Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 10/2003

01.10.2003 | News

A European Directive for clinical research

verfasst von: François J. P. Lemaire, and an ESICM Task Force

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 10/2003

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

After a long process the European Parliament and Council adopted on 4 April 2001 a directive on "the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use" [1]. Even if physicians and lay people will probably see it, for obvious ethical reasons, as a corpus of laws and regulations aiming at protecting the patients enrolled in trials, the Directive must be interpreted as the will of the Commission to create a common market for medicinal products. To do so the regulations concerning drugs testing and approval in all European countries (Member States) need to be harmonized. This explains why the Directive has been elaborated by the Enterprise General-Directorate, which deals with the "internal" market integration and elaboration of common standards, and is not of the responsibility of the Research Commissioner, for instance. Harmonization of European legislations concerning clinical research is certainly highly desirable. However, those deeply involved in research activities at the bedside, especially the intensivists, may be apprehensive, as Brussels regulations are not usually known for simplicity. Additionally, some provisions of the directive may directly affect ICU research. …
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat European Parliament (2001) Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 4 April 2001. Official Journal L121:34–44 European Parliament (2001) Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 4 April 2001. Official Journal L121:34–44
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton R (1999) Time to register randomized trials. BMJ 319:865–866PubMed Horton R (1999) Time to register randomized trials. BMJ 319:865–866PubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Tonks A (2002) A clinical trials register for Europe. BMJ 325:1314–1315PubMed Tonks A (2002) A clinical trials register for Europe. BMJ 325:1314–1315PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann H (2002) Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results. Lancet 359:406–408PubMed Mann H (2002) Research ethics committees and public dissemination of clinical trial results. Lancet 359:406–408PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Levine R (1986) Ethics and regulation of clinical research, 2nd edn. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore Levine R (1986) Ethics and regulation of clinical research, 2nd edn. Urban and Schwarzenberg, Baltimore
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacombe D (1998) Insuring international clinical trials: an Academic viewpoint. Appl Clin Trials 8:24–29 Lacombe D (1998) Insuring international clinical trials: an Academic viewpoint. Appl Clin Trials 8:24–29
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrand E, Bachoud-Levi AC, Rodrigues M, Maggiore S, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F (2001) Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 27:1360–1364PubMed Ferrand E, Bachoud-Levi AC, Rodrigues M, Maggiore S, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F (2001) Decision-making capacity and surrogate designation in French ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 27:1360–1364PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Dijk Y van, van der Voort PH, Kuiper MA, Kesecioglu J (2003) Research on subjects incompetent of giving informed consent: the situation in Dutch intensive care departments. Intensive Care Med (in press) Dijk Y van, van der Voort PH, Kuiper MA, Kesecioglu J (2003) Research on subjects incompetent of giving informed consent: the situation in Dutch intensive care departments. Intensive Care Med (in press)
9.
Zurück zum Zitat British Medical Association (1999) Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatments: guidance for decision making. BMJ, London British Medical Association (1999) Withholding and withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatments: guidance for decision making. BMJ, London
10.
Zurück zum Zitat United States Food and Drug Administration (1996) Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent in certain emergency research; final rules. Federal Register 51497-51531 United States Food and Drug Administration (1996) Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent in certain emergency research; final rules. Federal Register 51497-51531
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Luce J (2003) California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity. Intensive Care Med 29:1024–1025 Luce J (2003) California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity. Intensive Care Med 29:1024–1025
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Visser H (2001) Non therapeutic research in the EU in adults incapable of giving consent? Lancet 357:818–819PubMed Visser H (2001) Non therapeutic research in the EU in adults incapable of giving consent? Lancet 357:818–819PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lemaire F (2002) Clinical research in the ICU; an official statement of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 28:1218–1219CrossRef Lemaire F (2002) Clinical research in the ICU; an official statement of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 28:1218–1219CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ster F, Singer E, Böttiger B, Chamberlain D, Baskett P, Bossaert L, Steen P (2002) A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. Resuscitation 53:237–238PubMed Ster F, Singer E, Böttiger B, Chamberlain D, Baskett P, Bossaert L, Steen P (2002) A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. Resuscitation 53:237–238PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Watson R (2003) EU legislation threatens clinical trials. BMJ 326:1348PubMed Watson R (2003) EU legislation threatens clinical trials. BMJ 326:1348PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A European Directive for clinical research
verfasst von
François J. P. Lemaire
and an ESICM Task Force
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2003
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 10/2003
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1963-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2003

Intensive Care Medicine 10/2003 Zur Ausgabe

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Hinter dieser Appendizitis steckte ein Erreger

23.04.2024 Appendizitis Nachrichten

Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

23.04.2024 Leitsymptom Rückenschmerzen Nachrichten

Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.