Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2020

Open Access 01.12.2020 | Research article

Prevalence and risk factors associated with headache amongst medical staff in South China

verfasst von: Wei Xie, Ruibing Li, Mianwang He, Fang Cui, Tingting Sun, Jianmei Xiong, Dengfa Zhao, Weinan Na, Ruozhuo Liu, Shengyuan Yu

Erschienen in: The Journal of Headache and Pain | Ausgabe 1/2020

Abstract

Background

A previous study by our team reported the prevalence of primary headache disorders and factors associated with headache among nurses in three hospitals in North China. The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to learn more about how medical nurses in South China were affected by headache. Additionally, we determined the prevalence of headache and measured the impact of headache among doctors in mainland China for the first time.

Methods

Stratified random cluster sampling was used to select 280 physicians and 365 nurses from various departments in four hospitals in Sanya, which is one of southernmost cities in China. Information was collected on demographic data, occupational factors and headache characteristics by using a structured questionnaire.

Results

Among 645 medical staff, 548 (85%) responded (doctors = 240, nurses = 308). Among the medical staff, the 1-year prevalence of primary headache disorders was 50%, with 25.9% experiencing migraine and 24.1% experiencing tension-type headache (TTH). The prevalence of migraine in female doctors was higher than that in female nurses, although this difference was not significant (32.4% vs. 29.8%, P = 0.628). Multivariate analysis showed that being female and working in other specialties (Emergency Department & Radiology Department) remained independent risk factors for migraine in doctors (OR 2.314 and 3.223). In nurses, being married was a risk factor for migraine (OR 3.728), and job titles remained an independent risk factor for migraine and TTH (OR 2.294 and 4.695). Working more than 6 night-shifts per month was associated with an increased prevalence of migraine and TTH in doctors; the same was true in nurses for migraine, but not for TTH.

Conclusion

The prevalence of primary headache disorders in both nurses and doctors is higher than that in the general population in South China. Our study shows that occupation, geography and sex may play an important role. Further, female doctors are more susceptible than female nurses to migraine. The risk factors relevant to headache that were found in this study should provide an important reference for promoting occupational health in medical staff, especially female doctors in China.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
CDH
Chronic daily headache
ICHD-3
International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition
MOH
Medication overuse headache
TTH
Tension type headache

Background

Few people never experience headache in their lifetime due to the high prevalence of this disorder in the general population throughout the world. The most prevalent headache disorders are migraine and tension-type headache (TTH) [1]. The 2016 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study established TTH as the third most prevalent condition in the world and migraine as the sixth [2]. A population-based study in China showed that the 1-year prevalence of primary headache disorders was 23.8% [3], which appears to be much lower than that in other countries and regions. In other Asian countries, the 1-year prevalence of headache disorders ranged from 64%(India) to 85%(Nepal) [4]. European regional studies showed that 53%–75%of people experienced headache disorders, while the 1-year headache prevalence was 45% in Ethiopia and 62% in Zambia [4]. Despite the differences in prevalence in different regions and countries, the socioeconomic impact of headache disorders was similar: The overall lost gross domestic product (GDP) was approximately 1.7% [4]. Headache can substantially impair quality of life and is ranked sixth among the leading causes of years lived with disability (YLDs) worldwide [5, 6].
Some epidemiological studies have shown that several risk factors, including sex [7], body mass index (BMI) [8], smoking [9], family history [10], and climate [11] might be associated with primary headache disorders. Despite the lower prevalence in China, the risk factors are similar to those reported for other countries [1214]. In a previous study in North China, we found that the prevalence of primary headache disorders in nurses was significantly higher than that in the general population (45.3% vs. 23.8%) [15]. Occupational factors may play a vital role in the pathogenesis of headache. Medical staff, including nurses, confront heavy workloads and experience states of high tension and high intensity for long periods [15]. Therefore, more attention should be paid to the health status of medical staff. In addition to occupation, climate affects the development of headache to varying degrees [16, 17]. China is a vast country spanning the temperate zone, tropics and subtropics. Hainan is the only province completely within the tropical region. It is located in the southernmost part of China, and Sanya city is located at the southern tip of Hainan. The headache rate of medical staff in this area is not yet available.
In this paper, we sought to provide recent statistics on the prevalence of primary headache disorders in medical staff in South China. Our aims were to update prior prevalence estimates and to identify other factors relevant to headache disorders among medical staff in China, which should be a supplementary extension of “Lifting The Burden” in China.

Methods

Ethics

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing. All patients were informed of the purpose of the study and provided informed consent prior to participating.

