Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology 1/2021

01.09.2020 | Original Article

Subcategory classifications of Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on MRI

verfasst von: Maya Honda, Masako Kataoka, Kosuke Kawaguchi, Mami Iima, Kanae Kawai Miyake, Ayami Ohno Kishimoto, Rie Ota, Akane Ohashi, Masakazu Toi, Yuji Nakamoto

Erschienen in: Japanese Journal of Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Category 4 in BI-RADS for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has a wide range of probabilities of malignancy, extending from > 2 to < 95%. We classified category 4 lesions into three subcategories and analyzed the positive predictive value (PPV) of malignancy in a tertiary hospital.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 346 breast MRIs with 434 category 2–5 lesions. All enhancing lesions were classified as category 2 (0% probability of malignancy), 3 (> 0%, ≤ 2%), 4 (> 2%, < 95%) and 5 (≥ 95%); category 4 lesions were further subcategorized into 4A (> 2%, ≤ 10%), 4B (> 10%, ≤ 50%) and 4C (> 50%, < 95%) at the time of diagnosis. Radiological and pathological reports were retrospectively analyzed, and the PPVs were calculated.

Results

We included 149 malignant and 285 benign lesions. The PPVs of subcategories 4A, 4B and 4C were 1.8%, 11.8% and 67.5%, respectively. The PPVs were higher for lesions coexisting with category 5 or 6 lesions compared with those for isolated lesions.

Conclusion

Category 4 lesions can be classified into three subcategories depending on the likelihood of malignancy. Lesions coexisting with category 5 or 6 lesions are more likely to be malignant.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BIRADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013. D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, et al. ACR BIRADS® atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2013.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Farghadani M, Soofi G, Sarrami A. Is there any correlation between magnetic resonance imaging features of breast lesions of BIRADS category 4 with histopathologic results? Adv Biomed Res Medknow. 2017;6:7.CrossRef Farghadani M, Soofi G, Sarrami A. Is there any correlation between magnetic resonance imaging features of breast lesions of BIRADS category 4 with histopathologic results? Adv Biomed Res Medknow. 2017;6:7.CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;264:51–8.CrossRef Mahoney MC, Gatsonis C, Hanna L, DeMartini WB, Lehman C. Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging. Radiology. 2012;264:51–8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Ogawa T, Abe S, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:241–6.CrossRef Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Ogawa T, Abe S, et al. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI. Breast Cancer. 2008;15:241–6.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313–21.CrossRef Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313–21.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: Interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330–7.CrossRef Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: Interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330–7.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat de Almeida JRM, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, Rocha MDS. Predictive performance of BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging descriptors in the context of suspicious (category 4) findings. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:137–43.CrossRef de Almeida JRM, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, Rocha MDS. Predictive performance of BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging descriptors in the context of suspicious (category 4) findings. Radiol Bras. 2016;49:137–43.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Sierra H, Cordova M, et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:426–30.CrossRef Liberman L, Mason G, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Sierra H, Cordova M, et al. Does size matter? Positive predictive value of MRI-detected breast lesions as a function of lesion size. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:426–30.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu HL, Zong M, Wei H, Lou JJ, Wang SQ, Zou QG, et al. Differentiation between malignant and benign breast masses: combination of semi-quantitative analysis on DCE-MRI and histogram analysis of ADC maps. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:460–6.CrossRef Liu HL, Zong M, Wei H, Lou JJ, Wang SQ, Zou QG, et al. Differentiation between malignant and benign breast masses: combination of semi-quantitative analysis on DCE-MRI and histogram analysis of ADC maps. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:460–6.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat De Almeida JRM, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, De Seixas RM. Subcategorization of suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS Category 4) according to MRI criteria: Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:222–31.CrossRef De Almeida JRM, Gomes AB, Barros TP, Fahel PE, De Seixas RM. Subcategorization of suspicious breast lesions (BI-RADS Category 4) according to MRI criteria: Role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:222–31.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujiwara K, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Okamoto S, Kojima Y, Tsugawa K, et al. Grading system to categorize breast MRI in BI-RADS 5th edition: a multivariate study of breast mass descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:W118–W12727.CrossRef Fujiwara K, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Okamoto S, Kojima Y, Tsugawa K, et al. Grading system to categorize breast MRI in BI-RADS 5th edition: a multivariate study of breast mass descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:W118–W12727.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith H, Chetlen AL, Schetter S, Mack J, Watts M, Zhu JJ. PPV 3 of suspicious breast MRI findings. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:1553–622.CrossRef Smith H, Chetlen AL, Schetter S, Mack J, Watts M, Zhu JJ. PPV 3 of suspicious breast MRI findings. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:1553–622.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Strigel RM, Burnside ES, Elezaby M, Fowler AM, Kelcz F, Salkowski LR, et al. Utility of BI-RADS assessment category 4 subdivisions for screening breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1392–9.CrossRef Strigel RM, Burnside ES, Elezaby M, Fowler AM, Kelcz F, Salkowski LR, et al. Utility of BI-RADS assessment category 4 subdivisions for screening breast MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;208:1392–9.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Asada T, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Fujiwara K, Okamoto S, Nakajima Y. Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36:200–8.CrossRef Asada T, Yamada T, Kanemaki Y, Fujiwara K, Okamoto S, Nakajima Y. Grading system to categorize breast MRI using BI-RADS 5th edition: a statistical study of non-mass enhancement descriptors in terms of probability of malignancy. Jpn J Radiol. 2018;36:200–8.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu D, Ba Z, Ni X, Wang L, Yu D, Ma X. Apparent diffusion coefficient to subdivide breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) category 4 lesions. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:2180–8.CrossRef Liu D, Ba Z, Ni X, Wang L, Yu D, Ma X. Apparent diffusion coefficient to subdivide breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging (BI-RADS-MRI) category 4 lesions. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:2180–8.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R, Wengert GJ, Kapetas P, Bernathova M, et al. A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2529–37.CrossRef Marino MA, Clauser P, Woitek R, Wengert GJ, Kapetas P, Bernathova M, et al. A simple scoring system for breast MRI interpretation: does it compensate for reader experience? Eur Radiol. 2016;26:2529–37.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:1157–65.CrossRef Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Okafuji T, Kamitani T, Soeda H, Setoguchi T, et al. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:1157–65.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS®-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:7–15.CrossRef Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS®-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2006;5:7–15.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin EH, Sickles EA, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35–433.CrossRef Kinkel K, Helbich TH, Esserman LJ, Barclay J, Schwerin EH, Sickles EA, et al. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:35–433.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Colin C, Cornford E, et al. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3669–788.CrossRef Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Colin C, Cornford E, et al. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:3669–788.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Subcategory classifications of Breast Imaging and Data System (BI-RADS) category 4 lesions on MRI
verfasst von
Maya Honda
Masako Kataoka
Kosuke Kawaguchi
Mami Iima
Kanae Kawai Miyake
Ayami Ohno Kishimoto
Rie Ota
Akane Ohashi
Masakazu Toi
Yuji Nakamoto
Publikationsdatum
01.09.2020
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Japanese Journal of Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 1867-1071
Elektronische ISSN: 1867-108X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-020-01029-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

Japanese Journal of Radiology 1/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Mammakarzinom: Brustdichte beeinflusst rezidivfreies Überleben

26.05.2024 Mammakarzinom Nachrichten

Frauen, die zum Zeitpunkt der Brustkrebsdiagnose eine hohe mammografische Brustdichte aufweisen, haben ein erhöhtes Risiko für ein baldiges Rezidiv, legen neue Daten nahe.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.