Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020

05.08.2019 | Original Article

Use of Machine Learning for Prediction of Patient Risk of Postoperative Complications After Liver, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Surgery

verfasst von: Katiuscha Merath, J. Madison Hyer, Rittal Mehta, Ayesha Farooq, Fabio Bagante, Kota Sahara, Diamantis I. Tsilimigras, Eliza Beal, Anghela Z. Paredes, Lu Wu, Aslam Ejaz, Timothy M. Pawlik

Erschienen in: Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery | Ausgabe 8/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment for patients with colorectal, liver, and pancreatic cancers. Although these procedures are performed with low mortality, rates of complications remain relatively high following hepatopancreatic and colorectal surgery.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was utilized to identify patients undergoing liver, pancreatic and colorectal surgery from 2014 to 2016. Decision tree models were utilized to predict the occurrence of any complication, as well as specific complications. To assess the variability of the performance of the classification trees, bootstrapping was performed on 50% of the sample.

Results

Algorithms were derived from a total of 15,657 patients who met inclusion criteria. The algorithm had a good predictive ability for the occurrence of any complication, with a C-statistic of 0.74, outperforming the ASA (C-statistic 0.58) and ACS-Surgical Risk Calculator (C-statistic 0.71). The algorithm was able to predict with high accuracy thirteen out of the seventeen complications analyzed. The best performance was in the prediction of stroke (C-statistic 0.98), followed by wound dehiscence, cardiac arrest, and progressive renal failure (all C-statistic 0.96). The algorithm had a good predictive ability for superficial SSI (C-statistic 0.76), organ space SSI (C-statistic 0.76), sepsis (C-statistic 0.79), and bleeding requiring transfusion (C-statistic 0.79).

