Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia 2/2019

Open Access 11.03.2019 | Special Article

The F Breathing Circuit, a universal single-limb breathing circuit: brief historical perspective

verfasst von: Atsuo Fukunaga

Erschienen in: Journal of Anesthesia | Ausgabe 2/2019

Abstract

This article presents a brief historical perspective of the F Breathing Circuit, a universal single-limb breathing circuit. The single-limb breathing circuit (tube within a tube configuration) comprises two tubes of sufficient size and compliance, so that either channel enables safe, unrestricted inspiration/expiration at all times in spontaneous and controlled ventilation. The single-limb circuit can function in various modes: as an anesthetic circle circuit as well as a Mapleson-type rebreathing circuit and as a non-rebreathing circuit (e.g., with ICU ventilators) in adult and pediatric patients. Therefore, it qualifies as a universal breathing circuit. Since its first introduction in Japan (1978), which was followed by further modifications and improvements, the circuit was made available in USA and worldwide.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Anesthesia breathing circuit in modern anesthesia

This article presents the background and brief historical perspective of the F Breathing Circuit, the first universal single-limb breathing circuit (USLBC).
There have been two types of breathing systems or circuits used in anesthesia: (a) the circle circuit, which prevents carbon dioxide rebreathing by use of CO2 absorber while allowing partial rebreathing of other exhaled gases and (b) the Mapleson, semi-closed rebreathing circuit, which does not use CO2 absorption and the exhaled gases are washed out with high fresh gas flows [1].
This paper is not intended to describe in detail or evaluate the two systems; it merely revisits the fundamental characteristics and function of the two tubes, particularly in reference to the tube within a tube design.

Anesthesia circle circuit (1930)

Since Brian C. Sword introduced the circle (CO2 absorption) system in the 1930s [2], the system with 2 separate breathing tubes became the standard anesthetic circle circuit in North America and in most of the countries which followed the American anesthesia technique. Numerous variants of the circle system have been suggested, depending on the site of fresh gas entry, relative positions of the uni-directional valves, the reservoir bag, and the carbon dioxide absorber [3]. However, their basic structure and, in particular, their physical configuration had not been changed: The circle system requires an apparatus which is constructed, so that the inspiratory and expiratory gas flow runs in the same direction (i.e., circular manner). This requires a separation by means of uni-directional valves and two separate tubes, one for inspiration and one for expiration connected by a “Y-piece”, which, in turn, connects to the patient via a mask, endotracheal tube (ETT), or a laryngeal mask (LMA). Thus, the main component which connects the patient’s airway to the anesthesia machine is a pair of tubes.
Despite its physical inconvenience (two separate tubes occluding and creating an obstacle around the face) and other limitations (e.g., cold and dry inspiratory gases), the conventional configuration of the circle system, which uses two separate limbs, was the only circuit available since 1930 (Fig. 1). It took almost 50 years until a viable, safe, single-limb circle circuit became available to the health practitioner [4].

Mapleson anesthetic system (1954)

In 1954, Mapleson classified five different semi-closed rebreathing anesthetic systems, and designated them as A–E systems; the F designation was later added [1] and refers to the Jackson–Rees circuit. The Mapleson A and D were modified by Lack and Bain, respectively, by placing one tube within the other tube. Bain placed the fresh gas inflow tube within the outer, rebreathing tube [5], whereas the outer tube led the fresh gas flow in the Lack configuration [6].

The Bain circuit: a coaxial modification of the Mapleson D type circuit (1972)

The well-known coaxial breathing circuit was introduced by Bain and Spoerel in 1972 [5]. However, the Bain circuit was not intended for use in a circle system. The Bain circuit was designed and intended to function as a Mapleson D type circuit: the narrow inner tube mainly functions as a “fresh gas inflowing tube” [5], rather than a respiratory tube. This important characteristic has been pointed out as a significant drawback of the system in several reports. Nott observed that the inner tube is too narrow and insufficient for tidal inspiration, and that “inspired gases come mainly from the (outer) expiratory side of the system and rebreathing is possible” [7]. Other reports point out that the Bain circuit is unusable in a circle system and potentially hazardous [810]. Thus, although the Bain circuit initially appeared to offer significant advantages due to its compactness, its use has been limited. Cooper states that, as of 2014, “in the UK, although it is often used in the induction room, it is rarely used in the operating room” [11].

