Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 4/2018

19.03.2018

The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Adult Consumer Satisfaction Survey Factor Structure and Relation to External Criteria

verfasst von: Alan Shafer, PhD, Rosemary Ang, MS

Erschienen in: The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The construct validity and generalizability of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) adult consumer satisfaction survey was examined using a representative sample (N = 4242) of public mental health client surveys and assessment data. Factor analysis found five factors generally supporting the hypothesized scales of Satisfaction, Outcomes-Functioning, Access, Quality, and Social Connectedness that had acceptable reliability (average coefficient alpha = 0.91). The relation of the satisfaction survey scales to clinician-rated symptom scales, hospitalization, and functioning for 3 years prior to and after the survey was examined. Correlations were modest in magnitude but were in the predicted directions, with greater patient satisfaction being associated with lower symptoms and more positive outcomes. The largest predictors of the clinician-rated symptom scales were Outcomes-Functioning and Social Connectedness.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat TeagueGB, GanjuV, HornikJA, et al.The MHSIP Mental Health Report Card. A Consumer-Oriented Approach to Monitoring the Quality-Appropriateness of Mental Health Plans. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program. Evaluation Review.1997;21(3):330–341.CrossRef TeagueGB, GanjuV, HornikJA, et al.The MHSIP Mental Health Report Card. A Consumer-Oriented Approach to Monitoring the Quality-Appropriateness of Mental Health Plans. Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program. Evaluation Review.1997;21(3):330–341.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat GanjuV. The MHSIP Consumer Survey: History, Development, Revisions, Applications, and Commonly Asked Questions. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, 1999. GanjuV. The MHSIP Consumer Survey: History, Development, Revisions, Applications, and Commonly Asked Questions. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation, 1999.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat LebowJL. Consumer Satisfaction with Mental Health Treatment. Psychological Bulletin.1982;91(2):244–259.CrossRef LebowJL. Consumer Satisfaction with Mental Health Treatment. Psychological Bulletin.1982;91(2):244–259.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat LebowJL. Research Assessing Consumer Satisfaction with Mental Health Treatment: A Review of Findings. Evaluation and Program Planning.1984;6(3–4):211–236. LebowJL. Research Assessing Consumer Satisfaction with Mental Health Treatment: A Review of Findings. Evaluation and Program Planning.1984;6(3–4):211–236.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat WackwitzJH. Consumer Survey Analysis: Memo to MHSIP Workgroup. Denver, CO: Colorado Mental Health Services, 2000. WackwitzJH. Consumer Survey Analysis: Memo to MHSIP Workgroup. Denver, CO: Colorado Mental Health Services, 2000.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat EisenSV, ShaulJA, LeffHS, et al.Toward a National Consumer Survey: Evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP Instruments. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2001;28(3):347–369.CrossRef EisenSV, ShaulJA, LeffHS, et al.Toward a National Consumer Survey: Evaluation of the CABHS and MHSIP Instruments. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2001;28(3):347–369.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat LuttermanT, PhelanBE, BerhaneA. Development of Mental Health Measure of Social Connectedness. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, 2007. LuttermanT, PhelanBE, BerhaneA. Development of Mental Health Measure of Social Connectedness. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, 2007.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat JerrellJM. Psychometrics of the MHSIP Adult Consumer Survey. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2006;33(4):483–488.CrossRef JerrellJM. Psychometrics of the MHSIP Adult Consumer Survey. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2006;33(4):483–488.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat KaufmannC, PhillipsD. Survey of State Consumer Surveys. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2000. KaufmannC, PhillipsD. Survey of State Consumer Surveys. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2000.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat ShaferA, TempleJ. Factor Structure of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Family and Youth Satisfaction Surveys. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2013;40(3):306–316.CrossRef ShaferA, TempleJ. Factor Structure of the Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Family and Youth Satisfaction Surveys. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research.2013;40(3):306–316.CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat RushAJ, TrivediMH, IbrahimHM, et al.The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR): A Psychometric Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Major Depression. Biological Psychiatry.2003;54(5):573–583.CrossRef RushAJ, TrivediMH, IbrahimHM, et al.The 16-item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) Clinician Rating (QIDS-C) and Self-Report (QIDS-SR): A Psychometric Evaluation in Patients with Chronic Major Depression. Biological Psychiatry.2003;54(5):573–583.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat DennehyEB, SuppesT, CrismonML, et al.Development of the Brief Bipolar Disorder Symptom Scale for Patients with Bipolar Disorder. Psychiatry Research.2004;127(1–2):137–145.CrossRef DennehyEB, SuppesT, CrismonML, et al.Development of the Brief Bipolar Disorder Symptom Scale for Patients with Bipolar Disorder. Psychiatry Research.2004;127(1–2):137–145.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat AlphsL, MorlockR., CoonC, et al.The 4-Item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-4) Instrument: A Simple Tool for Evaluating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Following Brief Training. Psychiatry (Edgmont).2010;7(7):26–32.PubMedPubMedCentral AlphsL, MorlockR., CoonC, et al.The 4-Item Negative Symptom Assessment (NSA-4) Instrument: A Simple Tool for Evaluating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia Following Brief Training. Psychiatry (Edgmont).2010;7(7):26–32.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat OverallJE, GorhamDR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports.1962;10(3):799–812.CrossRef OverallJE, GorhamDR. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports.1962;10(3):799–812.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat ShaferA. Meta-Analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment.2005;17(3):324–335.CrossRef ShaferA. Meta-Analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment.2005;17(3):324–335.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat DazziF, ShaferA, Lauriola, M. Meta-Analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded (BPRS-E) Structure and Arguments for a New Version. Journal of Psychiatric Research.2016;81:140–151.CrossRef DazziF, ShaferA, Lauriola, M. Meta-Analysis of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Expanded (BPRS-E) Structure and Arguments for a New Version. Journal of Psychiatric Research.2016;81:140–151.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Texas Department of State Health Services. User’s Manual for the Adult Texas Recommended Assessment Guidelines (Adult-TRAG).Austin, TX: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division, 2011. Texas Department of State Health Services. User’s Manual for the Adult Texas Recommended Assessment Guidelines (Adult-TRAG).Austin, TX: Mental Health and Substance Abuse Division, 2011.
Metadaten
Titel
The Mental Health Statistics Improvement Program (MHSIP) Adult Consumer Satisfaction Survey Factor Structure and Relation to External Criteria
verfasst von
Alan Shafer, PhD
Rosemary Ang, MS
Publikationsdatum
19.03.2018
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 1094-3412
Elektronische ISSN: 2168-6793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-018-9607-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Demenzkranke durch Antipsychotika vielfach gefährdet

23.04.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Wenn Demenzkranke aufgrund von Symptomen wie Agitation oder Aggressivität mit Antipsychotika behandelt werden, sind damit offenbar noch mehr Risiken verbunden als bislang angenommen.

Weniger postpartale Depressionen nach Esketamin-Einmalgabe

Bislang gibt es kein Medikament zur Prävention von Wochenbettdepressionen. Das Injektionsanästhetikum Esketamin könnte womöglich diese Lücke füllen.

„Psychotherapie ist auch bei sehr alten Menschen hochwirksam!“

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Kombination aus Medikamenten und Psychotherapie gilt als effektivster Ansatz bei Depressionen. Das ist bei betagten Menschen nicht anders, trotz Besonderheiten.

Auf diese Krankheiten bei Geflüchteten sollten Sie vorbereitet sein

22.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Um Menschen nach der Flucht aus einem Krisengebiet bestmöglich medizinisch betreuen zu können, ist es gut zu wissen, welche Erkrankungen im jeweiligen Herkunftsland häufig sind. Dabei hilft eine Internetseite der CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).

Update Psychiatrie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.