Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 11/2014

01.11.2014 | Computed Tomography

An evaluation of the use of oral contrast media in abdominopelvic CT

verfasst von: Erica Lauren Buttigieg, Karen Borg Grima, Kelvin Cortis, Sandro Galea Soler, Francis Zarb

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 11/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of different oral contrast media (OCM) for abdominopelvic CT examinations performed for follow-up general oncological indications. The objectives were to establish anatomical image quality criteria for abdominopelvic CT; use these criteria to evaluate and compare image quality using positive OCM, neutral OCM and no OCM; and evaluate possible benefits for the medical imaging department.

Methods

Forty-six adult patients attending a follow-up abdominopelvic CT for general oncological indications and who had a previous abdominopelvic CT with positive OCM (n = 46) were recruited and prospectively placed into either the water (n = 25) or no OCM (n = 21) group. Three radiologists performed absolute visual grading analysis (VGA) to assess image quality by grading the fulfilment of 24 anatomical image quality criteria.

Results

Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis of the data showed comparable image quality with regards to reproduction of abdominal structures, bowel discrimination, presence of artefacts, and visualization of the amount of intra-abdominal fat for the three OCM protocols.

Conclusion

All three OCM protocols provided similar image quality for follow-up abdominopelvic CT for general oncological indications.

Key Points

• Positive oral contrast media are routinely used for abdominopelvic multidetector computed tomography
• Experimental study comparing image quality using three different oral contrast materials
• Three different oral contrast materials result in comparable CT image quality
• Benefits for patients and medical imaging department
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berther R, Patak MA, Eckhardt B, Erturk SM, Zollikofer CL (2008) Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 18:1902–1909PubMedCrossRef Berther R, Patak MA, Eckhardt B, Erturk SM, Zollikofer CL (2008) Comparison of neutral oral contrast versus positive oral contrast medium in abdominal multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 18:1902–1909PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Harieaswar S, Rajesh A, Griffin Y, Tyagi R, Morgan B (2009) Routine use of positive oral contrast material is not required for oncology patients undergoing follow-up multidetector CT. Radiology 250:246–253PubMedCrossRef Harieaswar S, Rajesh A, Griffin Y, Tyagi R, Morgan B (2009) Routine use of positive oral contrast material is not required for oncology patients undergoing follow-up multidetector CT. Radiology 250:246–253PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. Am J Roentgenol 193:1282–1288 Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. Am J Roentgenol 193:1282–1288
4.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Malley ME, Halpern E, Mueller PR, Gazele GS (2000) Helical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey. Am J Roentgenol 175:109–113CrossRef O’Malley ME, Halpern E, Mueller PR, Gazele GS (2000) Helical CT protocols for the abdomen and pelvis: a survey. Am J Roentgenol 175:109–113CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1998) Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. Radiology 209(37–48):37PubMedCrossRef Frush DP, Donnelly LF (1998) Helical CT in children: technical considerations and body applications. Radiology 209(37–48):37PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat McNamara MM, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Berland LL (2010) Oral contrast media for body CT: comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. Am J Roentgenol 195:1137–1141CrossRef McNamara MM, Lockhart ME, Fineberg NS, Berland LL (2010) Oral contrast media for body CT: comparison of diatrizoate sodium and iohexol for patient acceptance and bowel opacification. Am J Roentgenol 195:1137–1141CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2008) Multi-detector computed tomography in the gastronintestinal system. In: Kalra MK, Saini S, Rubin GD (eds) MDCT: from protocols to practice. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., Via Decembrio 28, I-20137 Milan, Italy, 138–54 Kambadakone AR, Sahani DV (2008) Multi-detector computed tomography in the gastronintestinal system. In: Kalra MK, Saini S, Rubin GD (eds) MDCT: from protocols to practice. Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., Via Decembrio 28, I-20137 Milan, Italy, 138–54
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Macari M, Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ (2007) A pattern approach to the abnormal small bowel: observations at MDCT and CT enterography. Am J Roentgenol 188:1344–1355CrossRef Macari M, Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ (2007) A pattern approach to the abnormal small bowel: observations at MDCT and CT enterography. Am J Roentgenol 188:1344–1355CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat European Commission (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262EN. Luxembourg European Commission (2000) European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography, EUR 16262EN. Luxembourg
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Padhani AR (2014) In: Nicholson T (ed) Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, 2nd edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, London Padhani AR (2014) In: Nicholson T (ed) Recommendations for cross-sectional imaging in cancer management, 2nd edn. The Royal College of Radiologists, London
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamieson DH (2002) Abdominal CT: clear fluids can replace water-soluble oral contrast media. Pediatr Radiol 32:462–463PubMedCrossRef Jamieson DH (2002) Abdominal CT: clear fluids can replace water-soluble oral contrast media. Pediatr Radiol 32:462–463PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM et al (2006) Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT. Radiology 238:87–95PubMedCrossRef Megibow AJ, Babb JS, Hecht EM et al (2006) Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT. Radiology 238:87–95PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. AAPM on-line report no. 03. AAPM, College Park, Maryland American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems. AAPM on-line report no. 03. AAPM, College Park, Maryland