The F Breathing Circuit: a universal single-limb breathing circuit (1978)

The first universal single-limb breathing circuit was introduced by Fukunaga in 1978 (Japanese Patent No. 1,146,290 filed on May 17, 1978; US Patent No. 4,265,235, filed on May 5, 1981 and based on the Japanese patent; the first clinical report was published in 1978 [4]). The circuit consists of a tube within a tube single-limb circuit that can be used in the circle anesthesia system as well as the Mapleson-type system. Specifically, the circuit has the following characteristics:
  • Compact, simple, and light in weight.
  • Either tube can provide streamlined inspiratory and expiratory flows in spontaneous, assisted, and controlled ventilation (an essential consideration for a safe breathing circuit).
  • When connected in a preferred mode, the outer tube’s expired gases pass through the uni-directional valves and the CO2 absorber which flows into the inner, inspiratory tube in one direction and then to the patient (an essential consideration for a circle anesthetic system which provides warmer and more humid inspired gases).
  • The inner tube is freely disposed at the patient end (i.e., the inner tube and the outer tube do not need to be anchored at both ends of the circuit, or be maintained in a strictly coaxial or concentric disposition, for example, by stays or spacer means). The freely floating inner, inspiratory tube at the patient end can prevent the potential hazard of inner tube disconnection at the machine end or eliminate breathing obstruction caused by kinking, bending or torsion of the inner, inspiratory tube, so that it will prevent excessive hypercarbia or hypoxia and thus provide a safe circuit.
  • Provides simplified construction, which made it feasible to manufacture the circuit more economically.
  • Can be used interchangeably as a circle anesthetic system, as a Mapleson type as well as a non-rebreathing circuit (e.g., for ICU ventilation). Thus, the circuit is a universal-type circuit.
The F Breathing Circuit expanded the scope and usage of the single-limb circuit to encompass both the circle system and the Mapleson system in one single system/circuit. Hence, the F Circuit can be universally used; it can safely function in a variety of breathing modalities [4, 12]; it can be connected to an anesthesia machine with or without a carbon dioxide absorber, or be connected to an ICU ventilator. Furthermore, the circuit can be used as a transport circuit in pediatric and adult cases. Because of its versatility and multipurpose functionality, the F Breathing Circuit was described as a “truly universal anesthetic breathing system” [13]. Safety, simplicity, and reliability were particularly emphasized in the development of the circuit. Hence, the inner and outer tubes were made to reliably enable inspiration and expiration in spontaneous and controlled ventilation at all times—even if the tubes are connected in a reversed manner (outer tube to inspire and inner tube to expire gases), the circuit will not be hazardous. The former mode is recommended because of its advantages (countercurrent heat exchange between the cold fresh gas, inspired gas, and the warmer expired streams) [14, 15]. The F Circuit subsumes both the circle circuit and Mapleson circuit types. The same circuit can be seamlessly used throughout different stages and modalities during the course of anesthesia: (a) for induction of anesthesia (in the induction room [in places where induction of anesthesia is performed in a separate location from the operating room]: use as the Bain circuit), (b) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia (in the operating room: use in the circle system), (c) for recovery of anesthesia (in the recovery room: use as the T-piece), (d) for ventilating a patient in need of oxygenation (in the ICU), or (e) for transporting the patient while ventilating (use as a Jackson–Rees circuit or in lieu of the Ambu bag device).

Development of the F Breathing Circuit (1978, 1992)

In reference to the F Breathing Circuit, a prototype made of plastic tubing comprising all the required characteristic mentioned above could be accomplished in a feasible, viable manner; The circuit was tested in the laboratory with a model lung and by volunteers. Thereafter, a clinical study was designed and evaluation of the circuit was performed. The circuit was approved for commercialization by the government agency in Japan (1978), and subsequently, development and commercialization were undertaken by Senko Medical Instrument Mfg Ltd (MERA), Tokyo, Japan.
The circuit was first identified as “Fukunaga Breathing Circuit”. The name was then abbreviated to “F Kairo,” “F Circuit,” “F Breathing Circuit,” “F Universal Circuit”, and “Mera F Circuit” (Fig. 1).
Over a decade later (1992), after the circuit had been widely used in Japan, the technology was further evolved and commercialized in the US and worldwide by King Systems Corporation (Ambu) of Indiana [16].
Several modifications, improvements, and expanded usages followed the first commercial circuit. One significant improvement is the provision of a separate manifold which is attached to the inspiratory and expiratory ports of the anesthesia machine, respectively (Fig. 1d). The manifold can be set in a permanent or semi-permanent manner. The single-limb circuit can be connected to the manifold with one motion, one connection, and greatly simplifying set-up. The connection can be done via a coaxial filter which is attached to the coaxial connector at the machine end of the hoses. The coaxial filter design distributes flow into dedicated inspiratory and expiratory quadrants. This provides filtration of both inspiratory and expiratory ends, thereby guaranteeing protection of both: the anesthesia machine and the patient, while eliminating the need of two filters and/or need for disposing the manifold. This simplifies the usage and saves set-up time, since the user does not need to make multiple connections or use two filters. Another improvement to the F Breathing Circuit was the use of two flexi tubes (accordion-like pleated tubes) which could be expanded and contracted simultaneously in a synchronized manner while maintaining the desired curvature, position, and length of the single-limb circuit. These later improvements added great flexibility and convenience to the unilimb circuit, and led to widespread, worldwide use of the USLBC under the trade names “Universal F,” “Universal F2,” “Ped F2,” and “KingUniversal F.”
The F Breathing Circuit has been used in millions of patients and veterinary cases worldwide, and although the present circuit can be readily used in a variety of modalities, the single-limb universal breathing circuit currently appears to be mainly associated with its use as a circle circuit. However, it should be kept in mind that a single F Circuit can function in different modes, minimizing the need for multiple circuits and devices—this important fact should be kept in mind as environmental and economic pressures necessitate the more efficient usage of medical devices.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

