Background
Methods
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Author and year | Study Design | Sample | Country of Origin | Country of Study | Outcomes of interest | Method of assessing outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brabeck & Xu [59] | Cross sectional survey | N = 132 immigrant parents who accessed immigrant community organisations Detention Duration: unknown | Various Latin American countries | United States | Impact of detention / deportation on Latino immigrant families | Self-report survey informed by Brabeck et al. [59] Translated and back translated |
Cleveland & Rousseau [38] | Cross-sectional, comparison survey | N = 122 detained adult asylum seekers, N = 66 non-detained adult asylum seekers Detention Duration: mean 31.2 days, median 17.5 days | Unknown | Canada | Anxiety, depression & PTSD | HTQ, HSCL-25, modified DEC |
Coffey et al. [40] | Cross-sectional semi-structured interview and survey | N = 17 refugees Detention Duration: mean 3 years 2 months, range 1.6 – 4.5 years | Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran and neighbouring countries | Australia | Experience of detention PTSD, depression, anxiety, quality of life | Semi-structured interviews; HSCL-25, HTQ, WHOQOL-Brief |
Cohen [50] | Data comparison | N = 231 self-harm incident reports N = 12 suicide incident reports from IRCs N = 38 suicides from coroners and ombudsman reports | Unknown | UK | Rates of self-harm and suicide | Analysis of records, coroner’s files and ombudsman’s reports |
Cwikel et al. [37] | Cross-sectional, comparison survey | N = 47 female brothel workers in detention, N = 55 female brothel workers Detention Duration: unknown | Former Soviet Union | Israel | PTSD, depression, somatic symptoms, suicidality | PCL, CES-D, constructed scale of physical symptoms, constructed scale of both past trauma and work trauma Russian speaking psychiatrist |
Graf et al. [47] | Cross-sectional survey | N = 80 males detained for violation of the Swiss Aliens Act Detention Duration: 4 days | 31 different countries | Switzerland | Prevalence rates of mental health disorders | BJMHS, CIDI (clinical psychologist), SCL-90R, subjective mental health questionnaire within 4 days of detention, SCL-90R and self-report again 6 months later where possible Material professionally translated into several languages |
Green & Eager [36] | Cross-sectional analysis of health records | N = 720 Detention Duration: range 3 – 24 months | 58 different countries | Australia | Estimated incidence rates of new health conditions, new mental health conditions and new injuries for each cohort | Health records coded by clinical coder |
Hedrick [49] | Analysis of incident reports | Unknown | Unknown | Australia | Self-harm | Self-harm incident reports |
Ichikawa et al. [41] | Cross-sectional, comparison survey | N = 18 former detained asylum seekers, N = 37 non-detained asylum seekers Accessible through a group of voluntary lawyers representing them and two NGO’s Detention Duration: median 7 months, range 4 – 10 months | Afghanistan | Japan | Anxiety, depression, PTSD | HSCL-25, HTQ Translated into Dari and read out to participants by NGO caseworkers |
Keller, Rosenfeld et al. [44] | Cross-sectional survey | N = 70 detained asylum seekers Detention Duration: median 7 months, range 2 – 42 months | Multiple countries | USA | Anxiety, depression, PTSD | HSCL-25, HTQ (+ two month follow up) Scales translated by interpreter, interviewed by experienced physician |
Lorek et al. [52] | Cross-sectional survey | N = 11 detained children, N = 9 parents who responded to free legal assistance Detention Duration: range 11 – 115 days | Multiple | Britain | Mental and physical health of children held within immigration detention centre | Clinical diagnostic interviews, SCAS, DSRS, R-IES-13, SDQ, CORE, observations Psychologist and paediatricians had all been trained in carrying out cross-cultural assessments and worked regularly with asylum seeking children and families |
Mares [54] | Secondary analysis of Australian Human Rights Commissions Data Set | N = 131 adults and N = 35 completed K10 N = 70 completed SDQ Detention Duration: mean 8 months, range 90-390 days | Unknown | Australia | Psychological distress, behavioural difficulties | K10, SDQ |