Sample and survey

This is a cross-sectional survey conducted in three tertiary A hospitals (Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, the Third People’s Hospital of Hainan Province and the People’s Hospital of Sanya) and one secondary A hospital (the Chinese PLA No. 425 Hospital) in Sanya, South China, from May 2018 to October 2018. We conducted a preliminary survey of one department in each hospital to test epidemiological methods and then adopted a stratified random cluster sampling method. In each hospital, we randomly selected eight clinical departments, from which all doctors and nurses were invited to participate the headache survey. The survey was divided into 2 parts: questionnaires and interviews (face-to-face interviews & telephone interviews). All those reporting headache were interviewed after their questionnaires were reviewed by neurologists.

Procedure

Questionnaires

Neurologists, who had been systematically trained with The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) tool and the survey, explained the notes for the questionnaire and answered the participant’s questions. Then each participant completed the structured questionnaire to gather demographic data, occupation-related factors and headache characteristics over the previous year. The demographic and headache profile sections of the questionnaire were the same items as used in a Chinese national epidemiology study, and were validated for headache assessment and diagnosis in the general population [3, 15, 18].
A.The demographic characteristics section: Sex, Age, Ethnicity (Han v.s. Non-Han), Marital Status: Unmarried (including single and divorced people) v.s. Married, Education (College or lower, Bachelor’s degree, Master’s degree or above), and body mass index (BMI, graded as Underweight, Normal Weight, Overweight, Obese).
B.The occupational characteristics section: Specialty (Internal Medicine, Surgical Department, Others: Emergency Department and Radiology Department), Work Seniority (Doctors: < 7 years v.s. ≥7 years; Nurses: < 5 years v.s. ≥5 years; 5 and 7 were the median), Title (Junior, Senior and Advanced. Doctors: Resident, Attending Physician and Deputy Chief Physician or above; Nurses: Nurse, Nurse Practitioner and Nurse-in-charge or above), Work Arrangements (rotational shifts) and Number of Night Shifts (for those performing shift work).
C.The headache profile section (25 questions): Headache Duration, Frequency, Location, Quality, Intensity, Aura, Characteristics of Accompanying Symptoms (Nausea, Vomiting, Photophobia and Phonophobia) and The Impact of Physical Activity on Headache, etc. Diagnostic questions began with a headache screening question “Have you had a headache in the last year not related to flu, hangover, cold or head injury?”. Those who answered “no” to this question were classified as headache-free. All those reporting headache were invited to interviews after their questionnaires were reviewed. In this questionnaire, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs), other primary headache disorders and secondary headaches were not included.

Interviews

In face-to-face interviews, trained neurologists would confirm the headache diagnosis based on the ICHD-3. Any participant who might have more than one type of headache was instructed to focus on the subjectively most bothersome type (meaning that only one headache type was diagnosed) for purposes of description, diagnosis and prevalence counting. Participants reporting headache occurs 15 or more days/month for more than 3 months were diagnosed with chronic daily headache (CDH) [1, 19, 20] and questioned if medication-overuse headache (MOH). Neurologists would consider differential diagnoses, and remain alert to other possible diagnosis that raise a need for further examinations: the Red flag mostly to signal cases that might be secondary headache. If necessary, they would perform general and neurological examination.
All the participants were interviewed through telephone, especially for originally headache-free participants and headache participants with ambiguous memories to lower the recall bias.

Statistics

The statistical analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS (version 23.0). Continuous variables that did not comply with the normal distribution were summarised as medians, and categorical variables were summarised as numbers and percentages. We used Chi-squared to compare distributions of categorical variables between groups, and used Bonferroni correction to adjust the statistical results for multiple comparisons (when the product of the Least Significant Difference P-value and the number of comparisons exceeds 1, the Bonferroni-adjusted P-value would be set 1.000). Multivariate logistic regression was applied to identify odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for different types of headache according to demographic and occupational characteristics. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Among the 645 medical staff invited to participate, 22 declined to complete the survey, and 75 submitted questionnaires with incomplete or perfunctory responses. The response rate was 85%. A total of 548 respondents completed the survey (doctors = 240, nurses = 308). The age ranged from 20 to 60 years, with a median of 28 years (doctors = 31 years, nurses = 27 years).
Only 3 respondents were diagnosed with two types of primary headache, and 18 had other headaches, including neuralgia, CDH, and unclassifiable headache. Only 1 nurse was diagnosed with MOH. As the number of people suffering from CDH and MOH was low, we did not take these disorders into account.
Table 1 and Fig. 1 showed that among the medical staff, the 1-year prevalence of primary headache disorders was 50% (95% CI 45.8–54.2%), with 25.9% (95% CI 22.2–29.6%) experiencing migraine and 24.1% (95% CI 20.5–27.7%) experiencing TTH. Both types of primary headache were more prevalent in nurses than in doctors (migraine: 29.2% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.045; TTH: 24.7% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.715) (showed in Table 2, Fig. 1). However, by further dividing doctors and nurses into two groups by sex, we found that the group of female doctors had the higher prevalence of migraine than female nurses, although this difference was not significant (32.4% v.s. 29.8%, P = 0.628) (see Table 2 and Fig. 2). The prevalence of both migraine and TTH peaked during middle age (30–39 years) in the nurse and doctor groups but were higher in the former group than in the latter (migraine: 31.4% vs. 25.2%, P = 0.168 < 0.05; TTH: 29.1% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.213 < 0.05). Because there were very few nurses over the age of 40 and none of them had TTH, we did not count them (see Figs. 3 and 4).
Table 1
The demographic characteristics comparisons between different types of headaches and non-headache among medical staff
Variable
Non-headache
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
N
N(%) P
N(%) Bonferroni P
N(%) Bonferroni P
Total
256
292(53.3)
142(25.9)
132(24.1)
Age
 
