Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2019

08.10.2018

Utilization of Structured Reporting to Monitor Outcomes of Doppler Ultrasound Performed for Deep Vein Thrombosis

verfasst von: Travis Browning, Sura Giri, Ron Peshock, Julia Fielding

Erschienen in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Determining the clinical impact of imaging exams at the enterprise level is problematic, as radiology reports historically have been created with the content meant primarily for the referring provider. Structured reporting can establish the foundation for enterprise monitoring of imaging outcomes without manual review providing the framework for assessment of utilization and quality. Ultrasound (US) for deep vein thrombosis evaluation (DVT) is an ideal testbed for assessing this functionality. The system standard template for Doppler US for extremity venous evaluation for DVT was updated with a discrete fixed picklist of impression options and implemented system wide. Template utilization and interpretive outcomes were actively monitored and use reinforced as part of standard clinical practice. From January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, 9111 US exams for DVT were performed with 8997 utilizing structured reporting (98.75%). Of those in the structured reporting group, 1074 (11.79%) were positive for any type of DVT with 732 (8.03%) reported as Acute/New above the knee. Positive rates for any type of DVT were 10.29% emergency department, 14.17% inpatient, and 13.20% outpatient. While being the lowest positive rate, the emergency department had the highest overall volume of exams. Structured reporting for DVT US assessment outcomes can be implemented with a very high rate of radiologist adoption and adherence providing accurate determination of positive rates, month by month, in differing patient locations. Structured elements can be used to automatically trigger downstream processes; in our institution, this will alert providers in the EHR if the patient does not receive anticoagulation within 2 h of a positive test. This lays the foundation for effective enterprise assessment of imaging outcomes forming the basis of future quality and safety initiatives on optimizing health system resource utilization.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kahn, Jr CE, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES, Carrino JA, Channin DS, Hovsepian DM et al.: Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252(3):852–856, 2009CrossRefPubMed Kahn, Jr CE, Langlotz CP, Burnside ES, Carrino JA, Channin DS, Hovsepian DM et al.: Toward best practices in radiology reporting. Radiology 252(3):852–856, 2009CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dunnick NR, Langlotz CP: The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 5(5):626–629, 2008CrossRefPubMed Dunnick NR, Langlotz CP: The radiology report of the future: a summary of the 2007 Intersociety Conference. J Am Coll Radiol 5(5):626–629, 2008CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL, Nair S, Pandharipande PV, Harvey HB: Creation of an open framework for point-of-care computer-assisted reporting and decision support tools for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 14(9):1184–1189, 2017CrossRefPubMed Alkasab TK, Bizzo BC, Berland LL, Nair S, Pandharipande PV, Harvey HB: Creation of an open framework for point-of-care computer-assisted reporting and decision support tools for radiologists. J Am Coll Radiol 14(9):1184–1189, 2017CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Pons E, Braun LM, Hunink MG, Kors JA: Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 279(2):329–343, 2016CrossRefPubMed Pons E, Braun LM, Hunink MG, Kors JA: Natural language processing in radiology: a systematic review. Radiology 279(2):329–343, 2016CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat McGinty GB, Allen, Jr B, Geis JR, Wald C: IT infrastructure in the era of imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol 11(12 Pt B):1197–1204, 2014CrossRefPubMed McGinty GB, Allen, Jr B, Geis JR, Wald C: IT infrastructure in the era of imaging 3.0. J Am Coll Radiol 11(12 Pt B):1197–1204, 2014CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, Kent TS, Sanchez N, Pedrosa I: Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274(2):464–472, 2015CrossRefPubMed Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM, Kent TS, Sanchez N, Pedrosa I: Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology 274(2):464–472, 2015CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Reiner BI, Knight N, Siegel EL: Radiology reporting, past, present, and future: the radiologist’s perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 4(5):313–319, 2007CrossRefPubMed Reiner BI, Knight N, Siegel EL: Radiology reporting, past, present, and future: the radiologist’s perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 4(5):313–319, 2007CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Suh-Burgmann EJ, Flanagan T, Lee N, Osinski T, Sweet C, Lynch M, Caponigro M, Mehta J, Alavi M, Herrinton LJ: Large-scale implementation of structured reporting of adnexal masses on ultrasound. J Am Coll Radiol 15(5):755–761, 2018CrossRefPubMed Suh-Burgmann EJ, Flanagan T, Lee N, Osinski T, Sweet C, Lynch M, Caponigro M, Mehta J, Alavi M, Herrinton LJ: Large-scale implementation of structured reporting of adnexal masses on ultrasound. J Am Coll Radiol 15(5):755–761, 2018CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Nass SJ, Patlak M, National Cancer Policy Forum (U.S.): Assessing and improving the interpretation of breast images : workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015, xx, 73 pages pCrossRef Nass SJ, Patlak M, National Cancer Policy Forum (U.S.): Assessing and improving the interpretation of breast images : workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2015, xx, 73 pages pCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pinto Dos Santos D, Scheibl S, Arnhold G, Maehringer-Kunz A, Duber C, Mildenberger P et al.: A proof of concept for epidemiological research using structured reporting with pulmonary embolism as a use case. Br J Radiol, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170564 Pinto Dos Santos D, Scheibl S, Arnhold G, Maehringer-Kunz A, Duber C, Mildenberger P et al.: A proof of concept for epidemiological research using structured reporting with pulmonary embolism as a use case. Br J Radiol, 2018. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1259/​bjr.​20170564
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson PA, Berland LL, Griffith B, Kahn, Jr CE, Liebscher LA: Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group. J Am Coll Radiol 11(6):552–558, 2014CrossRefPubMed Larson PA, Berland LL, Griffith B, Kahn, Jr CE, Liebscher LA: Actionable findings and the role of IT support: report of the ACR Actionable Reporting Work Group. J Am Coll Radiol 11(6):552–558, 2014CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B: Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506, 2010CrossRefPubMed Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Zapadka ME, Lyders EM, Littenberg B: Radiology report clarity: a cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. J Am Coll Radiol 7(7):501–506, 2010CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Utilization of Structured Reporting to Monitor Outcomes of Doppler Ultrasound Performed for Deep Vein Thrombosis
verfasst von
Travis Browning
Sura Giri
Ron Peshock
Julia Fielding
Publikationsdatum
08.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0131-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.