nach oben

Erschienen in:

12.10.2020 | Original Research Article

Prognostic Role of Blood Eosinophil Count in Patients with Sorafenib-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma

verfasst von: Giulia Orsi, Francesco Tovoli, Vincenzo Dadduzio, Caterina Vivaldi, Oronzo Brunetti, Luca Ielasi, Fabio Conti, Giulia Rovesti, Laura Gramantieri, Mario Domenico Rizzato, Irene Pecora, Antonella Argentiero, Federica Teglia, Sara Lonardi, Francesca Salani, Alessandro Granito, Vittorina Zagonel, Giorgia Marisi, Giuseppe Cabibbo, Francesco Giuseppe Foschi, Francesca Benevento, Alessandro Cucchetti, Fabio Piscaglia, Stefano Cascinu, Mario Scartozzi, Andrea Casadei-Gardini

Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Inflammation is a long-established hallmark of liver fibrosis and carcinogenesis. Eosinophils are emerging as crucial components of the inflammatory process influencing cancer development. The role of blood eosinophils in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving systemic treatment is an unexplored field.

Objective

The objective of this study was to analyse the prognostic role of the baseline eosinophil count in patients with sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma.

Patients and Methods

A training cohort of 92 patients with advanced- or intermediate-stage sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma and two validation cohorts of 65 and 180 patients were analysed. Overall survival and progression-free survival in relation to baseline eosinophil counts were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

A negative prognostic impact of low baseline eosinophil counts (< 50*10⁹/L) was demonstrated in all cohorts (training cohort: hazard ratio = 50.1, 95% confidence interval 11.6–216.5, p < 0.0001 for low vs high eosinophil counts; first validation cohort: hazard ratio = 4.55, 95% confidence interval 1.24–16.65, p = 0.022; second validation cohort: hazard ratio = 3.21, 95% confidence interval 1.83–5.64, p < 0.0001). Moreover, low eosinophil counts had a negative prognostic role in patients progressing on or intolerant to sorafenib who received second-line regorafenib, but not capecitabine or best supportive care.

Conclusions

Our analysis identified baseline blood eosinophil counts as a new prognostic factor in patients with sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma. Concerning second-line therapies, eosinophil counts were associated with survival outcomes only in regorafenib-treated patients, suggesting a possible predictive role in this setting.

International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Cancer today. 2019. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home. Accessed 30 Sept 2020.

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.PubMedCrossRef

Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc J-F, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378–90.PubMedCrossRef

Cheng AL, Kang Y-K, Chen Z, Tsao C-J, Qin S, Kim JS, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):25–34.PubMedCrossRef

European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69:182–236.CrossRef

Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS, Sirlin CB, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:358–80.PubMedCrossRef

Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han K-H, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163–73.PubMedCrossRef

Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang Y-H, Bodoky G, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):56–66.PubMedCrossRef

Zhu AX, Kang Y-K, Yen C-J, Finn RS, Galle PR, Llovet JM, et al. Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(2):282–96.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Abou-Alfa GK, Meyer T, Cheng A-L, El-Khoueiry AB, Rimassa L, Ryooet B-Y, et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(1):54–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

11.

Tovoli F, Casadei-Gardini A, Benevento F, Piscaglia F. Immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of potential new drugs based on ongoing clinical studies as of 2019. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(8):1067–73.PubMedCrossRef

12.

El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsuet C, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10088):2492–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

13.

Zhu AX, Finn RS, Edeline J, Cattan S, Ogasawara S, Palmeret D, et al. Pembrolizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma previously treated with sorafenib (KEYNOTE-224): a non-randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(7):940–52.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Finn RS, Ryoo B-Y, Merle P, Kudo M, Bouattour M, Lim H-Y, et al. Results of KEYNOTE-240: phase 3 study of pembrolizumab (Pembro) vs. best supportive care (BSC) for second line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_Suppl.):4004.

15.

Yau T, Park JW, Finn RS, Cheng A-L, Mathurin P, Edeline J, et al. CheckMate 459: a randomized, multi-center phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) vs sorafenib (SOR) as first-line (1L) treatment in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Ann Oncol. 2019;30(5_Suppl.):v874–5.

16.

Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim T-Y, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894–905.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Ghouri YA, Mian I, Rowe JH. Review of hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, etiology, and carcinogenesis. J Carcinog. 2017;16:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

18.