0.067
0.072
0.969
20–29
140
163(53.8)
82(27.1)
70(23.1)
30–39
84
109(56.5)
54(28.0)
51(26.4)
≥40
32
20(38.5)
6(11.5)
11(21.2)
Ethnicity
 
0.421
1.000
0.675
Han
238
266(52.8)
131(26.0)
118(23.4)
Non-Han
18
26(59.1)
11(25.0)
14(31.8)
Marital status
 
0.051
0.063
1.000
Unmarried
(Single&Divorced)
130
124(48.8)
55(21.7)
61(24.0)
Married
126
168(57.1)
87(29.6)
71(24.1)
Education
 
0.672
0.303
1.000
College or lower
76
97(56.1)
57(32.9)
35(20.2)
Bachelor
151
163(51.9)
70(22.3)
81(25.8)
Master or above
29
32(52.5)
15(24.6)
16(26.2)
BMI
 
0.982
1.000
1.000
Lower than normal (< 18.5)
44
49(52.7)
22(23.7)
23(24.7)
Normal (18.5- < 23)
128
145(53.1)
80(29.3)
59(21.6)
Overweight (23- < 25)
38
47(55.3)
22(25.9)
20(23.5)
Obese(≥25)
46
51(52.6)
18(18.6)
30(30.9)
Table 2
Prevalence of migraine and Tension-type headache among doctors and nurses of different genders
Variable
Doctors
Nurses
Non-headache N
Total headahe
Migraine
TTH
Non-headache N
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
N(%) P
N(%) P
N(%) P
N(%) P
N(%) P
N(%) P
Total
127
113(47.1)
52(21.7)
56(23.3)
129
179(58.1)
90(29.2)
76(24.7)
Sex
 
0.193
0.002
0.712
 
0.409
0.241
1.000
male
78
60(43.5)
19(13.8)
36(26.1)
4
2(33.3)
0(0)
2(33.3)
female
49
53(52.0)
33(32.4)
20(19.6)
125
177(58.6)
90(29.8)
74(24.5)
Comparisons of the demographic data for medical staff with different types of headaches and non-headache are shown in Table 1. Univariate analysis suggested that age, marital status, ethnicity, education, and BMI were not linked to either of two types of primary headaches.
Comparisons of the occupation-related data between different types of headaches and non-headaches for doctors and nurses are shown in Tables 3 and 4. Specialty did not correlate with any type of headaches in doctors (migraine: internal medicine: 20.3%, surgical department: 19.2%, other specialties: 34.5%, P = 0.786 > 0.05; TTH: internal medicine: 22.5%, surgical department:27.4%, other specialties: 17.2%, P = 1.000 > 0.05) or with TTH in nurses (internal medicine: 26.2%, surgical department: 22.8%, other specialties: 26.1%, P = 1.000 > 0.05). However, internal medicine nurses were less likely to experience migraine than nurses in the surgical department (internal medicine: 21.5%, surgical department: 36.0%, P = 0.033 < 0.05). The prevalence of TTH was significantly higher for some nursing roles (nurse: 15.6%, nurse practitioner: 34.0%, P < 0.001), but this was not observed for doctors (resident: 22.5%, attending physician: 26.6%, deputy chief physician or above: 21.3%, P = 1.000 > 0.05). The prevalence of migraine and total headache did not significantly differ with title for either doctors or nurses. Seniority and work arrangement had no effect on the prevalence of headache, including migraine and TTH, in doctors or nurses.
Table 3
The occupational characteristics comparisons between different types of headache and non-headache among doctors
Variable
Non-headache N
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
N(%) P
N(%) Bonferroni P
N(%) Bonferroni P
Total
127
113(47.1)
52(21.7)
56(23.3)
Specialty
 
0.505
0.786
1.000
Internal Medicine
77
61(44.2)
28(20.3)
31(22.5)
Surgical Department
37
36(49.3)
14(19.2)
20(27.4)
Others
13
16(55.2)
10(34.5)
5(17.2)
Seniority (year)
 
0.945
1.000
1.000
< 5 or 7
59
53(47.3)
27(24.1)
24(21.4)
≥5 or 7
68
60(46.9)
25(19.5)
32(25.0)
Title
 
