Background
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurological disease and the most common form of neurodegenerative dementia [
1]. At the cellular level, AD is characterized by Aβ accumulation, tau protein hyperphosphorylation, and neuroinflammation [
2]. Physiological production of Aβ peptides through amyloid precursor protein (APP) proteolysis by β- and γ-secretases is an essential step in AD pathogenesis [
1,
2]. AD is a complex disease that involves many key risk factors [
3]. Several studies have suggested the potential role of epigenetic mechanisms in neurodegenerative processes leading to AD [
4]. Particularly, changes in epigenetic modification in neuronal cells can trigger variations in gene transcription levels, leading to AD pathogenesis [
5]; this highlights the important role of epigenetics in the onset and progression of AD.
Aberrant DNA methylation is associated with neurodegenerative diseases including AD [
6,
7]. As an epigenetic mechanism, DNA methylation involves the covalent transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM) to the C-5 position of cytosine (5c) to form 5-methylcytosine (5mC) [
8]. This process is mediated by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) family members, namely, DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, and DNMT3l [
8,
9]. The catalytic domain of Dnmt3a is the functional domain for CpG methylation. Dnmt3a is a major de novo DNA methyltransferase and predominantly methylates CpG dinucleotides [
10]. Also, DNA methylation plays a critical role in many biological processes, including transcription regulation [
11], chromosome maintenance [
12], and genomic imprinting [
13]. In addition,
APP hypomethylation has been reported in patients with AD, suggesting that DNA methylation may control AD pathogenesis.
Catalytically inactivated Cas9 (dCas9) is an endonuclease-inactivated clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/Cas9 mutant, which provides an efficient tool for targeted gene modification [
14]. When fused with effector domains, it can be used for various genomic engineering processes, such as DNA methylation [
15,
16], gene expression modulation [
17], and epigenetic regulation [
18]. For instance, the fusion of Dnmt3a or Ten-eleven translocation 1 (Tet1) with dCas9 can induce targeted DNA methylation in the mammalian genome in vitro and in vivo [
15]. Targeted DNA methylation around promoter regions can be effectively achieved using dCas9-mediated de/methylation [
15,
16]. DNA methylation editing has been used as a novel treatment for a broad range of diseases [
19,
20]. For example, dCas9-Dnmt3a-based system has been used to increase DNA methylation for repressing the transcription of oncogenes
CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A) and
BACH2 (BTB domain and CNC homolog 2) in cancer development associated with aberrant DNA methylation [
21,
22]. DNA methylation editing has also been implemented in the treatment of several neurodegenerative diseases. For instance, the Cas9-mediated DNA methylation editing of
FMR1 efficiently repairs neuronal abnormalities observed in fragile X syndrome (FXS) [
20]. Thus, DNA methylation editing has emerged as a novel approach to controlling gene expression efficiently for treating genetic diseases.
In this study, we used a dCas9-Dnmt3a-mediated DNA methylation editing system to induce APP hypermethylation for effectively suppressing APP in primary neurons and in the mouse brain in vivo. Initially, we verified the targeted methylation of the APP promoter region by dCas9-Dnmt3a and subsequent suppression of APP expression in the mouse brain. Then we examined Aβ42 formation and Aβ-associated memory impairment in the APP knock-in (APP-KI) mouse model, in order to test the potential of targeted methylation editing of APP gene as an AD treatment strategy.
Methods
Production of guide RNAs
A single guide RNA (sgRNA) was cloned with a pLenti-sgRNA (Addgene, Cambridge, MA, #71,409) vector. The vector was linearized with the BsmbI (NEB) enzyme at 37 °C for 2 h. Next, guide RNA oligonucleotide pairs were annealed using a T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB), and 30 ng of the digested pLenti-sgRNA vector was ligated with the annealed oligonucleotides at room temperature (RT) for 2 h. The ligated vectors were transformed, and transformation was confirmed through enzyme digestion and sequence analysis (GACTATCATATGCTTACCGT was used as the primer).
Animal experiments
All animal experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Dongguk University and performed in accordance with institutional guidelines. The mice used in this study were maintained under controlled conditions (12-h light/dark cycle at 22–23 °C).
