Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2019

06.11.2018 | Review

Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Marco Milone, Michele Manigrasso, Ugo Elmore, Francesco Maione, Nicola Gennarelli, Fabio Rondelli, Nunzio Velotti, Giovanni Domenico De Palma

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Provide the surgeon with a tool to decide the best surgical approach to transverse colon cancer.

Objective

To compare the surgical and oncological outcomes between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy for patients with tumours of the transverse colon.

Data sources

A systematic search was performed in the electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, EMBASE), using the following search terms and/or MeSH terms in all possible combinations: transverse, transversus, colectomy, hemicolectomy, segmental resection, transverse colon cancer. The last search was performed on 10 May 2018.

Study selection

Two independent authors (Mi.M. and N.V.) analysed each article and performed the data extraction independently. In case of disagreement, a third investigator was consulted (Ma.M.). Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Data extraction and synthesis

Data regarding sample size, major clinical and demographic variables, oncologic outcomes and postoperative recovery and complications were extracted.

Main outcome measures

Main outcomes analysed were anastomotic leakage, early mortality, hospital stay, operative time, overall complications rate, wound infection, harvested nodes and disease-free survival.

Results

No statistical differences were found between transverse colectomy and extended hemicolectomy in short- and long-term outcomes; our results revealed no differences in disease-free survival between the two surgical approaches. As expected, a statistically significant difference was found in favour of extended hemicolectomy in terms of number of harvested lymph nodes.

Conclusions

This systematic review with meta-analysis focus on the two major approaches to transverse colon cancer. The reviewed evidence suggests that a conservative approach to transverse colon cancer is feasible and safe and oncological outcomes are comparable between a conservative and an extended surgical procedure.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lê P, Mehtari L, Billey C (2006) Carcinoma of the transverse colon. J Chir (Paris) 143(5):285–293CrossRef Lê P, Mehtari L, Billey C (2006) Carcinoma of the transverse colon. J Chir (Paris) 143(5):285–293CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee YS, Lee IK, Kang WK, Cho HM, Park JK, Oh ST, Kim JG, Kim YH (2008) Surgical and pathological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer. Int J Color Dis 23:669–673CrossRef Lee YS, Lee IK, Kang WK, Cho HM, Park JK, Oh ST, Kim JG, Kim YH (2008) Surgical and pathological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer. Int J Color Dis 23:669–673CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323:101–105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sterne JA, Egger M, Smith GD (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. BMJ 323:101–105CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463CrossRef Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Kanaji S, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2018) Optimal surgery for mid-transverse colon cancer: laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy versus laparoscopic transverse colectomy. World J Surg 42:3398–3404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4612-z CrossRefPubMed Matsuda T, Sumi Y, Yamashita K, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Kanaji S, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2018) Optimal surgery for mid-transverse colon cancer: laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy versus laparoscopic transverse colectomy. World J Surg 42:3398–3404. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00268-018-4612-z CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CS, Huh JW, Oh BY, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY (2016) Operative method for transverse colon carcinoma: transverse colectomy versus extended colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 59(7):630–639CrossRefPubMed Chong CS, Huh JW, Oh BY, Park YA, Cho YB, Yun SH, Kim HC, Lee WY (2016) Operative method for transverse colon carcinoma: transverse colectomy versus extended colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 59(7):630–639CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rongen I, Damhuis RA, van der Hoeven JA, Plaisier PW (2013) Comparison of extended hemicolectomy versus transverse colectomy in patients with cancer of the transverse colon. Acta Chir Belg 113(2):107–111CrossRefPubMed van Rongen I, Damhuis RA, van der Hoeven JA, Plaisier PW (2013) Comparison of extended hemicolectomy versus transverse colectomy in patients with cancer of the transverse colon. Acta Chir Belg 113(2):107–111CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Guan X, Zhao Z, Yang M et al (2017) Whether partial colectomy is oncologically safe for patients with transverse colon cancer: a large population-based study. Oncotarget 8(54):93236–93244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guan X, Zhao Z, Yang M et al (2017) Whether partial colectomy is oncologically safe for patients with transverse colon cancer: a large population-based study. Oncotarget 8(54):93236–93244CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, Sandvik L, Nesbakken A (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Color Dis 10:33–40 Sjo OH, Lunde OC, Nygaard K, Sandvik L, Nesbakken A (2008) Tumour location is a prognostic factor for survival in colonic cancer patients. Color Dis 10:33–40
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim CW, Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JC (2010) Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes for splenic flexure colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat 42:69–76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim CW, Shin US, Yu CS, Kim JC (2010) Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical treatment and outcomes for splenic flexure colon cancer. Cancer Res Treat 42:69–76CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Morikawa E, Yasutomi M, Shindou K, Matsuda T, Mori N, Hida J, Kubo R, Kitaoka M, Nakamura M, Fujimoto K, Inufusa H, Hatta M, Izumoto G (1994) Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:219–223CrossRefPubMed Morikawa E, Yasutomi M, Shindou K, Matsuda T, Mori N, Hida J, Kubo R, Kitaoka M, Nakamura M, Fujimoto K, Inufusa H, Hatta M, Izumoto G (1994) Distribution of metastatic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer by the modified clearing method. Dis Colon Rectum 37:219–223CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A et al (2007) Italian research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC). The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 245(4):543–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A et al (2007) Italian research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC). The ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patients. Ann Surg 245(4):543–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Short- and long-term outcomes after transverse versus extended colectomy for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von
Marco Milone
Michele Manigrasso
Ugo Elmore
Francesco Maione
Nicola Gennarelli
Fabio Rondelli
Nunzio Velotti
Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Publikationsdatum
06.11.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3186-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.