Introduction
Blood-lactate concentrations are frequently measured at the bedside in critically ill patients, and high lactate levels have been widely used as a marker of tissue hypoxia [
1]. However, blood lactate is not frequently used as a trigger to administrate fluid bolus (FB) in this setting [
2] unless very high lactate concentrations are observed. Circulating lactate levels are the product of the balance between lactate generation, metabolism, and clearance rate. As such, hyperlactatemia may not reflect only tissue hypoxia, but also the equilibration between production and utilization of lactate [
3]. Therefore, giving FB based on only high lactate levels might lead to an inadequate or excessive fluid administration in critically ill patients [
4,
5].
The ratio of the veno-arterial difference of carbon dioxide partial pressure to over the artero-venous difference in oxygen content (P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2) has been suggested as a marker of tissue hypoxia that can be easily measured at bedside [
6]. An increased value represents an inequivalence between global CO
2 production and oxygen consumption, which is typically found in anaerobic metabolism [
6,
7]. Thus, FB administration in patients with high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 may have significant metabolic effects as the expected improvement in oxygen delivery can decrease anaerobic metabolism and lactate production.
Previous studies have demonstrated that high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 was associated with an increase in oxygen consumption (VO
2) after FB [
8,
9]. However, the association of baseline P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 in significant lactate decreases after FB has not been established yet and its role in treating patients with hyperlactatemia is under investigation [
10]. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that a high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 is associated with decreasing blood-lactate levels during FB and whether it has clinical utility to guide fluid treatment in this regard. To do so, we evaluated blood-lactate kinetics and preinfusion P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 in critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia who received FB.
Discussion
The results of this study can be summarized as follows: 1) in critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia, elevated PvaCO2/CavO2 is not associated with decreases in blood-lactate levels after FB and cannot be used to predict them, 2) increases in oxygen consumption observed only in patients with elevated baseline PvaCO2/CavO2 were not associated with blood lactate decreases after FB and 3) in patients with hyperlactatemia, blood-lactate levels and changes during FB were not corelated with PvaCO2/CavO2 values and changes.
Previous studies have suggested using the P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 ratio measured after the end of resuscitation for predicting failure for decreasing blood-lactate levels in patients with hyperlactatemia [
15‐
17]. Similar to these studies, we found that decreasing blood-lactate levels are less likely in patients with elevated P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 before FB. Conversely, and similar to another study [
15], patients with low baseline P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 had a higher likelihood for decreasing blood lactate levels. Thus, the results of our study extend the knowledge about the FB effects on blood lactate in critically ill patients according to baseline P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2, suggesting that FB has limited effects on decreasing lactate levels in patients with elevated baseline P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2. Additionally, the reduction in blood lactate levels observed in patients with normal baseline P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 values may not be associated with an improvement of aerobic metabolism after FB.
Herein, P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 was used as an alternative of respiratory quotient. The failure of high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 to predict decreases in blood lactate levels after FB could be due to the unreliable correlation of this ratio with the occurrence of anaerobic metabolism in this mixed population of critically ill patients [
18]. Similar to previous studies [
8,
9] several patients with hyperlactatemia and high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 increased VO
2 after FB, which implies oxygen delivery/consumption dependence. However, high oxygen extraction state was observed only in few patients with elevated P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2, which may contradict this hypothesis.Therefore, we conclude that in our cohort of non-selected critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia, elevated P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 may reflect not only anaerobic metabolism as a result of tissue hypoxia (i.e. hypoperfusion), but also as a result of tissue dysoxia (i.e. impairment in oxygen utilization) [
19].
Significant decreases in blood lactate after FB were observed in patients with P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 < 1.4 mmHg/mL, but not in the patients with P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 < 1 mmHg/mL. P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 ≥ 1.4 mmHg/mL was defined abnormal based on the previous studies that have demonstrated that this cut-off can predict persistent hyperlactatemia in critically ill patients [
6,
15]. Incidentally, other authors have suggested higher cut-off values to predict increases in VO
2 after FB [
8,
9,
20]. However, in another study, a cut-off of > 1 mmHg/mL was found to adequately predict mortality [
17]
. Hence, our results suggest that the anaerobic threshold of critically ill patients with hyperlactatemia may vary across the patients [
21]. Nevertheless, a value of P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 < 1 mmHg/mL may be used to exclude anaerobic metabolism and decreasing blood lactate levels after FB.
Increases in oxygen consumption after FB were not associated with a decrease in blood-lactate levels. Notably, we found that the patients who had an increase oxygen consumption after FB were less likely to present a significant decrease in blood-lactate levels. Different factors can explain this phenomenon. Calculation of VO
2 based on the reverse Fick principle may not be accurate [
22,
23]. Inadequate hemodynamic resuscitation can be an additional explanation, even though a sufficient dose of fluid at high rate was administrated [
24]. Furthermore, increased tissue perfusion during FB may cause a paradoxical elevation in blood lactate levels due to ‘washout’ phenomenon [
25‐
28] or accelerated aerobic glycolysis [
29,
30]. Of note, a weak correlation between VO
2 and blood lactate changes was observed. Thus, based on our results, high P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 before FB is associated with VO
2 dependency on DO
2, similar to previous studies [
8,
9], but also with failure of FB to decrease blood lactate. In these patients, whether no change or even increase in blood lactate levels indicates FB failure to improve peripheral perfusion should be further evaluated in future studies.
Not surprisingly, the majority of the patients with hyperlactatemia had an elevated P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 since either of these variables increases due to anaerobic metabolism. Nevertheless, there was no correlation between P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 and blood-lactate levels. Hence, our results suggest that P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 can be used as a complementary marker for the evaluation of patients with hyperlactatemia and the effects of FB. For instance, we observed a negative correlation of changes in blood lactate and P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 during FB. A plausible explanation for this phenomenon could be that decreases in blood lactate illustrate an improvement in tissue oxygenation, and P
vaCO
2/C
avO
2 illustrates oxygen debt repayment after perfusion improvement [
31,
32].
The strength of this study was that we evaluated the predictive value of PvaCO2/CavO2 in a non-selected critically ill population with mild hyperlactatemia treated with FB. Patients in this cohort presented a high range of PvaCO2/CavO2, and a significant number of patients had low PvaCO2/CavO2. We evaluated changes in blood lactate close to the time of the FB in stable conditions, and non-major variation in metabolism was expected.
Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, no formal sample power calculation was done and not predictive test were performed. However, the results are in the opposite direction of our hypothesis, and the possibility of finding different results with a higher sample size is low. Additionaly, based on our findings we conclude that PvaCO2/CavO2 cannot have clinical relevant predictive value for decreasing blood lactate levels after FB. Second, therapeutic interventions that can affect lactate levels before and after FB were not standardized. However, all the patients were treated under standard local therapeutic strategies. Third, only central venous and not mixed venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide tension differences were evaluated. Fourth, other parameters that can affect the amount PvaCO2 such as temperature, metabolic acidosis, and Haldane effect were not assessed in this study. Fifth, we did not evaluate that within-subject variability might significantly influence our results, as relatively low values of baseline blood lactate were observed. Sixth, possible liver dysfunction effects on lactate metabolism was not evaluated.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.