Shu-Chen Liao and Shih-Chieh Shao contributed equally to this work.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
PE
Pulmonary embolism
CI
Confidence interval
COVID-19
Coronavirus disease 2019
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains an increasing global pandemic, with significant morbidity and mortality. Severe complications of COVID-19 associated with coagulation changes, mainly characterized by increased D-dimer and fibrinogen levels with higher thrombosis risk, in particular pulmonary embolism (PE), have been reported recently [1]. However, the epidemiology of PE among COVID-19 patients is currently only based on small case series and retrospective studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses this gap in knowledge, facilitating first-line healthcare providers’ understanding of PE incidence and mortality in COVID-19.
Relevant Chinese or English language studies were identified by systematic search of EMBASE and PUBMED from inception to June 28, 2020, using the keywords “COVID-19,” “pulmonary embolism,” “incidence,” “prevalence,” and “mortality” with appropriate MeSH terms, whereby the reference lists of identified studies yielded additional sources. We excluded conference abstracts, other types of publications (e.g., editorials, review articles, commentaries and treatment consensus), and studies lacking PE incidence or mortality rate reports. Two reviewers (SCL, SCS) screened the titles and abstracts for relevance, independently assessed the full texts of the screened search results, and drew up a final list of studies for inclusion through discussion and only after reaching full agreement. All statistical analyses were performed using MedCalc (Windows) version 15.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Incidence and mortality rates of PE in COVID-19 are represented as proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI), using the random effects model, and displayed as Forest plot. Heterogeneity among the studies was detected by Cochran Q test, whereby a p value < 0.10 indicated significant heterogeneity. We assessed the proportion of variation in study estimates attributable to heterogeneity through the I2 statistic.
Anzeige
We excluded 78 out of 97 articles screened: 20 studies were duplicates, 5 were irrelevant, 3 were conference abstracts, 21 were other types of publications, 28 lacked data on PE incidence or mortality, and 1 was published in French. Ultimately, our analysis included 19 articles, mostly from Europe (84%), and we summarize their demographic data in Table 1. Overall, the incidence and mortality rate of COVID-19 patients developing PE was 15.3% (95%: 9.8–21.9) and 45.1% (95%: 22.0–69.4), respectively. Some evidence of statistical heterogeneity among the studies reporting PE incidence (I2: 92.0%, p < 0.001) and mortality (I2: 78.6%, p < 0.001) in COVID-19 was observed (Fig. 1).
*In studies not reporting the median, results are represented by the mean
CDU complete duplex ultrasound, CTPA CT pulmonary angiography, ICU intensive care unit, NA not available, PE pulmonary embolism, RCT randomized controlled trial
×
With increasing reports of PE following COVID-19 infection, our findings indicate that nearly 2 in 10 developed PE among a total of 1835 COVID-19 patients. Immobilization, inflammation, activated coagulation, and suppressed fibrinolysis have been proposed to explain the occurrence of PE in COVID-19 patients; however, the incidence of PE in COVID-19 patients is higher than in patients with seasonal and pandemic influenza (3%) [21]. In addition, our report indicates COVID-19 patients with PE may have up to 45% higher mortality rate compared to general cases (in-hospital mortality rate 4%) [22]. Therefore, first-line healthcare providers should be vigilant about the occurrence of severe and potentially fatal PE complications in COVID-19 patients [23].
As far as we know, this systematic review is the first summarizing PE incidence and mortality in COVID-19 patients. However, caution is advised in interpreting our findings. First, most published literatures are observational studies, making it difficult to confirm causality between COVID-19 and PE. Second, clinical heterogeneity between studies is noteworthy; for example, the included studies apply different diagnostic tools of varying sensitivity and specificity to investigate PE incidence. In conclusion, prevention and control of COVID-19 remains paramount in the current pandemic, but repeated assessment and optimal management of PE complications may significantly modify the prognosis and reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19 [24].
Acknowledgements
None.
Anzeige
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
This original article has not been published and is not under consideration by another journal.
Competing interests
None.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.
Schmerzen im Unterbauch, aber sonst nicht viel, was auf eine Appendizitis hindeutete: Ein junger Mann hatte Glück, dass trotzdem eine Laparoskopie mit Appendektomie durchgeführt und der Wurmfortsatz histologisch untersucht wurde.
Personen mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen, die von einfühlsamen Ärzten und Ärztinnen betreut werden, berichten über weniger Beschwerden und eine bessere Lebensqualität.
Derzeit wird empfohlen, eine Therapie mit GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten präoperativ zu unterbrechen. Eine neue Studie nährt jedoch Zweifel an der Notwendigkeit der Maßnahme.
Update AINS
Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.