Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 10/2022

09.08.2022 | Reports of Original Investigations

A novel ultrasound software system for lumbar level identification in obstetric patients

verfasst von: MASc Jorden Hetherington, MB, BCh, FCAI Janette Brohan, PhD Robert Rohling, MD, FRCPC Vit Gunka, PhD Purang Abolmaesumi, PhD Arianne Albert, MD, FRCPC, MMSc Anthony Chau

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 10/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Using machine learning, we developed a proprietary ultrasound software called the Spine Level Identification (SLIDE) system, which automatically identifies lumbar landmarks in real time as the operator slides the transducer over the lumber spine. Here, we assessed the agreement between SLIDE and manual palpation and traditional lumbar ultrasound (LUS) for determining the primary target L3–4 interspace.

Methods

Upon institutional ethics approval and informed consent, 76 healthy term parturients scheduled for elective Caesarean delivery were recruited. The L3–4 interspace was identified by manual palpation and then by the SLIDE method. The reference standard was located using traditional LUS by an experienced operator. The primary outcome was the L3–4 interspace identification agreement of manual palpation and SLIDE with the reference standard, as percentage agreement and Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1).

Results

The raw agreement was 70% with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC1) = 0.59 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.77) for manual palpation and 84% with Gwet’s AC1 = 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.93) for SLIDE. When the levels differ from the reference, the manual palpation method identified L2–3 more often than L4–5 while the SLIDE method identified equally above or below L3–4. The SLIDE system had greater agreement than palpation in locating L3–4 and all other lumber interspaces after controlling for body mass index (adjusted odds ratio, 2.99; 95% CI, 1.21 to 8.7; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

The SLIDE system had higher agreement with traditional ultrasound than manual palpation did in identifying L3–4 and all other lumber interspaces after adjusting for BMI in healthy term obstetric patients. Future studies should examine factors that affect agreement and ways to improve SLIDE for clinical integration.

Study Registration

www.​ClinicalTrials.​gov (NCT02982317); registered 5 December 2016.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Young B, Onwochei D, Desai N. Conventional landmark palpation vs. preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics - a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analyses. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 818–31. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​anae.​15255 Young B, Onwochei D, Desai N. Conventional landmark palpation vs. preprocedural ultrasound for neuraxial analgesia and anaesthesia in obstetrics - a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analyses. Anaesthesia 2021; 76: 818–31. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​anae.​15255
21.
Metadaten
Titel
A novel ultrasound software system for lumbar level identification in obstetric patients
verfasst von
MASc Jorden Hetherington
MB, BCh, FCAI Janette Brohan
PhD Robert Rohling
MD, FRCPC Vit Gunka
PhD Purang Abolmaesumi
PhD Arianne Albert
MD, FRCPC, MMSc Anthony Chau
Publikationsdatum
09.08.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-022-02300-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2022

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 10/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.