nach oben

Annals of Dyslexia

Erschienen in:

01.04.2021

Analyzing the role of fidelity of RTI Tier 2 reading intervention in Spanish kindergarten and first grade students

verfasst von: Juan E. Jiménez, Nuria Gutiérrez, Sara C. de León

Erschienen in: Annals of Dyslexia | Ausgabe 1/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study examined the role of fidelity in the reading outcomes within a Tier 2 intervention implemented by Spanish kindergarten and first grade school teachers. For this purpose, differences in reading performance growth were analyzed among at-risk students who received a Tier 2 intervention with high fidelity, at-risk students who received the same intervention with medium fidelity, and an at-risk control group that did not receive a Tier 2 intervention. Implementation fidelity was analyzed using direct observations and self-reports. All students were assessed three times during the academic year. Hierarchical linear modeling analyses were conducted to explore differences in growth rate. The at-risk children in the intervention condition showed a higher growth compared to at-risk children in the control condition, and specifically when the intervention was delivered with a high degree of fidelity.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.CrossRef

Benner, G. J., Nelson, J. R., Stage, S. A., & Ralston, N. C. (2011). The influence of fidelity of implementation on the reading outcomes of middle school students experiencing reading difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361265.CrossRef

Bickman, L., Riemer, M., Brown, J. L., Jones, S. M., Flay, B. R., Li, K.-K., et al. (2009). Approaches to measuring implementation fidelity in school-based program evaluations. Journal of Research in Character Education, 7(2), 75–102.

Boletín Oficial de Canarias. (2017). Convenio de colaboración entre la Consejería de Educación y Universidades y la Universidad de La Laguna para el desarrollo del programa “Modelo RtI (respuesta a la intervención temprana): Prevención y mejora del rendimiento de la lectura, escritura y matemáticas [Collaboration agreement between the Ministry of Education and Universities and the Universidad de La Laguna for the development of the RtI Model (response to early intervention): Prevention and improvement of the performance of reading, writing and mathematics] Pub. L. No. BOC-A-2017-151-3906, 23912. Spain. http://www.gobiernodecanarias.org/boc/2017/151/016.html.

Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., & Rintamaa, M. (2013). Reading intervention in middle and high schools: Implementation fidelity, teacher efficacy, and student achievement. Reading Psychology, 34(1), 26–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.577695.CrossRef

Capin, P., Walker, M. A., Vaughn, S., & Wanzek, J. (2018). Examining how treatment fidelity is supported, measured, and reported in K-3 reading intervention research. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 885–919. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9429-z.CrossRef

Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1999). The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34(3), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2.CrossRef

Crespo, P., Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., Baker, D. L., & Park, Y. (2018). Differences in growth reading patterns for at-risk Spanish-monolingual children as a function of a tier 2 intervention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, 1–16.

Cross, W., & West, J. (2011). Examining implementer fidelity: Conceptualising and measuring adherence and competence. Journal of Children’s Services, 6(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.5042/jcs.2011.0123.CrossRef

Dane, A. V., & Schneider, B. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00043-3.CrossRef

Emshoff, J. G., Blakely, C., Gottschalk, R., Mayer, J., Davidson, W. S., & Erickson, S. (1987). Innovation in education and criminal justice: Measuring fidelity of implementation and program effectiveness. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9(4), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373009004300.CrossRef

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600304.CrossRef

Fuchs, D., Mock, D., Morgan, P. L., & Young, C. L. (2003). Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the Learning Disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00072.CrossRef

Gersten, R., Compton, D. L., Dimino, J., Santoro, L. E., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading : Response to Intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. Washington DC: Institute for Education Sciences, NCEE.

Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202.CrossRef

Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591.CrossRef

González, M. J., & Martín, I. (2017). Effects on reading of an early intervention program for children at risk of learning difficulties. Remedial and Special Education, 38(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516657652.CrossRef

Gutiérrez, N., Jiménez, J.E., & de León, S.C. (2021). Reading curriculum-based measures for universal screening in Spanish monolinguals first graders [Manuscript submitted for publication]. Universidad de La Laguna

Gutiérrez, N., Jiménez, J. E., de León, S. C., & Seoane, R. C. (2020). Assessing foundational reading skills in kindergarten: A curriculum-based measurement in Spanish. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219419893649.CrossRef

Hall, G., & Loucks, S. (1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Educational Research Journal, 14(3), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1162291.CrossRef

Hernández-Cabrera, J. A. (n.d.). ULLRToolbox. Universidad de La Laguna.

