nach oben

Translational Stroke Research

Erschienen in:

09.07.2017 | Review

Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery

verfasst von: Ali Alawieh, Stephen Tomlinson, DeAnna Adkins, Steve Kautz, Wuwei Feng

Erschienen in: Translational Stroke Research | Ausgabe 6/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Motor impairment is the most common complication after stroke, and recovery of motor function has been shown to be dependent on the extent of lesion in the ipsilesional corticospinal tract (iCST) and activity within ipsilesional primary and secondary motor cortices. However, work from neuroimaging research has suggested a role of the contralesional hemisphere in promoting recovery after stroke potentially through the ipsilateral uncrossed CST fibers descending to ipsilateral spinal segments. These ipsilateral fibers, sometimes referred to as “latent” projections, are thought to contribute to motor recovery independent of the crossed CST. The aim of this paper is to evaluate using cumulative evidence from animal models and human patients on whether an uncrossed CST component is present in mammals and conserved through primates and humans, and whether iCST fibers have a functional role in hemiparetic/hemiplegic human conditions. This review highlights that an ipsilateral uncrossed CST exists in human during development, but the evidence on a functionally relevant iCST component in adult humans is still elusive. In addition, this review argues that whereas activity within the ipsilesional cortex is essential for enhancing motor recovery after stroke, the role of iCST projections specifically is still controversial. Finally, conclusions from current literature emphasize the importance of activity in the ipsilesional cortex and the integrity of crossed CST fibers as major determinants of motor recovery after brain injury.

Armand J. Topical versus diffuse organization of the corticospinal tract in the cat. Journal de physiologie. 1978;74(3):227–30.PubMed

Satomi H, Takahashi K, Kosaka I, Aoki M. Reappraisal of projection levels of the corticospinal fibers in the cat, with special reference to the fibers descending through the dorsal funiculus: a WGA-HRP study. Brain Res. 1989;492(1–2):255–60.CrossRefPubMed

Lacroix S, Havton LA, McKay H, Yang H, Brant A, Roberts J, et al. Bilateral corticospinal projections arise from each motor cortex in the macaque monkey: a quantitative study. J Comp Neurol. 2004;473(2):147–61. doi:10.1002/cne.20051.CrossRefPubMed

Tigges J, Nakagawa S, Tigges M. Efferents of area 4 in a south American monkey (Saimiri). I. Terminations in the spinal cord. Brain Res. 1979;171(1):1–10.CrossRefPubMed

Gerloff C, Bushara K, Sailer A, Wassermann EM, Chen R, Matsuoka T, et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain. 2006;129(Pt 3):791–808. doi:10.1093/brain/awh713.CrossRefPubMed

Muller K, Kass-Iliyya F, Reitz M. Ontogeny of ipsilateral corticospinal projections: a developmental study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Ann Neurol. 1997;42(5):705–11. doi:10.1002/ana.410420506.CrossRefPubMed

Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krageloh-Mann I. Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 10):2222–37.CrossRefPubMed

Lawrence DG, Kuypers HG. Pyramidal and non-pyramidal pathways in monkeys: anatomical and functional correlation. Science. 1965;148(3672):973–5.CrossRefPubMed

Herbert WJ, Powell K, Buford JA. Evidence for a role of the reticulospinal system in recovery of skilled reaching after cortical stroke: initial results from a model of ischemic cortical injury. Exp Brain Res. 2015;233(11):3231–51. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4390-x.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Buetefisch CM. Role of the Contralesional hemisphere in post-stroke recovery of upper extremity motor function. Front Neurol. 2015;6:214. doi:10.3389/fneur.2015.00214.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Dancause N, Touvykine B, Mansoori BK. Inhibition of the contralesional hemisphere after stroke: reviewing a few of the building blocks with a focus on animal models. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:361–87. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Eyre JA. Development and plasticity of the corticospinal system in man. Neural Plast. 2003;10(1–2):93–106. doi:10.1155/NP.2003.93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Eyre JA, Taylor JP, Villagra F, Smith M, Miller S. Evidence of activity-dependent withdrawal of corticospinal projections during human development. Neurology. 2001;57(9):1543–54.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Dum RP, Strick PL. Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16(20):6513–25.PubMed

15.

Ralston DD, Ralston HJ. The terminations of corticospinal tract axons in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol. 1985;242(3):325–37.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kim SH, Pohl PS, Luchies CW, Stylianou AP, Won Y. Ipsilateral deficits of targeted movements after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(5):719–24.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92(6):3276–85. doi:10.1152/jn.00549.2004.CrossRefPubMed

18.