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Börjesson S, Håkansson M, Båth M et al (2005) A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 114:45–52CrossRef Börjesson S, Håkansson M, Båth M et al (2005) A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology. Radiat Prot Dosim 114:45–52CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Håkansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Båth M, Månsson LG (2010) ViewDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:42–51CrossRef Håkansson M, Svensson S, Zachrisson S, Svalkvist A, Båth M, Månsson LG (2010) ViewDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies. Radiat Prot Dosim 139:42–51CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ledenius K, Svensson E, Stålhammar F, Wiklund L-M, Thilander-Klang A (2010) A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images. Br J Radiol 83:604–611PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Ledenius K, Svensson E, Stålhammar F, Wiklund L-M, Thilander-Klang A (2010) A method to analyse observer disagreement in visual grading studies: example of assessed image quality in paediatric cerebral multidetector CT images. Br J Radiol 83:604–611PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Båth M, Månsson LG (2007) Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176PubMedCrossRef Båth M, Månsson LG (2007) Visual grading characteristics (VGC) analysis: a non-parametric rank-invariant statistical method for image quality evaluation. Br J Radiol 80:169–176PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006)Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 12:150–157PubMedCrossRef Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006)Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 12:150–157PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson SE, Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RL, McNicholas MM, Prassopoulos P (1999) Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent. Radiology 211:870–875PubMedCrossRef Thompson SE, Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RL, McNicholas MM, Prassopoulos P (1999) Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent. Radiology 211:870–875PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Keyzer C, Cullus P, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA (2009) MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Am J Roentgenol 193:1272–1281CrossRef Keyzer C, Cullus P, Tack D, De Maertelaer V, Bohy P, Gevenois PA (2009) MDCT for suspected acute appendicitis in adults: impact of oral and IV contrast media at standard-dose and simulated low-dose techniques. Am J Roentgenol 193:1272–1281CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Frush KS (1998) Aspirated contrast material contributing to respiratory arrest in a pediatric trauma patient. Am J Roentgenol 171:471–473CrossRef Donnelly LF, Frush DP, Frush KS (1998) Aspirated contrast material contributing to respiratory arrest in a pediatric trauma patient. Am J Roentgenol 171:471–473CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Halsted MJ, Racadio JM, Emery KH et al (2004) Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water. Am J Roentgenol 182:1555–1559CrossRef Halsted MJ, Racadio JM, Emery KH et al (2004) Oral contrast agents for CT of abdominal trauma in pediatric patients: a comparison of dilute hypaque and water. Am J Roentgenol 182:1555–1559CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Seymour CW, Pryor JP, Gupta R, Schwab CW (2004) Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast for computed tomography. J Trauma 57:1105–1107PubMedCrossRef Seymour CW, Pryor JP, Gupta R, Schwab CW (2004) Anaphylactoid reaction to oral contrast for computed tomography. J Trauma 57:1105–1107PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Reichelderfer M, Weichert JP (2006) Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 31:48–53PubMedCrossRef Hebert JJ, Taylor AJ, Winter TC, Reichelderfer M, Weichert JP (2006) Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography. Abdom Imaging 31:48–53PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2004) Blunt abdominal trauma: performance of CT without oral contrast material. Radiology 233:689–694PubMedCrossRef Stuhlfaut JW, Soto JA, Lucey BC et al (2004) Blunt abdominal trauma: performance of CT without oral contrast material. Radiology 233:689–694PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Polit DF, Beck CT (2008) Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Polit DF, Beck CT (2008) Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice, 8th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Metadaten
Titel
An evaluation of the use of oral contrast media in abdominopelvic CT
verfasst von
Erica Lauren Buttigieg
Karen Borg Grima
Kelvin Cortis
Sandro Galea Soler
Francis Zarb
Publikationsdatum
01.11.2014
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3285-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2014

European Radiology 11/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

S3-Leitlinie zu Pankreaskrebs aktualisiert

23.04.2024 Pankreaskarzinom Nachrichten

Die Empfehlungen zur Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms wurden um zwei Off-Label-Anwendungen erweitert. Und auch im Bereich der Früherkennung gibt es Aktualisierungen.

Fünf Dinge, die im Kindernotfall besser zu unterlassen sind

18.04.2024 Pädiatrische Notfallmedizin Nachrichten

Im Choosing-Wisely-Programm, das für die deutsche Initiative „Klug entscheiden“ Pate gestanden hat, sind erstmals Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit Notfällen von Kindern erschienen. Fünf Dinge gilt es demnach zu vermeiden.

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

13.04.2024 Klinik aktuell Kongressbericht

Die Teilnehmer eines Forums beim DGIM-Kongress waren sich einig: Fehler in der Medizin sind häufig in ungeeigneten Prozessen und mangelnder Kommunikation begründet. Gespräche mit Patienten und im Team können helfen.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.