The onset and progression of osteoporosis can be influenced by a myriad of factors, including age, gender, trauma, and medication [
19]. These factors can result in aberrant bone metabolism and subsequent manifestation of osteoporosis. In contrast to health bone tissue, the osteoporosis microenvironment is typified by dysfunctional bone cell activity and anomalous cytokine secretion, culminating in diminished bone mass and skeletal imbalance. This impairs the preservation of normal bone mass and density [
20,
21]. Moreover, alterations in the composition of the bone matrix, such as the reduction in collagen fibers and bone mineral salt content, may influence the mechanical properties of the skeletal system [
22]. Fluctuations in the pH of the microenvironment can further exacerbate bone loss and progression of osteoporosis [
23]. Additionally, inadequate blood supply within the osteoporosis microenvironment can results in bone tissue hypoxia and malnutrition, thereby impacting the growth and function of bone cells [
24].
Bone tissue microenvironment in OP
Examining the bone tissue level, alterations in the osteoporotic bone tissue microenvironment encompass the destruction of bone microarchitecture, reduction in bone mass, and modifications in mechanical stimulation among other changes.
The skeleton, often refereed to as the as the calcium and phosphorus reservoir, is the body’s largest system for calcium and phosphorus deposition. It is composed of bone cells and bone matrix [
25]. The growth and metabolism of bone tissue are dynamic processes. Healthy bone tissue undergoes a process of forming bone-like structures, depositing calcium and phosphorus salts, and gradually developing into bone [
26]. The structure of bone tissue transitions from woven bone to lamellar bone, ultimately forming compact bone, while the interior of cancellous bone primarily consists of numerous trabeculae [
26]. When OP occurs, it leads to abnormalities in bone growth metabolism, resulting in the loss of bone matrix and the disruption of bone microarchitecture. This is mainly manifested in the following aspects [
27]: First, trabecular thinning and fracturing: normal cancellous bone consists of tiny trabeculae, while OP causes a reduction, fracturing, or disappearance of these trabeculae, resulting in the loosening of the bone tissue structure. Second, decreased trabecular bone volume: the width and volume of trabeculae directly influence the strength and rigidity of bone tissue, thereby causing a weakened biomechanical load. Lastly, abnormalities in trabecular bone structure: abnormal trabecular structure is also a characteristic of osteoporosis. As the degree of trabecular separation increases and the trabecular connectivity rate decreases, the overall structure of bone tissue becomes abnormal.
From the perspective of bone loss, Type I postmenopausal osteoporosis and Type II senile osteoporosis (disuse osteoporosis) exhibit distinct mechanisms of bone loss [
28]. Type I osteoporosis is primarily results from heightened osteoclasts activity due to estrogen deficiency following menopause in women, leading to bone loss that surpasses bone reconstruction, and consequently increasing the risk of bone fractures. One of the main causes of Type II osteoporosis is the skeleton aging, characterized by the accumulation of bone marrow adipose tissue (BMAT) [
29].
Bone marrow adipose tissue can adversely impact bone formation, as bone marrow adipose cells and osteoblasts share a common precursor cell, resulting in a negative correlation between them and a decrease in the number of osteoblasts [
30]. The abnormal expansion of bone marrow adipose tissue directly influences bone remodelling through the secretion of adipokines and cytokines and exerts a significant detrimental effect on bone homeostasis via negative regulation of hematopoietic mechanisms, exacerbating bone loss [
31]. Studies have discovered that the combined effects of MAT accumulation, inflammation, and oxidative stress contribute to the development of osteoporosis [
31].
From a biomechanical perspective, the skeleton is a tissue capable of sensing changes in mechanical forces, continuously modulating external mechanical stimuli through the interaction of osteocytes, osteoclasts, and osteoblasts. Guillaume T. Charras et al. found that primary osteoblasts possess a non-selective stretch-activated cation channel with a conductivity of 15pS, and the opening of this cation channel is closely related to the mechanical force stimuli received [
32]. In some patients with developmental abnormalities or trauma, changes in their lower limb force lines or lumbar spine sagittal balance parameters may occur. If not corrected in time, long-term abnormal biomechanical stimuli can cause abnormal growth and metabolism of trabecular structures and intraosseous space structures [
33].
