Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2019

14.02.2019 | Original Article

Triple-S Lift for Facial Rejuvenation

verfasst von: Igor Belyi, Oleg Tymofii, Mikhail Barannik

Erschienen in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Since the beginning of the last century, when the aesthetic rejuvenating surgery was first described, there have been great changes in tactics and methods for solving the problems of age-related facial changes. Since the first description of the superficial muscular aponeurotic system (SMAS), there have been two main approaches to influencing this structure. These are various types of SMAS plications and different in-depth and technique sub-SMAS liftings. Each of these approaches has its advantages and disadvantages.

Methods

We have developed and applied a face-lift technique that combines the advantages of both approaches. We call it the triple-S lift, which is based on three basic principles:
1.
A short scar technique;
 
2.
The safety SMAS (limited sub-SMAS dissection to anterior border of the masseter muscle);
 
3.
The support system (a complex of ligatures in the sub-SMAS layer, which allows lifting and plication of the medial part of the SMAS simultaneously)
 
According to this method, there were 93 operations performed on 8 men and 85 women aged 38 to 72 years.

Results

The first clinical applications produced good results. The patients noted a high degree of satisfaction, and the level of complications was quite low. Since the technique has been performed for a short period of time, we demonstrate results of the 2-year period.

Conclusion

The described technique requires further study, but the first results suggest that this type of a surgical intervention is safe, easy to execute, and may be an option to choose for surgical correction of facial aging changes.

