Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 9/2019

13.06.2019 | Hollow Organ GI

The yield and patient factors associated with CT colonography C-RADS results in a non-screening patient population

verfasst von: Mahsa Kamali, Amy Brake, Marcel Pothier, Mohamed Abdolell, Andreu F. Costa

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the proportion of diagnostic computed tomography colonography (CTC) Reporting and Data System (C-RADS) categories in a non-screening population, and which patient factors are associated with a positive CTC (C2–4), a non-diagnostic CTC (C0), and potentially relevant extracolonic findings (ECF, E3–4).

Methods

Diagnostic CTCs performed at a single academic center from 2017 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. For each examination, the indications, age, sex, admission status, and C-RADS categories were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression was performed of patient demographic factors and clinical indications, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals.

Results

1373 CTCs were included. The mean age was 66.4 ± 13 years (range 24–97). There were 782 women and 75 inpatients. The number of CTCs reported as C0–C4 were 194/1373 (14.1%), 970/1373 (70.6%), 77/1373 (5.6%), 86/1373 (6.3%), and 46/1373 (3.4%), respectively, and 134/1373 (9.8%), 960/1373 (69.9%), 173/1373 (12.6%), and 106/1373 (7.7%) CTCs were reported as E1–4, respectively. Factors that demonstrated the strongest associations were as follows: with C2–4, age groups 50–79 (OR 2.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4–6.1), 80–89 (6.2, 2.9–14.5) and ≥ 90 (7.6, 2.0–29.1), and inpatients (3.4, 1.8–6.4); with C0, age groups 50–79 (5.9, 2.2–24.4), 80–89 (9.8, 3.4–41.8), and ≥ 90 (22.5, 5.8–113.0), incomplete colonoscopy (3.2, 2.0–5.1) and melena or gastrointestinal bleeding (4.1, 1.8–9.4); and with E3–4, age groups 50–79 (1.6, 1.0–2.9), 80–89 (2.0, 1.1–3.9), and ≥ 90 (3.2, 1.2–8.8), and inpatients (2.3, 1.3–3.9).

Conclusion

Older age is increasingly associated with a positive test, a non-diagnostic test and potentially relevant ECF. Inpatients are also associated with positive tests and E3–4 findings. Symptoms are not strongly associated with a positive CTC.
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N, Syed AM, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2009) Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 11 (2):138-145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01554.x CrossRef White TJ, Avery GR, Kennan N, Syed AM, Hartley JE, Monson JR (2009) Virtual colonoscopy vs conventional colonoscopy in patients at high risk of colorectal cancer--a prospective trial of 150 patients. Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland 11 (2):138-145. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​j.​1463-1318.​2008.​01554.​x CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R, Yao G, Kay C, Burling D, Faiz O, Teare J, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J, Halligan S, investigators S (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381 (9873):1194-1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62186-2 CrossRefPubMed Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Edwards R, Yao G, Kay C, Burling D, Faiz O, Teare J, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J, Halligan S, investigators S (2013) Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 381 (9873):1194-1202. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S0140-6736(12)62186-2 CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, Mayo-Smith WW, Megibow AJ, Yee J, Brink JA, Baker ME, Federle MP, Foley WD, Francis IR, Herts BR, Israel GM, Krinsky G, Platt JF, Shuman WP, Taylor AJ (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 7 (10):754-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013 CrossRefPubMed Berland LL, Silverman SG, Gore RM, Mayo-Smith WW, Megibow AJ, Yee J, Brink JA, Baker ME, Federle MP, Foley WD, Francis IR, Herts BR, Israel GM, Krinsky G, Platt JF, Shuman WP, Taylor AJ (2010) Managing incidental findings on abdominal CT: white paper of the ACR incidental findings committee. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR 7 (10):754-773. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jacr.​2010.​06.​013 CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, Shah U, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Faiz O, Teare J, Edwards R, Kay C, Yao G, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J, Atkin W, Investigators S (2015) Identification of Extracolonic Pathologies by Computed Tomographic Colonography in Colorectal Cancer Symptomatic Patients. Gastroenterology 149 (1):89-101 e105. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.011 Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, Shah U, Kralj-Hans I, von Wagner C, Faiz O, Teare J, Edwards R, Kay C, Yao G, Lilford RJ, Morton D, Wardle J, Atkin W, Investigators S (2015) Identification of Extracolonic Pathologies by Computed Tomographic Colonography in Colorectal Cancer Symptomatic Patients. Gastroenterology 149 (1):89-101 e105. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1053/​j.​gastro.​2015.​03.​011
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML, Ransohoff DF (2009) Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 150 (12):849-857, W152CrossRefPubMed Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, Meekins A, Topor M, Brown ML, Ransohoff DF (2009) Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med 150 (12):849-857, W152CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D, Gluck M, Ross A, Chiorean M, Koch J, Lin OS (2016) Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 14 (1):80-86 e81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.036 Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D, Gluck M, Ross A, Chiorean M, Koch J, Lin OS (2016) Risks and Benefits of Colonoscopy in Patients 90 Years or Older, Compared With Younger Patients. Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 14 (1):80-86 e81. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​cgh.​2015.​06.​036
Metadaten
Titel
The yield and patient factors associated with CT colonography C-RADS results in a non-screening patient population
verfasst von
Mahsa Kamali
Amy Brake
Marcel Pothier
Mohamed Abdolell
Andreu F. Costa
Publikationsdatum
13.06.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02099-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Abdominal Radiology 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Letter to the editor

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.