Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2022

06.01.2022

Clinical application of pancreatic-duct-jejunum end-to-side continuous suture anastomosis in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

verfasst von: Hongqin Ma, Ji Wang, Li Liu, Yusheng Du, Wenxing Zhao, Xinguo Zhu

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 7/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

To present a new pancreaticojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and to evaluate its safety and reliability.

Methods

The data of 120 patients who underwent LPD at a single centre from October 2017 to October 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Of these patients, 71 received continuous suture pancreaticojejunostomy, and 49 received “8-character” suture pancreaticojejunostomy for LPD. We compared and analysed the operation time, anastomosis time, and incidence of postoperative complications between the patients in the two groups.

Results

All operations were successfully performed, with no transfer to open surgery. The operation time and anastomosis time in the continuous suture group were lower than those in the “8-character” suture group (305.8 ± 60.7 min vs. 354.3 ± 69.1 min; 28.6 ± 6.3 min vs. 39.4 ± 11.9 min P < 0.001), and the postoperative hospital stay was also shorter (12.9 ± 3.8 days vs. 15.4 ± 5.8 days P < 0.05) in the continuous suture group. There was no significant difference in the pancreatic duct diameter or intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in the incidence of a pancreatic fistula between the continuous suture group and the “8-character” suture group. The data of patients in the continuous suture group with pancreatic duct diameters < 3 mm and ≥ 3 mm were statistically analysed. There was no significant difference in the operation time, pancreaticojejunostomy time, postoperative hospital stay, or incidence of pancreatic fistula in the different pancreatic duct diameter groups.