0.136
0.222
1.000
Junior
64
65(50.4)
33(25.6)
29(22.5)
Senior
32
32(50.0)
14(21.9)
17(26.6)
Advanced
31
16(34.0)
5(10.6)
10(21.3)
Work arrangement
 
0.419
0.249
1.000
Day-shift
35
26(42.6)
8(13.1)
16(26.2)
Rotating-shift
92
87(48.6)
44(24.6)
40(22.3)
Table 4
The occupational characteristics comparisons between different types of headache and non-headache among nurses
Variable
Non-headache N
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
N(%) P
N(%) Bonferroni P
N(%) Bonferroni P
Total
129
179(58.1)
90(29.2)
76(24.7)
Specialty
 
0.073
0.033
1.000
Internal Medicine
72
77(51.7)
32(21.5)
39(26.2)
Surgical Department
50
86(63.2)
49(36.0)
31(22.8)
Others
7
16(69.6)
9(39.1)
6(26.1)
Seniority (year)
 
0.192
0.777
0.579
< 5 or 7
63
74(54.0)
37(27.0)
30(21.9)
≥5 or 7
66
105(61.4)
53(31.0)
46(26.9)
Title
 
0.002
0.450
0.000
Junior
70
65(48.1)
38(28.1)
21(15.6)
Senior
45
99(68.8)
43(29.9)
49(34.0)
Advanced
14
15(51.7)
9(31.0)
6(20.7)
Work arrangement
 
0.734
1.000
1.000
Day-shift
28
36(56.3)
20(31.3)
15(23.4)
Rotating-shift
101
143(58.6)
70(28.7)
61(25.0)
We investigated whether the number of night shifts per month affected the prevalence of headache by grouping both doctors and nurses according to whether they worked more or less than the median of six (see Table 5). Doctors who worked more than six night-shifts were significantly more likely to suffer both types of headache than those who worked fewer than six night-shifts (migraine: 27.7% v.s. 21.2%; TTH: 27.7% v.s. 16.5%). Nurses who worked more than six night-shifts were significantly more likely to experience migraine headaches than those who worked fewer than six night-shifts (37.8% v.s. 18.8%); however, the prevalence of TTH did not significantly differ with the frequency of night shift work.
Table 5
The impact of number of night shifts per month on the prevalence of different types of headache among doctors and nurses
 
Doctors
Nurses
Total headache
OR (95% CI)
Migraine
OR (95% CI)
TTH
OR (95% CI)
Total headache
OR (95% CI)
Migraine
OR (95% CI)
TTH
OR (95% CI)
Prevalence (%)
Prevalence (%)
Prevalence (%)
Prevalence (%)
Prevalence (%)
Prevalence (%)
Night shift number
 
1.94
(1.07–3.52)
 
1.80
(0.87–3.72)
 
2.31
(1.07–4.98)
 
1.67
(1.00–2.80)
 
2.72
(1.43–5.15)
 
0.99
(0.52–1.87)
 < 6
34/85 (40.0)
 
18/85 (21.2)
 
14/85 (16.5)
 
61/117 (52.1)
 
22/117(18.8)
 
34/117(29.1)
 
 ≥6
53/94 (56.4)
 
26/94 (27.7)
 
26/94 (27.7)
 
82/127 (64.6)
 
48/127(37.8)
 
27/127(21.3)
 
The above factors were analysed by multivariate logistic regression (Tables 6 and 7), which showed that being female and working in other specialties remained independent risk factors for migraine in doctors. Female doctors were more than twice as likely as male doctors to experience migraine headaches, and doctors in other specialties were more likely to suffer migraines than doctors in the internal medicine and surgical departments. In nurses, being married and holding a senior job title remained independent risk factors for headaches overall, as did being married for migraine and having a senior job title for migraine and TTH. Nurses in the surgical department were more likely to suffer migraines than those in internal medicine. Nurses in other specialties were more likely to suffer migraines than internal medicine nurses, but there was no significant difference.
Table 6
Multivariable adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for total headache, migraine, and tension-type headache (TTH) among doctors
 
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
Sex
 Male
Reference
Reference
Reference
 Female
1.477(0.782–2.789)
2.314(1.005–5.326)*
1.088(0.493–2.402)
Specialty
 Internal Medicine
Reference
Reference
Reference
 Surgical Department
1.364(0.720–2.586)
1.564(0.630–3.877)
1.275(0.586–2.771)
 Others
1.932(0.814–4.586)
3.223(1.122–9.259)*
1.051(0.308–3.586)
*P < 0.05
Table 7
Multivariable adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) for total headache, migraine, and tension-type headache (TTH) among nurses
 