None. In the past, the author received compensation from the companies that commercialized the product.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Anästhesiologie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Anästhesiologie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes AINS, den Premium-Inhalten der AINS-Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten AINS-Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Andrews JJ. Inhaled anesthetic delivery systems. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 174–206. Andrews JJ. Inhaled anesthetic delivery systems. In: Miller RD, editor. Anesthesia. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p. 174–206.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Sword BC. The closed circle method of administration of gas anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1930;9(5):198–202. Sword BC. The closed circle method of administration of gas anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1930;9(5):198–202.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Eger IIEI, Ethans CT. The effects of inflow, overflow and valve placement on economy of the circle system. Anesthesiology. 1968;29:93–100.CrossRefPubMed Eger IIEI, Ethans CT. The effects of inflow, overflow and valve placement on economy of the circle system. Anesthesiology. 1968;29:93–100.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukunaga A. A compact multipurpose breathing circuit: an application to the anesthesia circle system (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 1978;27:1113–17. Fukunaga A. A compact multipurpose breathing circuit: an application to the anesthesia circle system (in Japanese with English abstract). Masui (Jpn J Anesthesiol). 1978;27:1113–17.
5.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Willis BA, Clyburn PA. Bain and circle systems. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:172.CrossRef Willis BA, Clyburn PA. Bain and circle systems. Anaesthesia. 1990;45:172.CrossRef
10.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper R. From the journal archives: a streamlined anesthetic system: the Bain (and Spoerel) circuit 40 years later. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61:587–90.CrossRefPubMed Cooper R. From the journal archives: a streamlined anesthetic system: the Bain (and Spoerel) circuit 40 years later. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61:587–90.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukunaga AF. Torsion and disconnection of inner tube of coaxial breathing circuit. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:1106–07.CrossRef Fukunaga AF. Torsion and disconnection of inner tube of coaxial breathing circuit. Br J Anaesth. 1981;53:1106–07.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Byrick RJ, Janssen E, Yamashita M. Rebreathing and co-axial circuits: a comparison of the Bain and Mera F. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1981;28:321–28.CrossRefPubMed Byrick RJ, Janssen E, Yamashita M. Rebreathing and co-axial circuits: a comparison of the Bain and Mera F. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1981;28:321–28.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramanathan S, Chalon J, Turndorf H. A compact, well-humidified breathing circuit for the circle system. Anesthesiology. 1976;44:238–42.CrossRefPubMed Ramanathan S, Chalon J, Turndorf H. A compact, well-humidified breathing circuit for the circle system. Anesthesiology. 1976;44:238–42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Onodera F, Kubota T. Clinical application of new ventilatory circuit constructing single breathing circuit with coaxial dual flow (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Soc Clin Anesth. 1984;4:100–5.CrossRef Onodera F, Kubota T. Clinical application of new ventilatory circuit constructing single breathing circuit with coaxial dual flow (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Soc Clin Anesth. 1984;4:100–5.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Fukunaga A. The universal “F Breathing Circuit” by King Systems. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists. The Hague, June 12–19, 1992. Fukunaga A. The universal “F Breathing Circuit” by King Systems. Paper presented at the 10th World Congress of Anaesthesiologists. The Hague, June 12–19, 1992.
Metadaten
Titel
The F Breathing Circuit, a universal single-limb breathing circuit: brief historical perspective
verfasst von
Atsuo Fukunaga
Publikationsdatum
11.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
Journal of Anesthesia / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Elektronische ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-019-02622-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Anesthesia 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Häufigste Gründe für Brustschmerzen bei Kindern

06.05.2024 Pädiatrische Diagnostik Nachrichten

Akute Brustschmerzen sind ein Alarmsymptom par exellence, schließlich sind manche Auslöser lebensbedrohlich. Auch Kinder klagen oft über Schmerzen in der Brust. Ein Studienteam ist den Ursachen nachgegangen.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.