Marchi V, Guzzetta A, Cioni G. Cerebral plasticity and functional reorganization in children with congenital brain lesions. Neonatology. 2017:1–10.

19.

Rehme AK, Fink GR, von Cramon DY, Grefkes C. The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. Cereb Cortex. 2011;21(4):756–68. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq140.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Johansen-Berg H, Rushworth MF, Bogdanovic MD, Kischka U, Wimalaratna S, Matthews PM. The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(22):14518–23. doi:10.1073/pnas.222536799.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Bestmann S, Swayne O, Blankenburg F, Ruff CC, Teo J, Weiskopf N, et al. The role of contralesional dorsal premotor cortex after stroke as studied with concurrent TMS-fMRI. J Neurosci. 2010;30(36):11926–37. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5642-09.2010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Cauraugh JH, Summers JJ. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;75(5):309–20. doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2005.04.001.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Chen R, Yung D, Li JY. Organization of ipsilateral excitatory and inhibitory pathways in the human motor cortex. J Neurophysiol. 2003;89(3):1256–64. doi:10.1152/jn.00950.2002.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Soteropoulos DS, Edgley SA, Baker SN. Lack of evidence for direct corticospinal contributions to control of the ipsilateral forelimb in monkey. J Neurosci. 2011;31(31):11208–19. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0257-11.2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2518–27.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Foltys H, Krings T, Meister IG, Sparing R, Boroojerdi B, Thron A, et al. Motor representation in patients rapidly recovering after stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(12):2404–15.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke. 2000;31(3):656–61.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Ward NS, Newton JM, Swayne OB, Lee L, Thompson AJ, Greenwood RJ, et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain. 2006;129(3):809–19.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Armand J, Kuypers HG. Organization of contralateral and bilateral projections of corticospinal tracts in cats. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci D. 1977;285(16):1455–8.

30.

Satomi H, Takahashi K, Aoki M, Kosaka I. Anatomical evidence for the re-crossing of lateral corticospinal fibers via the posterior gray commissure in the cat spinal cord. Neurosci Lett. 1988;88(2):157–60.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Rapisarda C, Simonelli G, Monti S. Cells of origin and topographic organization of corticospinal neurons in the guinea pig by the retrograde HRP method. Brain Res. 1985;334(1):85–96.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Armand J, Kuypers HG. Cells of origin of crossed and uncrossed corticospinal fibers in the cat: a quantitative horseradish peroxidase study. Exp Brain Res. 1980;40(1):23–34.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Brosamle C, Schwab ME. Cells of origin, course, and termination patterns of the ventral, uncrossed component of the mature rat corticospinal tract. J Comp Neurol. 1997;386(2):293–303.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Alstermark B, Ogawa J, Isa T. Lack of monosynaptic corticomotoneuronal EPSPs in rats: disynaptic EPSPs mediated via reticulospinal neurons and polysynaptic EPSPs via segmental interneurons. J Neurophysiol. 2004;91(4):1832–9.CrossRefPubMed

35.

Nielsen JB, Perez MA, Oudega M, Enriquez-Denton M, Aimonetti JM. Evaluation of transcranial magnetic stimulation for investigating transmission in descending motor tracts in the rat. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;25(3):805–14. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05326.x.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Brus-Ramer M, Carmel JB, Martin JH. Motor cortex bilateral motor representation depends on subcortical and interhemispheric interactions. J Neurosci. 2009;29(19):6196–206. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5852-08.2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Hoff E, Hoff H. Spinal terminations of the projection fibers from the motor cortex of primates. Brain. 1934.

38.

Nakagawa S. Onuf's nucleus of the sacral cord in a south American monkey (Saimiri): its location and bilateral cortical input from area 4. Brain Res. 1980;191(2):337–44.CrossRefPubMed

39.