Total headache
Migraine
TTH
Marital status
 Unmarried/Divorced
Reference
Reference
Reference
 Married
2.737(1.421–5.271)**
3.728(1.640–8.472)**
1.855(0.839–4.099)
Specialty
 Internal Medicine
Reference
Reference
Reference
 Surgical Department
1.463(0.886–2.418)
1.910(1.036–3.521)*
1.018(0.536–1.936)
 Others
2.180(0.797–5.962)
2.607(0.841–8.083)
1.352(0.375–4.876)
Title
 Junior
Reference
Reference
Reference
 Senior
3.044(1.530–6.057)**
2.294(1.012–5.199)*
4.695(1.866–11.808)**
 Advanced
1.720(0.527–5.616)
1.966(0.487–7.933)
2.006(0.422–9.524)
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Among the doctors, sex and specialty were not risk factors for TTH in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, and age, nationality, marital status, education, BMI, seniority, title, and work arrangement were not identified as risk factors for either type of headache. Among the nurses, marital status and specialty were not identified as risk factors for TTH in the multivariate logistic regression analysis, and age, nationality, education, BMI, seniority, and work arrangement were not identified as risk factors for either type of headache.

Discussion

Primary headache disorders are important causes of disability and reduced quality of life, and hospital workers are at high risk [2123]. We found that the 1-year prevalence of primary headache disorders among medical staff in Sanya, South China, was 50% (migraine: 25.9%; TTH: 24.1%), which was significantly higher than the 23.8% (migraine: 9.3%; TTH: 10.8%) obtained in a population-based study in mainland China [3]. The prevalence rate of hospital workers in previous literature was high, as Sokolovic reported a 3-month prevalence of 61% [24], and Onwuekwe showed that the half-year prevalence was more than 70% [25]. There are two possible reasons for the difference. First, previous studies included non-clinical subjects (e.g., administrators and research staff). Second, a web-based survey adopted by previous studies may overrepresent persons with headache based on their willingness to respond.
Our nationwide population-based headache survey [3] suggested the prevalence of migraine was near the global average of 11%, while CDH (1% v.s. 3%) was less prevalent than it was worldwide. And MOH accounted for approximately 60% of CDH. Our group’s another study [26] showed MOH clinical profile -MOH in China was associated with lower educational level and annual income. A recent report [27] also suggested MOH was more common in the less well educated. Another study [15] recruited 1102 nurses among which only 10 respondents had two types of primary headache and only 2 were diagnosed with both CDH and MOH, suggesting nursing staff had lower prevalence of MOH and CDH than the general population.
Similar to their results, among 548 respondents in our survey only 3 respondents were diagnosed with two types of primary headache, and 18 had other headaches, including neuralgia, CDH, and unclassified headache. Only 1 nurse was diagnosed with MOH, which may be related to the group characteristics of medical staff. Generally medical staff have higher average education level and annual income than general population. Moreover, as a special occupational group with certain medical knowledge and convenient medical conditions, they took medicine more rationally and timely, which could be the main reason for the lower prevalence of MOH and CDH among medical staff.
As mentioned above, through headache questionnaires, face-to-face interviews and subsequent telephone follow-ups, we carefully confirmed only 3 respondents were diagnosed with two types of primary headache among 548 respondents, which was in accordance with the findings of the Chinese population-based door-to-door survey and northern nursing staff surveys [3, 15]. Of course, this may be associated with our small sample.
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to investigate the prevalence of primary headache disorders among doctors in mainland China (45% had primary headache disorder: 21.7% had migraine, and 23.3% had TTH). Unexpectedly, few data were available regarding headache among doctors on PubMed. Doctors’ headaches seemed to be ignored. Bartolini M reported that doctors were generally not more sensitised to problematic headache than the general population and tended to avoid evaluation by their general practitioner [28]. According to a survey of neurologists in Australia and New Zealand, 65.9% of neurologists had a personal history of migraine. This finding suggested significant under-recognition of migraine among non-neurologists [29]. In the future, headache disorder education should target interventions to raise awareness of cephalalgia disorders in populations of doctors.
When the prevalence of headache among nurses in Sanya, South China was analysed separately, we found a 53.9% prevalence of primary headache, including a 29.2% prevalence of migraine and a 24.7% prevalence of TTH. Compared with North China (where the prevalence rates were 45.3, 14.8, and 26.2% for primary headache, migraine and TTH, respectively) [15], the prevalence of TTH was similar, while migraine was more prevalent in South China. Geographical factors may be one explanation for the divergence. Sanya, located in the southernmost part of Hainan Island, is an international tourist city with a tropical maritime monsoon climate and plenty of sunlight. According to Tai MS, tropical weather can influence all types of trigger factors for migraine, and sunlight was a particularly common trigger factor in the equatorial and tropical regions of Asia [16]. Wang J reported that sunlight was one of the most common triggers for migraineurs in China [30].
Our study indicated that the prevalence of migraine in male doctors was lower than in female doctors. This result was consistent with the normal epidemiology of migraine, which was more common among women than among men [31]. However, female doctors seemed to have a higher prevalence of migraine than female nurses did. Chinese doctors must confront a large number of patients every day and perform scientific research to improve their knowledge. They were under great pressure and were very fatigued, which were triggers of migraine [32]. Strained doctor-patient relationships might also be responsible for this phenomenon.
Medical staff, a specific occupational group, were characterised by frequent shift work, especially night shifts. Night shift work had a series of well-known consequences, including sleep deprivation, sleep disturbances and irregular daily routines, which were considered triggers of migraine and TTH [33, 34]. The study in North China reported a higher prevalence of migraine among shift-working nurses [15]. Similar to previous findings, our results demonstrated that medical staff who worked a greater number of night shifts (≥6) had an increased prevalence of migraine. We found that working a relatively higher number of night shifts was associated with higher odds of TTH onset in doctors, but not in nurses. This phenomenon may be explained by the fact that doctors sit longer than nurses and that sitting causes an excessive forward head position or forward head posture (FHP). Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C found that FHP was associated with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). His study suggested that shortened, contracted head and neck muscles associated with FHP may contribute to the development or perpetuation of TTH [35, 36]. However, further studies are required to investigate this possibility.
Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical nurses were more likely to have migraine than internal medicine nurses. Long and continuous working hours, missed meals, odours in the operating room and other common triggers of migraine may be responsible for the difference [37]. However, surgeons who worked in the same environment as the surgical nurses and experienced high stress levels during operations, were not more likely to have migraines than physicians. This may be attributable to a strong ability to manage stress and suggested that sex hormone may be a leading cause of migraine instead of other factors because almost all surgeons in China were male. In our study, a senior job title was significantly associated with a greater prevalence of headache (both TTH and migraine) in nurses, indicating that occupational factors affected the prevalence of headache. Nurses with senior titles tended to be married and had the dual responsibilities of mothers and wives. They must shoulder the burden of family and carry a high workload. In addition to clinical work, they were also responsible for management and teaching activities. However, the small number of participants with advanced titles may have affected the reliability of the results.

