Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 8/2009

01.08.2009 | Breast

Should previous mammograms be digitised in the transition to digital mammography?

verfasst von: S. Taylor-Phillips, M. G. Wallis, A. G. Gale

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Breast screening specificity is improved if previous mammograms are available, which presents a challenge when converting to digital mammography. Two display options were investigated: mounting previous film mammograms on a multiviewer adjacent to the workstation, or digitising them for soft copy display. Eight qualified screen readers were videotaped undertaking routine screen reading for two 45-min sessions in each scenario. Analysis of gross eye and head movements showed that when digitised, previous mammograms were examined a greater number of times per case (p = 0.03), due to a combination of being used in 19% more cases (p = 0.04) and where used, looked at a greater number of times (28% increase, p = 0.04). Digitising previous mammograms reduced both the average time taken per case by 18% (p = 0.04) and the participants’ perceptions of workload (p < 0.05). Digitising previous analogue mammograms may be advantageous, in particular in increasing their level of use.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population based study—the Oslo Ii study. Radiology 232:197–204PubMedCrossRef Skaane P, Skjennald A (2004) Screen-film mammography versus digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population based study—the Oslo Ii study. Radiology 232:197–204PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the vestfold county study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191PubMedCrossRef Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA, Hofvind S, Skaane P (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the vestfold county study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866CrossRef Del Turco MR, Mantellini P, Ciatto S et al (2007) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts. Am J Roentgenol 189:860–866CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE (2002) Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1173–1177PubMed Burnside ES, Sickles EA, Sohlich RE, Dee KE (2002) Differential value of comparison with previous examinations in diagnostic versus screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1173–1177PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Callaway MP, Boggis CR, Astley SA, Hutt I (1997) The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 52:527–529PubMedCrossRef Callaway MP, Boggis CR, Astley SA, Hutt I (1997) The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. Clin Radiol 52:527–529PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E (2000) Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 41:52–56PubMedCrossRef Thurfjell MG, Vitak B, Azavedo E, Svane G, Thurfjell E (2000) Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms. Acta Radiol 41:52–56PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS et al (2003) Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:343–346PubMed Sumkin JH, Holbert BL, Herrmann JS et al (2003) Optimal reference mammography: a comparison of mammograms obtained 1 and 2 years before the present examination. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:343–346PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Varela C, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (2005) Use of previous mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. Eur J Radiol 56:248–255PubMedCrossRef Varela C, Karssemeijer N, Hendriks JHCL, Holland R (2005) Use of previous mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. Eur J Radiol 56:248–255PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Liston J, Wilson R, Cooke J et al (2005) Quality assurance guidelines for breast cancer screening radiology. NHSBSP Publication No 59 Liston J, Wilson R, Cooke J et al (2005) Quality assurance guidelines for breast cancer screening radiology. NHSBSP Publication No 59
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Gale AG (2003) PERFORMS—a self assessment scheme for radiologists in breast screening. seminars in breast disease: improving and monitoring mammographic interpretative skills 6:148–152 Gale AG (2003) PERFORMS—a self assessment scheme for radiologists in breast screening. seminars in breast disease: improving and monitoring mammographic interpretative skills 6:148–152
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, Macmahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA (1987) Digital mammography: roc studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 22:581PubMedCrossRef Chan HP, Vyborny CJ, Macmahon H, Metz CE, Doi K, Sickles EA (1987) Digital mammography: roc studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications. Invest Radiol 22:581PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 139–183 Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N (eds) Human mental workload. North-Holland, Oxford, pp 139–183
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD (1994) Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21:1203PubMedCrossRef Chan HP, Niklason LT, Ikeda DM, Lam KL, Adler DD (1994) Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys 21:1203PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nab HW, Karssemeijer N, Van Erning L, Hendriks JHCL (1992) Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms. Med Inform Internet Med 17:125–131CrossRef Nab HW, Karssemeijer N, Van Erning L, Hendriks JHCL (1992) Comparison of digital and conventional mammography: a ROC study of 270 mammograms. Med Inform Internet Med 17:125–131CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruschin M, Hemdal B, Andersson I et al (2005) Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study. Radiat Prot Dosimet 114:415–423CrossRef Ruschin M, Hemdal B, Andersson I et al (2005) Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study. Radiat Prot Dosimet 114:415–423CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Karssemeijer N, Frieling JTM, Hendriks JHCL (1993) Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 28:413PubMedCrossRef Karssemeijer N, Frieling JTM, Hendriks JHCL (1993) Spatial resolution in digital mammography. Invest Radiol 28:413PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study. Radiology 237:444–449PubMedCrossRef Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM (2005) Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom national breast screening programme: prospective study. Radiology 237:444–449PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J et al (2008) Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands 2000–2005. Eur Radiol 18:2390–2397PubMedCrossRef Duijm LE, Groenewoud JH, Fracheboud J et al (2008) Utilization and cost of diagnostic imaging and biopsies following positive screening mammography in the southern breast cancer screening region of the Netherlands 2000–2005. Eur Radiol 18:2390–2397PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Should previous mammograms be digitised in the transition to digital mammography?
verfasst von
S. Taylor-Phillips
M. G. Wallis
A. G. Gale
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1366-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

European Radiology 8/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.