APP-KI (
AppNL-G-F/NL-G-F; Swedish [NL], Beyreuther/Iberian [F], and Arctic [G] mutation knock-in) mice were purchased from the RIKEN Brain Science Institute [
23]. Three-month-old male
APP-KI mice and B6C57 mice were used for the experiments. For stereotaxic injection, the male mice were anesthetized with 120 mg/kg Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), and 10 µl of dCas9-Dnmt3a and empty vector (control) or APP -189 sgRNA lentivirus were microinjected into the dentate gyrus (DG) region of each hemisphere at the following coordinates: AP − 2 mm, ML ± 1.1 mm, and DV − 2 mm. One month after injection, the mice were subjected to behavioral tests and biochemical analysis. For the behavioral tests, Y-maze, fear conditioning, and water maze tests were conducted, and observations were recorded and analyzed using Noldus Ethovision XT 13 (Noldus, Netherlands). In the Y-maze test, the number of alternations was determined using three open-arm chambers. The mouse behavior was recorded for 10 min and the total number of spontaneous visits to each arm position was calculated. Fear conditioning tests were conducted for 2 consecutive days. On day 1 of training, the mice were placed in a fear conditioning chamber and allowed to explore for 3 min. Then, they were given pairs of regular stimuli and aversive unconditioned stimuli (1 s, 0.7 mA). After exposure to stimuli, the mice stayed for further 1 min for measurement of freezing behavior. On day 2, freezing behavior tests were conducted to evaluate the conditioned fear, and freezing behavior was recorded for 2 min. The water maze test was performed in a circular water tank. In the visible platform trial, the mice were trained for 4 days, with three trials conducted per day. In the invisible platform test on day 4, the time spent in each quadrant was recorded for 1 min. After the behaviorial test, the 4-month-old male mice were sacrificed for biochemical analysis.
Cell culture
Mouse primary fibroblasts (MEFs) and NIH/3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (Gibco, Waltham, MA) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco). Primary neurons were obtained from APP-KI mice on embryonic day 14 (E14) and maintained in a neurobasal medium (Gibco) supplemented with heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (Gibco), glutamine (Gibco), B-27™ supplement (Gibco), L-glutamine (Gibco), P/S (Gibco), and laminin (Corning®, Corning, NY), for 2 weeks followed by biochemical analysis. All cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cell lines were authenticated by STR (Short Tandem Repeat) analysis (Kogene Biotech, Seoul, Korea), and mycoplasma was tested using a MycoSensor PCR assay kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). For lentivirus production, HEK293T cells were passaged and cultured at 80% confluency and transfected with lentiviral vectors (psPAX2, pMD2.G, and pLenti-sgRNA [Addgene, Cambridge, MA, #71409] or Fuw-dCas9-Dnmt3a [Addgene, #84476]) using calcium phosphate (Sigma) and HEPES (Sigma). The medium was replaced 24 h after transfection, and the virus was harvested by centrifugation after 72 h.
Off-target analysis
Potential off-target sequences were validated using the off-target site prediction software Cas-OFFinder (
http://www.rgenome.net/cas-offinder) [
24]. For validation of potential off-target sites, the top six predicted off-target sites with two or less mismatches compared to the on-target sequence were analyzed using quantitative real-time PCR analysis.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells and hippocampal brain tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) and washed with PBS buffer. The samples were blocked with PBST supplemented with 1% BSA for 20 min and incubated with anti-NeuN (Invitrogen, PA5-78639), anti-Tuj1 (Sigma, T8578), anti-Map2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, 13-1500), or anti-ab42 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab201060) at 4 °C overnight. Then they were washed with PBST, incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies at RT for 2 h, and counterstained with DAPI (Invitrogen). The stained samples were visualized under an LSM 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The percentage of Aβ42+/Map2+ cells was calculated as follows: number of Aβ42- and Map2-double positive cells/number of Map2-positive cells × 100%.
RNA isolation and qRT-PCR
RNA was extracted using an eCube tissue RNA mini kit (Philekorea, Seoul, Korea) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 1 μg of the prepared RNA was reverse transcribed using AccuPower® CycleScript RT PreMix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea). qRT-PCR was conducted using a Rotor-Gene Q real-time PCR cycler (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with suitable primer sets and AccuPower® PCR PreMix (Bioneer, Daejeon, Korea).
Western blot analysis
The samples (cells and brain tissues) were mixed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Sigma), 1 × proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and 5 × loading buffer, incubated at 100 °C for 10 min, and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min to remove the debris. The prepared samples were separated with SDS-PAGE and blotted onto membranes. The blotted membranes were incubated with anti-APP C-terminal (Sigma, A8717) or anti-β-actin (AbFrontier, Seoul, Korea, LF-PA0207) at 4 °C overnight. They were then incubated with a conjugating secondary antibody. Protein bands were visualized using an ECL kit (Dogen, Seoul, Korea).
Bisulfite sequencing
Total DNA was extracted using an eCube tissue DNA mini kit (Philekorea, Seoul, Korea), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 2 μg of DNA was modified with an EpiTect bisulfite kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The bisulfite-converted DNA was then amplified with PCR primer sets designed via the PrimerSuite website (
www.primer-suite.com). The amplified products were extracted using NucleoSpin® gel and a PCR clean-up kit (Macherey–Nagel, Düren, Germany) and cloned using a TA Cloning™ kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for sequencing.