Conclusions

Continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy in LPD is simple, safe, reliable, and rapid. This technique not only saves the anastomosis time but also suitable for pancreatic ducts < 3 mm.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ukkola O, Kervinen K, Salmela PI, von Dickhoff K, Laakso M, Kesäniemi YA (1993) Apolipoprotein E phenotype is related to macro- and microangiopathy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 101:9–15CrossRef Ukkola O, Kervinen K, Salmela PI, von Dickhoff K, Laakso M, Kesäniemi YA (1993) Apolipoprotein E phenotype is related to macro- and microangiopathy in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 101:9–15CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan GS, Anand VN, Nalankilli VP, Praveen RP, Parthasarathy R, Rajapandian S (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104:1443–1450CrossRef Palanivelu C, Senthilnathan P, Sabnis SC, Babu NS, Srivatsan GS, Anand VN, Nalankilli VP, Praveen RP, Parthasarathy R, Rajapandian S (2017) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours. Br J Surg 104:1443–1450CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang M, Xu S, Zhang H, Peng S, Zhu F, Qin R (2017) Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy used in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for nondilated pancreatic duct. Surg Endosc 31:1986–1992CrossRef Wang M, Xu S, Zhang H, Peng S, Zhu F, Qin R (2017) Imbedding pancreaticojejunostomy used in pure laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for nondilated pancreatic duct. Surg Endosc 31:1986–1992CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(633–638):638–640 Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, Reid-Lombardo KM, Truty MJ, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML (2014) Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg 260(633–638):638–640
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tee MC, Kendrick ML, Farnell MB (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: is it an effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Adv Surg 49:143–156CrossRef Tee MC, Kendrick ML, Farnell MB (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: is it an effective procedure for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Adv Surg 49:143–156CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakeem AR, Verbeke CS, Cairns A, Aldouri A, Smith AM, Menon KV (2014) A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:435–441CrossRef Hakeem AR, Verbeke CS, Cairns A, Aldouri A, Smith AM, Menon KV (2014) A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 13:435–441CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen Y, Ke N, Tan C, Zhang H, Wang X, Mai G, Liu X (2015) Continuous versus interrupted suture techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 193:590–597CrossRef Chen Y, Ke N, Tan C, Zhang H, Wang X, Mai G, Liu X (2015) Continuous versus interrupted suture techniques of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Surg Res 193:590–597CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G (2015) Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 13:84–89CrossRef Ji W, Shao Z, Zheng K, Wang J, Song B, Ma H, Tang L, Shi L, Wang Y, Li X, Song B, Zhang Y, Jin G (2015) Pancreaticojejunostomy with double-layer continuous suturing is associated with a lower risk of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg 13:84–89CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yao G, Fan Y, Zhai J (2016) Continuous suturing with two anterior layers reduces post-operative complications and hospitalization time in pancreaticoenterostomy. BMC Gastroenterol 16:69CrossRef Yao G, Fan Y, Zhai J (2016) Continuous suturing with two anterior layers reduces post-operative complications and hospitalization time in pancreaticoenterostomy. BMC Gastroenterol 16:69CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Han HJ, Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Kim YC, Choi SY (2011) Reliability of continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:2132–2139PubMed Han HJ, Choi SB, Lee JS, Kim WB, Song TJ, Suh SO, Kim YC, Choi SY (2011) Reliability of continuous suture of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 58:2132–2139PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jin WW, Xu XW, Mou YP, Zhou YC, Zhang RC, Yan JF, Zhou JY, Huang CJ, Lu C (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of 233 cases by a single team. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 55:354–358PubMed Jin WW, Xu XW, Mou YP, Zhou YC, Zhang RC, Yan JF, Zhou JY, Huang CJ, Lu C (2017) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a report of 233 cases by a single team. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 55:354–358PubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Adham M, Singhirunnusorn J (2012) Surgical technique and results of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) in pancreatic tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:340–345CrossRef Adham M, Singhirunnusorn J (2012) Surgical technique and results of total mesopancreas excision (TMpE) in pancreatic tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol 38:340–345CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Du Y, Wang J, Li Y, Ma H, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zhao W (2019) Clinical application of a modified pancreatojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 21:1336–1343CrossRef Du Y, Wang J, Li Y, Ma H, Liu L, Zhu Y, Zhao W (2019) Clinical application of a modified pancreatojejunostomy technique for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford) 21:1336–1343CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu HM, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del CM, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del CC, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C, Sarr M, Abu HM, Adham M, Allen P, Andersson R, Asbun HJ, Besselink MG, Conlon K, Del CM, Falconi M, Fernandez-Cruz L, Fernandez-Del CC, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Gouma DJ, Hackert T, Izbicki J, Lillemoe KD, Neoptolemos JP, Olah A, Schulick R, Shrikhande SV, Takada T, Takaori K, Traverso W, Vollmer CR, Wolfgang CL, Yeo CJ, Salvia R, Buchler M (2017) The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery 161:584–591CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688CrossRef Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Rahbari NN, Adam R, Capussotti L, Fan ST, Yokoyama Y, Crawford M, Makuuchi M, Christophi C, Banting S, Brooke-Smith M, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Nimura Y, Figueras J, DeMatteo RP, Buchler MW, Weitz J (2011) Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 149:680–688CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallet J, Zih FS, Deobald RG, Scheer AS, Law CH, Coburn NG, Karanicolas PJ (2015) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 17:113–122CrossRef Hallet J, Zih FS, Deobald RG, Scheer AS, Law CH, Coburn NG, Karanicolas PJ (2015) The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB (Oxford) 17:113–122CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, Xiao W (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31:3085–3097CrossRef Peng L, Lin S, Li Y, Xiao W (2017) Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 31:3085–3097CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-delCastillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, Büchler MW (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161:1221–1234CrossRef Shrikhande SV, Sivasanker M, Vollmer CM, Friess H, Besselink MG, Fingerhut A, Yeo CJ, Fernandez-delCastillo C, Dervenis C, Halloran C, Gouma DJ, Radenkovic D, Asbun HJ, Neoptolemos JP, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Conlon KC, Fernandez-Cruz L, Montorsi M, Bockhorn M, Adham M, Charnley R, Carter R, Hackert T, Hartwig W, Miao Y, Sarr M, Bassi C, Büchler MW (2017) Pancreatic anastomosis after pancreatoduodenectomy: a position statement by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 161:1221–1234CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng Y, Briarava M, Lai M, Wang X, Tu B, Cheng N, Gong J, Yuan Y, Pilati P, Mocellin S (2017) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:D12257 Cheng Y, Briarava M, Lai M, Wang X, Tu B, Cheng N, Gong J, Yuan Y, Pilati P, Mocellin S (2017) Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:D12257
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang M, Zhang H, Wu Z, Zhang Z, Peng B (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 29:3783–3794CrossRef Wang M, Zhang H, Wu Z, Zhang Z, Peng B (2015) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 29:3783–3794CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Karagul S, Kayaalp C, Sumer F, Yagci MA (2018) Extramucosal pancreaticojejunostomy at laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Minim Access Surg 14:76–78CrossRef Karagul S, Kayaalp C, Sumer F, Yagci MA (2018) Extramucosal pancreaticojejunostomy at laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Minim Access Surg 14:76–78CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Y, Luo H, Li Y, Gao P, Peng B (2019) A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 33:1572–1577CrossRef Cai Y, Luo H, Li Y, Gao P, Peng B (2019) A novel technique of pancreaticojejunostomy for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 33:1572–1577CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Olakowski M, Grudzińska E, Mrowiec S (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy-a review of modern techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 405:13–22CrossRef Olakowski M, Grudzińska E, Mrowiec S (2020) Pancreaticojejunostomy-a review of modern techniques. Langenbecks Arch Surg 405:13–22CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Offner PJ (2000) Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 231:832–837CrossRef Burch JM, Franciose RJ, Moore EE, Biffl WL, Offner PJ (2000) Single-layer continuous versus two-layer interrupted intestinal anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 231:832–837CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Brodsky JT, Dadian N (1997) Single-layer continuous suture for gastrojejunostomy. Am Surg 63:395–398PubMed Brodsky JT, Dadian N (1997) Single-layer continuous suture for gastrojejunostomy. Am Surg 63:395–398PubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, Jiang GY, Wu D, Maher H, Cai XJ (2017) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 17:120CrossRef Chen K, Pan Y, Liu XL, Jiang GY, Wu D, Maher H, Cai XJ (2017) Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery. BMC Gastroenterol 17:120CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Song KB, Kim SC, Lee W, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Kwon J, Park Y, Lee SJ, Park G (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center. Surg Endosc 34:1343–1352CrossRef Song KB, Kim SC, Lee W, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Kwon J, Park Y, Lee SJ, Park G (2020) Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center. Surg Endosc 34:1343–1352CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellner UF, Küsters S, Sick O, Busch C, Bausch D, Bronsert P, Hopt UT, Karcz KW, Keck T (2014) Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:849–856CrossRef Wellner UF, Küsters S, Sick O, Busch C, Bausch D, Bronsert P, Hopt UT, Karcz KW, Keck T (2014) Hybrid laparoscopic versus open pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: retrospective matched case comparison in 80 patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 399:849–856CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gupta D, Sharma U, Chauhan S, Sahu SA (2018) Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:1159–1163CrossRef Gupta D, Sharma U, Chauhan S, Sahu SA (2018) Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: a randomized controlled trial. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:1159–1163CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical application of pancreatic-duct-jejunum end-to-side continuous suture anastomosis in total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy
verfasst von
Hongqin Ma
Ji Wang
Li Liu
Yusheng Du
Wenxing Zhao
Xinguo Zhu
Publikationsdatum
06.01.2022
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08920-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2022