Additionally, abnormal skeletal force lines are frequently associated with the onset of arthritis, chronic inflammation factors may provoke atypical responses in bone matrix, as well as intraosseous vascular growth and metabolism, leading to abnormal growth of bone joints, diaphysis, epiphyses, and periosteum. Wei Wang et al. showed that patients with lumbar disc herniation may experience lower limb pain, and long-term pain can cause abnormalities in lower limb force lines and lower limb kinematic disorders, leading to muscle and skeletal impairments [
34].
Therefore, changes in mechanical force stimulation can affect intraosseous structures, trabecular development, and vascular growth, acting on the bone tissue microenvironment. Insufficient mechanical stimuli have also become one of the pathogenic factors for type II osteoporosis. Furthermore, a recent study by Peng Hui Zhang showed that changes in the biomechanical microenvironment generated by mechanical loading can act on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in three-dimensional scaffolds to promote the expression of osteogenic markers, enhance cell vitality, and inhibit inflammatory factors [
35]. As a result, the beneficial effects of mechanical loading on the bone microenvironment can provide new insights for the preparation of bone biomaterials [
35]. It is also speculated that this could have a positive impact on chronic inflammatory diseases like osteoporosis (OP) and could serve as a further research direction for OP treatment.
In conclusion, changes in bone microstructure, bone loss, and bone marrow composition, as well as stimulation by the biomechanical microenvironment, can lead to alterations in skeletal growth and development and bone mass accumulation, involving dynamic changes in the bone tissue microenvironment at the tissue level.
Changes of bone tissue cells in OP microenvironment
Bone tissue primarily comprises osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and immune cells, among other components [
36]. These various cell types interact and regulate bone tissue growth and metabolism. Recently, researchers have aimed to uncover new mechanisms for bone aging and loss by examining the microenvironment from a novel perspective. Studies have demonstrated that, with increasing age, some cells in the bone microenvironment become heterogenous due to senescence, and these cells and their secreted dysfunctional factors are collectively referred to as the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). SASP plays a role in mediating age-related bone loss [
37].
Osteoblasts play a crucial role in bone formation, as they are responsible for the deposition of various bone minerals and type I collagen, and eventually differentiate into osteocytes. Osteocytes primarily serve functions such as mechanical force transmission, regulation of osteoblast activity, control of bone resorption, regulation of PO
43− and Ca
2+ levels, intercellular communication with perivascular cells, remodeling of the surrounding environment, and secretion of relevant hormones, among others [
38]. Multiple microenvironmental factors influence the process, including matrix mineralization, extracellular matrix arrangement, oxygen tension, mechanical force, collagen degradation, exogenous molecules, and FGF-2, among others [
38]. In the osteoporosis (OP) microenvironment, osteoblasts aging has a significant impact on bone loss. Factors contributing to osteoblast aging include the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the bone microenvironment, DNA damage, and telomere attrition, among others [
39]. In the chronic inflammatory microenvironment of OP, aged osteoblasts accumulate and exhibit resistance to clearance by immune cells, subsequently secreting receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) [
40]. RANKL activates osteoclasts via the RANKL-RANK pathway, exacerbating bone resorption. Consequently, researchers have proposed that eliminating the RANKL secretion in aging osteoblasts and blocking their aberrant interaction with osteoclasts might serve as a new strategy for OP [
41]. In this context, an innovative hydrogen peroxide-responsive bone repair complex (HPB@RC)-alendronate (ALN) nanoscale enzyme drug delivery platform was developed to reverse OP progression by scavenging reactive oxygen species (ROS) and silencing the RANKL gene [
41]. Additionally, as age advances, osteoblast thickness measurements in the basic multicellular unit (BMU) reveal an inverse relationship with age [
42], indicating that the microenvironmental changes induced by osteoblast aging are closely related to bone resorption and can potentiate OP progression by promoting bone loss.