Limitations

Our study had several limitations. First, the sample size was small, which may affect the accuracy of the results. It was not possible to further investigate the prevalence of and risk factors associated with subtypes of migraine and TTH. Second, the role of other factors, such as anxiety, depression, noise exposure, alcohol use and changes in the weather, which may potentially influence the prevalence of headache, should be explored in future studies. In addition, the recall bias arising from participants’ answers to occurrences and characteristics of headache in the past year may have affected the reliability of survey data, and prospective diary studies should be encouraged.

Conclusion

Our study shows that the prevalence of primary headache disorders (including migraine and TTH) in both nurses and doctors is higher than that of the general population in South China. The special geographical location of Sanya could be responsible for the difference in the prevalence of migraine between nurses in North and South China. Multiple factors associated with migraine and TTH among medical staff were verified, including sex and specialty for migraine in doctors; marital status, title and specialty for migraine in nurses; and job title for TTH in nurses. To improve the health of medical staff, headache education and strategies for managing these factors should be effectively implemented.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the nurses and doctors who participated in this study.
The ethics committee of the Chinese PLA General Hospital approved this study. All respondents were informed of the purpose of the study. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lj S, Hagen K, Jensen R et al (2007) The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 27(3):193–210CrossRef Lj S, Hagen K, Jensen R et al (2007) The global burden of headache: a documentation of headache prevalence and disability worldwide. Cephalalgia 27(3):193–210CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat (2018) Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 17(11):954–976 (2018) Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 17(11):954–976
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu S, Liu R, Zhao G et al (2012) The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. Headache 52(4):582–591CrossRef Yu S, Liu R, Zhao G et al (2012) The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. Headache 52(4):582–591CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Saylor D, Steiner TJ (2018) The global burden of headache. Semin Neurol 38(2):182–190CrossRef Saylor D, Steiner TJ (2018) The global burden of headache. Semin Neurol 38(2):182–190CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat (2016) Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1603–1658 (2016) Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 315 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE), 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1603–1658
6.
Zurück zum Zitat (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1545–1602 (2016) Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388(10053):1545–1602
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Delaruelle Z, Ivanova TA, Khan S et al (2018) Male and female sex hormones in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 19(1):117CrossRef Delaruelle Z, Ivanova TA, Khan S et al (2018) Male and female sex hormones in primary headaches. J Headache Pain 19(1):117CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinhas-Hamiel O, Frumin K, Gabis L et al (2008) Headaches in overweight children and adolescents referred to a tertiary-care center in Israel. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(3):659–663CrossRef Pinhas-Hamiel O, Frumin K, Gabis L et al (2008) Headaches in overweight children and adolescents referred to a tertiary-care center in Israel. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16(3):659–663CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Straube A, Heinen F, Ebinger F (2013) von KR. Headache in school children: prevalence and risk factors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110(48):811–818PubMedPubMedCentral Straube A, Heinen F, Ebinger F (2013) von KR. Headache in school children: prevalence and risk factors. Dtsch Arztebl Int 110(48):811–818PubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lebedeva ER, Kobzeva NR, Gilev DV, Olesen J (2016) Factors associated with primary headache according to diagnosis, sex, and social group. Headache 56(2):341–356CrossRef Lebedeva ER, Kobzeva NR, Gilev DV, Olesen J (2016) Factors associated with primary headache according to diagnosis, sex, and social group. Headache 56(2):341–356CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman DI, De ver Dye T (2009) Migraine and the environment. Headache 49(6):941–952CrossRef Friedman DI, De ver Dye T (2009) Migraine and the environment. Headache 49(6):941–952CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu S, Liu R, Yang X et al (2012) Body mass index and migraine: a survey of the Chinese adult population. J Headache Pain 13(7):531–536CrossRef Yu S, Liu R, Yang X et al (2012) Body mass index and migraine: a survey of the Chinese adult population. J Headache