Rosenzweig ES, Brock JH, Culbertson MD, Lu P, Moseanko R, Edgerton VR, et al. Extensive spinal decussation and bilateral termination of cervical corticospinal projections in rhesus monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 2009;513(2):151–63.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Yoshino-Saito K, Nishimura Y, Oishi T, Isa T. Quantitative inter-segmental and inter-laminar comparison of corticospinal projections from the forelimb area of the primary motor cortex of macaque monkeys. Neuroscience. 2010;171(4):1164–79. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.10.007.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, McNeal DW, Pizzimenti MA, Darling WG. Terminal distribution of the corticospinal projection from the hand/arm region of the primary motor cortex to the cervical enlargement in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2013;521(18):4205–35. doi:10.1002/cne.23410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Kondo T, Yoshihara Y, Yoshino-Saito K, Sekiguchi T, Kosugi A, Miyazaki Y, et al. Histological and electrophysiological analysis of the corticospinal pathway to forelimb motoneurons in common marmosets. Neurosci Res. 2015;98:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2015.05.001.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Aizawa H, Mushiake H, Inase M, Tanji J. An output zone of the monkey primary motor cortex specialized for bilateral hand movement. Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(1):219–21.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Boudrias MH, Lee SP, Svojanovsky S, Cheney PD. Forelimb muscle representations and output properties of motor areas in the mesial wall of rhesus macaques. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(3):704–19. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp136.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Montgomery LR, Herbert WJ, Buford JA. Recruitment of ipsilateral and contralateral upper limb muscles following stimulation of the cortical motor areas in the monkey. Exp Brain Res. 2013;230(2):153–64. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3639-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Morecraft RJ, Ge J, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, McNeal DW, Hynes SM, Pizzimenti MA, et al. Vulnerability of the medial frontal corticospinal projection accompanies combined lateral frontal and parietal cortex injury in rhesus monkey. J Comp Neurol. 2015;523(4):669–97. doi:10.1002/cne.23703.CrossRefPubMed

47.

Aisaka A, Aimi Y, Yasuhara O, Tooyama I, Kimura H, Shimada M. Two modes of corticospinal reinnervation occur close to spinal targets following unilateral lesion of the motor cortex in neonatal hamsters. Neuroscience. 1999;90(1):53–67.CrossRefPubMed

48.

Liu Z, Zhang RL, Li Y, Cui Y, Chopp M. Remodeling of the corticospinal innervation and spontaneous behavioral recovery after ischemic stroke in adult mice. Stroke. 2009;40(7):2546–51. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.547265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Whishaw IQ, Metz GA. Absence of impairments or recovery mediated by the uncrossed pyramidal tract in the rat versus enduring deficits produced by the crossed pyramidal tract. Behav Brain Res. 2002;134(1–2):323–36.CrossRefPubMed

50.

Carmel JB, Kimura H, Berrol LJ, Martin JH. Motor cortex electrical stimulation promotes axon outgrowth to brain stem and spinal targets that control the forelimb impaired by unilateral corticospinal injury. Eur J Neurosci. 2013;37(7):1090–102.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Gonzalez CL, Gharbawie OA, Williams PT, Kleim JA, Kolb B, Whishaw IQ. Evidence for bilateral control of skilled movements: ipsilateral skilled forelimb reaching deficits and functional recovery in rats follow motor cortex and lateral frontal cortex lesions. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(12):3442–52. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03751.x.CrossRefPubMed

52.

Okabe N, Narita K, Miyamoto O. Axonal remodeling in the corticospinal tract after stroke: how does rehabilitative training modulate it? Neural Regen Res. 2017;12(2):185–92. doi:10.4103/1673-5374.200792.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Wahl AS, Omlor W, Rubio JC, Chen JL, Zheng H, Schroter A, et al. Neuronal repair. Asynchronous therapy restores motor control by rewiring of the rat corticospinal tract after stroke. Science. 2014;344(6189):1250–5. doi:10.1126/science.1253050.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Fouad K, Klusman I, Schwab ME. Regenerating corticospinal fibers in the marmoset (Callitrix jacchus) after spinal cord lesion and treatment with the anti-Nogo-a antibody IN-1. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20(9):2479–82. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03716.x.CrossRefPubMed

55.

Freund P, Schmidlin E, Wannier T, Bloch J, Mir A, Schwab ME, et al. Nogo-A-specific antibody treatment enhances sprouting and functional recovery after cervical lesion in adult primates. Nat Med. 2006;12(7):790–2. doi:10.1038/nm1436.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Zaaimi B, Edgley SA, Soteropoulos DS, Baker SN. Changes in descending motor pathway connectivity after corticospinal tract lesion in macaque monkey. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 7):2277–89. doi:10.1093/brain/aws115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

57.