Mares & Jureidini [53] | Assessment of referrals into CAMHS | N = 16 adults, 20 children, 10 families Detention Duration: mean 1 year 3 months, range 12 – 18 months | Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine | Australia | Clinical assessment | Clinical instrument unknown |
Momartin et al. [51] | Cross-sectional survey | N = 49 former immigration detainees on temporary protection visas and N = 67 granted permanent protection visas Detention duration: mean 12 months | Unknown | Australia | PTSD, anxiety, depression, general health, living difficulties and experiences of detention | HTQ, HSCL-25, GHQ-30, MOSSF-12, PMDC, DEC |
Puthoopparambil et al. [46] | Cross-sectional survey | N = 127 immigration detainees Detention Duration: mean 37.8 days | 46 different countries | Sweden | Quality of life | WHOQOL-BREF – incl. Six psychological questions Authorised telephone interpreters (used by 77 participants) |
Robjant et al. [11] | Cross-sectional, comparison survey | N = 67 detained asylum seekers, N = 30 detained former prisoners, N = 49 asylum seekers living in the community Detention Duration: unknown | Unknown | UK | PTSD, depression, anxiety | HADS, IES-R, PDS English |
Rojas-Flores [57] | Cross sectional comparison survey | N = 39 children of detained or deported parents N = 42 unauthorised no history of detention or deportation N = 16 Legal permanent resident Detention Duration: unknown | Mexico or Central America | US | PTSD, depression, behavioural difficulties, daily functioning | UCLA PTSD-RI, CES-DSC, BASC-2 PRS-C, TSCYC-SP, BASC-2 TRS-C, CAFAS |
Rothe et al. (2002a) | Cross sectional survey | N = 74 adolescents Detention Duration: 4-6 months | Cuba | US | PTSD, psychological distress | PTSDRI, checklist of PTSD symptoms |
Rothe et al. (2002b) | Cross sectional survey | N = 87 adolescents Detention Duration: mean 6-8 months | Cuba | US | PTSD, behavioural difficulties | PTSDRI, CBCL-TRF |
Sen et al. [45] | Observational, Cross-sectional | N = 101 male detained in immigration removal centre Detention Duration: unknown | 27 different countries | UK | Neurodevelopmental | MINI v6, SAPAS, AQ-10, ASRS, LDSQ, CANFOR No interpreters |
Sobhanian et al. [42] | Cross-sectional survery | N = 150 former refugee detainees Detention Duration: mean 11.3 months, range 2 – 21 months | Iran, Afghanistan | Australia | Psychological status and quality of life | T-FAST, QOLI, POMS, SIS Translated and back translated into Farsi, self report administered under supervision of clinical psychologist |
Steel et al. [23] | Cross-sectional | N = 10 families (14 adults, 20 children) held for in immigration detention for more than two years Detention Duration: mean 2 years 4 months, range 2 years 2 months – 2 years 8 months | Unknown | Australia | Psychiatric Status | DEC, DSC, K-SADS-PL, SCID-IV, Parenting Questionnaire, Over the telephone by same language-speaking psychologists with prior professional experience working with refugees |
Steel et al. [43] | Cross-sectional, comparison survey | N = 241 Arabic-speaking Mandaean refugees Detention Duration: median 6 months | Mainly Iran and Iraq | Australia | Anxiety, depression & PTSD | HTQ, HSCL-25, MOSSF-12, PMLD, DEC, DSC Translated and back translated by certified Arabic-speaking healthcare interpreter |
Steel et al. [39] | Longitudinal survey | N = 47 former immigration detainees on temporary protection visas and N = 57 granted permanent protection visas attending a state-wide early intervention program in New South Wales Detention Duration: meadian 8 months, range 1 – 30 months | Iran, Afghanistan | Australia | Anxiety, depression and PTSD | HTQ, HSCL-25, GHQ-30, PSWQ, PMLD Baseline and 2-year follow up Measures translated by experienced clinical psychologist fluent in both dialects, and back translated. Interviews undertaken by Fasi / Dari speaking psychologists |
Young & Gordon [48] | Secondary analysis of Australian Human Rights Commissions Data Set | N = 1354 detained refugees, asylum seekers and ‘others’ | Unknown | Australia | PTSD, mental health | K10, HTQ, HoNOS, HoNOSCA |
Zwi et al. [58] | Cross sectional survey | N = 48 detained children N = 38 child asylum seekers in community | Eastern Mediterranean, South East Asia, Pacific, Africa, Stateless origin | Australia | Behavioural difficulties | SDQ |
Quality Question 1-7 | |||||||