Level of Evidence IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.​springer.​com/​00266.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassus C (1997) Cervicofacial rhytidectomy: the superficial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 21:25–31CrossRef Lassus C (1997) Cervicofacial rhytidectomy: the superficial plane. Aesth Plast Surg 21:25–31CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Min-Hee Ryu, Moon VA, Yin W (2018) The inclusion of orbicularis oculi muscle in the SMAS flap in Asian facelift: anatomical consideration of orbicularis muscle and zygomaticus major muscle. Aesth Plast Surg 42:471–478CrossRef Min-Hee Ryu, Moon VA, Yin W (2018) The inclusion of orbicularis oculi muscle in the SMAS flap in Asian facelift: anatomical consideration of orbicularis muscle and zygomaticus major muscle. Aesth Plast Surg 42:471–478CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gosain AK, Amarante MT, Hyde JS, Yousif NJ (1996) A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implications for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:622–636CrossRefPubMed Gosain AK, Amarante MT, Hyde JS, Yousif NJ (1996) A dynamic analysis of changes in the nasolabial fold using magnetic resonance imaging: implications for facial rejuvenation and facial animation surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:622–636CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamra ST (2000) Prevention and correction of the “facelifted” appearance. Facial Plast Surg 16:215–229CrossRefPubMed Hamra ST (2000) Prevention and correction of the “facelifted” appearance. Facial Plast Surg 16:215–229CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamra ST (1990) The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 861:53–616CrossRef Hamra ST (1990) The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 861:53–616CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hamra ST (2001) Correcting the unfavorable outcomes following face-lift surgery. Clin Plast Surg 28:621–638PubMed Hamra ST (2001) Correcting the unfavorable outcomes following face-lift surgery. Clin Plast Surg 28:621–638PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Mendelson BC (2009) Facelift anatomy, SMAS, retaining ligaments, and facial spaces. In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech DS, Walden JL (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery. Elsevier, London, pp 53–72 Mendelson BC (2009) Facelift anatomy, SMAS, retaining ligaments, and facial spaces. In: Aston SJ, Steinbrech DS, Walden JL (eds) Aesthetic plastic surgery. Elsevier, London, pp 53–72
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Owsley JQ (1993) Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:463–474 (discussion 475–466) CrossRefPubMed Owsley JQ (1993) Lifting the malar fat pad for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:463–474 (discussion 475–466) CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Owsley JQ (1995) Elevation of the malar fat pad superficial to the orbicularis oculi muscle for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Clin Plast Surg 22:279–293PubMed Owsley JQ (1995) Elevation of the malar fat pad superficial to the orbicularis oculi muscle for correction of prominent nasolabial folds. Clin Plast Surg 22:279–293PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Owsley JQ, Zweifler M (2002) Midface lift of the malar fat pad: technical advances. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):674–685 (discussion 686–687) CrossRefPubMed Owsley JQ, Zweifler M (2002) Midface lift of the malar fat pad: technical advances. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):674–685 (discussion 686–687) CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Panfilov DE (2003) MIDI face-lift and tricuspidal SMAS-flap. Aesth Plast Surg 27:27–37CrossRef Panfilov DE (2003) MIDI face-lift and tricuspidal SMAS-flap. Aesth Plast Surg 27:27–37CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S, Castillo P, Leniz P (2006) A clinical retrospective study comparing two short-scar face lifts: minimal access cranial suspension versus lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1413–1425 (discussion 1426–1427) CrossRefPubMed Prado A, Andrades P, Danilla S, Castillo P, Leniz P (2006) A clinical retrospective study comparing two short-scar face lifts: minimal access cranial suspension versus lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:1413–1425 (discussion 1426–1427) CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Robbins LB, Brothers DB, Marshall DM (1995) Anterior SMAS application for the treatment of prominent nasomandibular folds and restoration of normal cheek contour. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1279–1287CrossRefPubMed Robbins LB, Brothers DB, Marshall DM (1995) Anterior SMAS application for the treatment of prominent nasomandibular folds and restoration of normal cheek contour. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1279–1287CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Sundine MJ, Kretsis V, Connell BF (2010) Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:229–237PubMed Sundine MJ, Kretsis V, Connell BF (2010) Longevity of SMAS facial rejuvenation and support. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:229–237PubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM (1995) Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 22:295–311PubMed Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM (1995) Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 22:295–311PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, Hamdi M, Matton GA (2002) Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1096:2074–2086CrossRef Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S, Van Landuyt K, Blondeel P, Hamdi M, Matton GA (2002) Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1096:2074–2086CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Yousif N, Gosain A, Matloub H et al (1994) The nasolabial fold: an anatomic and histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:60CrossRefPubMed Yousif N, Gosain A, Matloub H et al (1994) The nasolabial fold: an anatomic and histologic reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 93:60CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Yousif N, Mendelson BC (1995) Anatomy of the midface. Clin Plast Surg 22:227–240PubMed Yousif N, Mendelson BC (1995) Anatomy of the midface. Clin Plast Surg 22:227–240PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Basile FV, Basile AR, Basile VV (2012) Triple-anchoring sub-SMAS face-lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:526–533CrossRef Basile FV, Basile AR, Basile VV (2012) Triple-anchoring sub-SMAS face-lift. Aesthet Plast Surg 36:526–533CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Connell BF, Semlacher RA (1997) Contemporary deep layer facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1513CrossRefPubMed Connell BF, Semlacher RA (1997) Contemporary deep layer facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1513CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyuron B (2005) Modified temporal incision for facial rhytidectomy: an 18-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:609CrossRefPubMed Guyuron B (2005) Modified temporal incision for facial rhytidectomy: an 18-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:609CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitz V, Peyronie M (1976) The superficial aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:80–88CrossRefPubMed Mitz V, Peyronie M (1976) The superficial aponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast Reconstr Surg 58:80–88CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry MG, Daivies D (2010) Platysma-SMAS placation facelift. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(5):793–800CrossRefPubMed Berry MG, Daivies D (2010) Platysma-SMAS placation facelift. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(5):793–800CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Choucair RJ, Hamra ST (2008) Extended superficial musculo-aponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 35(4):607–622CrossRefPubMed Choucair RJ, Hamra ST (2008) Extended superficial musculo-aponeurotic system dissection and composite rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 35(4):607–622CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacono AA, Parikh SS (2011) The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 318:874–890CrossRef Jacono AA, Parikh SS (2011) The minimal access deep plane extended vertical facelift. Aesthet Surg J 318:874–890CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Marten TJ (2008) High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 35:569–603CrossRefPubMed Marten TJ (2008) High SMAS facelift: combined single flap lifting of the jawline, cheek, and midface. Clin Plast Surg 35:569–603CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang S, Pusic A, Rohrich RJ (2011) A systematic review of comparison of efficacy and complication rates among face-lift techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):423–433CrossRefPubMed Chang S, Pusic A, Rohrich RJ (2011) A systematic review of comparison of efficacy and complication rates among face-lift techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(1):423–433CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M (2000) National plastic surgery survey: facelift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1185–1195 (discussion 1196) CrossRefPubMed Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M (2000) National plastic surgery survey: facelift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1185–1195 (discussion 1196) CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Abboushi N, Yezhelyev M, Symbas J, Nahai F (2012) Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center’s experience. Aesthet Surg J 32:413–420CrossRefPubMed Abboushi N, Yezhelyev M, Symbas J, Nahai F (2012) Facelift complications and the risk of venous thromboembolism: a single center’s experience. Aesthet Surg J 32:413–420CrossRefPubMed
34.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N (2001) The prevention of hematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg 54:481–486CrossRefPubMed Grover R, Jones BM, Waterhouse N (2001) The prevention of hematoma following rhytidectomy: a review of 1078 consecutive facelifts. Br J Plast Surg 54:481–486CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Rammos CK, Mohan AT, Maricevich MA et al (2015) Is the SMAS flap facelift safe? A comparison of complications between the sub-SMAS approach versus the subcutaneous approach with or without SMAS plication in aesthetic rhytidectomy at an academic institution. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(6):870–876CrossRef Rammos CK, Mohan AT, Maricevich MA et al (2015) Is the SMAS flap facelift safe? A comparison of complications between the sub-SMAS approach versus the subcutaneous approach with or without SMAS plication in aesthetic rhytidectomy at an academic institution. Aesthet Plast Surg 39(6):870–876CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Baker DC (2001) Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face-lift) with lateral SMASectomy. Aesthet Surg J 21:68–79CrossRefPubMed Baker DC (2001) Minimal incision rhytidectomy (short scar face-lift) with lateral SMASectomy. Aesthet Surg J 21:68–79CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Labbe´ D, Franco RG, Nicolas J (2006) Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2001–2007CrossRefPubMed Labbe´ D, Franco RG, Nicolas J (2006) Platysma suspension and platysmaplasty during neck lift: anatomical study and analysis of 30 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:2001–2007CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamson PA, Dahiya R, Litner J (2007) Midface effects of the deep-plane vs. the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Arch Fac Plast Surg 9(1):9–11 Adamson PA, Dahiya R, Litner J (2007) Midface effects of the deep-plane vs. the superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift. Arch Fac Plast Surg 9(1):9–11
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Becker FF, Bassichis BA (2004) Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed Becker FF, Bassichis BA (2004) Deep-plane face-lift vs superficial musculoaponeurotic system plication face-lift: a comparative study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 6(1):8–13CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jacono AA, Stong BC (2010) Anatomic comparison of the deep plane face-lift and the transtemporal midface-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12(5):339–341CrossRefPubMed Jacono AA, Stong BC (2010) Anatomic comparison of the deep plane face-lift and the transtemporal midface-lift. Arch Facial Plast Surg 12(5):339–341CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller AJ, Graham HD 3rd (1997) Comparison of conventional and deep plane facelift. J La State Med Soc 149(11):406–411PubMed Miller AJ, Graham HD 3rd (1997) Comparison of conventional and deep plane facelift. J La State Med Soc 149(11):406–411PubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Noon BR (2006) Suture suspension malarplasty with SMAS plication and modified SMASectomy: a simplified approach to midface lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:792CrossRef Noon BR (2006) Suture suspension malarplasty with SMAS plication and modified SMASectomy: a simplified approach to midface lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:792CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Triple-S Lift for Facial Rejuvenation
verfasst von
Igor Belyi
Oleg Tymofii
Mikhail Barannik
Publikationsdatum
14.02.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-019-01319-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Wie erfolgreich ist eine Re-Ablation nach Rezidiv?

23.04.2024 Ablationstherapie Nachrichten

Nach der Katheterablation von Vorhofflimmern kommt es bei etwa einem Drittel der Patienten zu Rezidiven, meist binnen eines Jahres. Wie sich spätere Rückfälle auf die Erfolgschancen einer erneuten Ablation auswirken, haben Schweizer Kardiologen erforscht.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Mehr Schaden als Nutzen durch präoperatives Aussetzen von GLP-1-Agonisten?

23.04.2024 Operationsvorbereitung Nachrichten

Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.

Ureterstriktur: Innovative OP-Technik bewährt sich

19.04.2024 EAU 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Ureterstriktur ist eine relativ seltene Komplikation, trotzdem bedarf sie einer differenzierten Versorgung. In komplexen Fällen wird dies durch die roboterassistierte OP-Technik gewährleistet. Erste Resultate ermutigen.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.