Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2013

01.06.2013

Quantitative Visually Lossless Compression Ratio Determination of JPEG2000 in Digitized Mammograms

verfasst von: Verislav T. Georgiev, Anna N. Karahaliou, Spyros G. Skiadopoulos, Nikos S. Arikidis, Alexandra D. Kazantzi, George S. Panayiotakis, Lena I. Costaridou

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The current study presents a quantitative approach towards visually lossless compression ratio (CR) threshold determination of JPEG2000 in digitized mammograms. This is achieved by identifying quantitative image quality metrics that reflect radiologists’ visual perception in distinguishing between original and wavelet-compressed mammographic regions of interest containing microcalcification clusters (MCs) and normal parenchyma, originating from 68 images from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Specifically, image quality of wavelet-compressed mammograms (CRs, 10:1, 25:1, 40:1, 70:1, 100:1) is evaluated quantitatively by means of eight image quality metrics of different computational principles and qualitatively by three radiologists employing a five-point rating scale. The accuracy of the objective metrics is investigated in terms of (1) their correlation (r) with qualitative assessment and (2) ROC analysis (A z index), employing pooled radiologists’ rating scores as ground truth. The quantitative metrics mean square error, mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio, and structural similarity demonstrated strong correlation with pooled radiologists’ ratings (r, 0.825, 0.823, −0.825, and −0.826, respectively) and the highest area under ROC curve (A z , 0.922, 0.920, 0.922, and 0.922, respectively). For each quantitative metric, the highest accuracy values of corresponding ROC curves were used to define metric cut-off values. The metrics cut-off values were subsequently used to suggest a visually lossless CR threshold, estimated to be between 25:1 and 40:1 for the dataset analyzed. Results indicate the potential of the quantitative metrics approach in predicting visually lossless CRs in case of MCs in mammography.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):277–300, 2010PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin 60(5):277–300, 2010PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clark R: Breast cancer screening: is it worthwhile? Cancer Control 2(3):189–194, 1995PubMed Clark R: Breast cancer screening: is it worthwhile? Cancer Control 2(3):189–194, 1995PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Costaridou L, Skiadopoulos S, Karahaliou A, Arikidis N, Panayiotakis G: Computer-aided diagnosis in breast imaging: Trends and challenges, In: Exarchos TP, Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI Eds. Handbook of Research on Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Applications. Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Inc. Global, 2009, p142-159 Costaridou L, Skiadopoulos S, Karahaliou A, Arikidis N, Panayiotakis G: Computer-aided diagnosis in breast imaging: Trends and challenges, In: Exarchos TP, Papadopoulos A, Fotiadis DI Eds. Handbook of Research on Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Applications. Hershey, PA: IDEA Group Inc. Global, 2009, p142-159
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P: Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 50(1):3–14, 2009PubMedCrossRef Skaane P: Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiol 50(1):3–14, 2009PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bankman I: Handbook of Medical Image Processing and Analysis, 2nd edition. Academic, Burlington, 2008 Bankman I: Handbook of Medical Image Processing and Analysis, 2nd edition. Academic, Burlington, 2008
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Huang HK: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications. WILEY-LISS, Hoboken, 2004CrossRef Huang HK: PACS and Imaging Informatics: Basic Principles and Applications. WILEY-LISS, Hoboken, 2004CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat European Society of Radiology (ESR): Usability of irreversible image compression in radiological imaging. A position paper by European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2(2):103–115, 2011CrossRef European Society of Radiology (ESR): Usability of irreversible image compression in radiological imaging. A position paper by European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging 2(2):103–115, 2011CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang BJ, Kim HS, Park CS, Choi JJ, Lee JH, Choi BG: Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000. Clin Radiol 66(7):609–613, 2011PubMedCrossRef Kang BJ, Kim HS, Park CS, Choi JJ, Lee JH, Choi BG: Acceptable compression ratio of full-field digital mammography using JPEG 2000. Clin Radiol 66(7):609–613, 2011PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Good WF, Sumkin JH, Ganott M, Hardesty L, Holbert B, Johns CM, Klym AH: Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms: an observer performance study. AJR, Am J Roentgenol 175(6):1573–1576, 2000CrossRef Good WF, Sumkin JH, Ganott M, Hardesty L, Holbert B, Johns CM, Klym AH: Detection of masses and clustered microcalcifications on data compressed mammograms: an observer performance study. AJR, Am J Roentgenol 175(6):1573–1576, 2000CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kocsis O, Costaridou L, Varaki L, Likaki E, Kalogeropoulou C, Skiadopoulos S, Panayiotakis