| Some patients didn’t want other people to be informed about illness; they feared gossiping and social isolation. |
(Korstanje, 2008) [60] | - |
-
| Relatives didn’t contact professionals because of language problems. Nurses were not well-informed as they spoke with Dutch-speaking relatives, who were not primary carers. | Caring relatives often felt overburdened, but could not discuss it, since helping was obviously expected. |
(Mostafa, 2009) [66] | - | Most women (with breast cancer) felt GP did not listen, resulting in late diagnosis. Women wanted treatment for physical complaints, not for mental care. |
-
|
-
|
(NOOM, 2009) [23] | Patients and relatives disliked direct way Dutch care providers informed patients about diagnosis. | Many immigrants didn’t talk about mental problems, instead they mentioned headache, pain in back or belly. Alzheimer disease was not recognized. | Assessment of symptoms was hampered by language barriers, as patients lost knowledge of Dutch. | Parents and children created a dilemma: ideal of children taking care of parents prevented them from discussing openly and looking for real solutions. |
(VPTZ, 2008b) [26] | First generation immigrants did not talk about life-threatening illnesses. They were not amused by Dutch doctors informing them about diagnosis with little respect for family relations. Second generation immigrants wanted to be informed. |
-
|
-
| Relatives who cared for dying patients advised discussing illness and dying within Moroccan and Turkish communities. |
(Yerden and Van Koutrike, 2007) [82] | - |
-
| Elderly faced language barriers, so children did administration. |
-
|
Results
Characteristics of the studies included
Language and place of study
Research questions and subjects
Designs, sample sizes and instruments
Reference, language/ country [nr] | Research question* | Research subjects | Design | Data collection (variables/topics measured)* | Meth. score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Studies concerning Turkish patients
| |||||
Akpinar et al., 2009, English/Turkey [27] | What are intensive care nurses’ attitudes to end-of-life decisions? | 54 nurses at a Paedriatric Intensive Care Nursing Symposium and 101 nurses at a Congress on Intensive Care Nursing. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on personal and professional characteristics, attitudes to end of life and futile treatment. | 25.5 |
Aksoy, 2005, English/Turkey [28] | What are reasons for limited use of hospice facilities in Turkey? | 200 volunteers, half of them were nurses or physicians in Ankara, Izmir , Sanliurfa or Erzurum. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on preferences for staying in hospital or at home, for sending relatives to hospital or letting them stay at home, for knowing diagnosis and letting relatives know their diagnosis, and experiences with courses on terminal care. | 16 |
Atesci et al., 2004, English/Turkey [29] | How is awareness of cancer diagnosis related to presence of psychiatric morbidity? | 117 patients having chemotherapy in different departments. | Quantitative study using questionnaires and assessment by a psychiatrist | Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, General Health Questionnaire. Psychiatric diagnosis (DSM-IV) Added questions: What do you think you are suffering from? And Why do you think you are in hospital? | 32 |
Bagcivan et al., 2009, English/Turkey [30] | What are barriers to pain management of cancer patients? What factors determine barriers in Turkish population? | 170 oncology outpatients of Gulhane Military medical academy Hospital having been or still using an analgesic for cancer-related pain. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | BQ-II measures about beliefs concerning fear of addiction, fatalism, anxiety, not complaining,treatment, side-effects, immune system, analgesics masking symptoms. Some items were added from Brief Pain Inventory and from Pain Management Index. | 35.5 |
Balseven Odabasi and Ornek Buken, 2009, Turkish/Turkey [31] | What ethical decisions are made in Turkey in diverse clinical situations and what is influence of patients, physicians and family members on decisions? | 150 outpatients visiting Hecettepe University Hospital in 2007–2008 and 151 physicians (surgeons, pediatricians, anesthetists, internists). | Quantitative study using questionnaires and use of vignettes | Questionnaire and vignettes developed by Ruhnke et al. (2000), addressing whether patients should be informed about an incurable cancer and whether a terminally ill patient wishing to die should be ventilated. | 33 |
Beji et al., 2005, English/Turkey [32] | What are reactions of gynaecologic cancer patients to poor prognosis and what are their preferences regarding location of terminal care and life-sustaining technology? | 68 patients visiting gynaecologic-oncology policlinic of Istanbul University. | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews | Self-administered topic list on concerns and reactions to diagnosis, desires for location of terminal care and preferences for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining technologies. | 25.5 |