Hill, D. H., King, S. A., Lemons, C. J., & Partanen, J. N. (2012). Fidelity of implementation and instructional alignment in response to intervention research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 27(3), 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2012.00357.x.CrossRef

Hill, H., & Erickson, A. (2019). Using implementation fidelity to aid in interpreting program impacts: A brief review. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19891436.CrossRef

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-1487 (1997, 2004).

Jiménez, J. E. (1986). Métodos de lectura y diagnóstico instruccional [Approaches to teaching reading and assessment]. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 41(6), 1063–1075.

Jiménez, J. E., & Gutiérrez, N. (2019). IPAL: Indicadores de Progreso de Aprendizaje en Lectura [Indicators of Basic Early Reading Skills] [Supplemental material]. In J. E. Jimenez (Ed.), Modelo de Respuesta a la Intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje [Response to Intervention Model. A preventive approach for learning disabilities]. Pirámide.

Jiménez, J. E., de León, S. C., & Gutiérrez, N. (2021). Piloting the response to intervention model in the Canary Islands: Prevention of reading and math learning disabilities. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24.

Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., Crespo, P., González, D., Artiles, C., & Alfonso, M. (2010). Implementation of Response to Intervention (RtI) Model in Spain: an example of a collaboration between Canarian universities and the department of education of the Canary Islands. Psicothema., 22(4), 935–42.

Jiménez, J.E., Rodríguez, C., González, D., O’Shanahan, I., Guzmán, R., & Suárez, N. (2020). Plataforma Web_Letra: programa tutorial para la formación docente en el Modelo de Respuesta a la Intervención en lectura [Web_Letra Platform: a web-based tutorial program for teacher training in the response to intervention model in reading]. Universidad de La Laguna. http://letras.ull.es.

Jiménez, J. E., Rodríguez, C., González, D., Crespo, P., O’Shanahan, I., Guzmán, R., & Suárez, N. (2019). Actividades instruccionales para la mejora de los procesos de aprendizaje de lectura [Instructional activities for early reading improvement] [Supplemental material]. In J. E. Jiménez (Ed.), Modelo de Respuesta a la Intervención. Un enfoque preventivo para el abordaje de las dificultades específicas de aprendizaje [Response to Intervention Model. A preventive approach for learning disabilities]. Pirámide.

Johnson, E., Mellard, D. F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M. A. (2006). Responsiveness to Intervention (RtI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities http://www.milcleaders.org/media/cms/files/Content/Pages/RTIManualFidelity.pdf.

Lerner, J. W., & Johns, B. H. (2012). Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities. Teaching strategies and new directions. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.

Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la mejora de la calidad educativa [Organic Law 8/2013, of December 9, for the improvement of educational quality]. Pub. L. No. 295, 12886 et seq (2013). Spain. http://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2013/12/10/pdfs/BOE-A-2013-12886.pdf.

Moeller, J. (2015). A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: Don’t. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01389.CrossRef

National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Essential components of RTI—A closer look at response to intervention. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH Publication No. 00-4769, 7, 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.1950070418.

Nelson, J. R., Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of a Tier 2 supplemental root word vocabulary and decoding intervention with Kindergarten Spanish-speaking learners. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(2), 184–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11403088.CrossRef

Nelson, P. M., Pulles, S. M., Parker, D. C., & Klaft, J. (2020). Implementation fidelity for math intervention: Basic quality ratings to supplement adherence. School Psychology, 35(1), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000338.CrossRef

Nunnery, J. A., Ross, S. M., & McDonald, A. (2006). A randomized experimental evaluation of the impact of Accelerated Reader/Reading Renaissance implementation on reading achievement in grades 3 to 6. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327671espr1101_1.CrossRef

O’Donnell, C. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in k-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793.CrossRef

Paeplow, C. (2015). Letterland evaluation: 2013-2014. Eye on evaluation. (D & A Report No. 1418). Wake County Public School System. Cary, NC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED565243.