In 1961, the direct external environment of osteocytes was defined as the Grenzscheide or limiting membrane, primarily composed of polysaccharides and extravascular fluid [
43]. This membrane serves as a barrier preventing mineralized materials from entering the cavity, thus providing channels for extracellular material transport [
43]. Aarden et al. discovered that in vitro, osteocytes can modulate their extracellular biochemical microenvironment by producing osteopontin, osteonectin, osteocalcin, and other molecules [
44]. Osteocytes are not only involved in calcium and phosphorus metabolism and endocrine signaling in bone, but also responsible for bone formation due to mechanical stimulation and bone loss induced by disuse [
45]. Osteocytes execute complex mechanical sensing between themselves, the environment, and adjacent cells. With their lacunar reticular structure cytoskeleton adhesion, dendrites, intercellular junctions, primary cilia, ion channels, extracellular matrix, and focal adhesion providing a complex microenvironmental system for periosteal cells. As a result, osteocytes can function as a biomechanical sensor to mediate changes in external mechanical stimulation and the intracellular biochemical microenvironment [
46]. In patients with disuse osteoporosis, diminished bodily function typically results in slowed cellular metabolism, weakened matrix mineralization capacity, hypoxia, and respiratory acidosis. These changes lead to fluctuations in the body's environmental pH. The lack of osteocyte mechanical stimulation in elderly patients, combined with the aforementioned factors, can engender osteocyte differentiation disorders. Knothe Tate et al. observed in their study of bone histology in osteoporotic patients that the structural integrity of the bone cell network and tissue three-dimensional architecture are altered, resulting in fractures that are prone to occur and difficult to heal due to the imbalance between bone reconstruction and the load capacity [
47].
Nelson G et al. reported that senescent cells secrete found that aging cells secrete chemokines, inflammatory factors, and extracellular matrix proteins that generate a toxic microenvironment, affecting neighboring cells and facilitating the accumulation of aging cells and the development of tissue dysfunction [
48]. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, microcapsules, and apoptotic bodies [
49], that can deliver specific proteins, such as tenascin C, sema4D, microRNA-214-3p, and bone morphogenetic protein 1–7 [
50]. Osteoclasts also release EVs to self-regulate, primarily by secreting EVs containing RANK, which competitively inhibits the interaction between the RANK receptor and RANKL on the surface of osteoclasts [
51]. Exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) can promote bone healing by delivering miRNA [
52]. Therefore, alternations in the extracellular microenvironment caused by EVs warrant consideration in developing novel OP therapeutic strategies. Additionally, the interaction between BMSCs and hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) can also influence the bone marrow cavity microenvironment [
53]. SusanK. Nilsson et al. found that megakaryocytes secrete various cytokines affecting the growth and proliferation of HSCs and other hematopoietic cells, which in turn affect bone formation [
54]. Recent studies by Chang Jun Li et al. revealed that during aging, senescent immune cells accumulate in the bone marrow and secrete grancalcin protein, which binds to the plexin-B2 (Plxnb2) receptor of BMSCs, inhibiting osteogenesis and promoting adipogenesis [
55]. Consequently, grancalcin protein may serve as potential target for the treating age-related osteoporosis [
55].
Immune cells play a crucial role in the bone tissue microenvironment [
56‐
58]. Studies have shown that resident macrophages are present in all tissues, with exception of hyaline cartilage [
59] and are intimately involved in tissue repair, debris removal, and maintaining the microenvironment homeostasis [
60]. Macrophage polarization can enhance osteoblast differentiation, increase osteogenic effects, and facilitate mineralization [
61]. The polarization state is also related to the immunosuppressive phenotype generated by the combination of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) in the bone microenvironment, which exerts the strongest immunosuppressive effect on M2 macrophage polarization [
62]. Studies have shown that the macrophages phenotype (M1) transitions to M2 following IL-4 stimulation when co-cultured with MC3T3 cells [
63]. The degree of osteoblast differentiation and osteogenic ability of MC3T3 cells was higher than that of M0 cells co-cultured with MC3T3 cells [
63]. Therefore, the in vivo the transformation from M1 to M2 phenotype is essential for tissue growth, healing, osteogenic effects, and osteoblasts function [
63]. Joseph Muñoz posits that modulating the fluctuations of various cytokines in the local in vivo microenvironment could treat osteoporosis based on macrophage polarization, representing a novel approach [
61]. XU's research indicates that the interaction among monocytes, macrophages, osteoclasts, bone marrow stromal cells, and osteoblasts plays a vital role in the pathological study of OP [
64].
Recently, new technologies have emerged for studying bone tissue microenvironment at the cellular level, with single-cell sequencing becoming a popular method for investigating bone tissue metabolic diseases. By extracting and sequencing from disease-affected areas, distinct heterogeneous cell subsets can be selected and compared with public data sets to identify interactions among various cell subsets during bone tissue diseases process. Associating different cell subsets with clinical indicators can help define the pathological state of related bone samples. The CyTOF (Cytometry by Time-Of-Flight) Mass Cytometry method enables high throughput, multi-omics single cell analysis, providing a technical means for detecting cellular changes and alteration in the surrounding microenvironment. Through microenvironment state analysis, sensitive cells exhibiting differential drug effects can be effectively screened, offering support for the identification of potential drug targets.