Betke, 2005, Dutch/Netherlands [33] | What are specific needs of Turkish elderly regarding palliative care and how can Dutch nursing homes fulfil these needs? | Interviews: 10 Dutch and 2 Turkish informants, (nurses, physicians and others). Focus groups: 32 Turkish elderly who were not ill yet. | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups | Topics addressed in interviews and focus groups were: experiences with delivered care, information needs, wishes regarding accommodation, food and staff. | 26.5 |
Bozcuk et al., 2002, English/Turkey [34] | What is current truth-telling practice for cancer patients in Turkey and does disclosure of truth affect quality of life? | 100 cancer patients: 29 lung cancer, 23 breast cancer 5 colon cancer, 6 gastric cancer, 10 head and neck cancer, 26 other cancers. | Mixed-method design combining questionnaires with interviews | Interviews: items on family support. Questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-C-30 measuring five functional, nine symptom scales and global health status. | 27 |
Buken, 2003, English/Turkey [37] | How can physicians give bad news to a terminally ill patient in an appropriate manner? | Questionnaire for 58 physicians and 150 medical students. Interviews with 82 newly diagnosed cancer patients about different services. | Mixed method design using questionnaires and interviews | Questionnaire and interviews about attitude of Turkish physicians, interferences with truth telling and regulations on information giving and patients’ rights. | 17.5 |
Celik et al., 2009, English/Turkey [38] | What does a nurse do to care for deceased patients in ICU? What factors influence this care? | 29 nurses working in cardiovascular urgical ICUs. | Qualitative observational study | Observations concerned nursing interventions for patient and emotional support for patients’ relatives. | 25 |
Cetingoz et al., 2002, English/Turkey [39] | What is basic knowledge of and general attitudes about cancer? | 630 subjects, none was known to have cancer (general public). | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on knowledge about cancer (e.g. signs, symptoms, preventive measures, treatment modalities) and on attitude (e.g. desire to know diagnosis, to change lifestyles). | 20 |
Cobanoglu and Algier, 2004, English/Turkey [40] | What are perceptions of physicians compared with perceptions of nurses on ethical problems in ICU? | 21 physicians and 22 nurses working in Intensive Care Units in hospitals in 3 cities in Turkey. | Qualitative study using focus groups | Focus group topics concerned end-of-life decisions, communication, hierarchical and social problems. More specified categories were euthanasia, futile treatment, DNR decisions, autonomy as parts of end-of-life decisions. | 32 |
Cohen et al., 2006, English/Turkey [41] | Is terminating life of incurably ill accepted in 33 European countries? What are associations with acceptance of euthanasia and social and religious factors? | Data of European Values Study of 1999–2000 including 1206 respondents in Turkey (general public).
| Analysis of quantitative questionnaire data | European Values Study regards more than 300 items, e.g. one regarding acceptance of euthanasia. | 34 |
de Meyere, 2004, Dutch/Belgium [47] | How do Turkish women in Belgium deal with breast cancer? | 1 Moroccan, 3 Turkish and 7 Flemish informants (physician, nurses and others).
| Qualitative study using semi structured interviews | Interview topics were social, medical and psychological problems around breast cancer. | 22 |
Demirsoy et al., 2008, English/Turkey [48] | What are nurses’ and patients’ attitudes regarding information sharing about medical diagnosis and prognosis? | 166 nurses and 435 patients.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on informing patients with a limited life expectancy about diagnosis and prognosis, preserving hope and family support in informing patients. | 25.5 |
Erer et al., 2008, English/Turkey [49] | What are views and expectations of cancer patients regarding information and autonomy? | 104 patients attending outpatient clinic. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on patients’ rights regarding being informed and autonomy. | 30.5 |
Ersoy and Goz, 2001, English/Turkey [52] | Can nurses recognize ethical problems and how do they use ethical principles in decisions? | 165 nurses working at bedside, encountering real ethical problems. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questionnaire on cases involving nursing care and ethical principles (autonomy, veracity, beneficence or justice). | 26.5 |
Ersoy and Gundogmus, 2003, English/Turkey [54] | Can physicians recognize ethical problems and how do they use ethical principles in decisions? | 207 physicians working in a hospital or primary health centre in Kocaeli. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questionnaire addressing cases of physicians involving care and ethical principles (autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence or justice). | 24 |
Groen-Van de Ven and Smits, 2009, Dutch/Netherlands [55] | What are experiences of family members of Suryoye elderly patients? | 15 Relatives.
| Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews | Topics were care history, experiences of giving care, personal caring qualities, influence of (Christian) religion and gender. | 26 |
Ilkilic, 2008, German/Germany [56] | What conflicts occur in intercultural end-of-life care? What concepts and instruments can help German doctors and Turkish families to solve them? | 3 cases of dying patients.