G: Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms. Eur Radiol 13(10):2390–2396, 2003PubMedCrossRef Kocsis O, Costaridou L, Varaki L, Likaki E, Kalogeropoulou C, Skiadopoulos S, Panayiotakis G: Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms. Eur Radiol 13(10):2390–2396, 2003PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D’Orsi CJ: Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology 236(1):31–36, 2005PubMedCrossRef Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D’Orsi CJ: Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. Radiology 236(1):31–36, 2005PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Penedo M, Souto M, Tahoces PG, Carreira JM, Villalón J, Porto G, Seoane C, Vidal JJ, Berbaum KS, Chakraborty DP, Fajardo LL: Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology 237(2):450–7, 2005PubMedCrossRef Penedo M, Souto M, Tahoces PG, Carreira JM, Villalón J, Porto G, Seoane C, Vidal JJ, Berbaum KS, Chakraborty DP, Fajardo LL: Free-response receiver operating characteristic evaluation of lossy JPEG2000 and object-based set partitioning in hierarchical trees compression of digitized mammograms. Radiology 237(2):450–7, 2005PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kallergi M, Lucier BJ, Berman CG, Hersh MR, Kim JJ, Szabunio MS, Clark RA: High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation. Radiology 238(1):62–73, 2006PubMedCrossRef Kallergi M, Lucier BJ, Berman CG, Hersh MR, Kim JJ, Szabunio MS, Clark RA: High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation. Radiology 238(1):62–73, 2006PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yang Y, Rong D, Yao X, Li K: Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Acta Radiol 49(7):747–751, 2008PubMedCrossRef Liang Z, Du X, Liu J, Yang Y, Rong D, Yao X, Li K: Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms. Acta Radiol 49(7):747–751, 2008PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Sung MM, Kim HJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Yoo JK, Yoo HS: Clinical evaluation of JPEG2000 compression for digital mammography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49(3):827–832, 2002CrossRef Sung MM, Kim HJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Yoo JK, Yoo HS: Clinical evaluation of JPEG2000 compression for digital mammography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 49(3):827–832, 2002CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Koff D, Bak P, Brownrigg P, Hosseinzadeh D, Khademi A, Kiss A, Lepanto L, Michalak T, Shulman H, Volkening A: Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios (“lossy” compression) for development of national guidelines. J Digit Imaging 22(6):569–578, 2009PubMedCrossRef Koff D, Bak P, Brownrigg P, Hosseinzadeh D, Khademi A, Kiss A, Lepanto L, Michalak T, Shulman H, Volkening A: Pan-Canadian evaluation of irreversible compression ratios (“lossy” compression) for development of national guidelines. J Digit Imaging 22(6):569–578, 2009PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Erkel AR, Pattynama PM: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. Eur J Radiol 27:88–94, 1998PubMedCrossRef Erkel AR, Pattynama PM: Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis: basic principles and applications in radiology. Eur J Radiol 27:88–94, 1998PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Perlmutter SM, Cosman PC, Gray RM, Olshen RA, Ikeda D, Adams CN, Betts BJ, Williams MB, Perlmutter KO, Li J, Aiyer A, Fajardo L, Birdwell R, Daniele BL: Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms. Signal Processing 59(2):189–210, 1997CrossRef Perlmutter SM, Cosman PC, Gray RM, Olshen RA, Ikeda D, Adams CN, Betts BJ, Williams MB, Perlmutter KO, Li J, Aiyer A, Fajardo L, Birdwell R, Daniele BL: Image quality in lossy compressed digital mammograms. Signal Processing 59(2):189–210, 1997CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zyout I, Abdel-Qader I, Al-Otum H: Progressive lossy to lossless compression of ROI in mammograms. Effects on microcalcification detection. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 15(3):241–251, 2008 Zyout I, Abdel-Qader I, Al-Otum H: Progressive lossy to lossless compression of ROI in mammograms. Effects on microcalcification detection. Integr Comput-Aided Eng 15(3):241–251, 2008
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim H, Jeong J, Lee J, Kang H, Dong K, Chung W, Kim E: Picture quality according to the type of detector in full-field digital mammography. J Korean Phys Soc 58(2):364–371, 2011CrossRef Kim H, Jeong J, Lee J, Kang H, Dong K, Chung W, Kim E: Picture quality according to the type of detector in full-field digital mammography. J Korean Phys Soc 58(2):364–371, 2011CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Przelaskowski A: Vector quality measure of lossy compressed medical images. Comput Biol Med 34(4):193–207, 2004PubMedCrossRef Przelaskowski A: Vector quality measure of lossy compressed medical images. Comput Biol Med 34(4):193–207, 2004PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Kegelmeyer P, Moore R, Chang K, Kumaran SM: Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998, pp 457–460 Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Kegelmeyer P, Moore R, Chang K, Kumaran SM: Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998, pp 457–460
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P: The Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing,2001, pp 212–218 Heath M, Bowyer KW, Kopans D, Moore R, Kegelmeyer P: The Digital Database for Screening Mammography. Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing,2001, pp 212–218