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Mehr Frauen im OP – weniger postoperative Komplikationen

21.05.2024 Allgemeine Chirurgie Nachrichten

Ein Frauenanteil von mindestens einem Drittel im ärztlichen Op.-Team war in einer großen retrospektiven Studie aus Kanada mit einer signifikanten Reduktion der postoperativen Morbidität assoziiert.

„Übersichtlicher Wegweiser“: Lauterbachs umstrittener Klinik-Atlas ist online

17.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Sie sei „ethisch geboten“, meint Gesundheitsminister Karl Lauterbach: mehr Transparenz über die Qualität von Klinikbehandlungen. Um sie abzubilden, lässt er gegen den Widerstand vieler Länder einen virtuellen Klinik-Atlas freischalten.

Was nützt die Kraniektomie bei schwerer tiefer Hirnblutung?

17.05.2024 Hirnblutung Nachrichten

Eine Studie zum Nutzen der druckentlastenden Kraniektomie nach schwerer tiefer supratentorieller Hirnblutung deutet einen Nutzen der Operation an. Für überlebende Patienten ist das dennoch nur eine bedingt gute Nachricht.

Klinikreform soll zehntausende Menschenleben retten

15.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Gesundheitsminister Lauterbach hat die vom Bundeskabinett beschlossene Klinikreform verteidigt. Kritik an den Plänen kommt vom Marburger Bund. Und in den Ländern wird über den Gang zum Vermittlungsausschuss spekuliert.

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.