| Qualitative design using case studies | Examination of thoughts about euthanasia, brain death, life prolonging measures, right to know your diagnoses, right not to know it, hierarchies in decision-making positions within family and potentials and limitations of living wills. | 19 |
Iyilikci et al., 2004, English/Turkey [57] | What are practices of Turkish anesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawing of life support from critically ill? | 369 anesthesiologists.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on education, religion, ICU facilities, bed capacity, ICU experience, experience with euthanasia, DNR orders and DNR decisions, and knowledge of Turkish Penal Code. | 24 |
Karadeniz et al., 2008, English/Turkey [58] | What are attitudes of health professionals towards euthanasia? | 510 health staff , viz. 309 physicians, 332 nurses, 91 midwifes.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questionnaire based on Euthanasia Attitude Scale: items on status of brain-dead persons, life-extending technology, ethics and legal issues. | 29 |
Kumas et al., 2007, English/Turkey [61] | What are opinions about euthanasia of nurses who work in intensive care units? | 186 nurses of 3 hospitals. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on nurses’ knowledge about euthanasia, their definitions, their sources of information, euthanasia practices. | 26 |
Mayda et al., 2005, English/Turkey [61] | What is attitude of oncologists towards euthanasia in Turkey? | 85 oncologists participating in a scientific meeting. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on physician’s approach to euthanasia, legal basis, euthanasia requests, actions towards passive euthanasia and expectations. | 26.5 |
Meric and Elcioglu, 2004, Turkish/Turkey [64] | What problems face nurses in de communication with terminally ill patients? | 125 nurses working on different disciplines/wards with < 10, with 11–50 and > 50 dying patients per year. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on informing patients and relatives about prognosis, talking near unconscious patients, participation of psychiatrist and physiotherapists in palliative care team, feelings of attachment, empathy and loss, and recommendations to improve care. | 36 |
Oflaz et al., 2010, English/Turkey [67] | What are concerns of nurses who care for oncology patients and how are these concerns related to their working experiences? | 157 nurses of oncology units. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questionnaire is an adaption of list of feelings in Durham & Weiss (1997) on concerns for dying patients. Added items on care for terminally ill patients and pain treatment and management. | 31 |
Oksuzoglu et al., 2006, English/Turkey [68] | What are attitudes and opinions of people accompanying cancer patients regarding cancer diagnosis disclosure? | 270 relatives of patients visiting outpatient unit for chemotherapy. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on telling patient and relatives about cancer diagnosis, on timing of telling truth and from whom it should be learned. | 22 |
Oz, 2001, English/Turkey [69] | What are views on euthanasia of nurses and physicians working at a hospital in Ankara? | 113 nurses and 84 physicians. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on definitions of euthanasia , views on for whom it may be appropriate, methods, conditions, kinds of help and information, feelings towards patients requesting euthanasia, responsibilities, willingness to take a role now or when it becomes legal. | 27 |
Ozcakir et al., 2008, English/Turkey [70] | What are attitudes and opinions of medical students about doctor-patient communication in case of dying patients and patients with chronic diseases? | 253 first-year medical students of 2004–2005. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on experiences in caring for someone with a serious disease and doctor-patient communication in case of patients with chronic diseases or dying patients. | 19 |
Ozdogan et al., 2004, English/Turkey [71] | What are relatives’ attitudes towards informing cancer patients about their diagnosis? What factors affect this attitude? |
Relatives of 150 patients visiting outpatient unit. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on attitude towards informing patients with cancer, religious beliefs, daily activities, preference about disclosure, previous requests for information and previous knowledge about cancer. | 27 |
Ozdogan et al., 2006, English/Turkey [72] | What are self-reported truth-telling practices of physicians and what factors influence these in Turkey? | 131 physicians participating in 15th National Oncology Meeting in 2003. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on attitude towards informing patients, views on patients’ mood, knowledge, wishes to be informed about diagnosis. | 26.5 |
Ozkara et al., 2004, English/Turkey [73] | Do physicians approve of legalization of euthanasia and assisted suicide? Is this correlated to their specialties, sex and workplace? | 949 physicians working in 7 different areas in Turkey. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on definitions of euthanasia, legal aspects of euthanasia, expectations about euthanasia and attitude towards euthanasia. | 25.5 |
Pelin and Arda, 2000, English/Turkey [74] | What are ethical attitudes of physicians in Ankara in 1995-1996? | 524 physicians.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on attitudes. e.g. towards informing patients about disease process and poor prognosis, alternative medicine, euthanasia. | 15 |
Tepehan et al., 2009, English/Turkey [74] | Has working in ICUs an impact on attitude to euthanasia? | 205 physicians and 206 nurses working in internal medicine, surgery and pediatrics in 3 hospitals. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on definition of euthanasia, attitude to euthanasia, number of euthanasia requests and experiences and expectations about euthanasia. | 34 |
Turla et al., 2006, English/Turkey [76] | What are attitudes of health professionals towards euthanasia? | 545 professionals working at health clinics and hospitals. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on definitions, legal status and ways of performing euthanasia, euthanasia requests, attitudes and expectations about euthanasia. | 24.5 |
Van den Bosch, 2010, Dutch/Netherlands [77] | What is the quality of life of Turkish-Dutch elderly? What are experiences with health care and what factors influence confidence in GPs? | Interviews: 17 Turkish elderly. Questionnaire: 50 Turkish elderly.
