Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2017

09.08.2016

The role of preoperative graded compression ultrasound in detecting acute appendicitis and influencing the negative appendectomy rate

verfasst von: Bader Hamza Shirah, Hamza Asaad Shirah, Wael Awad Alhaidari, Mohamed Ali Elraghi, Mohammad Azam Chughtai

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The diagnosis of acute appendicitis is mainly clinical and is correct in about 80% of patients, but 20–33% present with atypical findings, which resulted in a negative appendectomy rate of 20–30%. The graded compression ultrasound method in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was reported with a sensitivity of 89%, and specificity of 95%. In this study, we aim to evaluate the graded compression ultrasonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, its influence on the clinical judgment to operate, and its role in lowering the negative appendectomy rate.

Methods

1073 patients treated surgically for acute appendicitis between January 2005 and December 2014 were reviewed. Ultrasound findings, histopathological diagnosis, and positive or negative appendectomy rates were analyzed.

Results

647 (60.3%) patients were males and 426 (39.7%) females. The mean age was 26.5 years. Positive ultrasound findings were recorded in 892 (83.13%), while negative findings were recorded in 181 (16.87%). Positive appendectomy was recorded in 983 (91.6%), while negative appendectomy was recorded in 90 (8.4%). The sensitivity was 83%, specificity was 100%, and the rate of negative appendectomy was 8.39%.