24.
Zurück zum Zitat D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. BI-RADS: Mammography, 4th edition in: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas, Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 2003 D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, Berg WA, et al. BI-RADS: Mammography, 4th edition in: D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Atlas, Reston, VA, American College of Radiology, 2003
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Margolis A, Lan L, Chinander MR: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12(7):863–73, 2005PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Margolis A, Lan L, Chinander MR: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12(7):863–73, 2005PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Skodras A, Christopoulos C, Ebrahimi T: The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Process Mag 18(5):36–58, 2001CrossRef Skodras A, Christopoulos C, Ebrahimi T: The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Process Mag 18(5):36–58, 2001CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kofidis E, Kolokotronis N, Vassilarakou A, Theodoridis S, Cavouras D: Wavelet-based medical image compression. Future Gener Comp Sy 15(2):223–243, 1999CrossRef Kofidis E, Kolokotronis N, Vassilarakou A, Theodoridis S, Cavouras D: Wavelet-based medical image compression. Future Gener Comp Sy 15(2):223–243, 1999CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G: An image visualization tool in mammography. Med Inform Internet Med 24(1):53–73, 1999PubMedCrossRef Sakellaropoulos P, Costaridou L, Panayiotakis G: An image visualization tool in mammography. Med Inform Internet Med 24(1):53–73, 1999PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Avcibas I, Sankur B, Sayood K: Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. J Electron Imaging 11(2):206–223, 2002CrossRef Avcibas I, Sankur B, Sayood K: Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. J Electron Imaging 11(2):206–223, 2002CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43(12):2959–2965, 1995CrossRef Eskicioglu AM, Fisher PS: Image quality measures and their performance. IEEE Trans Commun 43(12):2959–2965, 1995CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Bovik AC: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(1):98–117, 2009CrossRef Wang Z, Bovik AC: Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures. IEEE Signal Process Mag 26(1):98–117, 2009CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612, 2004PubMedCrossRef Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612, 2004PubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen I: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):20–37, 1960CrossRef Cohen I: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20(1):20–37, 1960CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D’Orsi CJ: A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging 17(1):64–70, 2004PubMedCrossRef Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A, Vedantham S, Waldrop SM, D’Orsi CJ: A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics. J Digit Imaging 17(1):64–70, 2004PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim KJ, Kim B, Mantiuk R, Richter T, Lee H, Kang HS, Seo J, Lee KH: A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag 29(8):1496–1503, 2010CrossRef Kim KJ, Kim B, Mantiuk R, Richter T, Lee H, Kang HS, Seo J, Lee KH: A comparison of three image fidelity metrics of different computational principles for JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag 29(8):1496–1503, 2010CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim B, Lee KH, Kim KJ, Mantiuk R, Hahn S, Kim TJ, Kim YH: Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000–compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:328–334, 2008PubMedCrossRef Kim B, Lee KH, Kim KJ, Mantiuk R, Hahn S, Kim TJ, Kim YH: Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000–compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:328–334, 2008PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Penedo M, Pearlman WA, Tahoces PG, Souto M, Vidal JJ: Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(10):1288–1296, 2003PubMedCrossRef Penedo M, Pearlman WA, Tahoces PG, Souto M, Vidal JJ: Region-based wavelet coding methods for digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 22(10):1288–1296, 2003PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, Maitz GS, Chang YH, Gur D: Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment. Acad Radiol 7(8):595–602, 2000PubMedCrossRef Zheng B, Sumkin JH, Good WF, Maitz GS, Chang YH, Gur D: Applying computer-assisted detection schemes to digitized mammograms after JPEG data compression: an assessment. Acad Radiol 7(8):595–602, 2000PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Quantitative Visually Lossless Compression Ratio Determination of JPEG2000 in Digitized Mammograms
verfasst von
Verislav T. Georgiev
Anna N. Karahaliou
Spyros G. Skiadopoulos
Nikos S. Arikidis
Alexandra D. Kazantzi
George S. Panayiotakis
Lena I. Costaridou
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2013
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2013
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-012-9538-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2013

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2013 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.