In this study, two assumptions derived from the Good Lives Model were examined: whether subjective Quality of Life is related to delinquent behaviour and psychosocial problems, and whether adolescents with adequate coping skills are less likely to commit delinquent behaviour or show psychosocial problems.
To this end, data of 95 adolescents with severe psychiatric problems who participated in a four-wave longitudinal study were examined. Subjective Quality of Life was assessed with the ten domains of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile and coping skills with the Utrecht Coping List for Adolescents.
Results showed that adolescents who reported a lower Quality of Life on the health domain had more psychosocial problems at follow-up. No relationship was found between Quality of Life and delinquent behaviour. In addition, active and passive coping were associated with delinquent behaviour and psychosocial functioning at follow-up.
Based on the results of this longitudinal study, the strongest support was found for the second assumption derived from the Good Lives Model. Adolescents with adequate coping skills are less likely to commit delinquent behaviour and have fewer psychosocial problems at follow-up. The current study provides support for the use of strength-based elements in the treatment programmes for adolescents in secure residential care.
Farrington DP. Developmental and life-course criminology: key theoretical and empirical issues—the 2002 Sutherland award address. Criminology. 2003;41(2):221–55. CrossRef
Fortune C-A, Ward T, Willis GM. The rehabilitation of offenders: reducing risk and promoting better lives. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2012;19(5):646–61. CrossRef
Ward T, Gannon TA. Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: the comprehensive Good Lives Model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggress Violent Behav. 2006;11(1):77–94. CrossRef
Ward T, Marshall WL. Good lives, aetiology and the rehabilitation of sex offenders: a bridging theory. J Sex Aggress. 2004;10(2):153–69. CrossRef
Purvis M, Ward T, Willis G. The Good Lives Model in practice: offence pathways and case management. European Journal of Probation. 2011;3(2):4–28. CrossRef
Mulder E, Vermunt J, Brand E, Bullens R, Van Marle H. Recidivism in subgroups of serious juvenile offenders: different profiles, different risks? Crim Behav Mental Health. 2012;22(2):122–35. CrossRef
Van Marle HJC, Hempel IS, Buck NML. Young serious and vulnerable offenders in the Netherlands: a cohort follow-up study after completion of a PIJ (detention) order. Crim Behav Mental Health. 2010;20(5):349–60. CrossRef
Bouman YHA, Schene AH, De Ruiter C. Subjective well-being and recidivism in forensic psychiatric outpatients. Int J Forensic Mental Health. 2009;8:225–34. CrossRef
Steinberg L, Chung HL, Little M. Re-entry of young offenders from the justice system: a developmental perspective. Youth Violence Juv J. 2004;2(1):21–38. CrossRef
Ward T. The management of risk and the design of good lives. Aust Psychol. 2002;37(3):172–9. CrossRef
Lehman AF. Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psych Epidemiol. 1996;31(2):78–88. CrossRef
Lehman AF. The well-being of chronic mental patients. Arch General Psychiatry. 1983;40:369–73. CrossRef
Draine J, Solomon P. Comparison of seriously mentally ill case management clients with and without arrest histories. J Psychiatry Law. 1992;20(3):335–49.
Draine J, Solomon P. Jail recidivism and the intensity of case management services among homeless persons with mental illness leaving jail. J Psychiatry Law. 1994;22:245–61.
Gullone E, Jones T, Cummins R. Coping styles and prison experience as predictors of psychological well-being in male prisoners. Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2000;7(1):170–81. CrossRef
Ebata AT, Moos RH. Coping and adjustment in distressed and healthy adolescents. J Appl Dev Psychol. 1991;12:33–54. CrossRef
Van Nieuwenhuizen C, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ, Huxley PJ. The Lancashire quality of life profile: modification and psychometric evaluation. Soc Psychiatry Psych Epidemiol. 2001;36(1):36–44. CrossRef
Van Nieuwenhuizen C, Schene AH, Koeter MWJ. Quality of life in forensic psychiatry: an unreclaimed territory? Int Rev Psychiatry. 2002;14(3):198–202. CrossRef
Harder AT, Knorth EJ, Kalverboer ME. Transition secured? A follow-up study of adolescents who have left secure residential care. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(12):2482–8. CrossRef
Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965. CrossRef
Debats DL, Van der Lubbe PM, Wezeman FRA. On the psychometric properties of the life regard index (lri)—a measure of meaningful life—an evaluation in 3 independent samples based on the Dutch version. Pers Indiv Differ. 1993;14(2):337–45. CrossRef
Van Nieuwenhuizen C, Schene A, Boevink W, Wolf J. The Lancashire quality of life profile: first experiences in the Netherlands. Commun Mental Health J. 1998;34(5):513–24. CrossRef
Oliver JPJ, Huxley PJ, Priebe S, Kaiser W. Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire quality of life profile. Soc Psychiatry Psych Epidemiol. 1997;32(2):76–83. CrossRef
Bijstra JO, Bosma HA, Jackson S. The relationship between social skills and psychosocial functioning in early adolescence. Pers Indiv Differ. 1994;16(5):767–76. CrossRef
Borum R, Bartel P, Forth A. Manual for the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY), consultation edition, version 1. Tampa: University of South Florida; 2002.
Van der Laan AM, Blom M, Kleemans ER. Exploring long-term and short-term risk factors for serious delinquency. Eur J Criminol. 2009;6(5):419–38. CrossRef
Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Psychiatry. 2001;40(11):1337–45. CrossRef
- Quality of life, delinquency and psychosocial functioning of adolescents in secure residential care: testing two assumptions of the Good Lives Model
C. S. Barendregt
A. M. Van der Laan
I. L. Bongers
Ch. Van Nieuwenhuizen
- BioMed Central