Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018

15.09.2017

An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses

verfasst von: Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Mark Hanna, Christina Y. Koh, Colette S. Inaba, Steven D. Mills, Joseph C. Carmichael, Ninh T. Nguyen, Michael J. Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Anastomotic leak is a devastating postoperative complication following rectal anastomoses associated with significant clinical and oncological implications. As a result, there is a need for novel intraoperative methods that will help predict anastomotic leak.

Methods

From 2011 to 2014, patient undergoing rectal anastomoses by colorectal surgeons at our institution underwent prospective application of intraoperative flexible endoscopy with mucosal grading. Retrospective review of patient medical records was performed. After creation of the colorectal anastomosis, application of a three-tier endoscopic mucosal grading system occurred. Grade 1 was defined as circumferentially normal appearing peri-anastomotic mucosa. Grade 2 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving <30% of either the colon or rectal mucosa. Grade 3 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving >30% of the colon or rectal mucosa or ischemia/congestion involving both sides of the staple line.

Results

From 2011 to 2014, a total of 106 patients were reviewed. Grade 1 anastomoses were created in 92 (86.7%) patients and Grade 2 anastomoses were created in 10 (9.4%) patients. All 4 (3.8%) Grade 3 patients underwent immediate intraoperative anastomosis takedown and re-creation, with subsequent re-classification as Grade 1. Demographic and comorbidity data were similar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 patients. Anastomotic leak rate for the entire cohort was 12.2%. Grade 1 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 9.4% (9/96) and Grade 2 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 40% (4/10). Multivariate logistic regression associated Grade 2 classification with an increased risk of anastomotic leak (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.21–13.63, P = 0.023).

Conclusion

Endoscopic mucosal grading is a feasible intraoperative technique that has a role following creation of a rectal anastomosis. Identification of a Grade 2 or Grade 3 anastomosis should provoke strong consideration for immediate intraoperative revision.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA surg 148:65–71CrossRefPubMed Kang CY, Halabi WJ, Chaudhry OO et al (2013) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. JAMA surg 148:65–71CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y et al (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1176–1185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammond J, Lim S, Wan Y et al (2014) The burden of gastrointestinal anastomotic leaks: an evaluation of clinical and economic outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 18:1176–1185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Jager T, Nawara C, Neureiter D et al (2015) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 86:1072–1082CrossRefPubMed Jager T, Nawara C, Neureiter D et al (2015) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival in mid-to-low rectal cancer. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen 86:1072–1082CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210–218CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576CrossRefPubMed Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ et al (2009) Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:569–576CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu Z, van de Haar RCJ, Sparreboom CL et al (2016) Is the intraoperative air leak test effective in the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1409–1417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu Z, van de Haar RCJ, Sparreboom CL et al (2016) Is the intraoperative air leak test effective in the prevention of colorectal anastomotic leakage? a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1409–1417CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiff ABB, Ghosh SK, Roy S et al (2016) Intra-operative anastomotic leak rates and testing methodology in colorectal resection surgery. J Surg Surgical Res 2:048–054 Schiff ABB, Ghosh SK, Roy S et al (2016) Intra-operative anastomotic leak rates and testing methodology in colorectal resection surgery. J Surg Surgical Res 2:048–054
8.
Zurück zum Zitat James DR, Ris F, Yeung TM et al (2015) Fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging–a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reduction. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 3):16–21CrossRefPubMed James DR, Ris F, Yeung TM et al (2015) Fluorescence angiography in laparoscopic low rectal and anorectal anastomoses with pinpoint perfusion imaging–a critical appraisal with specific focus on leak risk reduction. Colorectal Dis 17(Suppl 3):16–21CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A et al (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28:2513–2530CrossRefPubMed Nachiappan S, Askari A, Currie A et al (2014) Intraoperative assessment of colorectal anastomotic integrity: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 28:2513–2530CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Ulf Wayand W et al (2012) Intraoperative endoscopy for the assessment of circular-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:65–67CrossRefPubMed Shamiyeh A, Szabo K, Ulf Wayand W et al (2012) Intraoperative endoscopy for the assessment of circular-stapled anastomosis in laparoscopic colon surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22:65–67CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Li VKM, Wexner SD, Pulido N et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23:2459CrossRefPubMed Li VKM, Wexner SD, Pulido N et al (2009) Use of routine intraoperative endoscopy in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery: can it further avoid anastomotic failure? Surg Endosc 23:2459CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P et al (2011) Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:145–152CrossRefPubMed Lieto E, Orditura M, Castellano P et al (2011) Endoscopic intraoperative anastomotic testing may avoid early gastrointestinal anastomotic complications. A prospective study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:145–152CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanthaler M, Biebl M, Mittermair R et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:27–31 Lanthaler M, Biebl M, Mittermair R et al (2008) Intraoperative colonoscopy for anastomosis assessment in laparoscopically assisted left-sided colon resection: is it worthwhile? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 18:27–31
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:239–243CrossRefPubMed Schmidt O, Merkel S, Hohenberger W (2003) Anastomotic leakage after low rectal stapler anastomosis: significance of intraoperative anastomotic testing. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:239–243CrossRefPubMed
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(82–92):e1 Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE et al (2015) Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 220(82–92):e1
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM et al (2015) Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 7:286ra68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shogan BD, Belogortseva N, Luong PM et al (2015) Collagen degradation and MMP9 activation by Enterococcus faecalis contribute to intestinal anastomotic leak. Sci Transl Med 7:286ra68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses
verfasst von
Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar
Mehraneh D. Jafari
Mark Hanna
Christina Y. Koh
Colette S. Inaba
Steven D. Mills
Joseph C. Carmichael
Ninh T. Nguyen
Michael J. Stamos
Alessio Pigazzi
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5860-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.