nach oben

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

Erschienen in:

01.07.2007

StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice

verfasst von: Atique Imam, Ranjana M. S. Carter, Jane Phillips-Hughes, Philip Boardman, Raman Uberoi

Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The StarClose device (Abbott Vascular Devices; Abbott Laboratories, Redwood City, CA) utilizes an externally placed Nitinol clip to achieve arterial closure following femoral artery puncture. The objectives of this study were to assess the efficacy and complications of the StarClose device in patients undergoing interventional radiological procedures. Preprocedural clotting status, pulse and blood pressure, severity of vessel calcification, sheath size, and time to deployment were recorded. Postdeployment complications immediately postprocedure, at 1 h, at 2 h, and at 1 week were recorded. A duplex scan was performed in the first 10 patients to assess any immediate vascular complications. Deployments were successful in 96% achieving immediate hemostasis. Mean deployment time was 48 s. There were no major complications. The StarClose device was found to have a high technical and clinical efficacy.

Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST (1999) Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J 138(6; Pt 1):1118–1125PubMedCrossRef

Bogart MA (1995) Time to hemostasis: |a comparison of manual versus mechanical compression of the femoral artery. Am J Crit Care 4(2):149–156PubMed

Thore V, Berder V, Houplon P, et al. (2001) Role of manual compression time and bed rest duration on the occurrence of femoral bleeding complications after sheath retrieval following 4fr left-sided cardiac catheterization. J Interv Cardiol 14(1):7–10PubMedCrossRef

Tagney J, Lackie D (2005) Bed-rest post-femoral arterial sheath removal: What is safe practice? A clinical audit. Nurs Crit Care 10(4):167–173PubMedCrossRef

Eggebrecht H, Haude M, Woertgen U, et al. (2002) Systematic use of a collagen-based vascular closure device immediately after cardiac catheterization procedures in 1,317 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 57(4):486–495PubMedCrossRef

Silber S (2000) Ten years of arterial closure devices: a critical analysis of their use after PTCA. Z Kardiol 89(5):383–389PubMedCrossRef

Koreny M, Riedmuller E, Nikfardjam M, et al. (2004) Arterial puncture closing devices compared with standard manual compression after cardiac catheterization: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 291:350–357PubMedCrossRef

Hoffer EK, Bloch RD (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:865–886PubMed

Sanborn TA, Gibbs HH, Brinker JA, et al. (1993) A multicenter randomized trial comparing a percutaneous collagen hemostasis device with conventional manual compression after diagnostic angiography and angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol 22:1273–1279PubMedCrossRef

10.

Chamberlin JR, Lardi AB, McKeever LS, et al. (1999) Use of vascular sealing devices (VasoSeal and Perclose) versus assisted manual compression (Femostop) in transcatheter coronary interventions requiring abciximab (ReoPro). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 47:143–147PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kahn ZM, Kumar M, Hollander G, et al. (2002) Safety and efficacy of the Perclose suture-mediated closure device after diagnostic and interventional catheterizations in a large consecutive population. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 55:8–13CrossRef

12.

Ward SR, Casale P, Raymond R, et al. (1998) Efficacy and safety of a hemostatic puncture closure device with early ambulation after coronary angiography. Angio-Seal Invest. Am J Cardiol 81:569–572PubMedCrossRef

13.

Abando A, Hood D, Weaver F, et al. (2004) The use of the Angioseal device for femoral artery closure. J Vasc Surg 40(2):287–290PubMedCrossRef

14.

Belenky A, Aranovich D, Greif F, et al. (2007) Use of a collagen-based device for closure of low brachial artery punctures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):273–275CrossRef

15.

Starnes BW, O’Donnell SD, Gillespie DL, et al. (2003) Percutaneous arterial closure in peripheral vascular disease: a prospective randomized evaluation of the Perclose device. J Vasc Surg 38(2):263–271PubMedCrossRef

16.

Juergens CP, Leung DY, Crozier JA, et al. (2004) Patient tolerance and resource utilization associated with an arterial closure versus an external compression device after percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63(2):166–170PubMedCrossRef

17.

Abbot Laboratories (2005) StarClose vascular closure system, instructions for use. Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, CA, p 2

18.

Castelli P, Caronno R, Piffaretti G, et al. (2006) Incidence of vascular injuries after use of the Angio-Seal closure device following endovascular procedures in a single center. World J Surg 30(3):280–284PubMedCrossRef

19.

Mukhopadhyay K, Puckett MA, Roobottom CA (2005) Efficacy and complications of Angioseal in antegrade puncture. Eur J Radiol 56(3):409–412PubMedCrossRef

20.

Kirchhof C, Schickel S, Schmidt-Lucke C, et al. (2002) Local vascular complications after use of the hemostatic puncture closure device Angio-Seal. Vasa 31(2):101–106PubMedCrossRef

21.

Wille J, Vos JA, Overtoom TT, et al. (2006) Acute leg ischemia: the dark side of a percutaneous femoral artery closure device. Ann Vasc Surg 20(2):278–281PubMedCrossRef

22.

Carey D, Martin JR, Moore CA, et al. (2001) Complications of femoral artery closure devices. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 52(1):3–7, discussion 8PubMedCrossRef

23.

Jang JJ, Kim M, Gray B, et al. (2006) Claudication secondary to Perclose use after percutaneous procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 67(5):687–695PubMedCrossRef

Titel: StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice
verfasst von: Atique Imam
Ranjana M. S. Carter
Jane Phillips-Hughes
Philip Boardman
Raman Uberoi
Publikationsdatum: 01.07.2007
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9079-5

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

StarClose Vascular Closure Device: Prospective Study on 222 Deployments in an Interventional Radiology Practice

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

A Rare Cause of Pulmonary Emboli in a Patient with Deep Vein Thrombosis: Doppler Ultrasonographic Compressibility Maneuver

Improved Patency of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt: The Efficacy of Cilostazol for the Prevention of Pseudointimal Hyperplasia in Swine TIPS Models

Initial Clinical Experience Using the Amplatzer Vascular Plug

Transhepatic Approach for Percutaneous Computed-Tomography-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Cell Carcinoma

SIR/RSNA/CIRSE Joint Medical Simulation Task Force Strategic Plan: Executive Summary

Aorto-iliac Endovascular Reconstruction by Kissing Stenting Through Bilateral Brachial Access

Neu im Fachgebiet Radiologie

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

Update Radiologie