Conclusion

Machine learning was used to develop an algorithm that accurately predicted patient risk of developing complications following liver, pancreatic, or colorectal surgery. The algorithm had very good predictive ability to predict specific complications and demonstrated superiority over other established methods.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):1029–34.PubMedCrossRef Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):1029–34.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kohlnhofer BM, Tevis SE, Weber SM, Kennedy GD. Multiple complications and short length of stay are associated with postoperative readmissions. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):449–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kohlnhofer BM, Tevis SE, Weber SM, Kennedy GD. Multiple complications and short length of stay are associated with postoperative readmissions. Am J Surg. 2014;207(4):449–56.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mavros MN, de Jong M, Dogeas E, Hyder O, Pawlik TM. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100(5):711–8.PubMedCrossRef Mavros MN, de Jong M, Dogeas E, Hyder O, Pawlik TM. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2013;100(5):711–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):823–30.PubMedCrossRef Healy MA, Mullard AJ, Campbell DA, Dimick JB. Hospital and payer costs associated with surgical complications. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(9):823–30.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Trudeau ME, Chen W, Zhang X, Kelz RR, et al. Changes in prognosis after the first postoperative complication. Med Care. 2005;43(2):122–31.PubMedCrossRef Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Trudeau ME, Chen W, Zhang X, Kelz RR, et al. Changes in prognosis after the first postoperative complication. Med Care. 2005;43(2):122–31.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Lamelas J, et al. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121(16):2730–9.PubMedCrossRef Spolverato G, Yakoob MY, Kim Y, Alexandrescu S, Marques HP, Lamelas J, et al. Impact of complications on long-term survival after resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer. 2015;121(16):2730–9.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dorcaratto D, Mazzinari G, Fernandez M, Muñoz E, Garcés-Albir M, Ortega J, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019; Dorcaratto D, Mazzinari G, Fernandez M, Muñoz E, Garcés-Albir M, Ortega J, et al. Impact of postoperative complications on survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019;
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, Akgul O, Idrees JJ, Dillhoff M, et al. Synergistic effects of perioperative complications on 30-day mortality following hepatopancreatic surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2018;22(10):1715–23.PubMedCrossRef Merath K, Chen Q, Bagante F, Akgul O, Idrees JJ, Dillhoff M, et al. Synergistic effects of perioperative complications on 30-day mortality following hepatopancreatic surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2018;22(10):1715–23.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ejaz A, Kim Y, Spolverato G, Taylor R, Hundt J, Pawlik TM. Understanding drivers of hospital charge variation for episodes of care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(11):955–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ejaz A, Kim Y, Spolverato G, Taylor R, Hundt J, Pawlik TM. Understanding drivers of hospital charge variation for episodes of care among patients undergoing hepatopancreatobiliary surgery. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(11):955–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in Medicare expenditures for treating perioperative complications: the cost of rescue. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):e163340.PubMedCrossRef Pradarelli JC, Healy MA, Osborne NH, Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB, Nathan H. Variation in Medicare expenditures for treating perioperative complications: the cost of rescue. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):e163340.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355–60.PubMedCrossRef Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355–60.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):201–8.PubMedCrossRef Gawande AA, Kwaan MR, Regenbogen SE, Lipsitz SA, Zinner MJ. An Apgar score for surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):201–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–842.e1-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, et al. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(5):833–842.e1-3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal EW, Saunders ND, Kearney JF, Lyon E, Wei L, Squires MH, et al. Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP online risk calculator depends on how you look at it: results from the United States Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Am Surg. 2018;84(3):358–64.PubMed Beal EW, Saunders ND, Kearney JF, Lyon E, Wei L, Squires MH, et al. Accuracy of the ACS NSQIP online risk calculator depends on how you look at it: results from the United States Gastric Cancer Collaborative. Am Surg. 2018;84(3):358–64.PubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gleeson EM, Shaikh MF, Shewokis PA, Clarke JR, Meyers WC, Pitt HA, et al. WHipple-ABACUS, a simple, validated risk score for 30-day mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy developed using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surgery. 11;160(5):1279–87. Gleeson EM, Shaikh MF, Shewokis PA, Clarke JR, Meyers WC, Pitt HA, et al. WHipple-ABACUS, a simple, validated risk score for 30-day mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy developed using the ACS-NSQIP database. Surgery. 11;160(5):1279–87.
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Beal EW, Lyon E, Kearney J, Wei L, Ethun CG, Black SM, et al. Evaluating the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement project risk calculator: results from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(12):1104–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Beal EW, Lyon E, Kearney J, Wei L, Ethun CG, Black SM, et al. Evaluating the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement project risk calculator: results from the U.S. Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancy Consortium. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(12):1104–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Annals of Surgery. 2018;268(4):574–83.PubMedCrossRef Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) Calculator. Annals of Surgery. 2018;268(4):574–83.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlos RC, Kahn CE, Halabi S. Data science: big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3 Pt B):497–8.PubMedCrossRef Carlos RC, Kahn CE, Halabi S. Data science: big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(3 Pt B):497–8.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Linden A, Yarnold PR. Modeling time-to-event (survival) data using classification tree analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(6):1299–308.PubMedCrossRef Linden A, Yarnold PR. Modeling time-to-event (survival) data using classification tree analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2017;23(6):1299–308.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Hu Y-J, Ku T-H, Jan R-H, Wang K, Tseng Y-C, Yang S-F. Decision tree-based learning to predict patient controlled analgesia consumption and readjustment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:131.