Sanghera C, Teh JJ, Pinato DJ. The systemic inflammatory response as a source of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int. 2019;39(11):2008–233.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Ogunwobi OO, Harricharran T, Huaman J, Galuza A, Odumuwagun O, Tanet Y, et al. Mechanisms of hepatocellular carcinoma progression. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(19):2279–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Hernandez-Gea V, Toffanin S, Friedman SL, Llovet JM. Role of the microenvironment in the pathogenesis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(3):512–27.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Budhu A, Wang XW. The role of cytokines in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Leukocyte Biol. 2006;80(6):1197–213.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye Q-H, Jia H-L, He P, Zanetti KA, et al. Prediction of venous metastases, recurrence, and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma based on a unique immune response signature of the liver microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2006;10(2):99–111.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Zhou H, Huang H, Shi J, Zhao Y, Dong Q, Jia H, et al. Prognostic value of interleukin 2 and interleukin 15 in peritumoral hepatic tissues for patients with hepatitis B-related hepatocellular carcinoma after curative resection. Gut. 2010;59(12):1699–708.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Bruix J, Cheng AL, Meinhardt G, Nakajima K, De Sanctis Y, Llove L. Prognostic factors and predictors of Sorafenib benefit in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of two phase III studies. J Hepatol. 2017;67(5):999–1008.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Da Fonseca LG, Barroso-Sousa R, Bento Ada S, Blanco BP, Valente GL, Pfiffer TE, et al. Pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio affects survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Med Oncol. 2014;31:264.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Howell J, Pinato DJ, Ramaswami R, Arizumi T, Ferrari C, Gibbin A, et al. Integration of the cancer-related inflammatory response as a stratifying biomarker of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib. Oncotarget. 2017;8:36161–700.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

27.

Lué A, Serrano MT, Bustamante FJ, Iñarrairaegui M, Arenas JI, Testillano M, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in European patients with hepatocellular carcinoma administered sorafenib. Oncotarget. 2017;8:103077–86.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

28.

Casadei Gardini A, Scarpi E, Faloppi L, Scartozzi M, Silvestris N, Santini D, et al. Immune inflammation indicators and implication for immune modulation strategies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib. Oncotarget. 2016;7(41):67142–9.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Varricchi G, Galdiero MR, Loffredo S, Lucarini V, Marone G, Mattei F, et al. Eosinophils: the unsung heroes in cancer? Oncoimmunology. 2017;7(2):e1393134.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

30.

Zahoor H, Barata PC, Jia X, Martin A, Allman KD, Wood LS, et al. Patterns, predictors and subsequent outcomes of disease progression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with nivolumab. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

31.

Rosner S, Kwong E, Shoushtari AN, Friedman CF, Betof AS, Bradye MS, et al. Peripheral blood clinical laboratory variables associated with outcomes following combination nivolumab and ipilimumab immunotherapy in melanoma. Cancer Med. 2018;7(3):690–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

32.

Wei Y, Zhang X, Wang G, Zhou Y, Luo M, Wang S, et al. The impacts of pretreatment circulating eosinophils and basophils on prognosis of stage I–III colorectal cancer. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018;14(5):e243–e251251.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Tanizaki J, Haratani K, Hayashi H, Chiba Y, Nakamura Y, Yonesaka K, et al. Peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with nivolumab. J Thorac Oncol. 2018;13(1):97–105.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Holub K, Biete A. Impact of systemic inflammation biomarkers on the survival outcomes of cervical cancer patients. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21(7):836–44.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Holub K, Conill C. Unveiling the mechanisms of immune evasion in pancreatic cancer: may it be a systemic inflammation responsible for dismal survival? Clin Transl Oncol. 2020;22(1):81–90.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Ownby HE, Roi LD, Isenberg RR, Brennan MJ. Peripheral lymphocyte and eosinophil counts as indicators of prognosis in primary breast cancer. Cancer. 1983;52(1):126–30.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Utsunomiya A, Ishida T, Inagaki A, Ishii T, Yano H, Komatsu H, et al. Clinical significance of a blood eosinophilia in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma: a blood eosinophilia is a significant unfavorable prognostic factor. Leuk Res. 2007;31(7):915–20.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Hude I, Sasse S, Bröckelmann PJ, von Tresckow B, Momotow J, Engert A, et al. Leucocyte and eosinophil counts predict progression-free survival in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with PD1 inhibition. Br J Haematol. 2018;181(6):837–40.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Steel JL, Kim KH, Dew MA, Unruh ML, Antoni MH, Olek MC, et al. Cancer-related symptom clusters, eosinophils, and survival in hepatobiliary cancer: an exploratory study. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2010;39(5):859–71.CrossRef

40.

