Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2017

19.11.2016

Predictors of primary care provider adoption of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening

verfasst von: Jennifer M. Weiss, David H. Kim, Maureen A. Smith, Aaron Potvien, Jessica R. Schumacher, Ronald E. Gangnon, B. Dustin Pooler, Patrick R. Pfau, Perry J. Pickhardt

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

To examine factors influencing primary care provider (PCP) adoption of CT colonography (CTC) for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study linking electronic health record (EHR) data with PCP survey data. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were not up-to-date with CRC screening and if they had CTC insurance coverage in the year prior to survey administration. PCPs were included if they had at least one eligible patient in their panel and completed the survey (final sample N = 95 PCPs; N = 6245 patients). Survey data included perceptions of CRC screening by any method, as well as CTC specifically. Multivariate logistic regression estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for PCP and clinic predictors of CRC screening by any method and screening with CTC.

Results

Substantial variation in CTC use was seen among PCPs and clinics (range 0–16% of CRC screening). Predictors of higher CTC use were PCP perceptions that CTC is effective in reducing CRC mortality, higher number of perceived advantages to screening with CTC, and Internal Medicine specialty. Factors not associated with CTC use were PCP perceptions of less organizational capacity to meet demand for colonoscopy, number of perceived disadvantages to screening with CTC, PCP age and gender, and clinic factors.

Conclusion

Significant variation in PCP adoption of CTC exists. PCP perceptions of CTC and specialty practice were related to CTC adoption. Strategies to increase PCP adoption of CTC for CRC screening should include emphasis on the effectiveness and advantages of CTC.
Literatur
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2008) Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57:253–258 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2008) Use of colorectal cancer tests—United States, 2002, 2004, and 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57:253–258
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wong MCS, Ching JYL, Chan VCW, et al. (2014) Informed choice vs. no choice in colorectal cancer screening tests: a prospective cohort study in real-life screening practice. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1072–1079. doi:10.1038/ajg.2014.136 CrossRefPubMed Wong MCS, Ching JYL, Chan VCW, et al. (2014) Informed choice vs. no choice in colorectal cancer screening tests: a prospective cohort study in real-life screening practice. Am J Gastroenterol 109:1072–1079. doi:10.​1038/​ajg.​2014.​136 CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA 58:130–160. doi:10.3322/CA.2007.0018 PubMed Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA 58:130–160. doi:10.​3322/​CA.​2007.​0018 PubMed
15.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, et al. (2003) A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 36:352–362CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Frame PS, Meadow A, et al. (2003) A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 36:352–362CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. (2005) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 43:939–944CrossRefPubMed Klabunde CN, Vernon SW, Nadel MR, et al. (2005) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of reports from primary care physicians and average-risk adults. Med Care 43:939–944CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, et al. (2004) Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141:264–271CrossRefPubMed Mysliwiec PA, Brown ML, Klabunde CN, et al. (2004) Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 141:264–271CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Kiabunde CN, et al. (2005) A national survey of primary care physicians’ methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med 142:86–94CrossRefPubMed Nadel MR, Shapiro JA, Kiabunde CN, et al. (2005) A national survey of primary care physicians’ methods for screening for fecal occult blood. Ann Intern Med 142:86–94CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) Interpreting model coefficients when the true model form is unknown. Epidemiology 4:310–318CrossRefPubMed Maldonado G, Greenland S (1993) Interpreting model coefficients when the true model form is unknown. Epidemiology 4:310–318CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC 19:716–723CrossRef Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC 19:716–723CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat United States Preventive Services Task Force (2007) Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville United States Preventive Services Task Force (2007) Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Potentially important extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: Incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 206:313–318. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.15193 CrossRef Pooler BD, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2016) Potentially important extracolonic findings at screening CT colonography: Incidence and outcomes data from a clinical screening program. Am J Roentgenol 206:313–318. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​15.​15193 CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, et al. (2010) Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 195:677–686. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3779 CrossRef Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, et al. (2010) Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Roentgenol 195:677–686. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​09.​3779 CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Park SK, Park DI, Lee SY, et al. (2009) Extracolonic findings of computed tomographic colonography in Koreans. World J Gastroenterol 15:1487–1492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park SK, Park DI, Lee SY, et al. (2009) Extracolonic findings of computed tomographic colonography in Koreans. World J Gastroenterol 15:1487–1492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1993) Adoption of software engineering process innovations—the case of object orientation. Sloan Manag Rev 34:7–22 Fichman RG, Kemerer CF (1993) Adoption of software engineering process innovations—the case of object orientation. Sloan Manag Rev 34:7–22
Metadaten
Titel
Predictors of primary care provider adoption of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening
verfasst von
Jennifer M. Weiss
David H. Kim
Maureen A. Smith
Aaron Potvien
Jessica R. Schumacher
Ronald E. Gangnon
B. Dustin Pooler
Patrick R. Pfau
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publikationsdatum
19.11.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0971-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Abdominal Radiology 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Falciform ligament sign

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.