Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology 3/2011

01.06.2011 | Topic Paper

The role of ethical publishing in promoting the evidence-based practice of urology

verfasst von: Gavin Sharrock, Chris Graf, John M. Fitzpatrick

Erschienen in: World Journal of Urology | Ausgabe 3/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

An evidence-based approach to the practice of urology relies on the accumulation of a body of evidence from clinical research. Ethical publishing has a major role to play in building confidence in the compiled evidence, which can lead to the development of clinical practice guidelines and new treatment paradigms.

Methods

The literature on the recent developments in ethical publishing was reviewed to highlight how this supported the promotion of the evidence-based practice of urology.

Conclusion

The requirements for complete and transparent reporting of results, the honest and full declaration of conflicts of interest, and the correct assignment of authorship are essential to build up confidence in the evidence-based practice of urology. Increasing the quality of the reporting of trials allows the evidence base to be scrutinized and validated. Reporting the experience and expertise of authors in compiling, analysing and interpreting evidence also helps to develop this trust. A great deal of progress has been made in the recent years, but there is a lot more work to be done.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Claridge JA, Fabian TC (2005) History and development of evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29:547–553PubMedCrossRef Claridge JA, Fabian TC (2005) History and development of evidence-based medicine. World J Surg 29:547–553PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425CrossRef Evidence-based Medicine Working Group (1992) Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 268:2420–2425CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Herr HW (2009) Civiale, stones and statistics: the dawn of evidence-based medicine. BJUI 104:300–302CrossRef Herr HW (2009) Civiale, stones and statistics: the dawn of evidence-based medicine. BJUI 104:300–302CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG (1994) Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA 272:125–128PubMedCrossRef Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Grimes DA, Altman DG (1994) Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA 272:125–128PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ (1987) Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med 317:426–432PubMedCrossRef Pocock SJ, Hughes MD, Lee RJ (1987) Statistical problems in the reporting of clinical trials. A survey of three medical journals. N Engl J Med 317:426–432PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman DG, Doré CJ (1990) Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet 335:149–153PubMedCrossRef Altman DG, Doré CJ (1990) Randomisation and baseline comparisons in clinical trials. Lancet 335:149–153PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Breau RH, Gaboury I, Scales CD Jr, Fesperman SF, Watterson JD, Dahm P (2010) Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literaure. J Urol 183(5):1693–1697PubMedCrossRef Breau RH, Gaboury I, Scales CD Jr, Fesperman SF, Watterson JD, Dahm P (2010) Reporting of harm in randomized controlled trials published in the urological literaure. J Urol 183(5):1693–1697PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tseng TY, Stoffs TL, Dahm P (2010) Evidence-based urology in practice: publication bias. BJUI 106:318–320CrossRef Tseng TY, Stoffs TL, Dahm P (2010) Evidence-based urology in practice: publication bias. BJUI 106:318–320CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: MR000006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000006.pub3 Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 1. Art. No.: MR000006. doi: 10.​1002/​14651858.​MR000006.​pub3
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D et al (2009) Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339:b4330 Graf C, Battisti WP, Bridges D et al (2009) Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339:b4330
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, Robinson A, Rowlands I (2009) Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. J Med Ethics 35:348–353PubMedCrossRef Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, Robinson A, Rowlands I (2009) Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. J Med Ethics 35:348–353PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A (2007) Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 152:1–26PubMed Graf C, Wager E, Bowman A, Fiack S, Scott-Lichter D, Robinson A (2007) Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publisher’s perspective. Int J Clin Pract Suppl 152:1–26PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, on behalf of the CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med 8:18 Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, on behalf of the CONSORT Group (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med 8:18
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P (2007) A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol 177(3):1090–1094 (discussion 1094–1095) Scales CD Jr, Norris RD, Keitz SA, Peterson BL, Preminger GM, Vieweg J, Dahm P (2007) A critical assessment of the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in the urology literature. J Urol 177(3):1090–1094 (discussion 1094–1095)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher R, Ferris L and the WAME Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy Committees (2009) Policy statement: conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals, July 25 2009, http://www.wame.org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010 Fletcher R, Ferris L and the WAME Publication Ethics and Editorial Policy Committees (2009) Policy statement: conflict of interest in peer-reviewed medical journals, July 25 2009, http://​www.​wame.​org. Accessed on 6 Nov 2010
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman LS, Richter ED (2004) Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 19:51–56PubMedCrossRef Friedman LS, Richter ED (2004) Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med 19:51–56PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Blum JA, Freeman K, Dart RC, Cooper RJ (2009) Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals. JAMA 302:2230–2234PubMedCrossRef Blum JA, Freeman K, Dart RC, Cooper RJ (2009) Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals. JAMA 302:2230–2234PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS (2001) Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci Eng Ethics 7:205–218PubMedCrossRef Krimsky S, Rothenberg LS (2001) Conflict of interest policies in science and medical journals: editorial practices and author disclosures. Sci Eng Ethics 7:205–218PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Drazen JM, Van Der Weyden MB, Sahni P et al (2009) Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals [published online ahead of print October 13, 2009]. JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1542 Drazen JM, Van Der Weyden MB, Sahni P et al (2009) Uniform format for disclosure of competing interests in ICMJE journals [published online ahead of print October 13, 2009]. JAMA doi: 10.​1001/​jama.​2009.​1542
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Tramèer MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ 315:635–640 Tramèer MR, Reynolds DJM, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. BMJ 315:635–640
Metadaten
Titel
The role of ethical publishing in promoting the evidence-based practice of urology
verfasst von
Gavin Sharrock
Chris Graf
John M. Fitzpatrick
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
World Journal of Urology / Ausgabe 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0661-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2011

World Journal of Urology 3/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Patrone im Penis bringt Urologen in Gefahr

30.05.2024 Operationen am Penis Nachrichten

In Lebensgefahr brachte ein junger Mann nicht nur sich selbst, sondern auch das urologische Team, das ihm zu Hilfe kam: Er hatte sich zur Selbstbefriedigung eine scharfe Patrone in die Harnröhre gesteckt.

15% bedauern gewählte Blasenkrebs-Therapie

29.05.2024 Urothelkarzinom Nachrichten

Ob Patienten und Patientinnen mit neu diagnostiziertem Blasenkrebs ein Jahr später Bedauern über die Therapieentscheidung empfinden, wird einer Studie aus England zufolge von der Radikalität und dem Erfolg des Eingriffs beeinflusst.

Costims – das nächste heiße Ding in der Krebstherapie?

28.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

„Kalte“ Tumoren werden heiß – CD28-kostimulatorische Antikörper sollen dies ermöglichen. Am besten könnten diese in Kombination mit BiTEs und Checkpointhemmern wirken. Erste klinische Studien laufen bereits.

Fehlerkultur in der Medizin – Offenheit zählt!

28.05.2024 Fehlerkultur Podcast

Darüber reden und aus Fehlern lernen, sollte das Motto in der Medizin lauten. Und zwar nicht nur im Sinne der Patientensicherheit. Eine negative Fehlerkultur kann auch die Behandelnden ernsthaft krank machen, warnt Prof. Dr. Reinhard Strametz. Ein Plädoyer und ein Leitfaden für den offenen Umgang mit kritischen Ereignissen in Medizin und Pflege.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.