Nathan PW, Smith MC, Deacon P. The corticospinal tracts in man. Course and location of fibres at different segmental levels. Brain. 1990;113(Pt 2):303–24.CrossRefPubMed

58.

Colebatch JG, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Cortical outflow to proximal arm muscles in man. Brain. 1990;113(Pt 6):1843–56.CrossRefPubMed

59.

Berardelli A, Priori A, Inghilleri M, Cruccu G, Mercuri B, Manfredi M. Corticobulbar and corticospinal projections to neck muscle motoneurons in man. A functional study with magnetic and electric transcranial brain stimulation. Exp Brain Res. 1991;87(2):402–6.CrossRefPubMed

60.

Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA. Evidence for bilateral innervation of certain homologous motoneurone pools in man. J Physiol. 1994;475(2):217–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Strutton PH, Beith ID, Theodorou S, Catley M, McGregor AH, Davey NJ. Corticospinal activation of internal oblique muscles has a strong ipsilateral component and can be lateralised in man. Exp Brain Res. 2004;158(4):474–9. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1939-5.CrossRefPubMed

62.

Quartarone A, MacKinnon C, Rothwell J. Ipsilateral EMG responses in pectoralis major muscle evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex. J Physiol Paris. 1999;520:74P.

63.

Tunstill SA, Wynn-Davies AC, Nowicky AV, McGregor AH, Davey NJ. Corticospinal facilitation studied during voluntary contraction of human abdominal muscles. Exp Physiol. 2001;86(1):131–6.CrossRefPubMed

64.

Ziemann U, Ishii K, Borgheresi A, Yaseen Z, Battaglia F, Hallett M, et al. Dissociation of the pathways mediating ipsilateral and contralateral motor-evoked potentials in human hand and arm muscles. J Physiol. 1999;518(Pt 3):895–906.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Ellaway PH, Davey NJ, Maskill DW, Rawlinson SR, Lewis HS, Anissimova NP. Variability in the amplitude of skeletal muscle responses to magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;109(2):104–13.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Tsao H, Galea MP, Hodges PW. Concurrent excitation of the opposite motor cortex during transcranial magnetic stimulation to activate the abdominal muscles. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;171(1):132–9. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.02.005.CrossRefPubMed

67.

Kikuchi T, Matsumoto R, Mikuni N, Yokoyama Y, Matsumoto A, Ikeda A, et al. Asymmetric bilateral effect of the supplementary motor area proper in the human motor system. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123(2):324–34. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.06.011.CrossRefPubMed

68.

Lo YL, Dan YF, Tan YE, Fook-Chong S, Tan SB, Tan CT, et al. Intraoperative monitoring study of ipsilateral motor evoked potentials in scoliosis surgery. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 5):656–60. doi:10.1007/s00586-006-0190-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

69.

Fisher KM, Zaaimi B, Baker SN. Reticular formation responses to magnetic brain stimulation of primary motor cortex. J Physiol. 2012;590(16):4045–60. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.226209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Wolpaw JR, Kaas JH. Taking sides: corticospinal tract plasticity during development. Neurology. 2001;57(9):1530–1.CrossRefPubMed

71.

Brouwer B, Smits E. Corticospinal input onto motor neurons projecting to ankle muscles in individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1996;38(9):787–96.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Can L, Harrison L, Evans A, Stephens J. Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Brain. 1993;116:1223–47.CrossRef

73.

Farmer SF, Harrison LM, Ingram DA, Stephens JA. Plasticity of central motor pathways in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Neurology. 1991;41(9):1505.CrossRefPubMed

74.

Leonard CT, Goldberger ME. Consequences of damage to the sensorimotor cortex in neonatal and adult cats. II. Maintenance of exuberant projections. Dev Brain Res. 1987;32(1):15–30.CrossRef

75.

Nathan PW, Smith M, Deacon P. Vestibulospinal, reticulospinal and descending propriospinal nerve fibres in man. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 6):1809–33.CrossRefPubMed

76.

Staudt M, Gerloff C, Grodd W, Holthausen H, Niemann G, Krägeloh-Mann I. Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(6):854–63.CrossRefPubMed

77.

Eyre JA. Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2007;31(8):1136–49. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.05.011.CrossRefPubMed

78.

Stanfield BB. The development of the corticospinal projection. Prog Neurobiol. 1992;38(2):169–202.CrossRefPubMed

79.