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hu Y-J, Ku T-H, Jan R-H, Wang K, Tseng Y-C, Yang S-F. Decision tree-based learning to predict patient controlled analgesia consumption and readjustment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:131.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.PubMed Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.PubMed Hall BL, Hamilton BH, Richards K, Bilimoria KY, Cohen ME, Ko CY. Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals. Ann Surg. 2009;250(3):363–76.PubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fink AS, Campbell DA, Mentzer RM, Henderson WG, Daley J, Bannister J, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236(3):344–53; discussion 353–354. Fink AS, Campbell DA, Mentzer RM, Henderson WG, Daley J, Bannister J, et al. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in non-veterans administration hospitals: initial demonstration of feasibility. Ann Surg. 2002;236(3):344–53; discussion 353–354.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. 745 p. (Springer series in statistics).CrossRef Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman JH. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2009. 745 p. (Springer series in statistics).CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Evaluating discrimination of risk prediction models: the C statistic. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1063–4.PubMedCrossRef Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB. Evaluating discrimination of risk prediction models: the C statistic. JAMA. 2015;314(10):1063–4.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Merath K, Bagante F, Beal EW, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Poultsides G, Makris E, et al. Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group. J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29448303 Merath K, Bagante F, Beal EW, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Poultsides G, Makris E, et al. Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: an analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group. J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2018; Available from: https://​www.​ncbi.​nlm.​nih.​gov/​pubmed/​29448303
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993. 436 p. (Monographs on statistics and applied probability).CrossRef Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1993. 436 p. (Monographs on statistics and applied probability).CrossRef
32.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhao B, Waterman RS, Urman RD, Gabriel RA. A machine learning approach to predicting case duration for robot-assisted surgery. J Med Syst. 2019;43(2):32.PubMedCrossRef Zhao B, Waterman RS, Urman RD, Gabriel RA. A machine learning approach to predicting case duration for robot-assisted surgery. J Med Syst. 2019;43(2):32.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Harvin JA, Green CE, Pedroza C, Tyson JE, Moore LJ, Wade CE, et al. Using machine learning to identify change in surgical decision making in current use of damage control laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(3):255–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Harvin JA, Green CE, Pedroza C, Tyson JE, Moore LJ, Wade CE, et al. Using machine learning to identify change in surgical decision making in current use of damage control laparotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2019;228(3):255–64.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Canchi T, Kumar SD, Ng EYK, Narayanan S. A review of computational methods to predict the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:861627. Canchi T, Kumar SD, Ng EYK, Narayanan S. A review of computational methods to predict the risk of rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:861627.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeong E-K, Hsiao T-C, Chiang HK, Lin C-W. Prediction of burn healing time using artificial neural networks and reflectance spectrometer. Burns. 2005;31(4):415–20.PubMedCrossRef Yeong E-K, Hsiao T-C, Chiang HK, Lin C-W. Prediction of burn healing time using artificial neural networks and reflectance spectrometer. Burns. 2005;31(4):415–20.PubMedCrossRef
37.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, editors. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. New York: Springer; 2013. 426 p. (Springer texts in statistics). James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, editors. An introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. New York: Springer; 2013. 426 p. (Springer texts in statistics).
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Parikh SA, Gomez R, Thirugnanasambandam M, Chauhan SS, De Oliveira V, Muluk SC, et al. Decision tree-based classification of abdominal aortic aneurysms using geometry quantification measures. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(12):2135–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Parikh SA, Gomez R, Thirugnanasambandam M, Chauhan SS, De Oliveira V, Muluk SC, et al. Decision tree-based classification of abdominal aortic aneurysms using geometry quantification measures. Ann Biomed Eng. 2018;46(12):2135–47.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Wynter-Blyth V, Moorthy K. Prehabilitation: preparing patients for surgery. BMJ. 8;358:j3702. Wynter-Blyth V, Moorthy K. Prehabilitation: preparing patients for surgery. BMJ. 8;358:j3702.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Minnella EM, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Awasthi R, et al. The impact of improved functional capacity before surgery on postoperative complications: a study in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2019;1–6. Minnella EM, Liberman AS, Charlebois P, Stein B, Scheede-Bergdahl C, Awasthi R, et al. The impact of improved functional capacity before surgery on postoperative complications: a study in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2019;1–6.
Metadaten
Titel
Use of Machine Learning for Prediction of Patient Risk of Postoperative Complications After Liver, Pancreatic, and Colorectal Surgery
verfasst von
Katiuscha Merath
J. Madison Hyer
Rittal Mehta
Ayesha Farooq
Fabio Bagante
Kota Sahara
Diamantis I. Tsilimigras
Eliza Beal
Anghela Z. Paredes
Lu Wu
Aslam Ejaz
Timothy M. Pawlik
Publikationsdatum
05.08.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery / Ausgabe 8/2020
Print ISSN: 1091-255X
Elektronische ISSN: 1873-4626
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04338-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2020

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 8/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Vorsicht, erhöhte Blutungsgefahr nach PCI!

10.05.2024 Koronare Herzerkrankung Nachrichten

Nach PCI besteht ein erhöhtes Blutungsrisiko, wenn die Behandelten eine verminderte linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion aufweisen. Das Risiko ist umso höher, je stärker die Pumpfunktion eingeschränkt ist.

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Deutlich weniger Infektionen: Wundprotektoren schützen!

08.05.2024 Postoperative Wundinfektion Nachrichten

Der Einsatz von Wundprotektoren bei offenen Eingriffen am unteren Gastrointestinaltrakt schützt vor Infektionen im Op.-Gebiet – und dient darüber hinaus der besseren Sicht. Das bestätigt mit großer Robustheit eine randomisierte Studie im Fachblatt JAMA Surgery.

Chirurginnen und Chirurgen sind stark suizidgefährdet

07.05.2024 Suizid Nachrichten

Der belastende Arbeitsalltag wirkt sich negativ auf die psychische Gesundheit der Angehörigen ärztlicher Berufsgruppen aus. Chirurginnen und Chirurgen bilden da keine Ausnahme, im Gegenteil.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.