Molecular mechanisms of the microenvironment in OP
In this study, we discuss the relationship between the TRPV family of ion channels and OP. Classical signaling pathways in OP, including Wnt/β-catenin, RANK/RANKL/OPG, TGF-β, PI3K/Akt, and Notch, have been widely studied and documented [
65].
The TRPV ion channels, a subfamily of transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV) receptors, are ubiquitously distributed calcium ion receptor proteins present on the cell membranes of various tissues and organs in living organisms [
66]. Based on homology, they can be further classified into TRPV1, TRPV2, TRPV3, TRPV4, TRPV5, and TRPV6 [
66]. These proteins comprise six transmembrane domains, with the fifth and sixth domains jointly forming a non-selective cation channel. The N-termini and C-termini of these proteins are located within the cytoplasm, and they exhibit permeability to Na
+, K
+, and Ca
2+ ions [
66]. However, different subtypes can respond to various external stimuli, such as pH, temperature, pressure, and osmotic pressure.
TRPV1, commonly referred to as the capsaicin receptor, exhibits sensitivity to Ca
2+, pH, and chemical stimuli, predominantly inducing downstream pain responses. It has been demonstrated that pain associated with bone loss is intimately linked to TRPV1 [
67]. TRPV2 primarily responds to temperature stimuli exceeding 53 °C and contributes to osteoclast differentiation and mediation of Ca
2+ oscillations governing bone metabolism [
68,
69]. TRPV3, denoted as thermo-activated channel, is predominantly sensitive to mild temperature stimuli (usually 30–33 °C) and exhibits the highest expression in keratinocyte-forming cells of the skin [
70]. Further investigation is required to elucidate its impact on the osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) [
17]. TRPV4 demonstrates heightened sensitivity to mechanical stimuli and is highly expressed in chondrocytes, playing a pivotal role in the proper development of bone growth plates [
71]. Research on TRPV5, initiated in 1999 [
72], has revealed its exceptional sensitivity and selectivity towards Ca
2+ ions, as well as its high sensitivity to extracellular pH, which directly influences its activity. Primarily distributed in bone tissue and renal cells, TRPV5 is crucial for regulating Ca
2+ absorption within the body [
73,
74]. TRPV6, another Ca
2+sensitive ion channel is strictly regulated by Ca
2+ and 1,25-(OH)
2D
3 [
14]. A summary of the functions and distributions of various TRPV family ion channels is presented in Table
1.
Table 1
TRPV family ion channel function and distribution
TRPV1 | Regulation: Temperature; Pressure; Osmotic pressure; pH | Capsaicin; Heat; Na+; Ca2+; Acidosis; H+; Endogenous agonists | Variety of tissues and cell types | |
TRPV2 | Regulation: Temperature Cell migration; Innate immune system | Ca2+; Heat | Skeletal muscle; Cardiac muscle; Neurons; Heart; Gastrointestinal tract; Lung; Pancreas; Retina; Brain | |
TRPV3 | Regulation: Temperature; Synaptic plasticity | Ca2+; Bradykinin; Histamine; ATP; PKC; PGE2; a-hydroxyl acids; 2-APB; PIP2; Heat | Tongue; Testis; Skin keratinocytes | |
TRPV4 | Regulation: Mechanical; Osmotic pressure | Ca2+; Heat | Chondrocyte; Adipocytes; Vascular endothelium; Retina; Neurons | |
TRPV5 | Regulation: pH; Ca2+selective TRP channel; Inward rectification of the current- voltage | Ca2+; E2; 1,25-(OH)2D3; Calcitonin; Klotho; PTH; Testosterone; Vasopressin; MUC1; PIP2 | Bone; Kidney; Placenta | |
TRPV6 | Regulation: Ca2+selective TRP channel | Ca2+; 1,25-(OH)2D3; Ba2+; Sr2+; Mn2+; Zn2+; Cd2+; La3+; Gd3+; PIP2 | Intestinal enterocytes; Kidney; Placenta; Uterus; Pancreas; Epididymal epithelium; Brain; Stomach | |