Verhaart W. Hypertrophy of pes pedunculi and pyramid al result of degeneration of contralateral corticofugal fiber tracts. J Comp Neurol. 1950;92(1):1–15.CrossRef

80.

Sebastianelli L, Versace V, Taylor A, Brigo F, Nothdurfter W, Saltuari L et al. Functional reorganization after hemispherectomy in humans and animal models: what can we learn about the brain’s resilience to extensive unilateral lesions? Brain Res Bull. 2017.

81.

Rutten GJ, Ramsey NF, van Rijen PC, Franssen H, van Veelen CW. Interhemispheric reorganization of motor hand function to the primary motor cortex predicted with functional magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Child Neurol. 2002;17(4):292–7. doi:10.1177/088307380201700411.CrossRefPubMed

82.

Pilato F, Dileone M, Capone F, Profice P, Caulo M, Battaglia D, et al. Unaffected motor cortex remodeling after hemispherectomy in an epileptic cerebral palsy patient. A TMS and fMRI study. Epilepsy Res. 2009;85(2–3):243–51. doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2009.03.016.CrossRefPubMed

83.

Kupper H, Kudernatsch M, Pieper T, Groeschel S, Tournier JD, Raffelt D, et al. Predicting hand function after hemidisconnection. Brain. 2016;139(Pt 9):2456–68. doi:10.1093/brain/aww170.CrossRefPubMed

84.

Lotze M, Markert J, Sauseng P, Hoppe J, Plewnia C, Gerloff C. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J Neurosci. 2006;26(22):6096–102. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4564-05.2006.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Schaechter JD, Fricker ZP, Perdue KL, Helmer KG, Vangel MG, Greve DN, et al. Microstructural status of ipsilesional and contralesional corticospinal tract correlates with motor skill in chronic stroke patients. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(11):3461–74. doi:10.1002/hbm.20770.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

86.

Butefisch CM, Kleiser R, Korber B, Muller K, Wittsack HJ, Homberg V, et al. Recruitment of contralesional motor cortex in stroke patients with recovery of hand function. Neurology. 2005;64(6):1067–9. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000154603.48446.36.CrossRefPubMed

87.

Verleger R, Adam S, Rose M, Vollmer C, Wauschkuhn B, Kompf D. Control of hand movements after striatocapsular stroke: high-resolution temporal analysis of the function of ipsilateral activation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(8):1468–76.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJ, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RS. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol. 1993;33(2):181–9. doi:10.1002/ana.410330208.CrossRefPubMed

89.

Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, Fraser C, Lemon RN. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996;101(4):316–28.CrossRefPubMed

90.

Feng W, Wang J, Chhatbar PY, Doughty C, Landsittel D, Lioutas VA, et al. Corticospinal tract lesion load: an imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes. Ann Neurol. 2015; doi:10.1002/ana.24510.

91.

Soderblom C, Lee DH, Dawood A, Carballosa M, Jimena Santamaria A, Benavides FD et al. 3D Imaging of Axons in Transparent Spinal Cords from Rodents and Nonhuman Primates. eNeuro. 2015;2(2). doi:10.1523/ENEURO.0001-15.2015.

Titel: Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery
verfasst von: Ali Alawieh
Stephen Tomlinson
DeAnna Adkins
Steve Kautz
Wuwei Feng
Publikationsdatum: 09.07.2017
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Translational Stroke Research / Ausgabe 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1868-4483
Elektronische ISSN: 1868-601X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-017-0551-5

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

25.04.2024 | Hypotonie | Nachrichten

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Preclinical and Clinical Evidence on Ipsilateral Corticospinal Projections: Implication for Motor Recovery

Abstract

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Parkinson-Therapie im Wandel – aktuelle Leitlinie im Fokus

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Neurologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2017

Annexin A2 Plus Low-Dose Tissue Plasminogen Activator Combination Attenuates Cerebrovascular Dysfunction After Focal Embolic Stroke of Rats

Infections Up to 76 Days After Stroke Increase Disability and Death

Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke

MicroRNA Changes in Preconditioning-Induced Neuroprotection

CD163, a Hemoglobin/Haptoglobin Scavenger Receptor, After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Functions in Microglia/Macrophages Versus Neurons

Novel Regenerative Therapies Based on Regionally Induced Multipotent Stem Cells in Post-Stroke Brains: Their Origin, Characterization, and Perspective

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

Parkinson-Therapie im Wandel – aktuelle Leitlinie im Fokus

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

Update Neurologie