Conclusion

Graded compression technique of ultrasound is a useful modality, in addition to the clinical judgment of the surgeon and clinical findings, in detecting true positive cases of acute appendicitis, and thus reducing the negative appendectomy rate. Values of 100% specificity, and 8.4% negative appendectomy rate, or better, could be achieved, when an experienced surgeon and a professional radiologist collaborate in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirah BH, Shirah HA (2016) Wound infection in non-perforated acute appendicitis- single dose preoperative antibiotics vs. prophylactic postoperative antibiotics: does it make any difference? Int J Res Med Sci 4(1):225–230CrossRef Shirah BH, Shirah HA (2016) Wound infection in non-perforated acute appendicitis- single dose preoperative antibiotics vs. prophylactic postoperative antibiotics: does it make any difference? Int J Res Med Sci 4(1):225–230CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shelton T, Mckinlay R, Schwartz RW (2003) Acute appendicitis: current diagnosis and treatment. Curr Surg 60(5):502–505CrossRefPubMed Shelton T, Mckinlay R, Schwartz RW (2003) Acute appendicitis: current diagnosis and treatment. Curr Surg 60(5):502–505CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Topin F, Thierry AL, Catrevaux O, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for acute appendicitis in a remote location. J Emerg Med 50(6):859–867CrossRefPubMed Topin F, Thierry AL, Catrevaux O, et al. (2016) Diagnostic accuracy of emergency physician-performed ultrasound for acute appendicitis in a remote location. J Emerg Med 50(6):859–867CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirah BH, Shirah HA, Alhaidari WA (2016) Perforated appendix—delay in presentation rather than delay in the surgical intervention: retrospective database analysis of 2573 saudi arabian patients in 10 years. Int J Sci Stud 4(1):32–36 Shirah BH, Shirah HA, Alhaidari WA (2016) Perforated appendix—delay in presentation rather than delay in the surgical intervention: retrospective database analysis of 2573 saudi arabian patients in 10 years. Int J Sci Stud 4(1):32–36
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Power D (2015) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Practitioner 259(1787):33PubMed Power D (2015) Pitfalls in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Practitioner 259(1787):33PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158(2):355–360CrossRefPubMed Puylaert JB (1986) Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology 158(2):355–360CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chesbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, Goff WB, Davis DJ (1993) Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression. Radiology 187(2):349–351CrossRefPubMed Chesbrough RM, Burkhard TK, Balsara ZN, Goff WB, Davis DJ (1993) Self-localization in US of appendicitis: an addition to graded compression. Radiology 187(2):349–351CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, et al. (1996) Appendicitis: usefulness of color Doppler US. Radiology 201(1):221–225CrossRefPubMed Lim HK, Lee WJ, Kim TH, et al. (1996) Appendicitis: usefulness of color Doppler US. Radiology 201(1):221–225CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis RF (1987) Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology 163:11–14CrossRefPubMed Jeffrey RB, Laing FC, Lewis RF (1987) Acute appendicitis: high-resolution real-time US findings. Radiology 163:11–14CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, et al. (2015) Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg 152(6 Suppl):S105–S115CrossRefPubMed Bouyou J, Gaujoux S, Marcellin L, et al. (2015) Abdominal emergencies during pregnancy. J Visc Surg 152(6 Suppl):S105–S115CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramalingam V, Lebedis C, Kelly JR, et al. (2015) Evaluation of a sequential multi-modality imaging algorithm for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pregnant female. Emerg Radiol 22(2):125–132CrossRefPubMed Ramalingam V, Lebedis C, Kelly JR, et al. (2015) Evaluation of a sequential multi-modality imaging algorithm for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the pregnant female. Emerg Radiol 22(2):125–132CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Khairy G (2009) Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate? Saudi J Gastroenterol 15(3):167–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khairy G (2009) Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate? Saudi J Gastroenterol 15(3):167–170CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Althoubaity FK (2006) Suspected acute appendicitis in female patients trends in diagnosis in emergency department in a university hospital in Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 27:1667–1673PubMed Althoubaity FK (2006) Suspected acute appendicitis in female patients trends in diagnosis in emergency department in a university hospital in Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 27:1667–1673PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB (1993) Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch Surg 128(9):1039–1044CrossRefPubMed Wade DS, Marrow SE, Balsara ZN, Burkhard TK, Goff WB (1993) Accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with the surgeon’s clinical impression. Arch Surg 128(9):1039–1044CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N, Hedayat A (2012) Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 5(1):26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nasiri S, Mohebbi F, Sodagari N, Hedayat A (2012) Diagnostic values of ultrasound and the modified alvarado scoring system in acute appendicitis. Int J Emerg Med 5(1):26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC, Ham SY, Yang SO (2002) Graded compression sonography with adjuant use of posterior compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(4):863–868CrossRefPubMed Lee JH, Jeong YK, Hwang JC, Ham SY, Yang SO (2002) Graded compression sonography with adjuant use of posterior compression technique in the sonographic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178(4):863–868CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Puig S, Hörmann M, Rebhandl W, et al. (2003) US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 226(1):101–104CrossRefPubMed Puig S, Hörmann M, Rebhandl W, et al. (2003) US as a primary diagnostic tool in relation to negative appendectomy: six years experience. Radiology 226(1):101–104CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Myers E, Kavanagh DO, Ghous H, Evoy D, McDermott EW (2010) The impact of evolving management strategies on negative appendicectomy rate. Colorectal Dis 12(8):817–821CrossRefPubMed Myers E, Kavanagh DO, Ghous H, Evoy D, McDermott EW (2010) The impact of evolving management strategies on negative appendicectomy rate. Colorectal Dis 12(8):817–821CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, et al. (2013) Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg 79(1):101–106PubMed Park JS, Jeong JH, Lee JI, et al. (2013) Accuracies of diagnostic methods for acute appendicitis. Am Surg 79(1):101–106PubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Corso F (1994) Laparoscopic appendectomy. Int Surg 79:247–250PubMed Corso F (1994) Laparoscopic appendectomy. Int Surg 79:247–250PubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunewald B, Keating J (1993) Should the ‘normal’ appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis? J R Coll Surg Edinb 38(3):158–160PubMed Grunewald B, Keating J (1993) Should the ‘normal’ appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis? J R Coll Surg Edinb 38(3):158–160PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandrasegaram MD, Rothwell LA, An EI, Miller RJ (2012) Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens. ANZ J Surg 82(11):844–847CrossRefPubMed Chandrasegaram MD, Rothwell LA, An EI, Miller RJ (2012) Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens. ANZ J Surg 82(11):844–847CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox TC, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, et al. (2016) Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients. Surg Endosc 30(2):593–602CrossRefPubMed Cox TC, Huntington CR, Blair LJ, et al. (2016) Laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy versus open: a study in 1999 pregnant patients. Surg Endosc 30(2):593–602CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Shirah BH, Shirah HA, Alhaidari WA, Abdulbagi OE (2016) Challenges in the management of subhepatic acute appendicitis in the emergency setting. Int J Cur Res Rev 8(6):47–52 Shirah BH, Shirah HA, Alhaidari WA, Abdulbagi OE (2016) Challenges in the management of subhepatic acute appendicitis in the emergency setting. Int J Cur Res Rev 8(6):47–52
Metadaten
Titel
The role of preoperative graded compression ultrasound in detecting acute appendicitis and influencing the negative appendectomy rate
verfasst von
Bader Hamza Shirah
Hamza Asaad Shirah
Wael Awad Alhaidari
Mohamed Ali Elraghi
Mohammad Azam Chughtai
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0862-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Abdominal Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Porcelain gallbladder

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “ivory vertebra” sign

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.