Pain 13(7):531–536CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo N, Qi W, Tong W et al (2014) Prevalence and burden of headache disorders in two neighboring provinces of China. J Clin Neurosci 21(10):1750–1754CrossRef Luo N, Qi W, Tong W et al (2014) Prevalence and burden of headache disorders in two neighboring provinces of China. J Clin Neurosci 21(10):1750–1754CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang Q, Yu H, Zhang N et al (2019) Body mass index and primary headache: a hospital-based study in China. Biomed Res Int 2019:4630490PubMedPubMedCentral Huang Q, Yu H, Zhang N et al (2019) Body mass index and primary headache: a hospital-based study in China. Biomed Res Int 2019:4630490PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Y, Xie J, Yang F et al (2015) The prevalence of primary headache disorders and their associated factors among nursing staff in North China. J Headache Pain 16:4CrossRef Wang Y, Xie J, Yang F et al (2015) The prevalence of primary headache disorders and their associated factors among nursing staff in North China. J Headache Pain 16:4CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tai MS, SXE Y, Lim TC, Pow ZY, Goh CB (2019) Geographical differences in trigger factors of tension-type headaches and migraines. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23(2):12CrossRef Tai MS, SXE Y, Lim TC, Pow ZY, Goh CB (2019) Geographical differences in trigger factors of tension-type headaches and migraines. Curr Pain Headache Rep 23(2):12CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Li W, Bertisch SM, Mostofsky E, Buettner C, Mittleman MA (2019) Weather, ambient air pollution, and risk of migraine headache onset among patients with migraine. Environ Int 132:105100CrossRef Li W, Bertisch SM, Mostofsky E, Buettner C, Mittleman MA (2019) Weather, ambient air pollution, and risk of migraine headache onset among patients with migraine. Environ Int 132:105100CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yu SY, Cao XT, Zhao G et al (2011) The burden of headache in China: validation of diagnostic questionnaire for a population-based survey. J Headache Pain 12(2):141–146CrossRef Yu SY, Cao XT, Zhao G et al (2011) The burden of headache in China: validation of diagnostic questionnaire for a population-based survey. J Headache Pain 12(2):141–146CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain (1988) Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 8(Suppl 7):1–96 Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain (1988) Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia 8(Suppl 7):1–96
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yancey JR, Sheridan R, Koren KG (2014) Chronic daily headache: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 89(8):642–648PubMed Yancey JR, Sheridan R, Koren KG (2014) Chronic daily headache: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician 89(8):642–648PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes MD, Wu J, Williams TC et al (2013) The experience of headaches in health care workers: opportunity for care improvement. Headache 53(6):962–969CrossRef Hughes MD, Wu J, Williams TC et al (2013) The experience of headaches in health care workers: opportunity for care improvement. Headache 53(6):962–969CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo WY, Huang CC, Weng SF et al (2015) Higher migraine risk in healthcare professionals than in general population: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Headache Pain 16:102CrossRef Kuo WY, Huang CC, Weng SF et al (2015) Higher migraine risk in healthcare professionals than in general population: a nationwide population-based cohort study in Taiwan. J Headache Pain 16:102CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T (2016) GBD 2015: migraine is the third cause of disability in under 50s. J Headache Pain 17(1):104CrossRef Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Vos T (2016) GBD 2015: migraine is the third cause of disability in under 50s. J Headache Pain 17(1):104CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sokolovic E, Riederer F, Szucs T, Agosti R, Sándor PS (2013) Self-reported headache among the employees of a Swiss university hospital: prevalence, disability, current treatment, and economic impact. J Headache Pain 14:29CrossRef Sokolovic E, Riederer F, Szucs T, Agosti R, Sándor PS (2013) Self-reported headache among the employees of a Swiss university hospital: prevalence, disability, current treatment, and economic impact. J Headache Pain 14:29CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Onwuekwe I, Onyeka T, Aguwa E, Ezeala-Adikaibe B, Ekenze O, Onuora E (2014) Headache prevalence and its characterization amongst hospital workers in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Head Face Med 10:48CrossRef Onwuekwe I, Onyeka T, Aguwa E, Ezeala-Adikaibe B, Ekenze O, Onuora E (2014) Headache prevalence and its characterization amongst hospital workers in Enugu, South East Nigeria. Head Face Med 10:48CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Dong Z, Chen X, Steiner TJ et al (2015) Medication-overuse headache in China: clinical profile, and an evaluation of the ICHD-3 beta diagnostic criteria. Cephalalgia 35(8):644–651CrossRef Dong Z, Chen