Peugh, J. L., & Heck, R. H. (2016). Conducting three-level longitudinal analyses. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(1), 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616642329.CrossRef

Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis Methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Richards-Tutor, C., Baker, D. L., Gersten, R., Baker, S., & Smith, J. M. (2015). The effectiveness of reading interventions for English learners: A research synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82, 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585483.CrossRef

Sénéchal, M., & LeFerve, J. A. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 65(1), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00417.CrossRef

Vadasy, P. F., Jenkins, J. R., Antil, L. R., Wayne, S. K., & O'Connor, R. E. (1997). The effectiveness of one-to-one tutoring by community tutors for at-risk beginning readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511219.CrossRef

Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2009). Supplemental fluency intervention and determinants of reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(5), 383–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430903162894.CrossRef

Vadasy, P. F., Sanders, E. A., & Nelson, J. R. (2015). Effectiveness of supplemental kindergarten vocabulary instruction for English learners: A randomized study of immediate and longer-term effects of two approaches. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(4), 490–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2015.1033120.CrossRef

van Dijk, W., Lane, H., & Gage, N. A. (2019). The relation between implementation fidelity and students’ reading outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/vhrp5.

Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K. J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219418775110.CrossRef

Wanzek, J., Vaughn, S., Scammacca, N., Gatlin, B., Walker, M. A., & Capin, P. (2016). Meta-analyses of the effects of Tier 2 type reading interventions in Grades K-3. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 551–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9321-7.CrossRef

Wolgemuth, J. R., Abrami, P. C., Helmer, J., Savage, R., Harper, H., & Lea, T. (2014). Examining the impact of Abracadabra on early literacy in Northern Australia: An implementation fidelity analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.823369.CrossRef

Titel: Analyzing the role of fidelity of RTI Tier 2 reading intervention in Spanish kindergarten and first grade students
verfasst von: Juan E. Jiménez
Nuria Gutiérrez
Sara C. de León
Publikationsdatum: 01.04.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Annals of Dyslexia / Ausgabe 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0736-9387
Elektronische ISSN: 1934-7243
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-021-00221-5

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Neurologie

Nicht Creutzfeldt Jakob, sondern Abführtee-Vergiftung

29.05.2024 Hyponatriämie Nachrichten

Eine ältere Frau trinkt regelmäßig Sennesblättertee gegen ihre Verstopfung. Der scheint plötzlich gut zu wirken. Auf Durchfall und Erbrechen folgt allerdings eine Hyponatriämie. Nach deren Korrektur kommt es plötzlich zu progredienten Kognitions- und Verhaltensstörungen.

Schutz der Synapsen bei Alzheimer

29.05.2024 Morbus Alzheimer Nachrichten

Mit einem Neurotrophin-Rezeptor-Modulator lässt sich möglicherweise eine bestehende Alzheimerdemenz etwas abschwächen: Erste Phase-2-Daten deuten auf einen verbesserten Synapsenschutz.

Sozialer Aufstieg verringert Demenzgefahr

24.05.2024 Demenz Nachrichten

Ein hohes soziales Niveau ist mit die beste Versicherung gegen eine Demenz. Noch geringer ist das Demenzrisiko für Menschen, die sozial aufsteigen: Sie gewinnen fast zwei demenzfreie Lebensjahre. Umgekehrt steigt die Demenzgefahr beim sozialen Abstieg.

Hirnblutung unter DOAK und VKA ähnlich bedrohlich

17.05.2024 Direkte orale Antikoagulanzien Nachrichten

Kommt es zu einer nichttraumatischen Hirnblutung, spielt es keine große Rolle, ob die Betroffenen zuvor direkt wirksame orale Antikoagulanzien oder Marcumar bekommen haben: Die Prognose ist ähnlich schlecht.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar "Urologie und Sexualmedizin in der Praxis"

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2021

External evaluations for dyslexia: do the data support parent concerns?

Relationships between test anxiety and metacognition in Chinese young adults with and without specific learning disabilities

Professor C. K. Leong: in memoriam

Improving reading skills in children with dyslexia: efficacy studies on a newly proposed remedial intervention—repeated reading with vocal music masking (RVM)

Suprasegmental but not segmental phonological awareness matters in understanding bilingual reading comprehension difficulties in Chinese and English: a 3-year longitudinal study

Is orthographic knowledge a strength or a weakness in individuals with dyslexia? Evidence from a meta-analysis