Study | Clear focus on question | Appropriate design | Appropriate sampling method | Appropriate sample | Tolerable level of non-participation | Exposure (detention) appropriately addressed | Outcomes (mental health symptoms and disorders) appropriately addressed |
Brabeck & Xu [59] | High | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low |
Cleveland & Rousseau [38] | High | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | High | High |
Coffey et al. [40] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | High |
Cohen [50] | Intermediate | Low | Low | Low | Low | Intermediate | Intermediate |
Cwikel et al. [37] | High | High | Low | Intermediate | Low | High | High |
Graf et al. [47] | High | High | High | Intermediate | Low | High | High |
Green & Eagar [36] | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | High | High | Intermediate |
Hedrick [49] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | Intermediate |
Ichikawa et al. [41] | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
Keller et al. [44] | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | High | High | High | High |
Lorek et al. [52] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low | High | Intermediate |
Mares [54] | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low | High | High |
Mares & Jureidini [53] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | Intermediate |
Momartin et al. [51] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | High | High |
Puthoopparambil et al. (2009) | High | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | High |
Robjant et al. [11] | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | High | High |
Rojas-Flores, L. [57] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low | Intermediate | High |
Rothe et al. [55] | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | Low | Low | High | Intermediate |
Rothe et al. [56] | High | High | Low | Low | Low | High | High |
Sen et al. [45] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | High |
Sobhanian et al. [42] | High | Intermediate | Low | Intermediate | Low | High | High |
Steel et al. [23] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | Intermediate |
Steel et al. [43] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | High |
Steel et al. (2011) | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
Young & Gordon [48] | High | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | Intermediate | High |
Zwi et al. [58] | High | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | High | High |
Quality Question 8-13 | |||||||
Study | Consideration of cofounders | Appropriate conduction of statistical analyses | Reporting of confidence intervals | Consideration of ethical issues | Adequate support for conclusions | Generalisability of findings | Total Score |
Brabeck & Xu [59] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 19/26 |
Cleveland & Rousseau [38] | High | High | High | High | High | High | 24/26 |
Coffey et al. [40] | Low | High | High | High | High | Intermediate | 20/26 |
Cohen [50] | Low | Low | Low | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 7/26 |
Cwikel et al. [37] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 18/26 |
Graf et al. [47] | Low | High | Low | High | High | High | 19/26 |
Green & Eagar [36] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | 22/26 |
Hedrick [49] | Intermediate | High | Low | Intermediate | High | High | 19/26 |
Ichikawa et al. [41] | High | High | High | High | High | Intermediate | 25/26 |
Keller et al. [44] | High | High | High | High | High | High | 23/26 |
Lorek et al. [52] | Intermediate | Low | Low | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 14/26 |
Mares [54] | Low | High | Low | High | High | Intermediate | 16/26 |
Mares & Jureidini [53] | Low | Intermediate | Low | Low | High | Intermediate | 14/26 |
Momartin et al. [51] | High | High | High | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 22/26 |
Puthoopparambil et al. [46] | High | High | High | High | High | High | 24/26 |
Robjant et al. [11] | High | High | High | High | High | High | 25/26 |
Rojas-Flores, L. [57] | High | High | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 18/26 |
Rothe et al. (2002a) | Low | Low | Low | Low | High | Low | 9/26 |
Rothe et al. (2002b) | High | High | Low | Intermediate | High | Low | 15/26 |