X, Steiner TJ et al (2015) Medication-overuse headache in China: clinical profile, and an evaluation of the ICHD-3 beta diagnostic criteria. Cephalalgia 35(8):644–651CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Luvsannorov O, Tsenddorj B, Baldorj D et al (2019) Primary headache disorders among the adult population of Mongolia: prevalences and associations from a population-based survey. J Headache Pain 20(1):114CrossRef Luvsannorov O, Tsenddorj B, Baldorj D et al (2019) Primary headache disorders among the adult population of Mongolia: prevalences and associations from a population-based survey. J Headache Pain 20(1):114CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartolini M, Viticchi G, Falsetti L et al (2014) Migraine in health workers: working in a hospital can be considered an advantage. Neurol Sci 35(Suppl 1):27–29CrossRef Bartolini M, Viticchi G, Falsetti L et al (2014) Migraine in health workers: working in a hospital can be considered an advantage. Neurol Sci 35(Suppl 1):27–29CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeh WZ, Blizzard L, Taylor BV (2018) What is the actual prevalence of migraine. Brain Behav 8(6):e00950CrossRef Yeh WZ, Blizzard L, Taylor BV (2018) What is the actual prevalence of migraine. Brain Behav 8(6):e00950CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang J, Huang Q, Li N, Tan G, Chen L, Zhou J (2013) Triggers of migraine and tension-type headache in China: a clinic-based survey. Eur J Neurol 20(4):689–696CrossRef Wang J, Huang Q, Li N, Tan G, Chen L, Zhou J (2013) Triggers of migraine and tension-type headache in China: a clinic-based survey. Eur J Neurol 20(4):689–696CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA (2017) Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine. Lancet Neurol 16(1):76–87CrossRef Vetvik KG, MacGregor EA (2017) Sex differences in the epidemiology, clinical features, and pathophysiology of migraine. Lancet Neurol 16(1):76–87CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Peroutka SJ (2014) What turns on a migraine? A systematic review of migraine precipitating factors. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18(10):454CrossRef Peroutka SJ (2014) What turns on a migraine? A systematic review of migraine precipitating factors. Curr Pain Headache Rep 18(10):454CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Fernández-Muñoz JJ, Palacios-Ceña M, Parás-Bravo P, Cigarán-Méndez M, Navarro-Pardo E (2018) Sleep disturbances in tension-type headache and migraine. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 11:1756285617745444CrossRef Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Fernández-Muñoz JJ, Palacios-Ceña M, Parás-Bravo P, Cigarán-Méndez M, Navarro-Pardo E (2018) Sleep disturbances in tension-type headache and migraine. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 11:1756285617745444CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Jensen HI, Larsen JW, Thomsen TD (2018) The impact of shift work on intensive care nurses' lives outside work: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 27(3–4):e703–e709CrossRef Jensen HI, Larsen JW, Thomsen TD (2018) The impact of shift work on intensive care nurses' lives outside work: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 27(3–4):e703–e709CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA (2006) Forward head posture and neck mobility in chronic tension-type headache: a blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 26(3):314–319CrossRef Fernández-de-las-Peñas C, Alonso-Blanco C, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA (2006) Forward head posture and neck mobility in chronic tension-type headache: a blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 26(3):314–319CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA (2007) Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility, and forward head posture in episodic tension-type headache. Headache 47(5):662–672CrossRef Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cuadrado ML, Pareja JA (2007) Myofascial trigger points, neck mobility, and forward head posture in episodic tension-type headache. Headache 47(5):662–672CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Pavlovic JM, Buse DC, Sollars CM, Haut S, Lipton RB (2014) Trigger factors and premonitory features of migraine attacks: summary of studies. Headache 54(10):1670–1679CrossRef Pavlovic JM, Buse DC, Sollars CM, Haut S, Lipton RB (2014) Trigger factors and premonitory features of migraine attacks: summary of studies. Headache 54(10):1670–1679CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Prevalence and risk factors associated with headache amongst medical staff in South China
verfasst von
Wei Xie
Ruibing Li
Mianwang He
Fang Cui
Tingting Sun
Jianmei Xiong
Dengfa Zhao
Weinan Na
Ruozhuo Liu
Shengyuan Yu
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2020
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
The Journal of Headache and Pain / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1129-2369
Elektronische ISSN: 1129-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-1075-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

The Journal of Headache and Pain 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.