| Mixed-methods study combining interviews with questionnaire | Topics in interviews and-self administered questionnaire concerned experiences with ageing, communicating with GP, use of professional care and health condition. | 28 |
Yaguchi et al., 2005, English/Turkey [79] | What are end-of-life attitudes of ICU physicians? | 1961 ICU physicians, all participants of International Symposium on Intensive care and Emergency Medicine in Brussels. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on treatment, use of do-not-resuscitate orders, strategy on mechanical ventilation and use of morphine in a constructed case. | 27 |
Yerden, 2000, Dutch/Netherlands [80] | What are mutual expectations of Turkish elderly and their children with regard to traditional care? What care is given and what were consequences within family? | 28 elderly and 32 relatives of 15 families: 10 active elderly, 8 in need of care and 10 bedridden. | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews | Interview topics concerned migration experiences, education and work, social relations in Netherlands and in Turkey, living conditions, care of parents by children, professional care. | 26 |
Yerden, 2004, Dutch/Netherlands [81] | What housing conditions can help care-dependent bedridden Turkish patients and their family members in combining family care with professional care? | 16 elderly patients, 11 partners and 28 children/grandchildren: 8 elderly in need of care and 8 bedridden, 3 living in nursing home. | Qualitative study using semi- structured interviews | Interview topics concerned care needs and expectations, caring tasks, social networks, contacts between parents and children, contacts with neighbours, use of professional care, housing conditions, knowledge and use of modifications in the home and wishes about housing. | 19 |
Yildrim et al., 2009, English/Turkey [83] | What is level of hopelessness among Turkish patients with cancer? How is this related to depression, anxiety and disease-related factors? | 95 patients.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questionnaire based on questions of Pain Numeric Rating Scale, Beck Hopelessness Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. | 34.5 |
Findings concerning Moroccan patients
| |||||
McCarthy et al., 2004, English/Morocco [63] | What are current practices of pain management among health professionals caring for children with cancer in Morocco? What are cultural and contextual influences for pain management? | 14 nurses and 11 physicians caring for children with cancer. | Qualitative study using focus groups | Topics in the focus groups concerned pain assessment and management, training and resources, cultural influences and beliefs about pain management, need for assessment and treatment cancer-related pain in pediatric oncology. | 32.5 |
Errihani et al., 2005, French/Morocco [52] | What are psycho-social characteristics of patients treated in Cancer Institute? | 1000 patients with a histological confirmed cancer. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on identity and origin, cultural and economic position and effects of illness on patient and family. | 18 |
Errihani et al., 2006, English/Morocco [50] | What are psycho-social features of Moroccan breast-cancer women? | 600 female patients with a histological confirmed breast cancer. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on repercussion of disease on patient and family. | 22.5 |
Errihani et al., 2008, English/Morocco [51] | What is impact of cancer on Moroccan patients of Moslim faith? | 1600 patients.
| Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire focusing on the repercussions of the disease on religious belief and practices. | 19 |
Findings concerning Turkish and Moroccan patients (sometimes including other immigrant patientsas well)
| |||||
ACTIZ, 2009, Dutch/ Netherlands [22] | What factors are successful in providing intercultural care in home care and elderly care organizations? | 44 nursing professionals and relatives.