Aβ42 and Aβ40 quantification
Samples (cells and brain tissues) were added with RIPA (Sigma) and 1× proteinase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 were determined using Aβ (1–40) and Aβ (1–42) (FL) kits (IBL International, Hamburg, Germany), respectively. Absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a VERSAmax tunable microplate reader (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). Differences between groups were evaluated using one-way ANOVA and Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Discussion
AD is characterized by progressive cognitive decline [
1], with pathologic manifestations of neurofibrillary tau tangles and amyloid plaque accumulation, which are responsible for the gradual deterioration of cognitive ability [
1,
28]. Current AD medications help temporarily alleviate AD symptoms [
29]. Cholinesterase inhibitors are the only drugs that can greatly improve memory functions of AD patients to date [
29,
30]. Some medications can improve behavioral symptoms of AD; however, they are associated with an increased fatality rate in older patients with AD experiencing progressive neuronal degeneration [
30]. Consequently, alternative treatments for controlling AD are being explored.
Aβ peptide production through APP proteolysis is an essential step in AD pathogenesis [
2].
APP hypomethylation, which increases Aβ peptide production, has also been reported in patients with AD [
5,
31]. However, deletion of
APP,
APLP1, and
APLP2 can cause abnormal cortical migration, suggesting that APP also participates in synaptic pruning and neural outgrowth [
32]. Therefore, knockout of these genes is not an ideal strategy for AD treatment. Thus, epigenetic alterations of
APP can be an alternative strategy for AD treatment. In this study, we demonstrated that the CpG methylation of the
APP promoter by dCas9-Dnmt3a decreased the generation of neurotoxic Aβ peptides and improved AD-associated learning and memory impairment. The dCas9-Dnmt3a treatment also led to the alteration of
APP methylation in mouse brain with minimal off-target effects; this result suggests the potential of dCas9-Dnmt3a-mediated
APP hypermethylation for AD treatment. More importantly, our results indicate that aberrant
APP CpG methylation can be involved in AD pathogenesis. In individuals aged ≥ 70 years,
APP is demethylated and excessively overexpressed, ultimately producing Aβ peptides [
22,
31,
33]. Therefore, regulation of DNA methylation plays an important role in the inhibition of AD pathogenesis.
Therapeutic epigenetic editing approaches have promising applications as innovative treatments for many neurodegenerative diseases [
20,
34,
35]. For example, aberrant DNA methylation, including aberrant hypomethylation and hypermethylation, plays key roles in the pathogenesis of FXS or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) [
20,
34]. DNA methylation in
FMR1 or
C9orf72 promoter region elicits protective effects against pathologies observed in FXS and ALS [
20,
34]. Moreover, de novo DNA methylation of the alpha-synuclein gene has potential for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) [
35]. Thus, by combining different epigenetic effector domains, such as DNMT3 and Tet1, with dCas9 [
22,
36], therapeutic epigenetic editing acts as a promising therapeutic tool for various neurological diseases, including FXS, ALS, and PD, with minimal side effects. Epigenetic editing induces reversible changes in DNA sequence, whereas gene editing causes irreversible changes; consequently, epigenetic editing has considerable advantages over gene editing for applications in a clinical setting [
36]. However, several aspects of epigenetic editing, including off-target effects and long-term safety, need to be addressed before clinical application. Also, the faithful dCas9-mediated transmission for long-lasting and durable therapeutic effects is essential for achieving more effective and safer therapeutic effects.
CRISPR-based gene editing strategies hold promise for the treatment of AD [
37‐
41]. However, numerous issues need to be addressed before clinical application of epigenetic editing-based therapies in AD patients. For example, clinical trials integrating viral vectors with the CRISPR/Cas9 system can lead to random insertional mutagenesis. To address this issue, non-integrating viruses or lipid vesicles need to be developed for efficient delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components. Also, injection of viruses for delivery of dCas9-Dnmt3a could elicit immune responses. Thus, studies on the safety of this strategy are required prior to application in human patients. Both effectiveness and safety of dCas9-Dnmt3a delivery systems need to be improved, in order to accelerate the wide use of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategies for gene editing and repair in the future. Moreover, we found that injection of dCas9-Dnmt3a before plaque deposition effectively modulated AD pathogenesis in the AD mouse model (Fig.
4b–f); such epigenetic editing may effectively reduce the risk of AD or delay the onset of more severe symptoms before the formation of plaques and symptoms. However, since
APP epigenetic editing can reduce the amount of Aβ peptides by preventing
APP transcription in the brain,
APP epigenetic editing could slow down AD progression or stop the destruction of nerve cells even after plaque formation. Thus, to achieve the best outcome, it is important to optimize the time point of CRISPR-based epigenetic editing in AD patients. Also, the persistence of epigenetic editing effects needs to be evaluated. Here, we observed that the dCas9-Dnmt3a-mediated CpG methylation at the
APP promoter was maintained up to 4 weeks after initial injection (Additional file
1: Fig. S1a). Further studies examining longer persistence of epigenetic editing effects, e.g., for more than 6 months or years, are needed.