Sen et al. [45] | Intermediate | High | Low | High | High | High | 19/26 |
Sobhanian et al. [42] | High | High | Low | Intermediate | High | High | 15/26 |
Steel et al. [23] | Intermediate | Intermediate | Low | High | High | Intermediate | 19/26 |
Steel et al. [43] | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | Intermediate | 23/26 |
Steel et al. [39] | Intermediate | Intermediate | High | High | High | Intermediate | 24/26 |
Young & Gordon [48] | Low | High | Low | Intermediate | High | Intermediate | 17/26 |
Zwi et al. [58] | Intermediate | High | High | Intermediate | High | High | 22/26 |
Search strategy
Data extraction and quality appraisal
Results
Adults
Self-report (see Table 3)
Mental Health Difficulty | Cleveland & Rousseau [38] | Coffey et al. [40] | Cwikel et al. [37] | Ichikawa et al. [41] | Keller et al. [44] | Robjant et al. [11] | Sen et al. [45] | Steel et al. [43] | Steel et al. [39] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Depression | √ | 88% | 79% | √ | 86% | √ | 52.5% | √ | √ |
Anxiety | √ | – | – | √ | 77% | 72% | 12% | √ | √ |
PTSD | √ | 70% | 17% | √ | 50% | 76% | 20.8% | √ | √ |
Specific Phobia | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Psychotic or Depressive Affective Disorder | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10% | – | – |
Personality Disorder | – | – | – | – | – | – | 34.7% | – | – |
Suicidal Ideation | – | – | 47% | – | 26% | – | – | – | – |
Suicide Attempt | – | – | 19% | – | 3% | – | – | – | – |
Somatisation | – | – | 40-60% | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Autism | – | – | – | – | – | – | 15% | – | – |
ADHD | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14% | – | – |
OCD | – | – | – | – | – | – | 9% | – | – |
Clinical assessments
Secondary health data
Comparison studies
Detention duration and release
Gender
Children and families
Steel et al. [23]
Diagnostic Interview
| Mares & Jureidini [53]
Diagnostic Interview
| Lorek et al. [52]
Diagnostic Interviews, Parent-report, Self-report
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Prevalence Rates in Children (N = 20) | Prevalence Rates in Parents (N = 14) | Prevalence Rates in Children (N = 20) | Prevalence Rates in Parents (N = 16) | Prevalence Rates in Children (N = 11) | Prevalence Rates in Parents (N = 9) | |
Mental Health Difficulty | ||||||
Major Depressive Disorder | 95% | 100% | 100% | 87% | 100% | 100% |
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder | 50% | 86% | 100% | 56% | 17% | 55% |
Anxiety Disorder | 50% (separation anxiety) | 100% | 70% | – | 36-100% | 100% |
Sleep Related Difficulties | 65% | – | 100% | – | 91% | – |
Eating Related Difficulties | – | – | – | – | 100% | – |
Oppositional Defiant Disorder / Conduct Problems | 45% | – | 30% | – | 55% | – |
Psychotic Symptoms | – | 14% | – | 25% | – | – |
Suicidal Ideation | + 50% | 93% | – | – | – | 100% |
Self-harm | 25% | 36% | 80% | 31% | – | – |
Somatic Complaints | – | – | 50% | – | 91% | – |
Hyperactive Behaviour | – | – | – | – | 27% | – |
Peer Relationship Problems | – | – | – | – | 64% | – |
Developmental Concerns | ||||||
Enuresis | 50% of children in middle childhood | n.a. | 30% of children aged 6-17 | – | 13% of children aged 1-4 | n.a. |
Encopresis | – | n.a. | – | – | 13% of children aged 1-4 | n.a. |
Food Refusal | – | n.a. | – | – | 38% of children aged 1-4 | n.a. |
Return to Nappies | – | n.a | – | – | 38% of children aged 1-4 | n.a. |
Language Regression | – | n.a. | 50% of children aged under 5 | – | 50% of children aged 1-4 | n.a. |
Attachment Problems | – | n.a. | 30% of children aged under 5 | n.a. | – | n.a. |
Comparison studies
Parental mental health
Detention duration and release
Discussion
Key findings of this review
Key strengths and limitations of this review
What this review adds to existing reviews
Key limitations of the available evidence and their implications for future research
Conclusions and practical recommendations
Acknowledgements
Funding
Availability of data and materials
Authors’ information
-
Clinical: specialist psychological care; medical advisory services and physical rehabilitation therapies
-
Legal protection and medico-legal assessment and documentation
-
Safeguarding and prevention of social deprivation
-
Community integration through life, employment and creative skills