| Qualitative study using interviews, focus groups and literature | Topics were accessibility of formal care provisions, acceptance of discussing diseases, contact with family members, translation problems, religion and traditions, special care wishes and care provision. | 22 |
Are frequency and characteristics of end-of-life practices of non-Western migrants different from Dutch natives? | 5342 physicians who signed death certificate for a non-sudden death. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on withholding and withdrawing medical treatments, alleviation of pain or other symptoms or prescription of drugs taking into account or with explicit intention of hastening death. | 36 | |
What experiences do Turkish and Moroccan families of terminally ill patients have of Dutch home care in terminal phase? What factors influence the access to and use of home care in the terminal phase? |
Relatives of 9 Turkish and 10 Moroccan terminally ill patients. | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews | Topics were the health situation of the patient in his last half year, how family care and eventually home care was organized, the care process, felt needs and how these needs were met. | 29 | |
What experiences do GPs and home care nurses have with regard to home care for terminally ill Turkish and Moroccan migrants in the Netherlands? What factors influence their access to and use of home care? | 88 GPs and 93 nurses, who had cared for terminally ill Turkish and Moroccan patients. | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Self-administered questionnaire on care for their last terminally ill patient, these patients’ needs and barriers to use of home care, their care giving and cooperation with other professionals. | 28 | |
What do cancer patients with a Turkish or Moroccan background mean by ‘good palliative care? How do Dutch care providers deal with ideas that diverge from their own ideas about palliative care? | 6 patients, 30 relatives, 17 GPs, 19 nurses, 5 specialists, 4 social workers and 2 pastoral workers, involved in palliative care for 19 Moroccan and 14 Turkish cancer patients. | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews | Topics were decisions made on care and treatment in palliative stage, an evaluation of these decisions and one’s own view on communication in process. | 34 | |
Koppenol et al., 2006, Dutch/Netherlands [59] | What are perceptions of immigrant cancer patients on behavioural patterns, communication with care providers and use of health care? | Focus groups: Turkish, Moroccan, Surinamese and Caribbean health advisors.
| Qualitative study using focus groups | Keywords concerned disease, immigrant groups, heath attitudes, communication, and health care utilization. Topics were cultural and religious aspects, social aspects, knowledge, personal emotions, informing patient of diagnosis and prognosis, informational needs, communication with care providers, use of treatments and care, psychosocial support. | 21 |
Korstanje, 2008, Dutch/Netherlands [60] | What are needs and experiences of family members of immigrant patients in a Dutch hospital? | 7 relatives of Turkish, Moroccan and West African Moslim immigrant patients. | Qualitative study using interviews | Keywords concerned family/informal care, intercultural care, immigrants, nursing, hospital. Topics were hygiene, religion, supporting patient, discharge from hospital, communication and becoming overburdened . | 18 |
Meulenkamp et al., 2010, Dutch/Netherlands [65] | What are wishes of elderly immigrants and what support do they need to achieve quality of life? | 83 elderly immigrants or their relatives, including 14 Turks and 12 Moroccans. | Qualitative study using interviews | Topics on physical welfare and health, living conditions, social participation and mental welfare. | 35 |
Mostafa, 2009, Dutch/Netherlands [66] | What are experiences of immigrant women with breast cancer and what do they expect of their GP? | Interviews with 3 Afghan, 2 Moroccan, 2 Turkish and 1 Iranian patients and focus groups with patients and professionals (e.g. nurses, physicians).
| Qualitative study using interviews and focus groups | Topics were: translation problems, communication, roles in care giving, cultural views, religion and personal experiences. | 24 |
NOOM, 2009, Dutch/ Netherlands [23] | What is known among active senior immigrants about vulnerability of elder immigrants in Netherlands? | 3 focus groups with elderly immigrants + Interviews with key informants.
| Qualitative study using focus groups and interviews | Topics were body and mind, social relations, material conditions, work and productive life, values and inspiration. | 18 |
Van Wijmen et al., 2010, English/Netherlands [78] | To what extent Dutch people know of existence of advance directives (ADs)? Which people do draw up an AD and for what reasons? | 1402 participants of a national panel of consumers of health services, representative of Dutch population (also involving immigrants). | Quantitative study using questionnaires | Questions concerned ADs and end-of-life issues, such as reasons for possession of ADs, awareness of ADs, preferences, experiences and expectations concerning dying, end-of-life care, decision making and quality of life. | 29 |
What are concerns of immigrants when caring for terminally ill? | 140 Moroccan relatives in Rotterdam and 115 Turkish relatives in Enschede. | Qualitative study using focus groups | Topics were views on ‘good care’, best place to die, preferences on who is caring, allocation of tasks in family and in professionals etcetera. | 21 | |
Yerden and Van Koutrike, 2007, Dutch/ Netherlands [82] | What care is given by family members in immigrant families? | 49 relatives (17 Turkish). | Qualitative study using focus groups | Topics were social networks, care duties, communication in family and use of professional care. | 19 |