Casadei Gardini A, Marisi G, Dadduzio V, Gramantieri L, Faloppi L, Ulivi P, et al. Association of NOS3 and ANGPT2 gene polymorphisms with survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving sorafenib: results of the multicenter prospective INNOVATE study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(17):4485–93.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Casadei Gardini A, Foca F, Scartozzi M, Silvestris N, Tamburini E, Faloppi L, et al. Metronomic capecitabine versus best supportive care as second-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42499.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Pelizzaro F, Sammarco A, Dadduzio V, Pastorelli D, Giovanis P, Soldà C, et al. Capecitabine in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter experience. Dig Liver Dis. 2019;51(12):1713–9.PubMedCrossRef

43.

McDonald JH. Fisher’s exact test of independence. In: Handbook of biological statistics. 3rd ed. Baltimore, Maryland: Sparky House Publishing; 2014.

44.

Gunduz S, Mutlu H, Uysal M, Coskun HS, Bozcuk H, et al. Prognostic value of hematologic parameters in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma using tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(8):3801–4.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Martens A, Wistuba-Hamprecht K, Geukes Foppen M, Yuan J, Postow MA, Wong P, et al. Baseline peripheral blood biomarkers associated with clinical outcome of advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(12):2908–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

46.

Weide B, Martens A, Hassel JC, Berking C, Postow MA, Bisschop K, et al. Baseline biomarkers for outcome of melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(22):5487–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

47.

Wang HK, Wan FN, Gu WJ, Zhu Y, Dai B, Shi G-H, et al. Eosinophil percentage elevation as a prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Oncotarget. 2016;7(42):68943–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

48.

Gebhardt C, Sevko A, Jiang H, Lichtenberger R, Reith M, Tarnanidis K, et al. Myeloid cells and related chronic inflammatory factors as novel predictive markers in melanoma treatment with ipilimumab. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(24):5453–9.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Davis BP, Rothenberg ME. Eosinophils and cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2014;2(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Ramirez GA, Yacoub MR, Ripa M, Mannina D, Cariddi A, Saporiti N, et al. Eosinophils from physiology to disease: a comprehensive review. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9095275.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

51.

Carretero R, Sektioglu IM, Garbi N, Salgado OC, Beckhove P, Hämmerling GJ, et al. Eosinophils orchestrate cancer rejection by normalizing tumor vessels and enhancing infiltration of CD8(+) T cells. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(6):609–17.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Shomura M, Kagawa T, Shiraishi K, Hirose S, Arase Y, Koizumi J, et al. Skin toxicity predicts efficacy to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2014;6(9):670–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

53.

Wang P, Tan G, Zhu M, Li W, Zhai B, Sun X, et al. Hand-foot skin reaction is a beneficial indicator of sorafenib therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;12(1):1–8.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Prognostic Role of Blood Eosinophil Count in Patients with Sorafenib-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
verfasst von: Giulia Orsi
Francesco Tovoli
Vincenzo Dadduzio
Caterina Vivaldi
Oronzo Brunetti
Luca Ielasi
Fabio Conti
Giulia Rovesti
Laura Gramantieri
Mario Domenico Rizzato
Irene Pecora
Antonella Argentiero
Federica Teglia
Sara Lonardi
Francesca Salani
Alessandro Granito
Vittorina Zagonel
Giorgia Marisi
Giuseppe Cabibbo
Francesco Giuseppe Foschi
Francesca Benevento
Alessandro Cucchetti
Fabio Piscaglia
Stefano Cascinu
Mario Scartozzi
Andrea Casadei-Gardini
Publikationsdatum: 12.10.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Targeted Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1776-2596
Elektronische ISSN: 1776-260X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-020-00757-3

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Prognostic Role of Blood Eosinophil Count in Patients with Sorafenib-Treated Hepatocellular Carcinoma